ライフサイエンスコーパス: transition temperature

1 ional short-range AFM correlations above the transition temperature.

2 pseudogaped metal above the superconducting transition temperature.

3 xtured body-centred cubic nanograins above a transition temperature.

4 bit a considerable difference in martensitic transition temperature.

5 Se(4) glass-forming liquids near their glass transition temperature.

6 with heating a material above its superionic transition temperature.

7 ture, giving rise to a local increase in the transition temperature.

8 This tends to lower the transition temperature.

9 ate to temperatures below the order-disorder transition temperature.

10 antiferromagnet PdCrO2 vanishes at the Neel transition temperature.

11 sharp downturn right below the ferromagnetic transition temperature.

12 ro-3-phosphocholine above and below the main transition temperature.

13 he host polymer segments and lower the glass transition temperature.

14 on is about 100 K higher than the bulk glass transition temperature.

15 r hand, preserves phase separation above the transition temperature.

16 the membranes below their miscibility phase transition temperature.

17 roton disorder to partial FE order below the transition temperature.

18 ncrease compared to the bulk superconducting transition temperature.

19 s structural antiferrodistortive (AFD) phase transition temperature.

20 lasses are critically dependent on the glass transition temperature.

21 ermally by taking the crystal over the phase transition temperature.

22 ropic domains where they locally depress the transition temperature.

23 perature, while ISOPOOH has the lowest glass transition temperature.

24 ties and lipid vesicles with different phase transition temperatures.

25 the homogenization of surface and bulk glass transition temperatures.

26 ounced effects on observables, such as phase-transition temperatures.

27 ials, particularly in the case of high phase-transition temperatures.

28 cover that higher pressure phases have lower transition temperatures.

29 the same time limiting their superconducting transition temperatures.

30 alcogenide semimetal 1T-TiSe2 Near the phase-transition temperature (190 kelvin), the energy of the e

31 synthesized (i.e., size, 5 and 11 nm; glass transition temperature, 28 degrees C to 65 degrees C).

32 canning Calorimeter analysis showed that the transition temperatures (69 degrees C-74 degrees C) and

33 millikelvin, well above the superconducting transition temperature (about 300 millikelvin).

34 0 to 275 gigapascals, with a sharp upturn in transition temperature above 220 gigapascals.

35 ctivity using two-dimensional materials with transition temperatures above 4.2 K.

36 es generates remarkably high superconducting transition temperatures above 80 K at an experimentally

37 sponding to a 50 degrees C modulation of the transition temperature achieved within the same compound

38 We find that GPMV transition temperatures adjust to be 16.7 +/- 1.2 degree

39 Glass transition temperatures, alpha-relaxation temperatures a

40 hracene, which reduces the modulus and glass transition temperature and allows the elastomers to reco

41 GLS glass generally results in a lower glass transition temperature and an extended transmission wind

42 commercial resin were maintained, and glass transition temperature and char yield under nitrogen wer

43 It sets in far above the superconducting transition temperature and competes with superconductivi

44 l behavior (including rubbery modulus, glass transition temperature and failure strain which is more

45 Given the high glass transition temperature and good hydration ability, these

46 well as combinations of features, like glass transition temperature and hydrophobicity, to classify o

47 while links are drawn between the superionic transition temperature and oxygen Frenkel disorder.

48 nd a density wave energy gap forms below the transition temperature and reaches 65 meV at 7 K, indica

49 Changes in the transition temperature and the crystalline phase distrib

50 The pressure evolution of the glass transition temperature and the crystallisation temperatu

51 of the gelatin film, by increasing the glass transition temperature and the degradation temperature.

52 The transition temperature and the degree of performance sup

53 so examined, as they underpin the superionic transition temperature and the increase in oxygen diffus

54 The sudden decrease of mobility around phase transition temperature and the presence of hysteresis lo

55 the influence of particle size on the glass transition temperature and viscosity of secondary organi

56 is study FeRh films with drastically reduced transition temperatures and a large magneto-thermal hyst

57 to dominate the distribution of the magnetic transition temperatures and dictates the nucleation and

58 f polymers for study that possess high glass transition temperatures and robust thermal stability.

