ライフサイエンスコーパス: transgenic plant

1 nd As ( 35%) in grains compared with the non-transgenic plant.

2 es in plant leaves and generated Arabidopsis transgenic plants.

3 ced pathogen infection in AvrRpt2-expressing transgenic plants.

4 duction of CHH and CHG methylation in the 2b-transgenic plants.

5 n of PIF3 are significantly reduced in these transgenic plants.

6 any plant species without having to generate transgenic plants.

7 ng pCAMBIA family vectors, highly present in transgenic plants.

8 higher grain yield compared with control non-transgenic plants.

9 in TaSnRK1alpha-overexpressing or silencing transgenic plants.

10 tranded RNA (dsRNA) transcript and siRNAs in transgenic plants.

11 bitor reversed the expression changes in the transgenic plants.

12 ction in fiber lignin as compared to the non-transgenic plants.

13 e cognate amino acids in ripe fruit from the transgenic plants.

14 ional studies to improve N use efficiency in transgenic plants.

15 s 35S Promoter (CaMV35S), inserted into most transgenic plants.

16 nductance and CO2 -assimilation rates of the transgenic plants.

17 lling ABA responses and drought tolerance in transgenic plants.

18 sidual MEcDP levels detected in dark-adapted transgenic plants.

19 ical reactions to confer new capabilities on transgenic plants.

20 pCAMBIA family vector, frequently present in transgenic plants.

21 ated with the EBB1 expression changes in the transgenic plants.

22 fficient for trichome-specific expression in transgenic plants.

23 ed modification of monolignol composition in transgenic plants.

24 ene that is constitutive up-regulated in the transgenic plants.

25 leading to the production of normal, fertile transgenic plants.

26 ression becomes rapidly silenced in TCS::GFP transgenic plants.

27 , while protein content was preserved in the transgenic plants.

28 detectable morphological differences in the transgenic plants.

29 e to pushing up the crop and replanting with transgenic plants.

30 nce and stay-green trait is observed in many transgenic plants.

31 ers are based on development of new improved transgenic plants.

32 ng us to interrogate different acyl pools in transgenic plants.

33 ering target that was subsequently tested in transgenic plants.

34 encing in plant cells and null phenotypes in transgenic plants.

35 C domain gene AsNAC60 were down-regulated in transgenic plants.

36 rence analysis and its function validated in transgenic plants.

37 protein abundance at the vasculature of the transgenic plants.

38 strong root growth that characterizes these transgenic plants.

39 s heat and water deficit stress tolerance in transgenic plants.

40 for binding to FKBP and GFP accumulation in transgenic plants.

41 ed-specific accumulation of jasmonic acid in transgenic plants.

42 Cell wall components are altered in transgenic plants.

43 promote the expression of two transgenes in transgenic plants.

44 tic alternations remains unresolved for most transgenic plants.

45 AMFs are applied to the PYL2-overexpression transgenic plants.

46 rized through overexpression or silencing in transgenic plants.

47 conferred enhanced drought resistance in the transgenic plants.

48 quired to overexpress two (or more) genes in transgenic plants.

49 downregulated in A. suturalis feeding on the transgenic plants.

50 prene formation was significantly reduced in transgenic plants.

51 iciency at four independent sites in rice T0 transgenic plants.

52 In transgenic plants, a G2A mutation completely abolished A

53 OsOTS1 depleted transgenic plants accumulate more ABA and exhibit more p

54 In addition, the TNHXS1-IRES-TVP1 transgenic plants accumulated less Na(+) and more K(+) i

55 Transgenic plants accumulating increased amounts of ster

56 1 was expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana, the transgenic plants acquired resistance to multiple herbic

57 icient system yielding 87-100% editing in T0 transgenic plants, all with di-allelic edits.

