ライフサイエンスコーパス: touch

1 h) than in the absence of movement (external touch).

2 nverting mechanical forces into the sense of touch.

3 n channels, such as voice, face, gesture and touch.

4 that endows cells with sensitivity to gentle touch.

5 nsinuating a role for them in discriminative touch.

6 to help explain the discriminatory power of touch.

7 on of explored object location during active touch.

8 nisms responsible for detecting and encoding touch.

9 ing results in single and multiple points of touch.

10 terior insula in the perception of affective touch.

11 skin and are exquisitely sensitive to light touch.

12 y activate MDNs in response to anterior body touch.

13 ical and spinal levels were faster for other-touch.

14 and they encode the run-speed better during touch.

15 asing benefits via gait-synchrony and mutual-touch.

16 rats engaging in naturalistic social facial touch.

17 fabric to represent aspects of the sense of touch.

18 spite mechanical perturbations during active touch.

19 delay between the movement and the resulting touch.

20 g the neural circuitry associated with human touch.

21 th those that would be predicted from direct touch.

22 l coding of external spatial information for touch.

23 ered the ratings of pleasantness of observed touch.

24 ngs of pleasantness of experienced affective touch.

25 psilateral to the passive limb receiving the touch.

26 tions attenuate the perception of the actual touch.

27 physiological processes, such as hearing and touch.

28 represented the whisker angle at the time of touch.

29 ing that shapes the neural representation of touch.

30 cy, but a significant effect on duration per touch.

31 f pain and itch as well as the physiology of touch.

32 n-dominant hand contributed to 66.1% of HFNS-touches.

33 odes to be 'adjacent' if they simultaneously touch a given graphlet.

34 the stretch causes an immediate illusion of touching a harder object that does not depend on the gra

35 s is the quick withdrawal of one's hand upon touching a hot object.

36 Upon active touch, a distinct pattern of activity was evoked across

37 al public perceive fears about inappropriate touching, accusations of sexual assault, and fear of cau

38 Mechanical stimuli, such as wind, rain, and touch affect plant development, growth, pest resistance,

39 athic pain, including pain aversion to light touch (allodynia).

40 25.3% of units were modulated during social touch and 8.3% of units displayed 'sex-touch' responses

41 in infected animals (e.g., defective whisker touch and blink responses and compromised balance) could

42 gether, these results suggest that innocuous touch and chemical itch information converge on GRPR neu

43 ons are perceived during both point-by-point touch and continuous moving.

44 h the aims of more closely imitating natural touch and further improving the effectiveness of HFS in

45 d psychophysiological responses to affective touch and increase attentional bias toward positive faci

46 Touch and itch sensations are crucial for evoking defens

47 rnal stresses and mediating the sensation of touch and pain(1,2).

48 and prosthetics to realise the sensation of touch and pain, and (iii) assistive technologies to enab

49 SPB tract that underlie affective aspects of touch and pain.

50 nd P mechanosensory neurons respond to light touch and pressure on the skin, respectively.

51 urons sense two mechanical stimuli: external touch and proprioceptive body movement.

52 ad rely on mechanoreceptors that encode both touch and self-motion.

53 fully restored the ability to detect object touch and significantly improved several sensorimotor fu

54 CIRL sensitizes sensory responses to gentle touch and sound by amplifying signal transduction in low

55 al (whisker) system in the context of direct touch and tactile stimulation, but recent work has shown

56 is fundamental in predicting self-generated touch and that this structure implements somatosensory a

57 Information about social touch and the sex of the interaction partner (a biologic

58 r presence of somatic sensation ranging from touch and vibration to pain and pressure.

59 Some senses, such as touch and vision, sample the environment rhythmically, w

60 actions to matched primary social (affective touch) and nonsocial (food) rewards were assessed.

61 responses to socially relevant, "affective" touch, and (ii) visual attention to emotional faces.

62 Their motor program was noisy, adaptive to touch, and directed to the rewarded range.

63 xtremity motor, lower-extremity motor, light touch, and pin prick scores after 1 year.

64 range of sensory modalities including taste, touch, and smell.

65 17.7% of participants reported touching animals (15.3% (pets), 0.0% (poultry) and 0.1%

66 less intense and less ticklish than the same touch applied externally.

67 Consistently, neurons encoding running-with-touch are more abundant in L2/3 and they encode the run-

68 tactile exploration, the dynamic patterns of touch are transduced to electrical signals and transform

69 er, conditions where symptoms include social touch avoidance and poor self-vs. other discrimination.