59 y, and a semiempirical formula between glass transition temperatures and volatility was derived.

60 es a frustrated smectic phase with depressed transition temperature, and the characteristic 1d period

61 large-scale phase separation below the phase transition temperature, and, on the other hand, preserve

62 nductivity with one of the highest elemental transition temperatures, and a maximum followed by a min

63 cuprate YBa2Cu3O6.54 at its superconducting transition temperature approximately 60 K.

64 The superconducting transition temperatures are highest for the electron-poo

65 The NTB-N (TNTBN) and N-I (TNI) transition temperatures are reduced upon UV light irradi

66 model is that its parameters, and hence the transition temperature, are treated as stochastic variab

67 ms which results in an increase in the phase transition temperature as thickness is reduced.

68 ed rice cultivars accounted for their higher transition temperatures as compared to other cultivars.

69 e approach, with the intention to reduce the transition temperature, as well as to maintain the MIT p

70 Raw TMC exhibited a first-order phase transition temperature at 58.15 +/- 0.38 degrees C.

71 Annealing at the glass transition temperature at ambient pressure reverses stru

72 This occurs well above the classical glass transition temperature at which microscopic mobility is

73 The transition temperature at which structural amorphization

74 We developed a method to estimate glass transition temperatures based on the molar mass and mole

75 tal lattice spacing of 3.5 nm and of a phase transition temperature below 43 degrees C, we attributed

76 Optical spectroscopy results show that the transition temperature between Form I (room temperature

77 Moreover, the change of the transition temperatures between the different magnetic p

78 net, we achieve unprecedented control of the transition temperature (between ferromagnetic and parama

79 at room temperature (RT) and near the glass transition temperature by synchrotron X-ray diffraction,

80 n glassy liquids above their dynamical glass transition temperatures by introducing a scalar field ca

81 Raman measurement and as derived from phase transition temperatures by microthermometry experiments

82 The PIL's LCST-type transition temperature can also be influenced by varying

83 n films and superlattices, the ferroelectric transition temperature can lie above the growth temperat

84 ction of doping are similar to those of high-transition-temperature copper oxides and other unconvent

85 The transition temperature could be shifted by adiabatic cha

86 For high-transition temperature cuprate superconductors, stripes

87 Below the superfluid transition temperature, D attains a universal value set

88 The glass transition temperature decreased due to QF addition.

89 tensile strength, Young's modulus and glass transition temperature decreased, when the moisture cont

90 iable thicknesses demonstrate that the phase transition temperature decreases with reducing microplat

91 The lack of dimensionality effect on the transition temperature defies expectations from the Merm

92 s an increase or decrease of the miscibility transition temperature depending upon the competition of

93 ndence and an abrupt disappearance above the transition temperature eliminate phononic mechanism of t

94 gainst deformation above the polymers' glass transition temperature, enabling the formation of LIG wi

95 ing reached a maximum in the third band, the transition temperature finally decreases, rounding out t

96 ichroism, revealed that the reduction in the transition temperature for helical unfolding for an H223

97 ture; that is, well above the spin crossover transition temperature for the pristine powder, and well

98 The measured superconducting transition temperatures for delta-MoN and cubic gamma-Mo

99 o reasonably high calculated superconducting transition temperatures for these materials.

100 e catalytic domain-fold as assessed by lower transition temperatures for unfolding, and three of thes

101 percooled liquids stop flowing below a glass transition temperature [Formula: see text] or whether mo

102 ess) at various temperatures below the glass transition temperature, [Formula: see text], of all film

103 Omega*cm, and a decrease in metal-insulator transition temperature from 270 K to 180 K and 172 K by

104 ion of Ag nanoparticles strongly affects the transition temperature from the initial metastable amorp

105 elting transition, only relatively low glass transition temperatures from -13 to -20 degrees C.

106 Bulk metallic glasses with glass transition temperatures greater than 1,000 kelvin have b

107 Heavily electron-doped iron-selenide high-transition-temperature (high-T c) superconductors, which

108 Understanding the mechanism of high-transition-temperature (high-T(c)) superconductivity is

109 and shows a concentration-dependent, tunable transition temperature in aqueous solution.