58 Transgenic plants also show symptoms of a reduced capaci

59 expression in mesophyll cell protoplasts and transgenic plants and binds directly to the DREB2A promo

60 activity in the leaf primordia of LFYasEMF1 transgenic plants and propose a combined effect of multi

61 We show that delayed senescence of transgenic plants and the corresponding longer stay-gree

62 ination of cis-NAT stable over-expression in transgenic plants and transient expression in protoplast

63 e levels were increased in ripe fruit of the transgenic plants, and as a consequence, total carboxyli

64 rrent limitations to accumulation of HFAs in transgenic plants, and may provide improved strategies f

65 ect report of Ag NP detoxification by GSH in transgenic plants, and these results will be highly usef

66 Indeed, Avr2 transgenic plants are attenuated in immunity-related rea

67 ies to deliver useful bio-based products via transgenic plants are described, some of which represent

68 Transgenic plants are more susceptible to digestion than

69 r expression of SOS1 (Na(+)/K(+) channel) in transgenic plants as compared to WT plants.

70 related with levels of the Bs2 expression in transgenic plants, as assessed by real-time qPCR, and ac

71 Transgenic plant assays have been used frequently for co

72 son with the nematode challenged control non-transgenic plants based on larger bunches and diminished

73 periment in which we induced ANT activity in transgenic plants bearing an ANT-glucocorticoid receptor

74 KEW lead to failure of phosphorylation, and transgenic plants bearing the mutant proteins display de

75 Analysis of transgenic plants bearing these mutations by quantitativ

76 not essential for repressing ABA response in transgenic plants, but does contribute to stronger ABA r

77 used widely for insect control in sprays and transgenic plants, but their efficacy is reduced when pe

78 easibility of using metabolic engineering in transgenic plants (Camelina sativa) to modify the seed o

79 All transgenic plants carried highly expressed active Asperg

80 n BIK1-mediated plant innate immunity as the transgenic plants carrying BIK1Y150F, Y243F, or Y250F (t

81 An examination of microtubers induced from transgenic plants carrying GUS reporter constructs of th

82 Moreover, the transgenic plants co-overexpressing AKR2A and KCS1 exhib

83 parameters, and lower electrolyte leakage in transgenic plants compared to the WT or hsfa2 mutant.

84 filing combined with 5'-RLM-RACE analysis in transgenic plants confirmed that amiRNAs were highly spe

85 In transgenic plants constitutively coexpressing WRINKLED1

86 ounts of myristic acid were also detected in transgenic plants constitutively expressing ShMKS2 with

87 Moreover, transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing SbMyb60

88 chloroform to suggest that biofilters using transgenic plants could remove VOCs from home air at use

89 Estradiol induction of HSFA4A in transgenic plants decreases, while the knockout hsfa4a m

90 Rapamycin inhibition is relieved in transgenic plants deficient in Arabidopsis FK506-binding

91 nvolving co-immunoprecipitation, use of NahG transgenic plants deficient in salicylic acid (SA) accum

92 Microarray analysis of transgenic plants demonstrated that down-regulated targe

93 ar and biochemical characterization of zmm28 transgenic plants demonstrated that their enhanced agron

94 regulation of OsDREB1A was transient and the transgenic plants did not show increased cold tolerance.

95 Morphologically, miR528-overexpressing transgenic plants display shortened internodes, increase

96 These transgenic plants displayed a WT phenotype, however, sup

97 Transgenic plants displayed an enhanced rhizosphere acid

98 itive phenotype, whereas phyB-overexpression transgenic plants displayed enhanced freezing tolerance.

99 EBB1-overexpressing transgenic plants displayed enlarged shoot meristems, op

100 The T1 generation transgenic plants displayed improved tolerance to variou

101 The transgenic plants displayed more resistance to nematode

102 In all cases, transgenic plants displayed the predicted phenotypes ind

103 tubes, but its suppression in Nicotiana spp. transgenic plants disrupts S-specific pollen rejection;

104 We demonstrate its use in transgenic plant, Drosophila and mammalian cells in vivo

105 in altered cell, tissue, and organ shapes in transgenic plants during vegetative and reproductive dev

106 The resulting transgenic plants (E8-SDB123) showed an increased biomas

107 In addition, transgenic plants exhibit growth promotion, higher bioma

108 These transgenic plants exhibit photosynthetic characteristics

109 1 into the soybean cultivar Williams 82, the transgenic plants exhibited enhanced resistance to F. vi