70 m of electronic systems and haptic (that is, touch-based) interfaces capable of softly laminating ont

71 Touch behaviour analysis included surface combinations a

72 l-characterized mechanosensory roles such as touch, blood-pressure sensing and hearing are now linked

73 ther increased in response to active whisker touch but only in PPC layers 2-4.

74 on between self-produced tactile stimuli and touch by others is necessary for social interactions and

75 iskers to identify a texture gather evidence touch by touch until they reach a threshold.

76 ata were collected synchronously during each touch condition.

77 with L5 neurons mainly reporting changes in touch conditions and L2/3 neurons continually integratin

78 Integration of two features, touch count and whisking midpoint at touch, was the simp

79 The unc-7 touch defect can be rescued by the homologous mouse gene

80 Only discriminative touch deficits were seen.

81 ally quantified by counting how often a node touches different graphlets (small, connected, induced s

82 O2 is the essential transduction channel for touch discrimination, vibration, and proprioception.

83 mal Noggin overexpression at E14.5 disrupted touch-dome formation but not hair-follicle specification

84 At embryonic stage 16.5 (E16.5), touch domes emerge as patches of Merkel cells and kerati

85 basis of touch-receptor patterning in mouse touch domes, which contain mechanosensory Merkel cell-ne

86 External cues, including touch, enable walking animals to flexibly maneuver aroun

87 ntrol of Ebola virus by decontaminating high-touch environmental surfaces (HITES), interrupting the v

88 ns can help robots to have the same sense of touch, especially for their social interactions.

89 odable with submillimeter precision from the touch-evoked spike counts of a randomly sampled handful

90 Touch excited fast-spiking (FS) interneurons at short la

91 for infection included close proximity (ie, touching, feeding, or nursing a NiV-infected person), en

92 We further show that delayed touches feel less ticklish and non-delayed touches more

93 ioral studies have shown that self-generated touch feels less intense and less ticklish than the same

94 e use of a piezoelectric system called Smart-touch fine needle (or STFN) mounted directly onto conven

95 in 2 visually impaired monkeys who relied on touch for interacting with their environment, demonstrat

96 The resulting burns remain sensitive to touch for weeks, but it is unknown whether calves experi

97 However, a non-invasive, touch-free and real-time pH sensing as a research tool i

98 Gender had no significant effect on touch frequency, but a significant effect on duration pe

99 cteristics which reflected room function and touch frequency.

100 feedback regarding the position of the to-be-touched hand (Experiment 1), were deprived of visual fee

101 Touch, hearing, and blood pressure regulation require me

102 In addition, T cells touching HRS cells are more frequently positive for CTLA

103 A thin conductive layer between touching hydrophilic cellulose membranes instead of poly

104 ponses to experienced and observed affective touch (i.e., being touched or watching others being touc

105 that people can rapidly unlearn to attenuate touch immediately after their movement and learn to atte

106 touch, we still know little about how social touch impacts cortical circuits.

107 On this basis, we also touch important aspects regarding the immune response in

108 r gentle touch in the TRNs, as well as harsh touch in both the TRNs and the PVD nociceptors.

109 lesion study on the perception of C-tactile touch in right hemisphere stroke patients (N = 59), reve

110 rienting.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Localizing a touch in space requires integrating somatosensory inform

111 an overall increased tendency to misperceive touch in the presence of a light, High ED participants w

112 spect of sensorimotor integration for active touch in the somatosensory system, but the cellular orga

113 protein UNC-7 are also essential for gentle touch in the TRNs, as well as harsh touch in both the TR

114 inical examination revealed he was tender to touch in the upper abdomen.

115 haped objects (cubes and spheres) using only touch (in darkness) or vision (in light, but barred from

116 TRNs but could not detect any differences in touch-induced mechanical strain between wild-type and mu

117 r neurons (TRNs), we visualized and measured touch-induced mechanical strain in Caenorhabditis elegan

118 Furthermore, the touch-induced mechanosensory pathway was transcriptional

119 nal tracts that convey pain, temperature and touch information from the spinal cord to the brain(1-4)

120 ical but not acute chemical itch nor noxious touch information.

121 Heterologous expression of unc-7 in touch-insensitive chemosensory neurons confers ectopic t

122 heir movement and learn to attenuate delayed touch instead, after repeated exposure to a systematic d

123 rge areas that are required to mimic natural touch interactions.