110 opens the path to increasing superconducting transition temperature in bulk transition-metal oxides a

111 ner theorem, in contrast to the much-reduced transition temperature in conventional two-dimensional s

112 a strategy for enhancing the superconducting transition temperature in cuprates.

113 TiO(3) heterostructures, the superconducting transition temperature in FeSe monolayer can be effectiv

114 xplanation for the different behavior of the transition temperature in GPMVs and giant unilamellar ve

115 Stable ferroelectricity with high transition temperature in nanostructures is needed for m

116 tron count dependence of the superconducting transition temperature in the high-entropy alloy falls b

117 In this work, we find that enhancement of transition temperatures in BaFe2As2-based crystals are c

118 iments identified domains of different phase transition temperatures in the mixed membranes.

119 ranslucent and amorphous features with glass transition temperatures in the range of 61-77 degrees C,

120 hydrodynamic radius (in solution) and glass transition temperature (in bulk materials) were observed

121 ic charge domains are further found near the transition temperature, in spite of the expected strong

122 ppears around the zero-field superconducting transition temperature; in contrast, the incommensurate

123 This tends to raise the transition temperature irrespective of which phase the a

124 S occurs at 258 K (-15 degrees C), and such transition temperature is 120 K lower than that of its b

125 ude that the unusual field dependence of the transition temperature is a hallmark of soft, two-dimens

126 uctors, the metallic state above the highest transition temperature is anomalous and is known as the

127 ~0.2 wt% carbon nanotube loading, the glass transition temperature is increased by ~20 degrees C, in

128 We show that the distribution of transition temperatures is a local property, set by surf

129 Lower transition temperatures may be attributed to the partial

130 Phase transition temperature measurements were correlated to m

131 When heated to a temperature close to glass transition temperature, metallic glasses (MGs) begin to

132 ), adsorbed on nanoparticles and a low-glass transition temperature miscible matrix, poly(ethylene ox

133 We measured the superconducting transition temperature of (6)Li between 16 and 26 GPa, a

134 bulk MoTe2 exhibits superconductivity with a transition temperature of 0.10 K.

135 let superconductivity in UTe(2), featuring a transition temperature of 1.6 kelvin and a very large an

136 onductor UTe(2), which has a superconducting transition temperature of 1.6 kelvin(5).

137 nant dynamic annealing process at a critical transition temperature of 130 degrees C.

138 P4/mmm phase of Li3Ar has a superconducting transition temperature of 17.6 K at 120 GPa.

139 n sulfide (H(2)S) to H(3)S, with a confirmed transition temperature of 203 kelvin at 155 gigapascals(

140 degrees C, much lower than the superprotonic transition temperature of 228 degrees C of CsH(2)PO(4),

141 xhibits helimagnetism with a relatively high transition temperature of 278 K in bulk crystals.

142 l precursors, with a maximum superconducting transition temperature of 287.7 +/- 1.2 kelvin (about 15

143 d the incommensurate CDW phases, which has a transition temperature of 350 K and gives an abrupt chan

144 es ferroelectric domains and an extrapolated transition temperature of 400 K.

145 185 picocoulombs per newton and a high phase-transition temperature of 406 kelvin (K) (16 K above tha

146 rm sized around 100 nm and exhibited a phase transition temperature of 43 degrees C.

147 orted rutile structure in both cases, with a transition temperature of 700 degrees C for the NbO2 ins

148 inside the MIM device and a slightly higher transition temperature of 750 degrees C for the referenc

149 sity wave order in single-layer TiTe2 with a transition temperature of 92 +/- 3 K.

150 0.8)Sr(0.2)NiO(2) indicate a superconducting transition temperature of about 9 to 15 kelvin.

151 erroelectricity in 2D CuInP2S6 (CIPS) with a transition temperature of approximately 320 K.

152 sing the pH led to the decrease of the glass transition temperature of camel and bovine whey powder (

153 n, the water sorption isotherm and the glass transition temperature of camel and bovine whey protein'

154 ability even at temperatures above the glass transition temperature of Cu-based BMGs.