110 of this study was to overexpress GmEu4, the transgenic plants exhibited GmEu4 co-suppression and dec

111 Transgenic plants exhibited GUS activity in tapetal cell

112 Transgenic plants exhibiting both overexpression of miR1

113 However, SDE5 over-expressing transgenic plant exhibits reduced defense responsive phe

114 Transgenic plant experiments show that rice TAL is speci

115 Phenotypes of transgenic plants expressing a deletion in a rate motif

116 Here, we show that K. daigremontiana transgenic plants expressing a functional, chimeric KdLE

117 Transgenic plants expressing an artificial target mimic

118 Transgenic plants expressing AtPDCD5 fused to GREEN FLUO

119 Transgenic plants expressing BlMGL and emitting DMS had

120 h levels were not further enhanced in double transgenic plants expressing both glgC and the maize bri

121 importance of redox regulation, we generated transgenic plants expressing constitutively active GWD.

122 We did this by generating transgenic plants expressing degradation rate variants o

123 Transgenic plants expressing dsRNA targeting dvssj1 show

124 direct application of dsRNA or by producing transgenic plants expressing dsRNA-awd.

125 J1 RNA interference (RNAi), we characterized transgenic plants expressing DvSSJ1 RNA transcripts targ

126 eaction in plants.Previous studies have used transgenic plants expressing ectopic PEPC forms with dim

127 glauca using both phylogenetic analysis and transgenic plants expressing either ProCgNIN::reporter g

128 Chloroplasts from transgenic plants expressing engineered Toc159 with a cy

129 Here we demonstrate that transgenic plants expressing Hvt alone or in combination

130 ins (HSP genes) is reduced in heat-sensitive transgenic plants expressing miR398-resistant forms of C

131 Transgenic plants expressing miR398-resistant forms of C

132 Moreover, we demonstrate that transgenic plants expressing mutant versions of AsphyA,

133 t the whole-plant level and to flowers) than transgenic plants expressing normal coding sequences of

134 Stable transgenic plants expressing one of these versions of Rx

135 the glutamate residue of the HXE motif, and transgenic plants expressing OTP84-E824A and CREF7-E554A

136 Analysis of phyB-9 transgenic plants expressing phospho-mimic and nonphosph

137 In this work, transgenic plants expressing ProRPL10:beta-glucuronidase

138 secondary wall biosynthesis were observed in transgenic plants expressing PtrMYB152.

139 In contrast, transgenic plants expressing SAUR63:GFP or SAUR63:GUS fu

140 Transgenic plants expressing the chimera under control o

141 Conversely, transgenic plants expressing the F-box domain deletion m

142 Our data demonstrate that (i) transgenic plants expressing the mutant phyB(Lys996Arg)-

143 thylesterified HG labeling in pmei6, whereas transgenic plants expressing the PMEI6 coding sequence u

144 eaves, and flowers and this was confirmed in transgenic plants expressing the ss-glucuronidase report

145 Markets for Bt products and transgenic plants expressing their toxins are driven by

146 We generated transgenic plants expressing UVR8 with a single amino ac

147 great challenges of transgene silencing for transgenic plants facing climate change.

148 We previously generated promoter::GUS transgenic plants for all leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RLKs

149 ralist herbivore Spodoptera exigua reared on transgenic plants gained more weight.

150 rial Rubisco expression was enhanced and the transgenic plants grew at near wild-type growth rates, a

151 Transgenic plants grew at the same rate as the wild type

152 Further, transgenic plants grown until desiccation produced more

153 PsGA3ox1 transgenic plants had longer internodes, tendrils, and f

154 Unexpectedly, the transgenic plants had purple-colored leaves and pink flo

155 f CML38 from the roots of hypoxia-challenged transgenic plants harboring CML38pro::CML38:YFP followed

156 t direct manipulation of cytokinin levels in transgenic plants has dramatic effect on drought phenoty

157 al fatty acids through beta-oxidation within transgenic plants has long been hypothesized as a major

158 herbicides and antibiotics for selection of transgenic plants has not been very successful with rega

159 Our results suggest that the transgenic plants have an advantage for the production o

160 HFA accumulation and distribution at TAG in transgenic plants have not been well studied.

161 terpenoid biosynthesis, and show that these transgenic plants have the potential to yield high produ

162 of the 18 targeted genes, with some primary transgenic plants having as many as five mutated genes.