124 However, 76% of all studies evaluate light touch interventions, the long-term impact of which remai

125 Touch is a fundamental aspect of social, parental and se

126 Importantly, the sense of touch is a key component of motor function.

127 Sense of touch is a major part of man's communication with their

128 egans, the avoidance response to gentle body touch is mediated by six touch receptor neurons (TRNs),

129 ENT Mechanical allodynia, in which innocuous touch is perceived as pain, is a common feature of patho

130 s.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hypersensitivity to touch is poorly understood and extremely difficult to tr

131 animate both motor function and the sense of touch, leveraging residual touch signaling from his own

132 s the view that the automatically determined touch location in external space affects limb assignment

133 alpha-Band suppression reflected external touch location only after informative cues, suggesting t

134 Instead, humans construct external touch location post-hoc and on demand.

135 itory feedback that depended continuously on touch location.

136 -20, less than 5% of the total) representing touch markedly reduced responses in the spared touch rep

137 e and emotional responses, and light tactile touch may induce unpleasant itch sensations (mechanical

138 Self-touch may promote the transfer of microorganisms between

139 rse repertoire of sensory modalities: gentle touch, mechanical pain, itch, thermosensation, and propr

140 d touches feel less ticklish and non-delayed touches more ticklish after exposure to the systematic d

141 f the cerebral cortex concerned with vision, touch, movement, and cognitive function, in addition to

142 d more than half (55.3%, 62.1%) of those who touched (n=8108, 79.8%) or adjusted (n=9356, 92.0%) thei

143 ated fatty acid decreases PIEZO2 currents in touch neurons derived from human induced pluripotent ste

144 suggest that the tiled network of the gentle-touch neurons has better resolution for spatial encoding

145 solution for spatial encoding than the harsh-touch neurons.

146 ubpopulation of mechanosensory receptors, T (touch) neurons, but not P (pressure) sensory neurons.

147 Here, we describe GFP-based Touching Nexus (G-baToN) which relies upon nanobody-dire

148 mentation masks and assigning boundaries for touching nuclei.

149 ment optimizes the escape response to gentle touch of animals raised in and tested at cold temperatur

150 Humans and mice alike experience rich active touch of the face.

151 ions and a probability matrix for sequential touches of 20 sub-surfaces.

152 limb-based processes were repurposed to map touch on a tool.

153 We also touch on the current state of miRNA therapy development,

154 urons remained unresponsive, or responded to touch on the hand or somatotopically abnormal parts, dep

155 ons were unresponsive or responded weakly to touch on the hand, while the cortical labeling pattern w

156 The duration per touch on the HFNS was fitted with a log-log linear distr

157 tivity, subdividing findings into those that touch on the rate, rhythm, or synchronization of neurons

158 Lastly, we touch on the topics of how TGx approaches could facilita

159 itor and long-time collaborator Susan Fiske) touches on some of her favorite ideas.

160 ing water is a recognized societal need that touches on the health and livelihood of millions of peop

161 A second EEG experiment showed that touches on the tool and arm surfaces were localized by s

162 iscussed from a neuroengineer's perspective, touching on the design of scalable electrophysiological

163 Most importantly, mucous membranes were touched, on average, 34.3 (SE = 2.4) times per hour, whi

164 he W state, which prevent the particles from touching one another over the entire evolution.

165 s and surfaces, physical distancing, and not touching one's eyes, nose or mouth.

166 occasionally described as naturalistic (e.g. touch or pressure), but were often paresthesias.

167 ed and observed affective touch (i.e., being touched or watching others being touched) were assessed

168 sensory areas.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When we touch our hand with the other, the resulting sensation f

169 ntense than when another person or a machine touches our hand with the same intensity.

170 as a self-healing human-machine interactive touch pad with pressure-sensitive adhesiveness on target

171 Hydrogel touch pads are adhered to curved or flat insulators, wit

172 However, most touch pads are developed based on stiff and brittle elec

173 ing interest to develop a next generation of touch pads that require stretchability and biocompatibil

174 d likely in the brain, circuits that mediate touch, pain, and itch engage in cross modulation.

175 i, eliciting sensations such as temperature, touch, pain, and itch.

176 ouse will be broadly useful for the study of touch, pain, and itch.

177 els, which constitute the basis for hearing, touch, pain, cold, and heat sensation, among other physi

178 ding solar cells, light-emitting diodes, and touch panels.

179 Using a bimanual self-touch paradigm, we demonstrate that people can rapidly u

180 In Experiment 1 (N = 36), we touched participants with either soft or rough fabrics i

181 umented and influence food choices, but oral touch perception is less understood.

182 he anterior insula for ipsilateral affective touch perception open new avenues of enquiry regarding t

183 In Experiment 2, individual differences in touch perception were explored: detection and discrimina

184 Thirty-two adults with normal touch perception were randomly assigned to an experiment

185 ear and specific impairments in vibrotactile touch perception, as do mutant mice lacking USH2A.