155 Glass transition temperature of IMF powder, determined by IGC,

156 ugh the gap forms around the superconducting transition temperature of lead, we do not find evidence

157 ) , even at a temperature close to the glass transition temperature of polymer (i.e., 217 degrees C)

158 e affected the mechanical strength and glass transition temperature of polymeric systems.

159 has a major influence on the superconducting transition temperature of Sn nanostructures.

160 and numerical simulations, we show that the transition temperature of such a device can be controlle

161 pronounced thickness dependence of the glass transition temperature of ternary polymer/fullerene blen

162 The superconducting transition temperature of tetragonal FeS was gradually d

163 led critical point may correspond to a phase transition temperature of the dynamic polymer structure.

164 sslinking points increases modulus and glass transition temperature of the elastomers, allowing for t

165 polarization emerges below the ferromagnetic transition temperature of the EuTiO3 layer (TFM = 6-8 K)

166 The transition temperature of the ferrimagnetic phase increa

167 magnitude lower than the ferromagnetic phase transition temperature of the films.

168 The glass transition temperature of the formed polyGMT was determi

169 The highest superconducting transition temperature of the monolayer is as high as th

170 the coupling of lattice strain to the local transition temperature of the phase transition.

171 l particle, which, in turn, lowers the glass transition temperature of the polymer inside the particl

172 te concentration increases the stability and transition temperature of the protein, but does not chan

173 metal patterns must be lower than the glass transition temperature of the substrate.

174 d others also containing boron) with a glass transition temperature of up to 1,162 kelvin and a super

175 nd C2/m-SnH14 exhibit higher superconducting transition temperatures of 81, 93 and 97 K compared to t

176 ueous solution, with a wide range of tunable transition temperatures of 88 to 28 degrees C.

177 The transition temperatures of epitaxial films of Fe(Te0:9Se

178 itor the effect of gramicidin on the melting transition temperatures of the two bilayer leaflets.

179 o induce solid phase can be predicted by the transition temperatures of their major metabolites.

180 We reproduce the observed dependence of the transition temperature on the cation radius in the well

181 ivity, owing to the strong dependence of the transition temperature on the strength and direction of

182 behaviour, large changes in metal-insulator transition temperatures or enhanced catalytic activity.

183 y, crystalline heterogeneity, gelatinization transition temperatures, pasting temperatures, peak visc

184 e phenyl groups, their rotational rates, and transition temperatures paves the way to controlling and

185 symmetric interphases formed by a high-glass transition temperature polymer, poly(methyl methacrylate

186 lor, transparency, microstructure) and glass transition temperature properties of films were studied

187 Therefore, below the transition temperature, ring motion is largely libration

188 This increases the magnetic transition temperature substantially-from 240 kelvin for

189 om polymeric and colloidal compounds to high-transition-temperature superconductors, proteins, ultrat

190 es, with a phase diagram reminiscent of high-transition-temperature superconductors.

191 Dual modification increased the transition temperatures, swelling power, and altered the

192 rst-order metal-insulator (MI) transition of transition temperature T (MI) ~ 28 K is observed at zero

193 The ferroelectric transition temperature T(c) of 1-UC SnTe film is greatly

194 The transition temperature T(c) of unconventional supercondu

195 the low-temperature region near the magnetic transition temperature T(c) We have expanded and enhance

196 ndence of the diamagnetic response above the transition temperature T(c), with a characteristic tempe

197 e coherence set in simultaneously at the CDW transition temperature T(cdw).

198 nables rapid crystallization above the glass transition temperature T(g) .

199 at temperatures below the lipid's main phase transition temperature T(m) and, based on these results,

200 ragonal-to-orthorhombic structural (nematic) transition temperature T(s).

201 its phonon mediated superconductivity with a transition temperatures T(c) ~ 3.2 K and upper critical

202 semiconductors (FMSs) featuring a high Curie transition temperature ( T(c)) and a strong correlation

203 The superconducting transition temperatures ( T(c)) of the dodecaborides wer

204 n cuprate superconductors with high critical transition temperature (T (c)), light hole-doping to the

205 PLD) enables improving their superconducting transition temperature (T c) by more than 40% than their

206 We find that the superconducting transition temperature (T c) increases from 84 K for the

207 ilized in any material that exhibits a glass-transition temperature (T g ) and a rubbery plateau.