163 expression and/or protein activity, we made transgenic plants in which a genomic copy of AIL6 was ex

164 ion to starch levels in wild-type plants, in transgenic plants in which GWD transcripts were strongly

165 ng flower development, we have characterized transgenic plants in which the coding region of AIL6 was

166 assembly of a cyanobacterial Rubisco, prior transgenic plants included the cyanobacterial chaperone

167 for manipulating miRNAs and their targets in transgenic plants including constitutive, stress-induced

168 It is important for the regeneration of transgenic plants, including for soybean (Glycine max).

169 lated in bacteria and the mechanism by which transgenic plants increased their starch production.

170 ance energy transfer analyses in Arabidopsis transgenic plants indicate that the AtAtg8 synthetic sub

171 that the increased greenness observed in the transgenic plants is due to more chlorophyll synthesis b

172 The enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic plants is related to significant down-regulat

173 Analysis of transgenic plants lacking or overexpressing ESV1 or LESV

174 ssion, preventing the generation of relevant transgenic plant lines.

175 he changed proline content in overexpressing transgenic plants may influence the growth and developme

176 This strategy may allow for transgenic plant-mediated suppression of other hemiptera

177 Rice transgenic plants (named mOsARF18) expressing an OsmiR16

178 These cDNAs were expressed in transgenic plants of a PORB-deficient knock-out mutant (

179 In order to design transgenic plants of Artemisia annua with enhanced biosy

180 on citrus canker resistance was evaluated in transgenic plants of Citrus sinensis cv.

181 In the present study, we developed transgenic plants of V. mungo using Agrobacterium mediat

182 by MPK3/MPK6 in either the gain-of-function transgenic plants or in response to B. cinerea infection

183 nt functions that could be produced later in transgenic plants or potentially applied exogenously to

184 In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), transgenic plants overexpressing CrDOF show floral delay

185 when FPA is mutated in ibm2 and impaired in transgenic plants overexpressing FPA By contrast, transp

186 ced by induction of RNA interference, and in transgenic plants overexpressing GWD.

187 s of miR398 in mutants lacking the miRNA, or transgenic plants overexpressing it.

188 ent with a role in regulating FDH abundance, transgenic plants overexpressing KEG were more sensitive

189 KEY MESSAGE: Carrizo transgenic plants overexpressing methionine-gamma-lyase

190 have higher AtSVP accumulation, whereas the transgenic plants overexpressing MIR396 display lower At

191 Further study using transgenic plants overexpressing one of the ABA receptor

192 We found that transgenic plants overexpressing Osa-miR319a displayed m

193 al opening are reduced in ost1 mutants while transgenic plants overexpressing OST1 show ABA hypersens

194 Transgenic plants overexpressing SBD123 in the cell wall

195 monstrated that elevated IAA biosynthesis in transgenic plants overexpressing the YUCCA 1 (YUC1) auxi

196 ts of the subfamily I, StPP2Ac2b, to develop transgenic plants overexpressing this gene (StPP2Ac2b-OE

197 Stable transgenic plants overproducing a 14-3-3 protein also di

198 These transgenic plants performed better than the wild type un

199 In the transgenic plants, photosynthesis was maintained at cont

200 he stress-induced cytokinin synthesis in the transgenic plants played a role in maintaining nitrate a

201 essing an exogenous protein: the creation of transgenic plants possessing a stably integrated gene co

202 o these changes remain to be identified, the transgenic plants presented here provide novel tools to

203 The resulting transgenic plants produced 2% to 3% more TAG as a compon

204 The leaves of transgenic plants produced approximately 4% arteannuin B

205 Further, transgenic plants produced higher degree of pectin methy

206 Transgenic plants producing insecticidal proteins from t

207 he stress-induced cytokinin synthesis in the transgenic plants promoted sink strengthening through a

208 To delay or counter resistance, transgenic plant "pyramids" producing two or more Bt pro

209 tion of CO2 responses showed that stomata of transgenic plants respond to [CO2 ] shifts.

