ライフサイエンスコーパス: total energy expenditure

1 of food (10% addition to other components of total energy expenditure).

2 as represented by parental obesity, and low total energy expenditure.

3 l running, spontaneous physical activity and total energy expenditure.

4 glucose tolerance, coincident with elevated total energy expenditure.

5 l loss in the olfactory system regardless of total energy expenditure.

6 rences in energy allocation rather than with total energy expenditure.

7 nd insulin resistance, in part by increasing total energy expenditure.

8 ctivation was associated with an increase in total energy expenditure.

9 rmic effect of meals was estimated at 10% of total energy expenditure.

10 te, activity levels, and resting, active and total energy expenditure.

11 er in the stroke group compared to controls (total energy expenditure 1840+/-354 vs. 2220+/-489 kcal,

12 e correlations between physical activity and total energy expenditure [4] but are challenged by ecolo

13 t more active populations do not have higher total energy expenditure [5-8].

14 Differences in resting metabolic rate and total energy expenditure among premenarcheal girls were

15 Additional measures included total energy expenditure and 24-h profiles of serum lept

16 erobic pathway accounted for 8.9 +/- 5.6% of total energy expenditure and although experienced player

17 Women born smaller have lower total energy expenditure and are less likely to engage i

18 which was objectively assessed as the sum of total energy expenditure and change in body energy store

19 Daily total energy expenditure and macronutrient oxidation wer

20 mass in DIO mice due to marked increases in total energy expenditure and physical activity levels.

21 Within seven days of stroke, total energy expenditure and physical activity were sign

22 e doubly labeled water method for estimating total energy expenditure and physical activity-related e

23 rect calorimetry) and two annual measures of total energy expenditure and physical-activity-related e

24 vity will lead to corresponding increases in total energy expenditure and prevent or reverse energy i

25 ity (1.0) of exerting a functional effect on total energy expenditure and sleeping metabolic rate.

26 (21 girls and 23 boys) were 1.5 y old, their total energy expenditure and TBF were assessed by using

27 to better reflect the constrained nature of total energy expenditure and the complex effects of phys

28 uces the gap between total energy intake and total energy expenditure and thus is an effective strate

29 Resting energy expenditure, total energy expenditure, and body protein did not incre

30 on, sleeping energy expenditure, free-living total energy expenditure, and the energy cost of activit

31 ctivity energy expenditure was calculated as total energy expenditure (assessed over 2 weeks by using

32 EIEst was derived from energy requirement: total energy expenditure = basal metabolic rate x physic

33 2) status, maternal BMI, energy expenditure (total energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate, and slee

34 assessment of 4-day physical activity level (total energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate) by heart

35 cated that leptin treatment did not increase total energy expenditure but prevented the decrease that

36 en underreported energy intake compared with total energy expenditure by 12-14% on 24HRs and 31-36% o

37 om 21 degrees C would lead to a reduction of total energy expenditure by 35.46 and 17.73 million doll

38 was measured weekly by ventilated hood, and total energy expenditure by doubly labeled water prior t

39 n human urine are measured during studies of total energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water met

40 et had increased resting metabolic rates and total energy expenditure compared with WT mice, along wi

41 e the birth weight was positively related to total energy expenditure (cycle 1: p = 0.014; cycle 2: p

42 Reported energy intake was 85.5-95.0% of total energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled wa

43 ted with the severity of chorea, but SMR and total energy expenditure did not.

44 Here we report that total energy expenditure (doubly labeled water) measured

45 Smaller size at birth predicted lower total energy expenditure during adulthood.

46 The total energy expenditure during rest and mild cold stres

47 ies in infants and children suggest that low total energy expenditure (EE) (TEE) and parental body co

48 ith the CON diet, the HP-TDR produced higher total energy expenditure [(EE) 81 82 kcal/d, P <0.001],

49 otein, potassium, and total sugar intake and total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry.

50 ations result in relatively minor effects on total energy expenditure estimates (approximately 6%).

51 measurements, >=3 of 4 diet diary days, and total energy expenditure estimations using the doubly la

52 Physical activity measures were total energy expenditure expressed as a multiple of slee

53 ldren with CF (TER-CF) derived from measured total energy expenditure, fecal fat energy loss, and the

54 over the human lifespan, cardiac output and total energy expenditure follow almost identical traject

55 Total energy expenditure for 7 wk was the same when subj

56 Biomarker AREE, calculated as the total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water minus

57 t-free mass, fat mass, total body water, and total energy expenditure in 63 subjects.

