戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ning higher cell densities produced very few transconjugants.
2 lmost equal numbers in biofilms that produce transconjugants.
3 o donors showed no difference in recoverable transconjugants.
4 verage of 103 antibiotic-resistant Y. pestis transconjugants.
5 he respective donors are carried over to the transconjugants.
6 s as drivers, we achieved precise editing of transconjugants.
7                     blcC-null donors yielded transconjugants 1 week earlier, but by the following wee
8                                          The transconjugant also significantly outcompeted the recipi
9 the stability of the plasmid in the isolated transconjugants and its ability to transfer back to E co
10 nd dehII genes in about 10% of transposition transconjugants and provided a genetic link between tran
11 h includes the lag time of newly formed F(+) transconjugants and the recovery time between successive
12 ms, differentiating invading plasmid donors, transconjugants, and plasmid-free cells at high resoluti
13                           The second type of transconjugant appears to have resulted from excision of
14 cribe changes in susceptible, resistant, and transconjugant bacteria over time.
15 lays a strong correlation with the number of transconjugant bacteria that formed.
16                               Four groups of transconjugants, based upon the transfer of the ermA and
17 erred the Ti plasmid to recipients, yielding transconjugants by 14 to 21 days following infection.
18         In further contrast to Hfr transfer, transconjugants can become donors, suggesting that the r
19 ing strains have access to unique nutrients, transconjugants can proliferate and reach high abundance
20                                         S.Tm transconjugants can subsequently re-enter host tissues i
21 , short- and long-term experiments show that transconjugants can thrive when nutrient competition is
22                                              Transconjugants containing tapD were sensitive to the ty
23                                 Thousands of transconjugants could be obtained in a single mating exp
24  (49,763 bp), isolated from Escherichia coli transconjugant D7-3, which was obtained through pRA1 tra
25                              Analysis of the transconjugants demonstrated that a 27,744 bp internal P
26 hroughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing on sorted transconjugants demonstrates that triclosan not only pro
27                                              Transconjugants derived from matings that used E. faeciu
28 m1 transfers at a frequency of 1.35 x 10(-5) transconjugants/donor to ICEPm1-deficient P. mirabilis u
29 itions result in a frequency of 2.9 x 10(-4) transconjugants/donor.
30                      Whereas approximately 1 transconjugant for every 100 donor cells could be recove
31  beta-lactam antibiotic treatment, enhancing transconjugant formation upon re-seeding.
32 ses and DNA hybridizations revealed that the transconjugant harbored a single plasmid of approx. 92 k
33                                 Two types of transconjugants have been identified.
34 ation is pivotal in minimizing the number of transconjugants in a population.
35 hancing the colonisation of bla(NDM-5)-IncX3 transconjugants in animal digestive tracts.
36 rs mutationally derepressed for blcC yielded transconjugants in planta at numbers 10-fold lower than
37                           Notably, pX3_NDM-5 transconjugants included the Gram-positive pathogen Ente
38          Southern blot analysis of different transconjugants indicated that Campbell insertions had o
39                                   One of the transconjugants is shown by cytotoxicity assay to produc
40                                          The transconjugant killed significantly more chicken embryos
41                                          The transconjugant named COLVA showed high and homogeneous r
42  must be transferred to regenerate oriT, Hfr transconjugants never become donors.
43 (4.5 x 10(-3)) was observed in all of the 23 transconjugants obtained, and the direction of tetracycl
44 tween virulence and avirulence by generating transconjugants of a virulent race harbouring plasmids e
45 ion increases the fitness of the B. fragilis transconjugant over its progenitor by arming it with the
46 donor strain, EcoFJ1(pRP4-gfp), and putative transconjugants over time.
47                                  Most of the transconjugant pCoo plasmids result from recombination w
48  DNA transfer at a frequency of about 10(-3) transconjugants per donor and that this process is depen
49 id transfer rates can reach or exceed 10(-1) transconjugants per donor in vivo and under laboratory c
50 equated to between 1.0 x 10-6 and 5.5 x 10-5 transconjugants per donor.
51   In contrast, EcoFJ1(pRP4-gfp) and putative transconjugants persisted much longer in anaerobic biofi
52 fer frequency, it reduced the breadth of the transconjugant pool.
53            We find that plasmid transfer and transconjugant proliferation have unimodal relationships
54 33-3 transfers to various Thermococcales and transconjugants propagate at 100 degrees C.
55 ned the genome sequences of 22 F1-generation transconjugants, providing the first genome-wide view of
56  resistance plasmids in some conditions, but transconjugants remain rare across treatments.
57 s feasible during warfare, but the resulting transconjugants remain rare.
58 manure application to soils and identify the transconjugants resulting from these events.
59                                 Screening of transconjugants revealed that the DNA of pDMG21A, a pVT7
60          Mating experiments using an in vivo transconjugant selection strategy demonstrated that pVAP
61 valent to that of UPEC strain HE300, and the transconjugant showed significantly increased growth com
62 ion site in a P. gingivalis Tn4351-generated transconjugant showed that a complete copy of the previo
63                                          The transconjugant showed the MDR-AmpC resistance profile.
64                 Three independently isolated transconjugants showed essentially the same properties a
65              Secondary transfer from primary transconjugant TCRFB1 to strain JH2SS in filter and brot
66 ulated M-type 3 GAS strain DLS003 produced a transconjugant that exhibited a mucoid colony morphology
67 tibiotic screening revealed only one type of transconjugant that was resistant to ampicillin and tetr
68 ured soil, ranging between 10(-5) and 10(-4) transconjugants-to-donor ratios).
69 ed in a 1,000-fold increase in the number of transconjugants upon plasmid transfer.
70                                          The transconjugants varied in their ability to grow on dichl
71                                          The transconjugant was compared to recipient strain NC, UPEC
72 as used as a donor, a highly conjugative VmR transconjugant was isolated that formed constitutive cel
73 rtion into the recipient chromosome in these transconjugants was recombination across flanking region
74                     In the pool of recovered transconjugants, we found amplicon sequence variants (AS
75 -Tet(s)) were resistant to erythromycin, the transconjugants were initially picked up as ampicillin-
76                                     Overall, transconjugants were only observed within the first 4 da
77 s 1 week earlier, but by the following week, transconjugants were recovered at numbers indistinguisha
78 oints by plating and flow cytometry, and the transconjugants were recovered by fluorescence-activated
79  ESBL-producing strains (17 Escherichia coli transconjugants) were studied to define "sensitive" inte
80 sive genome-wide mosaicism within individual transconjugants, which generated large-scale sibling div