210 and decreased PhCAT2 expression in PAL-RNAi transgenic plants resulted in 1.6-fold increase in pheny

211 PsASGR-BBML expression in apomictic F1 RNAi transgenic plants results in fewer visible parthenogenet

212 titative trait locus mapping and analysis of transgenic plants reveal a role for TomLoxC in apocarote

213 Global gene-expression analysis of the transgenic plants revealed an array of responding genes

214 Homozygous T(3)/T(4) transgenic plants revealed that PcINO1 transformed trans

215 MYB134-overexpressing transgenic plants show a strong high-PA phenotype.

216 The transgenic plants show better tissue compartmentalizatio

217 AtNUDT7 promoter-GUS transgenic plants show rapid inducibility in response to

218 In addition, transgenic plants showed an increase in artemisinic acid

219 Pot-grown transgenic plants showed better growth than WT after 9 d

220 CtHsfA2b transgenic plants showed elevated transcriptional regula

221 iated with systemic acquired resistance, and transgenic plants showed enhanced resistance toward a vi

222 Tonoplast vesicles isolated from transgenic plants showed higher rates of Glu and GABA tr

223 Sscp1-expressing transgenic plants showed increased concentrations of sal

224 Transgenic plants showed increased resistance to the fun

225 We found group II transgenic plants showed stunted growth, and the changed

226 vity tests on seeds from pmei6 and 35S:PMEI6 transgenic plants showed that PMEI6 inhibits endogenous

227 riments along with BdPTAL1-downregulation in transgenic plants showed that the TAL activity of BdPTAL

228 pocotyl, it exhibited increased stability in transgenic plants silenced for Sl-MMP activity, and it w

229 Generating alternative transgenic plant sources of omega-3 LC-PUFAs, i.e. eicos

230 Naturally transgenic plant species occur on an unexpectedly large

231 Transgenic plants subjected to drought showed a decrease

232 detected some key amino acids from leaves of transgenic plants such as aspartate, lysine, glycine, le

233 Analysis of these transgenic plants suggested the involvement of additiona

234 , thebaine) was significantly reduced in the transgenic plants suggesting that 4'OMT2 was efficiently

235 ositol and/or pinitol pool in three types of transgenic plants suggests that plants whose inositol pr

236 fusion proteins expressed in chloroplasts of transgenic plants suppressed inhibitor formation directe

237 e or more endogenous genes were validated in transgenic plants that (1) exhibited the expected phenot

238 ty, and M. persicae produces more progeny on transgenic plants that heterologously produce one of the

239 thway into glycosylation-destructed mutants, transgenic plants that sialylate glycoproteins in alpha2

240 Whereas seed yield decreases in transgenic plants that ubiquitously overexpress pPLAIIId

241 hes used to achieve stay-green phenotypes in transgenic plants, the expression of the IPT gene under

242 In OsHAC4pro-GUS transgenic plants, the gene was expressed exclusively in

243 Following the production of transgenic plants, the selectable marker gene(s) used in

244 re significantly increased in the needles of transgenic plants, there was no increase in the major mo

245 difying lignin content and/or composition in transgenic plants through down-regulation of lignin bios

246 (42.6 mumol g(-1) seed) in seeds of B. napus transgenic plants through silencing of the GSL-ALK gene

247 can further boost root TAG content in these transgenic plants to 17% of dry weight.

248 ading to hypersusceptibility of the ERF6-EAR transgenic plants to B. cinerea.

249 esis inhibitors reversed the response of the transgenic plants to B. cinerea.

250 ents analyze the phenotypes and genotypes of transgenic plants to determine the requirements for tran

251 (PUT3OE) results in hypersensitivity of the transgenic plants to polyamine and paraquat.