208 glass-forming systems implies a lower glass transition temperature (T g ), is considered a universal

209 ctural phase transition, the superconducting transition temperature (T(C) ) increases to ~19.1 K from

210 3)C and (207)Pb nuclei varied near the phase transition temperature (T(C) = 236 K), indicating that t

211 cales monotonically with the superconducting transition temperature (T(C) with H = 0).

212 The increase in superconducting transition temperature (T(C)) of Sn nanostructures in co

213 having robust spin polarization and magnetic transition temperature (T(C)) well above 300 K, has attr

214 lent adaptable network (CAN) with high glass transition temperature (T(g) ), superior mechanical prop

215 he treatment was carried out below the glass transition temperature (T(g) ~ 483 degrees C) at P = 1 G

216 The glass transition temperature (T(g)) is a key property that dic

217 rage conditions on crystallisation and glass transition temperature (T(g)) of three Chilean dried rai

218 re and RH during storage decreased the glass transition temperature (T(g)) to <0 degrees C and solubi

219 moplastic polymer is sprayed below its glass transition temperature (T(g)) to investigate the SLED be

220 s in a fluid-like bilayer close to the phase transition temperature (T(m)).

221 d above and below their nematic-to-isotropic transition temperature (T(NI) ) are created, whose actua

222 n liquid crystal above the nematic-isotropic transition temperature (T(NI)).

223 Remarkably, they exhibit transition temperatures (T(c) ) much higher than that of

224 d a common resurgence of the superconducting transition temperatures (T(c)s) of the monolayer Bi(2)Sr

225 the carbonate analogues possess higher glass-transition temperatures (T(g) =32 to -5 degrees C) than

226 In the present study, glass transition temperatures (T(g)) of isoprene SOA component

227 shable from the conventionally defined glass transition temperature, T (g) For x < 17, the observed l

228 e pressure dependence of the superconducting transition temperature, T(c), near to optimal doping tha

229 niaxial pressure derivatives of the HO/LMAFM transition temperature T0 change dramatically when cross

230 The spin-transition temperature T1/2 is lowered by 20 K in the ho

231 sults for HgBa2CuO(4+delta) (superconducting transition temperature Tc approximately 71 K, pseudogap

232 In particular, the superconducting transition temperature Tc calculated for LaH10 is 274-28

233 ydride superconductor with a superconducting transition temperature Tc of 203 kelvin at 155 gigapasca

234 of the dynamical mean-field superconducting transition temperature Tc(d), the maximum of the condens

235 mpetes with superconductivity (SC) below the transition temperature Tc, suggesting that these two ord

236 y, the superconducting semimetal FeSe with a transition temperature Tc=8.5 K has been found to be dee

237 this work, the relationship between magnetic transition temperature (TC) and the substrate induced (p

238 e pressure dependence of the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) and unit cell metrics of tet

239 A superconducting transition temperature (Tc) as high as 100 K was recentl

240 The superconducting transition temperature (TC) in a FeSe monolayer on SrTiO

241 axis) of the crystal lattice results in the transition temperature (Tc) increasing from 1.5 kelvin i

242 Phenolic compounds also increased phase transition temperature (Tc) of nanoliposomes (2.01-7.24

243 al) exhibit the highest bulk superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) up to 55 K and thus hold th

244 c states such as anomalous and possibly high-transition-temperature (Tc) superconductivity.

245 ity waves, have been a central issue in high transition-temperature (Tc) superconductors.

246 the Cr concentration where the ferromagnetic transition temperature, Tc, goes to 0.

247 ratures far greater than the superconducting transition temperature, Tc.

248 The transition temperature (TCDW) of the CDW is approximatel

249 temperature' T(*) located between the glass transition temperature Tg, and the crystal melting tempe

250 ssess good thermal stability and a low glass-transition temperature (Tg approximately -67 degrees C).

