ライフサイエンスコーパス: tumefaciens

1 Z operon in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

2 ediction in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

3 ycophorin A blocked T-pilus biogenesis in A. tumefaciens.

4 gulate the motile to non-motile switch in A. tumefaciens.

5 egulated in the soil bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

6 Asticcacaulis biprosthecum and Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

7 was utilized as sole source of sulphur by A. tumefaciens.

8 subtilis, with no impact on attraction of A. tumefaciens.

9 the tumour-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

10 n crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

11 of AiiB, an AHL lactonase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

12 nce for twitching or swarming motility in A. tumefaciens.

13 amiana plants using engineered Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

14 mation of Arabidopsis roots by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

15 Gram-negative bacteria such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

16 another alpha-proteobacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

17 l for As(III) oxidation in this strain of A. tumefaciens.

18 (residues 425-789) of VirB4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

19 Bordetella bronchiseptica and Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

20 plasmid in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

21 ells from lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

22 required for synthesis of this polymer in A. tumefaciens.

23 controls the expression of three sRNAs in A. tumefaciens.

24 Our model organism Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5A contains two distinct ars operons (ars1 a

25 arsenite on gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5A.

26 udomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A.t.) as a tractable system to identify mol

27 We report that Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a soil bacterium that triggers tumorigenesi

28 d TraM2, not encoded on the Ti plasmid of A. tumefaciens A6, was identified, in addition to a copy on

29 The Gram-negative Agrobacterium tumefaciens accumulates four different glycolipids under

30 ly nothing was previously known about how A. tumefaciens acquires sulphur during colonization.

31 The A. tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase model was refined to 2.1 A with

32 Crystals of Agrobacterium tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase were obtained using lithium sul

33 The A. tumefaciens ADPGlc PPase/fructose 6-phosphate structural

34 A. tumefaciens also has two additional pleC/divJhomologue s

35 sion of a self-priming GS from Agrobacterium tumefaciens also increased the number of round granules.

36 Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes are closely rel

37 Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes are related pat

38 tions into the genomes of both Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes As an example,

39 e related alpha-proteobacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella abortus.

40 o the T4SS VirB8 proteins from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella suis (G-) and to the transfer p

41 ell-studied model systems from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella suis Here, we studied the struc

42 , including Coxiella burnetii, Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Legionella pneumophila.

43 ively transported into the plant pathogen A. tumefaciens and processed into the toxin TM84.

44 zed TssM in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens and provided the first biochemical evidence

45 cterial species: the pathogens Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the model symbio

46 o heterotrophic soil bacteria (Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and a poorly cr

47 ansformation of host plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related species represents a unique mode

48 re provides an introduction to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related species, focusing on their modes

49 with the pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens and similar pathogens (e.g. Bartonella hense

50 n vitro-grown endosperms using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and standard binary vectors.

51 expands the model for ExoR regulation in A. tumefaciens and underscores the global role that this re

52 we examine chemical interactions between A. tumefaciens and unwounded plants.

53 tobacco and Arabidopsis when colonized by A. tumefaciens and was utilized as sole source of sulphur b

54 roteins from Escherichia coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Aquifex aeolicus, as well as the ADAT2-

55 ichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Mesoplasma florum, revealing transcript

56 enes via manipulation of sRNA pathways in A. tumefaciens, and moreover, while the VtlR/LsrB protein i

57 ic (6-4) photolyase, PhrB from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and propose that (6-4) photolyases are broa

58 m meliloti, the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the animal pathogen Brucella abortus.

59 ganisms, Bacillus subtilis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and two experimental systems, aromatic amin

60 everal virB genes and virD4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens are found in an intravacuolar pathogen Ehrli

61 -DivK and CckA-ChpT-CtrA phosphorelays in A. tumefaciens are vertically-integrated, as in C. crescent

62 In summary, regulation of A. tumefaciens As(III) oxidation is complex, apparently bei

63 e isopentenyl transferase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as a positive selectable marker for plastid

64 usceptibility to the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as revealed by a higher efficiency of T-DNA

65 se-related protein A (PhrA) of Agrobacterium tumefaciens at 1.67-A resolution.

66 rystal structures of HutI from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (At-HutI) and an environmental sample from t

67 wo substrates of recombinant METTL20 from A. tumefaciens (AtMETTL20), namely ETFbeta and the ribosoma

68 A. tumefaciens attaches efficiently to plant tissues and to

69 The phytochrome Agp2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens belongs to the group of bathy phytochromes t

70 orresponding target sites into Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary plasmids, allowing efficient implemen

71 As predicted the A. tumefaciens biotin protein ligase is a fully functional

72 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens BlcR is a member of the emerging isocitrate

73 Atu3266 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 and Oant2987 from Ochrobactrum anthropi

74 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 contains four replicons, circular chromo

75 The A. tumefaciens C58 genome sequence revealed the presence of

76 nthase (CS) deletion mutant of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 is highly attenuated in virulence.

77 A search of the genome of A. tumefaciens C58 revealed four proteins, encoded on diffe

78 t protein G (VgrG) paralogs in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 specifically control the secretion and i

79 The genome of a biovar I strain, A. tumefaciens C58, has been previously sequenced.

80 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, the pathogenic bacteria that causes cro

81 50 constructs are infected with oncogenic A. tumefaciens C58, transgenic lines harbouring the 2S2D::p

82 e previously published genome sequence of A. tumefaciens C58.