252 volvement of ROS scavenging machinery in the transgenic plants to provide salt tolerance.

253 ter significantly increased the tolerance of transgenic plants to salt stress treatment; under sub-le

254 ne nitric oxide (NO) scavenging in vitro and transgenic plants to show S-nitrosylation and other in v

255 ls to difficulties in preparing and handling transgenic plants to silence homologous sequences in fun

256 hat facilitates an enhanced tolerance of the transgenic plants to water deficit.

257 Reduced tillering allowed testing the transgenic plants under high density which resulted in s

258 d upregulation of stress-responsive genes in transgenic plants under salinity stress conditions could

259 ich induced a strong resistance phenotype in transgenic plants upon challenge with avirulent Blumeria

260 The delay in PPD in transgenic plants was also observed under field conditio

261 ssay that the higher amount of OsICE1 in the transgenic plants was correlated with a lower amount of

262 e also found that lignin content in group II transgenic plants was higher than that in group I and WT

263 rapid efflux of (10)B from the roots of the transgenic plants was observed within 1 h of (10)B treat

264 expressed in both leaves and roots of stable transgenic plants, we showed that losing one of the leuc

265 rate of R. similis isolated from the Rs-cps transgenic plants were also significantly reduced.

266 BvSTI-transgenic plants were bioassayed for resistance to five

267 Transgenic plants were characterized by molecular and ge

268 nalysis revealed that 41.7 % of the analysed transgenic plants were completely marker free, results t

269 GRF4-GIF1 transgenic plants were fertile and without obvious devel

270 yB null mutant background, singly and doubly transgenic plants were generated that express fusion pro

271 Transgenic plants were generated with yeast invertase in

272 Total proteins from wild type and transgenic plants were investigated using two-dimensiona

273 of these effectors in wild-type Arabidopsis transgenic plants were largely alleviated in bak1 mutant

274 Transgenic plants were more resistant to Botrytis cinere

275 The transgenic plants were morphologically similar to the no

276 When the transgenic plants were pretreated with DEX prior to infe

277 rough pollination with magnetofected pollen, transgenic plants were successfully generated from trans

278 Transgenic plants were taller than wild type, possibly o

279 production in different cells, we generated transgenic plants where ABA biosynthesis was rescued in

280 rP1 did not affect the flavin profile of the transgenic plants, whereas silencing of AtPyrP2 decrease

281 volved in the accumulation of HFA in oils of transgenic plants, which include metabolic bottlenecks a

282 Pretreating leaves of the transgenic plants with a PG resulted in increased resist

283 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana produced transgenic plants with a significantly increased threoni

284 of protoxin is a critical step in toxicity, transgenic plants with activated toxins rather than prot

285 itation assays and expression analysis using transgenic plants with altered levels of different E2F t

286 abidopsis lines and challenged the resulting transgenic plants with an Arabidopsis-adapted PM pathoge

287 Transgenic plants with forced SnRK1alpha-subunit localiz

288 Analysis of transgenic plants with genetic dysfunction in CaM KMT re

289 tinguish between one- and two-copy events in transgenic plants with large genomes.

290 Here, we employed transgenic plants with manipulated levels of BiP to asse

291 f the athb25-1D mutant were recapitulated in transgenic plants with moderate (4- to 6-fold) overexpre

292 Recent advances in engineering transgenic plants with modified PBR gene expression to e

293 Using transgenic plants with PaFTL2 driven by an inducible pro

294 We found that CK signaling mutants and transgenic plants with reduced endogenous CK levels show

295 In BSV::ARGOS8 transgenic plants with reduced ethylene sensitivity due

296 gation of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) transgenic plants with sense silencing of Arabidopsis RE

297 Transgenic plants with the lowest levels of pCA had decr

298 Transgenic plants with the SlAT2 promoter driving GFP ex

299 istance to Pst in synthetic hexaploid wheat; transgenic plants with YrAS2388R show resistance to elev

300 s cytokinins, which facilitates selection of transgenic plants without selectable markers.