251 increase upon both compression at the glass transition temperature (Tg) and ambient pressure sub-Tg

252 The glass transition temperature (Tg) for all of the powders signi

253 % head-to-tail regioselectivity, and a glass-transition temperature (Tg) of 37 degrees C.

254 herms of green and roasted coffee, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the samples has been meas

255 stability of this coating is having a glass transition temperature (Tg) very close to ambient temper

256 ionship was found between hardness and glass transition temperature (Tg), but there was a significant

257 t temperatures, up to 60 K below their glass transition temperature (Tg), by subjecting them to activ

258 ty when coated on seed depended on the glass transition temperature (Tg), functional groups of the po

259 vity (aw), solubility, hygroscopicity, glass transition temperature (Tg), particle size, and microstr

260 were applied to analyse microcapsules glass transition temperature (Tg).

261 s in amorphous polyesters that exhibit glass transition temperatures (Tg ) of up to 109 degrees C.

262 fibers - digital SMPs - with different glass transition temperatures (Tg) to control the transformati

263 hanges little with cooling towards the glass transition temperature, Tg.

264 anostructure has a different insulator-metal transition temperature that depends on the VO2 domain si

265 that the 3R polytype shows a superconducting transition temperature that is between 6 and 17 times hi

266 We find s+/- pairing with a transition temperature that peaks beyond the Lifshitz po

267 ion of the calorimetric and mechanical glass transition temperatures that demarcate the passage from

268 ely Gi(1/2)(T/Tc) (Tc is the superconducting transition temperature) that has been achieved in our fi

269 effect is the smallest, and the decrease in transition temperature the largest, when the alcohol par

270 Above the order-disorder transition temperature, the disordered states are locall

271 In the vicinity of the transition temperature, these quantities change sign wit

272 mains disappear above a distinct miscibility transition temperature (Tmix) and reappear below Tmix, o

273 large decrease in liquid-liquid miscibility transition temperatures (Tmix) observed when short-chain

274 rch in the glassy state and shifts the glass transition temperature to a higher value.

275 t is in contrast to the insensitivity of the transition temperature to magnetic fields in the three-d

276 ure boundary and, simultaneously reduces the transition temperature to promote rutile structure at lo

277 1T-TaS2 and 1T-TiSe2 exhibit unusually high transition temperatures to different CDW symmetry-reduci

278 er uptake, mass loss, dry and hydrated glass transition temperature, to help understand the related l

279 rapid cooling from above the order-disorder transition temperature (TODT = 66 degrees C) using small

280 The observed high transition temperature, together with the strong spin-or

281 Between TODT and the order-order transition temperature TOOT = 42 degrees C, an equilibri

282 By tuning the transition temperature towards absolute zero, striking d

283 Liquids cooled towards the glass transition temperature transform into amorphous solids t

284 ation whereby samples remain soluble below a transition temperature (Tt) but form amorphous coacervat

285 tration of 12.0% (w/w) reduced the chromatic transition temperature (Ttr) to as low as 24 degrees C.

286 up to 190 gigapascals, and reduction of the transition temperature under an external magnetic field

287 external pressure dramatically enhances the transition temperature up to maximum value of 8.2 K at 1

288 onducting to a greater increase in the phase transition temperatures up to 4.14 degrees C, while the

289 all-electric control of the superconducting transition temperature using a device comprised of a con

290 , were used to calculate the superconducting transition temperature using the Allen-Dynes-McMillan (A

291 ne viscoelastic properties and sol-gel phase transition temperatures using rheological methods.

292 ane vesicles (GPMVs) to explore how membrane transition temperature varies with growth temperature in

293 more physiological lipids with a lower phase transition temperature, we achieved efficient fusion wit

294 Near the CDW transition temperature, we observe two independent signa

295 tead, a dramatic rise and a peak in a single-transition temperature were observed(3,4).

296 Three characteristic transition temperatures were allocated to specific quate

297 small-chain alcohols reduce the miscibility transition temperature when added to giant plasma membra

298 methyltetrol sulfates have the highest glass transition temperature, while ISOPOOH has the lowest gla

299 account for the observed change in magnetic transition temperature with size of the ligands or anion

300 ores and the variation of the spin-crossover transition temperature, with the high-spin state of the