ライフサイエンスコーパス: transcranial magnetic stimulation

1 -interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

2 e of which muscle was stimulated paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

3 ctural brain MRI, magnetoencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

4 measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation.

5 stimulating with theta versus beta rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation.

6 deep brain electrodes or noninvasively using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

7 rticomotor excitability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

8 sed therapeutics, with a particular focus on transcranial magnetic stimulation.

9 n (DBS), and noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.

10 ognitive remediation therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

11 y, and motor evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

12 target selection and neuro-navigation of the transcranial magnetic stimulation.

13 om neuropsychology [5], neuroimaging [6-11], transcranial magnetic stimulation [12, 13], single-unit

14 Transcranial magnetic stimulation also induced anticorre

15 Transcranial magnetic stimulation altered size perceptio

16 motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and (2) spontaneous ve

17 A new study using transcranial magnetic stimulation and a virtual reality

18 In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and demonstrated that

19 ural responsivity, as measured by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG.

20 s to perturbations, as can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

21 We used a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogr

22 asive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), single-transcranial magnetic stimulation and external trigemina

23 Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and fMRI in healthy pa

24 on can be blocked in vivo using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and further highlight

25 dress these issues, we combined single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked poten

26 efined electrophysiological method involving transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve s

27 ked potentials (MEPs) evoked by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and short-interval int

28 Motor physiology was performed with transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory phys

29 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation and tasks designed to

30 itude of corticospinal responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and the magnitude of m

31 ulation, and non-invasive such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direc

32 recorded from extensor carpi radialis using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and fractional anisot

33 rd protocol is an updated form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and it is an effectiv

34 s that can be probed by the onset latency of transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to primary mot

35 Finally, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the human P

36 Therefore, motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation are larger when a cort

37 In this Neurology Grand Rounds, we use transcranial magnetic stimulation as a model to explore

38 d around sites that had been identified with transcranial magnetic stimulation-based functional local

39 studies on treatment including medications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, biofeedback, target-s

40 nistered post-cortical spreading depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation blocked the propagatio

41 plying a uniform spatial sampling procedure, transcranial magnetic stimulation can produce cortical f

42 Transcranial magnetic stimulation can show changes in fo

43 data, a robotic arm positioned a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coil over a subject-sp

44 Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroe

45 that effective connectivity, as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroe

46 peripheral nerve electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with electro

47 Here, we use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) to test this mo

48 following adaptation, continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) was delivered t

49 ar inhibition (CBI): a conditioning pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the cereb

50 eral nerve in close temporal contiguity with transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the contr

51 Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has highlighte

52 Dual site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has revealed i

53 y study indicated beneficial effects of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) targeting the m

54 ssible region of the hippocampal network via transcranial magnetic stimulation during concurrent fMRI

55 We combined transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroencephalograph

56 A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed d

57 Further support was obtained by a transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment, where subj

58 This is further supported by our transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment: subjects w

59 Transcranial magnetic stimulation focused on either the

60 Here, we use 180 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimulation for approximately 30 m

61 In humans, we applied theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, guided by subject-spe

62 More generally, our novel transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided lesion-deficit

63 lthy participants, we show how damage to our transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions affecte

64 lly compensate for the contribution that the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions make to

65 The classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions was val

66 ween those with and without damage to these 'transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided' regions remain

67 A single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation has been shown to be e

68 nical neurophysiology of the brain employing transcranial magnetic stimulation has convincingly demon

69 lp electroencephalography (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 22 participants dur

70 nge to dIPL node with continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in a randomized, sham-

71 h prior findings from functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy participant

72 rticospinal conduction failure assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the right upper lim

73 associative stimulation (cPAS) is a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation in which paired pulses

74 ng functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation indicated the involvem

75 l excitability alterations were monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked p

76 ubjects, as indicated by specific markers of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle and bra

77 A combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle relaxat

78 maging paradigms, we report that noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation interference with a re

79 s should use individualized therapies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, intracerebral stem/pr

80 Neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation is one of the most pro

81 c options such as electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, ketamine infusions, a

82 ured corticospinal excitability at rest with transcranial magnetic stimulation, local concentrations

83 in stimulation (STN-DBS) with motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-TMS) at specific t