186 ioceptively deafferented patient with spared touch perception, suggesting that location information i

187 demonstrated increased sensitivity to light touch, pinprick, and thermal hyperalgesia in the absence

188 technique, product use and audit of frequent touch point cleaning.

189 opens a large gap of 80 meV at the quadratic touching point between the Dirac and flat bands, endowin

190 echnique, product use, and audit of frequent touch-point cleaning.

191 apacitive touch system is adopted to sense a touched position.

192 physiological processes, including hearing, touch, proprioception, osmoregulation, and morphogenesis

193 Where we perceive a touch putatively depends on topographic maps that code t

194 y systems: the gentle-touch (TRNs) and harsh-touch (PVD) circuits.

195 Using the touch receptor neurons (TRNs) of Caenorhabditis elegans,

196 onse to gentle body touch is mediated by six touch receptor neurons (TRNs), and is dependent on MEC-4

197 gged mitochondria as fiducial markers in the touch receptor neurons (TRNs), we visualized and measure

198 ike prior models of the dynamic responses of touch receptor neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans (Eastwo

199 We explored the cellular basis of touch-receptor patterning in mouse touch domes, which co

200 nical forces by proprioceptors and cutaneous touch receptors.

201 uch markedly reduced responses in the spared touch representation, but not in other representations.

202 We investigated self-motion and touch representations in L5 of S1 with juxtacellular loo

203 ease PIEZO2 function could reduce heightened touch responses during inflammation.

204 whereas deactivating L2/3 mainly facilitated touch responses in L5.

205 ocial touch and 8.3% of units displayed 'sex-touch' responses (responded differently, depending on th

206 so that the neurochemical bases for food and touch rewards are not identical.

207 on and correlates with contamination on high-touch room surfaces.

208 The touch's actual location in external space was irrelevant

209 ly depends on topographic maps that code the touch's location on the skin [1] as well as its position

210 p (MD 4.0 points [1.7-6.3]; p=0.0006), light touch scores improved by 19.0 points (15.1-23.0) vs 14.8

211 g ultrathin flexible materials, solar cells, touch-screen panels, nanotextured surfaces for enhanced

212 h as medical imaging, self-energy-harvesting touch screens and invisible robotic devices.

213 ds, automotive coatings, conductive inks and touch screens, to name a few.

214 om one computer display to another using two touch-screens.

215 Touch sensation hinges on force transfer across the skin

216 Touch sensation is initiated by mechanosensory neurons t

217 ering a precise understanding of its role in touch sensation.

218 cated understanding of piezo2 roles in light-touch sensation.

219 Haptic actuators generate touch sensations and provide realism and depth in human-

220 For the first time a dynamical touch sensing are studies by means of a spatio-temporal

221 sing EIT to create a low cost and large area touch sensing.

222 However, contrasting its role in touch-sensitive neurons, CIRL dampens the response of no

223 the expression of Zic2cre(ER) mediate light touch sensitivity and textural discrimination.

224 nsitive chemosensory neurons confers ectopic touch sensitivity, indicating a specific role for UNC-7

225 Utility of the cells as components of a touch sensor operational across a wide temperature range

226 ioral licking task monitored by a capacitive touch-sensor water spout.

227 and the sense of touch, leveraging residual touch signaling from his own hand.

228 m M1, enabling grip reanimation regulated by touch signaling.

229 tor cortex (M1), residual subperceptual hand touch signals are simultaneously demultiplexed from ongo

230 ncluding whisking phase, are integrated with touch signals to enable spatially accurate tactile perce

231 ty to form H-bonded complexes has never been touched so far.

232 ion channel play critical roles in the light-touch somatosensation.

233 ssembly enabled nanofibers to be obtained by touch-spinning, which exhibit higher Young's moduli (1.3

234 cs, in neat oral fluid was carried out using touch spray mass spectrometry from volumetric absorptive

235 s reveal that they respond to mechanosensory touch stimuli delivered to various parts of the body inc

236 At steady state, touch stimuli sufficient to activate TRNs induce an aver

237 sory cortex (S1) encodes complex patterns of touch, such as those that occur during tactile explorati

238 High touch surface contamination is shown in ten (66.7%) out

239 nsors when arrayed enabled fast reliable one-touch surface texture classification with neuromorphic e

240 cocci isolates recovered from high frequency touched surfaces from public areas in the community and

241 aracteristics, tumor characteristics, and no-touch surgery rates were similar between the 39 SCC and

242 hand, while they watched a rubber hand been touched synchronously with the same fabric or with a 'hi

243 A surface-capacitive touch system is adopted to sense a touched position.

244 flexible arms using a specialized "taste by touch" system to locally sense and respond to prey-deriv

245 ctive sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precise

246 on of the oblique vaginal septum using a "No-Touch" technique is a safe, minimally invasive, and effe

247 on of the oblique vaginal septum using a "No-touch" technique over an 8-year period.

