ライフサイエンスコーパス: total resection

1 .58, p=0.89 for sub-total resection vs gross total resection).

2 to gross total resection compared with near-total resection.

3 erved 111 patients age < 40 years with gross total resection.

4 ted a recurrence of disease after a previous total resection.

5 se with residual tumor, and those with gross total resection.

6 Seventy-six (78%) patients underwent gross total resection, 13 (14%) had residual disease, and 8 (8

7 rmed for the 70 patients who underwent gross total resection, 51% of whom received IP therapy.

8 should include surgery with the aim of gross-total resection and conformal, high-dose, postoperative

9 sub-total tumor resection compared to gross total resection and those with worse postoperative facia

10 Patients with EPN_PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should

11 rvival or overall survival benefit for gross total resection compared with near-total resection (HR 1

12 ause there is no definitive benefit to gross total resection compared with near-total resection.

13 For patients with group 4 tumours, gross total resection conferred a benefit to progression-free

14 ection (<1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining), or sub-total resection (>/=1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining).

15 posite outcome of undergoing less than gross total resection (GTR) or experiencing long-term facial p

16 ue to their typically benign behavior, gross total resection (GTR) remains the standard of care.

17 01) after adjustment for age, sex, and gross total resection (GTR) status.

18 Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 119 cases (70.8%)

19 Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 16/27 (59.3%) pati

20 Gross total resection (GTR) was attempted for cerebellar and c

21 ack ethnicity, higher KPS, obtaining a gross total resection (GTR), MGMT promoter-methylated gene sta

22 ere analyzed to assess mortality after gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), and bio

23 ntorial ependymoma were observed after gross total resection (GTR).

24 or observation, subtotal resection, and near-total resection/GTR groups given immediate postoperative

25 o underwent major debulking or total or near-total resection had longer overall survival (OS): 18.5 m

26 However, gross total resection had no effect on overall survival compar

27 l benefit for gross total resection over sub-total resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.9

28 for gross total resection compared with near-total resection (HR 1.05, 0.71-1.53, p=0.8158 for progre

29 progression-free survival compared with sub-total resection (HR 1.97, 1.22-3.17, p=0.0056), especial

30 on was performed in 83% of cases, with gross total resection in 96% of those.

31 effect on overall survival compared with sub-total resection in patients with group 4 tumours (HR 1.6

32 Total resection is sometmies impossible because of the r

33 s total resection (no residual tumour), near-total resection (<1.5 cm(2) tumour remaining), or sub-to

34 nderwent gross total resection, n = 74; near-total resection, n = 6; subtotal resection, n = 8), prio

35 ding to extent of resection (underwent gross total resection, n = 74; near-total resection, n = 6; su

36 the basis of postoperative imaging as gross total resection (no residual tumour), near-total resecti

37 After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231

38 perative MRI has been shown to improve gross-total resection of high-grade glioma.

39 hase 3 trial of patients with complete gross total resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and no prio

40 sis, support early surgical intervention and total resection of PPGLs, regardless of the tumour size.

41 women) aged 38-75 years who underwent gross total resection of squamous cell carcinomas arising in t

42 A total resection of the pathological mass was achieved.

43 Gross total resection of the primary tumor was achieved in 11

44 eived immediate postoperative CRT after near-total resection or GTR.

45 progression-free survival benefit for gross total resection over sub-total resection (hazard ratio [

46 eadings was associated with less chance of a total resection (P = 0.002) and correlated with the use

47 Older patients with total or near-total resections (P = .003) and localized disease at dia

48 ary event rates of deficits as well as gross total resection rate and eloquent locations.

49 9.4 Gy to 73 patients or 54.0 Gy after gross-total resection to 15 patients younger than 18 months) w

50 tumours (HR 1.03, 0.67-1.58, p=0.89 for sub-total resection vs gross total resection).

51 A gross total resection was achieved in 95.5% of patients.

52 Gross total resection was associated with a decreased risk for

53 Gross total resection was associated with prolonged survival c

54 r survivals for patients who underwent gross total resection were 51% and 36%, respectively.

55 Younger age (</=60 years) and gross total resection were associated with increased survival.

56 ercentages of radiologically confirmed gross total resections were 75% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) with ISM

57 ter subtotal resection (SPTX), and 19% after total resection with autotransplantation (TPTX).

58 reated at recurrence following initial gross total resection with reoperation (subtotal resection in

59 proved to be insufficient in attaining gross total resection without the danger of incurring postoper