84 Overall baclofen did not alter transcranial magnetic stimulation-measured GABA(B) inhib

85 oups: piTBS monotherapy (n = 35), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation monotherapy (n = 35),

86 ysiological biomarkers were assessed using a transcranial magnetic stimulation multiparadigm approach

87 Transcranial magnetic stimulation normalized depression-

88 male human participants, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of a frontal midline n

89 mpact the activity of brain regions, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or rapid-acting antide

90 Here, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation over four frontopariet

91 We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cor

92 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cor

93 d motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm represent

94 n motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilateral m

95 SICI was obtained by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left motor co

96 d motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the leg represent

97 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used t

98 imed to have corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor

99 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor

100 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation, paired-pulse intracor

101 Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm, we examined

102 We discuss how recent methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, positron emission tom

103 A targeted pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation produced a brief reeme

104 usical duet task with a real-time repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, we provide e

105 nderlying plasticity induction by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols such as inte

106 sent a promising target for novel repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols.

107 prefrontal cortex target, and 50 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were delivered

108 Results showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation reduced classification

109 A causal intervention with transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed clear special

110 Here, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and fMRI to det

111 then temporarily inhibited PPC by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and hypothesize

112 rally patterned waveforms such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcrania

113 fusion tensor imaging, and online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied during

114 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over th

115 cs following low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an inhibitor

116 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can alter neuro

117 Despite growing evidence that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be used as

118 nciple trials suggest efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatme

119 Although several strategies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been inves

120 inical and cognitive responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bipolar II d

121 roposed therapeutic potential for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in swallowing r

122 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a commonly-

123 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasiv

124 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective

125 n-invasive brain stimulation like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasin

126 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly

127 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used as a th

128 ate the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right do

129 Critically, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on participants

130 rtex for treating depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains unknown

131 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the

132 r, and 1 hour after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right PP

133 ion (TBS), a specific protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), induces change

134 Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recent

135 c.,) or need for retreatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

136 ition (pre-conditioning with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS) and unilateral

137 Transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively modulates

138 ose using region-specific therapies, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

139 Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

140 Additionally transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibite

141 aging studies of phonological processing, or transcranial magnetic stimulation sites that did not use

142 ted by redefining the borders of each of the transcranial magnetic stimulation sites to include areas

143 Here, we used a dense grid of transcranial magnetic stimulation spots covering the who

144 Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have highlight

145 are in agreement with functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in human Parki

146 inical and functional assessments along with transcranial magnetic stimulation studies were taken on

147 nts and increased cortical excitability in a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in healthy volun

148 g two face-selective regions with thetaburst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) and measuring th

149 al-temporal cortex by delivering theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) concurrent with

150 Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) is a potential n

151 essed this question by combining theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) with fMRI to tes

152 primary motor and sensory cortices by using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques.

153 We finally confirm, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, that the fMRI-identif

154 use of brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, the therapeutic effic

155 They also predict responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (n = 154).

156 ly well to two different forms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for MDD.

157 estingly, disrupting cerebellar activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) abolished the ad

158 ral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

159 By using double-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

160 By combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencep

161 Here, we combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and fMRI to test

162 the right or left speech motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and measured the

163 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and simultaneous

164 To assess this, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to visua

165 This fMRI study used concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a causal pert

166 nt advances emerging from the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research an

167 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at beta frequenc

168 sity 500 kHz TUS transducer was coupled to a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil.

169 exposure group (N=17) underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with

170 eceived brief patterns of rhythmic or random transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to the

171 tested whether high-frequency, non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered twice

172 ation (VA) of elbow flexors was assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during maximum v

173 plitude, and timing of beta events preceding transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) each significant

174 This motivated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to e

175 e feasibility, safety, and efficacy of 10-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for adolescents

176 rts of patients who received left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for treatment of

177 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown t

178 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been suggest

179 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a

180 ese neural oscillations, we applied rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in either theta

181 Previous studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans to dem

182 The development of the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the study of

183 ous, causal test by combining the FCM with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention tha

184 order (MDD) has become a particular focus of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) investigational

185 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive

186 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used

187 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an accessible

188 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective

189 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used i

190 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of cort

191 We demonstrate that paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) near ventral pre

192 interval between trigeminal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of fM1 was 15-30

193 xcitability and neural plasticity often used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of hand motor co

194 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human occipit

195 f motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 using an o

196 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the dorsolate

197 r or extensor muscle at the motor point with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cor

198 that disruption of these circuitries by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the PFC and i

199 Probing corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary m

200 rformed the sequential task while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the RLPFC ver

201 s studies have shown asymmetrical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on task performa

202 stimulation in combination with directional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1.

