1 STV, 41.72% were type I (dysplastic enlarged transverse process), 41.4% were type II (pseudoarticulat

2 s large anterior and posterior zygapophyses, transverse processes, and broad neural spines, all of wh

3                  In addition, alterations in transverse processes, costal joints, and zygapophyses we

4 tatistically significant association between transverse process fractures and abdominal injury.

5                              CT scans showed transverse process fractures in 39 (7.3%) patients.

6                                              Transverse process fractures of the L3 vertebra were mos

7 inal trauma were prospectively evaluated for transverse process fractures of the lumbar spine.

8 s relatively insensitive in the detection of transverse process fractures of the lumbar spine.

9                                              Transverse process fractures were associated with abdomi

10 ype III (fusion), and 5.2% were type IV (one transverse process fused and one with pseudoarticulation

11 ng, cranially and ventrally oriented costal (transverse) processes, implying powerful trunk musculatu

12                                          The transverse processes increase in number from the proxima

13 ns effectively divide the lateral nucleus in transverse processing modules that prevent runaway excit

14 ke was shown at the articulation between the transverse process of a lumbosacral transitional vertebr

15 tanding pelvic radiographs that included the transverse processes of L5 were graded according to Cast

16 usion of vertebral bodies and of spinous and transverse processes was noted by micro-computed tomogra