248 om the visible edge of the lesion with a "no-touch" technique.

249 ng a self-generated movement (self-generated touch) than in the absence of movement (external touch).

250 t texture related EEG features during active touch that are minimally influenced by movement type and

251 The velocity of the touch that participants received (affective/non-affectiv

252 t conditions and care should be taken to not touch the SLA surface of the implant.

253 5.34; 95% CI, 3.04, 9.39), and when any HCP touched the patient (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.04, 6.51).

254 he gallbladder and the right kidney, the tip touching the duodenum, the rectum or appendages, and a l

255 Touching the endotracheal tube (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38,

256 ic coolant water only without the scaler tip touching the implant (active control).

257 s removed by fine-scissor dissection without touching the mucosa.

258 rkness) or vision (in light, but barred from touching the objects) could subsequently discriminate th

259 demonstrated significant improvement in not touching the ocular surface (P = 0.046), the eyelashes (

260 m by pulling or pressing the gel probe after touching the sample.

261 Collectively, these results demonstrate that touching the skin induces local mechanical strain in int

262 SECM allows positioning of the probe without touching the substrate while mapping the chemical parame

263 During self-touch, the sensorimotor cortex was functionally connecte

264 On every touch, the somatosensory cortex sends a packet of textur

265 nuate the perception of their self-generated touch, the stronger the functional connectivity between

266 perceptually attenuated their self-generated touches, the stronger this corticocerebellar coupling.

267 HCWs touched their own torso and mask in 32% and 29% of the v

268 uate office, students spent 9% of their time touching their own hair, face, neck, and shoulders (HFNS

269 at they had the feeling that they could just touch them with their left/right hand/heel.

270 participants regularly attributed the first touch to a limb that had received neither of the two sti

271 ircuitry hard-wired for converting innocuous touch to irritating itch.

272 hich includes the whole spectrum from gentle touch to noxious stimuli.

273 n healthy adults systematically misattribute touch to other limbs.

274 cantly higher than conditions which included touch to participants own, unseen body.

275 senses, such as version, hearing, smell, and touch, to move around by avoiding colliding with other h

276 The neural substrate for touch-to-itch conversion in the spinal cord remains elus

277 had narrow angles or peripheral iridocorneal touches together with elevated IOP (80%).

278 It is a two-step touch-trigger system that consists of a pretargeting anc

279 mpare two mechanosensory systems: the gentle-touch (TRNs) and harsh-touch (PVD) circuits.

280 identify a texture gather evidence touch by touch until they reach a threshold.

281 The touch-up rate decreased to 5.8% (3/52) in patients under

282 only in 77.3% (153/198) of PVs and requiring touch-up with a standard radiofrequency ablation cathete

283 tention, consolidation, and bilingualism and touch upon the neural bases of a processing approach.

284 rldwide, this work is highly relevant, as it touches upon a less recognized socioemotional risk facto

285 ex, so to improve the imaging resolution and touch visibility an artificial intelligent (AI) was used

286 Touch was misattributed to non-stimulated limbs of the o

287 visual capture and perceived pleasantness of touch was not modulated by subthreshold eating disorder

288 somatosensory areas was attenuated when the touch was presented during a self-generated movement (se

289 Other-touch was related to activation in several areas, includ

290 ted the remapped stimulus location only when touch was task relevant.

291 G), we found that where a hand-held tool was touched was immediately coded in the neural dynamics of

292 atures, touch count and whisking midpoint at touch, was the simplest model that explained behavior be

293 During self-touch, we instead found deactivation in insula, anterior

294 in PPC during voluntary whisking and object touch, we performed loose-patch single-unit recordings a

295 edge about cortical processing of non-social touch, we still know little about how social touch impac

296 ions of whisker angle during self-motion and touch were independent, both in the selection of which n

297 i.e., being touched or watching others being touched) were assessed using facial electromyography (EM

298 cortical amplitudes were reduced during self-touch, while latencies at cortical and spinal levels wer

299 Haptic perception synthesizes touch with proprioception, the sense of body position.

300 which participants saw the rubber hand being touched with a fabric of incongruent roughness and hence