58 measured changes in substrate oxidation and total energy expenditure in Acc2(-/-) and WT control mic

59 ed with body fatness, physical activity, and total energy expenditure in preschool children.

60 adiposity were accompanied by higher REE and total energy expenditure in the KE group compared to PF

61 1 (LKB1), resulting in a similar increase in total energy expenditure in the two strains.

62 After weight loss, total energy expenditure -- in particular, energy expend

63 ned total energy expenditure model, in which total energy expenditure increases with physical activit

64 greater resting energy expenditure, but the total energy expenditure measured over a 24-h period or

65 We compared total energy expenditure, measured using doubly labeled

66 Overall, when compared with DLW total energy expenditure measurements, EI from self-repo

67 e methods (the Goldberg method and predicted total energy expenditure method).

68 Here we tested a Constrained total energy expenditure model, in which total energy ex

69 enditure plateaued, supporting a Constrained total energy expenditure model.

70 Such Additive total energy expenditure models are supported by exercis

71 rs nationwide (0.13% and 0.06% of the annual total energy expenditure on air conditioning), respectiv

72 d resting energy expenditure (P = 0.045) and total energy expenditure (P = 0.035).

73 usting for body weight, variants in MATK for total energy expenditure (p = 2.7E-08) and in CHRNA3 for

74 Energy intake was objectively estimated as total energy expenditure, physical activity expenditure,

75 cts in the upper range of physical activity, total energy expenditure plateaued, supporting a Constra

76 ion amplitude x number of strokes) predicted total energy expenditure (R(2) = 0.63) better than flipp

77 hydrate oxidation resulted in an increase in total energy expenditure, reductions in fat and lean bod

78 ed a relatively low Physical Activity Level (total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure </=

79 expenditure and physical activity level (ie, total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure); ba

80 eep: 1486.5 +/- 129.5 kcal/d; P = 0.136) and total energy expenditure (short sleep: 2589.2 +/- 526.5

81 In contrast, higher levels of total energy expenditure significantly predicted decreas

82 tritive sucking behavior during a test meal, total energy expenditure, sleeping energy expenditure, a

83 In relation to change in total energy expenditure, standardized B-coefficients we

84 at primates' slow life histories reflect low total energy expenditure (TEE) (kilocalories per day) re

85 bias of diet records against the referent of total energy expenditure (TEE) and 2) to compare the met

86 of the study was to examine the relation of total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity [physical ac

87 Three-month reliability was substantial for total energy expenditure (TEE) and AEE (intraclass corre

88 Changes in total energy expenditure (TEE) and its components were m

89 ffect of an aerobic exercise program on 24-h total energy expenditure (TEE) and its components-basal

90 people in developing countries have a higher total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity lev

91 sed by isotopic water dilution (18O) whereas total energy expenditure (TEE) and resting metabolic rat

92 timated from doubly labeled water studies of total energy expenditure (TEE) and the energy cost of gr

93 eveloped based on doubly labeled water (DLW) total energy expenditure (TEE) and weight variation duri

94 We assessed the relation between total energy expenditure (TEE) as well as substrate oxid

95 s not directly translate into an increase in total energy expenditure (TEE) because other components

96 cy Questionnaire (YAQ) against the criterion total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water (

97 olic rate (RMR) by indirect calorimetry, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water i

98 olic rate (BMR) was measured by calorimetry, total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water,

99 R) by indirect calorimetry, and FFM, FM, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water.

100 assessed by using respiratory gas exchange, total energy expenditure (TEE) by using doubly labeled w

101 y comparing reported energy intake (EI) with total energy expenditure (TEE) by using the doubly label

102 expenditure can make accurate prediction of total energy expenditure (TEE) challenging.

103 Total energy expenditure (TEE) data in patients with ear

104 resting metabolic rate (RMR) and suppressed total energy expenditure (TEE) drive these relations.

105 Increases in total energy expenditure (TEE) during overfeeding have b

106 ergy requirements with the measured value of total energy expenditure (TEE) from DLW, which is consid

107 o determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged >=65 y) t

108 tudies have provided an objective measure of total energy expenditure (TEE) in free-living men and wo

109 e systematically reviewed studies of FEA and total energy expenditure (TEE) in obese patients undergo

110 We quantified total energy expenditure (TEE) in patients with SBS by u

111 edicted resting energy expenditure (REE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) in postpartum women.

