ライフサイエンスコーパス: trochanter

1 mage of the mass at the level of the greater trochanter.

2 of the femoral neck, and level of the lesser trochanter.

3 ences were observed for the femoral neck and trochanter.

4 uscles and the bursal complex of the greater trochanter.

5 on were related to the facets of the greater trochanter.

6 ine curving around the posterior part of the trochanter.

7 nd at the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and trochanter.

8 ge of the lesion at the level of the greater trochanter.

9 ge of the lesion at the level of the greater trochanter.

10 mage of the mass at the level of the greater trochanter.

11 SH (score: 11-38) was associated with higher trochanter (0.026 +/- 0.006 g/cm2, P <0.001), femoral ne

12 ter, P<0.001), and 10.8 percent lower at the trochanter (0.66+/-0.11 vs. 0.74+/-0.08 g per square cen

13 GPa vs 3.86-4.47 GPa; P = .006-.007; greater trochanter, 0.65-1.21 GPa vs 1.96-2.62 GPa; P = .01-.02)

14 .1 %), femoral neck (1.6% vs -1.2%), femoral trochanter (3.3% vs -0.7%), and midshaft of the radius (

15 , 12.0 to 15.5 percent), 10.3 percent at the trochanter (95 percent confidence interval, 8.1 to 12.4

16 fractures to identify those below the lesser trochanter and above the distal metaphyseal flare (subtr

17 of separate fractures involving the greater trochanter and crossing the midline of the femur in the

18 pecific muscles, the tergal depressor of the trochanter and dorsoventral muscles I and II.

19 At age 18, smaller lesser trochanter and femoral neck width (FNW) in females still

20 t that it encompasses different joints (coxa-trochanter and femur-tibia), and in this species we also

21 greater trochanter, medially oriented lesser trochanter and presence of third trochanter) are also pr

22 dial 2/3 of the distance between the greater trochanter and sacral hiatus.

23 aterally reduced distance between the lesser trochanter and the ischium.

24 The bone density of the trochanter and total body also increased significantly i

25 small inverse associations were seen at the trochanter and total femur in women.

26 imal femur (femoral neck, Ward triangle, and trochanter) and lumbar spine by using dual-photon absorp

27 tal femur, lumbar spine [L1-L4], and femoral trochanter) and total BMC were measured using DXA at bas

28 n the lumbar spine, 2.1+/-0.6 percent in the trochanter, and 1.8+/-0.4 percent in the total hip, and

29 emoral head and neck, Ward triangle, greater trochanter, and intertrochanteric region.

30 osterior spine, lateral spine, femoral neck, trochanter, and total body were 4.9% (0.6%) (P<.001), 4.

31 d prevented bone loss from the femoral neck, trochanter, and total body, despite severe estrogen defi

32 -body, lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), trochanter, and Ward's triangle (WT) bone mineral measur

33 nted lesser trochanter and presence of third trochanter) are also present in earlier Miocene apes.

34 bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and trochanter at a rate of 0.72% (P = 0.005) and 0.85% (P =

35 bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and trochanter at a rate of 2.0% and 0.9% per year, respecti

36 ssociated only with total hip (P = 0.01) and trochanter BMD (P = 0.007) in postmenopausal women.

37 ene and lutein+zeaxanthin with 4-y change in trochanter BMD in men (P for trend = 0.0005, 0.02, 0.009

38 protective associations against 4-y loss in trochanter BMD in men and in lumbar spine in women.

39 (L2-L4), femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and trochanter, both before and after adjustment for the eff

40 eline at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter by 1% to 4% and in the total body by 0.3% to

41 , -5.0% to -4.0%) and a 2.4% decrease at the trochanter (CI, -2.7% to -2.1%) (P < 0.001 for both chan

42 The bony surface of the greater trochanter consists of four facets: anterior, lateral, p

43 d sequentially moved past those on the other trochanter during the preparatory cocking and the propul

44 /- 0.038 g/cm2 and 3 +/- 2 g, respectively), trochanter (DXAdiff = 0.100 +/- 0.044 g/cm2 and 1.7 +/-

45 The gear teeth on one trochanter engaged with and sequentially moved past thos

46 ded measurements at the level of the greater trochanter, femoral neck, base of the femoral neck, and

47 mineral content (BMC) in the head, neck, and trochanter from CT findings and pixel distribution param

48 umbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), femoral trochanter (FT), and femoral Wards (FW) were calculated.

