ライフサイエンスコーパス: transabdominal

1 F samples collected from women who underwent transabdominal amniocentesis after an episode of spontan

2 Transabdominal amniotic fluid obtained from 254 asymptom

3 Here, the feasibility of US-guided transabdominal and partially transcostal BH ablation of

4 ta indicate BH is a promising technology for transabdominal and transcostal mechanical ablation of tu

5 questionnaire, gave a blood sample, and had transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasounds performed by

6 and hospital stay) and cost when compared to transabdominal aneurysm repair.

7 anal approach was 2.23 points lower than the transabdominal approach (95% confidence interval: [-6.64

8 A transabdominal approach and 8-12-F catheters are most fr

9 duodenal approach rather than a percutaneous transabdominal approach was a risk factor for inferior P

10 specific anatomic problems that preclude the transabdominal approach.

11 , was compared between the transanal and the transabdominal approach.

12 In addition, the costs of transabdominal biopsy and endoscopic biopsy were compare

13 GAs) between 15 and 41 weeks with a 3.75-MHz transabdominal curvilinear probe.

14 are drained externally using a percutaneous, transabdominal drainage catheter.

15 Transabdominal electrocardiograms-based Fetal Stress Ind

16 Prospective studies of transabdominal esophagocardiomyotomy were selected.

17 (72% vs 68%, P = 0.63) between transanal and transabdominal extraction groups.

18 Transabdominal fetal echocardiography in the first trime

19 We report the feasibility of transabdominal first-trimester fetal echocardiography fo

20 Transabdominal grey scale and real time 3D ultrasound (U

21 eport our large, single-center experience of transabdominal ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA) redo

22 a-IPAA were compared to 119 (male: 53%) with transabdominal IPAA.

23 Transabdominal luminescence compared well with the locat

24 A transabdominal "magnetic anchoring and guidance system"

25 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (ta-IPAA) with transabdominal minimal invasive approach in ulcerative c

26 The feasibility of transabdominal near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for dete

27 Transabdominal needle and endoscopic forceps upper and l

28 een fetal blood saturation determined by the transabdominal NIR method and arterial and venous fetal

29 y defining a subset of PGC resected using an transabdominal-only approach, one may discriminate true

30 ntified 98 patients with PGC resection via a transabdominal-only approach.

31 h proximal gastric cancer (PGC) treated by a transabdominal-only resection to that of patients with d

32 article units by using either a percutaneous transabdominal or an endoscopic ultrasound approach.

33 otal extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP), and transabdominal patch plasty (TAPP) techniques for primar

34 d to determine the diagnostic performance of transabdominal pelvic ultrasonography and bone age in id

35 LGR8 (RXFP2) are essential for mediating the transabdominal phase of testicular descent during early

36 cm from anorectal junction, and laparoscopic transabdominal posterior dissection to <4 cm from anal v

37 g 4 groups: Lichtenstein groin, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin, open ventral,

38 copic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), using a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperi

39 laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), or modified Lichten

40 tally extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) laparo-

41 ed for inguinal hernia repair, including the transabdominal preperitoneal repair, the intraperitoneal

42 Twenty-seven patients underwent an anterior transabdominal procedure, whereas 21 underwent a posteri

43 less invasive and has fewer morbidities than transabdominal pull-through.

44 currence and inferior survival compared with transabdominal rectal resection.

45 Patients undergoing transabdominal redo surgery for failed IPAA between 1983

46 cm) were compared to 100 patients undergoing transabdominal repair (mean age 72.9, AAA size 5.9 cm).

47 an organ-preserving treatment alternative to transabdominal resection for patients with stage I recta

48 mours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resection.

49 Endoscopic and transabdominal sampling procedures were attempted in 28

50 Transabdominal scans of mouse embryos staged between 8.5

51 outcomes were compared between transanal and transabdominal specimen extraction after laparoscopic co

52 rt-term data suggest similar efficacy to the transabdominal techniques.

53 sion of the ligand or receptor that controls transabdominal testicular descent.

54 in patients who cannot undergo conventional transabdominal, transvaginal, or transrectal catheter dr

55 Transabdominal ultrasonography (US) is the technique of

56 y aimed to evaluate the application value of transabdominal ultrasonography combined with elastograph

57 formed in 147 healthy children who underwent transabdominal ultrasonography for strain elastography o

58 at increased depth through the follicle and transabdominal ultrasonography in vivo showed that decre

59 and higher than that of pancreatic cysts at transabdominal ultrasonography.

60 Given the limited study data, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is currently not establ

61 s criteria underwent laboratory examination, transabdominal ultrasound examination, CAP-TE 502 (by Ec

62 l examination, rectal diameter assessed from transabdominal ultrasound, and total gastrointestinal tr

63 uantify ileitis by intravital microscopy and transabdominal US.