203 ucceeds bdif succeeds lbif) while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cortica

204 ere we explored this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

205 Along this scheme, we tested the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand ar

206 e, we investigated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human p

207 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipit

208 We found that applying theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the PPC, bu

209 By applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary

210 r (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary

211 11 healthy controls, we applied paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols to eva

212 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represents a nov

213 been at the forefront of advancing clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) since the mid-19

214 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have pro

215 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in human

216 tional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study.

217 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy can modu

218 In the current study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

219 Here we employed fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whethe

220 Here, by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to block consoli

221 e areas and attentional modulations, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to briefly alter

222 s subjects underwent MRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to co-localise p

223 halography (EEG) to record brain signals and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to deliver infor

224 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evaluate the

225 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the p

226 ed the virtual lesion methodology offered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to explore the i

227 ht be possible to use MI in conjunction with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to induce plasti

228 e and female participants using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere wit

229 To test this idea, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interrupt pro

230 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure corti

231 sed peripheral nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor

232 ale and female) brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the exc

233 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to shed light on

234 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test the effe

235 ity was modulated with 5 days of twice-daily transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the cerebella

236 Here, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to esta

237 We delivered double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while moving a s

238 ronometry of the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computation

239 Measuring the brain's response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroence

240 We employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneou

241 ntal eye field (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent

242 motivation, we hypothesized that inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) would reduce app

243 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked

244 Here, using fMRI, psychophysics, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), all within the

245 f the first corticospinal volley elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), by interacting

246 itative real time polymerase chain reaction, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), functional magn

247 increased resting motor threshold (RMT) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is known to be

248 rk in prediction of response to both ECT and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), offering a new

249 The most common are transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial el

250 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we applied a no

251 Here, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide caus

252 d the complexity of the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)--an approach tha

253 he neural basis for contagious yawning using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

254 ns with magnetic resonance imaging-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

255 ted the dynamics of relevant processes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

256 rain activity was investigated with fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

257 sively treat a variety of brain disorders is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

258 died the visuomotor interaction using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

259 ally drive ("entrain") these oscillations by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

260 The present study addressed this issue using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

261 was transiently disrupted using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

262 revealed by investigative techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

263 e and corticospinal excitability (CSE) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

264 ed by beta activity and is readily probed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

265 circuit is to probe candidate regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

266 vide such evidence, using fMRI-guided online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

267 applying excitatory or inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to a subject-specific

268 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter brain functio

269 pairing of peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter functional re

270 al magnetic resonance imaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to demonstrate the rep

271 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right f

272 Applying rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation to interfere with earl

273 We used fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the neu

274 We tested this idea using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure corticospin

275 This was achieved by applying a transcranial magnetic stimulation to the medial prefront

276 he conditional stop-signal task, and applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to the motor cortex, t

277 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation tools to investigate t

278 ng brain stimulation in addiction, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

279 ectromagnetic stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct c

280 Using a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation-transcranial alternati

281 pre-SMA is a potential target for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in OCD, thes

282 y and related differentially to a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment outcome.

283 g changes in motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimul

284 tigate the potential mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation, using a transcortical

285 Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied 100 ms aft

286 los with a videoed partner, and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied around the

287 Inhibitory theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was applied to the lef

288 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at 80, 2

289 ohort of 57 participants, threshold-tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess cor

290 Third, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we demonstrate that t

291 Finally, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found that during

292 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we investigated the r

293 nterfering with rTPJ activity through online transcranial magnetic stimulation, we showed that partic

294 sing a motoric incentive motivation task and transcranial magnetic stimulation, we studied the motor

295 Diffusion and perfusion MRI, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were used to study str

296 we measured motor cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation while female and male

297 trol site by means of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, while measuring effor

298 tency of motor-evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation with an anterior-poste

299 ency of motor-evoked potentials generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation with an AP orientation

300 combining inhibitory continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation with model-based funct