49 Greater trochanter (GT) lesions are relatively uncommon.

50 racture or only presence of isolated greater trochanter [GT] fracture).

51 cted flatter femoral head and smaller lesser trochanter in females compared with males and, following

52 bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and trochanter in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who wer

53 erior and lateral) and proximal femur (neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, Ward's triangle, and total

54 ergy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, Ward's triangle, and total

55 athletes predicted BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanteric region, and tibia.

56 f interest: femoral neck, the Ward triangle, trochanter, intertrochanteric region, and total proximal

57 Although imaging of greater trochanter lesions remains essential for differential di

58 model used a single CT image at the greater trochanter level.

59 917 (0.908, 0.926), P for trend = 0.02], the trochanter [lowest-to-highest tertiles (95% CI): 0.811 (

60 s (for example, laterally protruding greater trochanter, medially oriented lesser trochanter and pres

61 ibers comprising the tergal depressor of the trochanter muscle (TDT, or jump muscle), which functions

62 main isoform in the tergal depressor of the trochanter muscle (TDT; jump muscle).

63 n bone density at both the total hip and the trochanter of 0.00044 g per square centimeter per puff p

64 enlarged fifth metacarpal and reduced third trochanter of the femur.

65 gned to the intraosseous groups, the greater trochanter of the left proximal femur was exposed and th

66 , 1.8% to 4.2%) higher, respectively, at the trochanter (P < 0.001 for both treatment comparisons) th

67 5) and 2.9% higher (CI, 1.6% to 4.2%) at the trochanter (P < 0.001).

68 (P < 0.001), and 4.6 +/- 0.8% at the femoral trochanter (P < 0.001).

69 bra (P < 0.05), femoral neck (P < 0.01), and trochanter (P < 0.01) compared with CON (-0.99% and -2.2

70 y at 48 weeks in the lumbar spine (P<0.001), trochanter (P = 0.003), total hip (P=0.005), and trabecu

71 ineral density in the total hip (P = 0.031), trochanter (P = 0.006), hip neck (P = 0.044), and pelvis

72 Greater trochanter pathologies show a broad spectrum of aetiolog

73 ciated only with bone density in the greater trochanter (r = -0.26, P < 0.05).

74 was significantly correlated with BMD of the trochanter (r =- 0.27), Ward's triangle (r = -0.26), and

75 R2' were the Ward triangle (r(2) = 0.48) and trochanter (r(2) = 0.37), respectively.

76 r-posterior and lateral spine, femoral neck, trochanter, radial shaft, and total body at 12 months of

77 For the head, neck, and trochanter, respectively, r values were 0.77, 0.53, and

78 6%, 2.26%, and 0.61% for the head, neck, and trochanter, respectively.

79 ignment among cases of ipsilateral hip pain, trochanter tenderness, hip pain or tenderness, and total

80 e mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck, trochanter, total femur, and lumbar spine (L2-L4) were m

81 e modified AHA-DLS, BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, total hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4) was asso

82 e mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck, trochanter, total hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4) was meas

83 e odds for osteoporosis or osteopenia at the trochanter, total hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4) were low

84 (P < .01) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward triangle, intertrochanteric region, fem

85 d at the proximal right femur (femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's area) with a dual-photon absorptiomet

86 al density (BMD) of the spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle, radius, and total body and

87 al oblique planes) MR imaging of the greater trochanter was performed in 10 cadaveric hips and 12 hip

88 A retrospective search for the word 'greater trochanter' was performed of a computerised radiology in

89 s divided by signal intensity of the greater trochanter) x 100, was measured in 182 hips of 91 patien