112 DRIs were derived from total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by using the dou

113 s reduced in participants with high baseline total energy expenditure (TEE) or whether it varied by B

114 We demonstrate that fish schools reduce total energy expenditure (TEE) per tail beat by up to 56

115 ll-mice fed FF exhibited consistently higher total energy expenditure (TEE) than their corresponding

116 Twenty-four-hour total energy expenditure (TEE) was assessed by precise t

117 ed by using 3 dietary assessment methods and total energy expenditure (TEE) was determined by using d

118 Total energy expenditure (TEE) was determined during bot

119 Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured by the doubl

120 ed by accelerometry over 6 consecutive days; total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured using the do

121 : 17.6 +/- 1.5 y) in which body movement and total energy expenditure (TEE) were simultaneously measu

122 We compared objectively assessed total energy expenditure (TEE) with estimates of energy

123 ate (RMR), diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), total energy expenditure (TEE), activity energy expendit

124 nown which effect predominates in regulating total energy expenditure (TEE), and thus whether the die

125 Total energy expenditure (TEE), basal metabolic rate (BM

126 We quantified total energy expenditure (TEE), food intake, and changes

127 al approach and is now possible with data on total energy expenditure (TEE), growth, and body composi

128 xpenditure (REE), with secondary outcomes of total energy expenditure (TEE), hormone levels, and meta

129 ve of current space agency requirements upon total energy expenditure (TEE), oxygen (O(2)) consumptio

130 ist for stature, but not for body mass) upon total energy expenditure (TEE), oxygen (O(2)) consumptio

131 objective was to examine the determinants of total energy expenditure (TEE), resting energy expenditu

132 The aims of this study were to profile total energy expenditure (TEE), resting energy expenditu

133 led water method to determine each subject's total energy expenditure (TEE), which is equal to usual

134 The objectives of the study were to measure total energy expenditure (TEE)-derived energy requiremen

135 umans because of the difficulty of measuring total energy expenditure (TEE).

136 obesity has been attributed to a decline in total energy expenditure (TEE).

137 f the "Multi-point" technique for estimating total energy expenditure (TEE).

138 urbulence levels, fish schools reduced their total energy expenditure (TEE, both aerobic and anaerobi

139 mple, water turnover was strongly related to total energy expenditure (TEE, kcal/d), physical activit

140 Low total energy expenditure (TEE, MJ/d) has been a hypothes

141 roup) by using indirect calorimetry and from total energy expenditure (TEE, n = 32 SQCP; n = 32 contr

142 The extent to which total energy expenditure (TEE; indicator of energy requi

143 e used doubly labelled water measurements of total energy expenditure (TEE; kcal day(-1)) in humans,

144 We measured MS (total energy expenditure [TEE]/BMR) using doubly labeled

145 sis is generally a much greater component of total energy expenditure than exercise or because any ty

146 t uses physical activity level (the ratio of total energy expenditure to basal energy expenditure) to

147 efficient between reported energy intake and total energy expenditure was 0.24; correlations were hig

148 s, the 24-h fat oxidation as a percentage of total energy expenditure was 17.7 +/- 6.9% compared with

149 Total energy expenditure was also higher among girls wit

150 Total energy expenditure was assessed over 2 weeks using

151 No significant treatment effect in total energy expenditure was found, resulting in weight

152 Total energy expenditure was measured by the doubly labe

153 Total energy expenditure was measured during 7 days in f

154 ter adjusting for body size and composition, total energy expenditure was positively correlated with

155 g the doubly labeled water method to measure total energy expenditure, we considered numerous psychos

156 vity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 and total energy expenditure were absent in both CB1(-/-) an

157 lic rate, nonresting energy expenditure, and total energy expenditure were all significantly lower am

158 Valid estimates of participants' total energy expenditure were also available from doubly

159 Metabolic risk factors and total energy expenditure were associated with PC6, PC9 (

160 Correlations for total energy expenditure were high (0.62-0.77).

161 REE and other components of total energy expenditure were measured in adolescents wi

162 Data on weight, length and total energy expenditure were selected from the literatu

163 In contrast, SMR and total energy expenditure were similar in patients and co

164 tivity levels as the body adapts to maintain total energy expenditure within a narrow range.

165 panied by increased basal metabolic rate and total energy expenditure, without marked alteration of u

166 We hypothesized that both resting and total energy expenditure would be lower in spinal cord-i

167 d adjusted cardiac output, underlying higher total energy expenditure, would have been a key process

168 ivity energy expenditure was calculated as: (total energy expenditure x 0.90) - resting metabolic rat