83 r d-altritol and galactitol in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58.

84 Agrobacterium tumefaciens can adhere to plant tissues and abiotic surf

85 R sites of Brucella plus the BioR site of A. tumefaciens can all interact with the Brucella BioR prot

86 in the extracellular milieu of Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be transported into the cytoplasm, or vi

87 Agrobacterium tumefaciens can grow anaerobically via denitrification.

88 Unlike TraR from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, CarR(Ecc) is not directly protected from ce

89 Overexpression of RepC in A. tumefaciens caused large increases in copy number in cis

90 Depletion of FtsZ(AT) in A. tumefaciens causes a striking phenotype: cells are exten

91 Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall disease.

92 The bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall tumor formation in plants.

93 Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall tumors on various plants b

94 D4, and Osa-GFP colocalizes with VirD4 at A. tumefaciens cell poles.

95 pression, as determined by infection with A. tumefaciens cells carrying the beta-glucuronidase intron

96 by co-infiltrating plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells harboring engineered RNA3 with cells c

97 nsformed using a short cocultivation with A. tumefaciens cells.

98 ynamic localization of several Agrobacterium tumefaciens components during the cell cycle.

99 iate stage of growth, are inoculated with A. tumefaciens containing the binary vector.

100 ved orthologues appear to be essential in A. tumefaciens, deletions in pleC or divK were isolated and

101 Agrobacterium tumefaciens delivers its single-stranded transferred DNA

102 motile, or flagellated but nonchemotactic A. tumefaciens derivatives were examined for biofilm format

103 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-derived crown galls of Arabidopsis (Arabidop

104 hizobia and the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens differed in their ability to facilitate long

105 biofilm-forming plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens drives swimming motility by utilizing a smal

106 A. tumefaciens efficiently transferred this T-DNA into cell

107 ansformation rates were obtained with the A. tumefaciens EHA101 strain and the pTF101.1 binary vector

108 Agrobacterium tumefaciens elongates by addition of peptidoglycan (PG)

109 plementation in a bioR isogenic mutant of A. tumefaciens elucidated that Brucella BioR is a functiona

110 strate that two Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens encode robust entry exclusion functions.

111 Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes a single NAD+-dependent DNA ligase a

112 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes predicted iron-responsive regulators

113 The A. tumefaciens enzyme was found to have the highest rate co

114 based on the severe biofilm deficiency of A. tumefaciens exoR mutants.

115 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens expresses virulence (vir) genes in response

116 be blocked by infiltrating the leaf with A. tumefaciens expressing RPS2 in the presence of RIN4, rec

117 on (MR) reporter cassettes for Agrobacterium tumefaciens expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.

118 with a 249-residue linker from Agrobacterium tumefaciens FtsZ interfered with cell division.

119 Overall, this work suggests that A. tumefaciens FtsZ makes distinct contributions to the reg

120 that the rod-shaped bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens grows unidirectionally from the new pole gen

121 fusion of the N-terminal region of SS4 to A. tumefaciens GS restored the development of wild-type-lik

122 he As(III)-oxidizing bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens GW4 displays positive chemotaxis towards 0.5

123 We propose that A. tumefaciens has appropriated a progenitor ParA/MinD-like

124 The alpha-Proteobacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens has proteins homologous to known regulators

125 n microscopy to image the localization of A. tumefaciens homologs of proteins involved in cell divisi

126 factor of plasmid RP1 (IncPalpha), render A. tumefaciens host cells nearly avirulent.

127 our study, we utilize the components from A. tumefaciens (i.e. 3-oxooctanyl-l-homoserine lactone [OOH

128 Transposon mutagenesis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens identified genes essential for As(III) oxida

129 osphorylase from the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, identifying a previously elusive activator

130 by the VirA/VirG two-component system in A. tumefaciens in response to various levels of phenolic in

131 Agrobacterium tumefaciens incites plant tumours that produce nutrients

132 of early division proteins of Agrobacterium tumefaciens including three FtsZ homologs, FtsA and FtsW

133 Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces crown gall tumors by transferring a

134 extrachromosomal T-DNA structures form in A. tumefaciens-infected plants immediately after infection.

135 reporter gene expression in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection assay in Nicotiana benthamiana.

136 During E. faecalis and A. tumefaciens infection, increased bacterial loads were ob

137 n and induce local necrotic lesions in an A. tumefaciens infiltration assay.

138 ons on NN tobacco plants in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration assay.

139 ng and combined the assay with Agrobacterium tumefaciens insertional mutagenesis to screen for hyphal

140 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a broad host range plant pathogen that co

141 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a close relative of both B. abortus and S

142 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a facultative plant pathogen and the caus

143 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a LuxR-type quorum-sensing transcription

144 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a LuxR-type transcription factor that reg

145 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a member of the LuxR family of quorum-sen

146 TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a member of the LuxR family of transcript

147 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen that transfers a segment

148 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogen that causes crown ga

149 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a unique plant pathogenic bacterium renow

150 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring and integrating a

151 transfer of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is controlled by a quorum-sensing system com

152 and the exopolysaccharide cellulose, when A. tumefaciens is incubated with the polysaccharide stain C

153 LiCl, indicating that the Mrp complex in A. tumefaciens is involved in Na+ circulation across the me

154 , an LpxE homologue present in Agrobacterium tumefaciens is selective for phosphatidylglycerol phosph

155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens is well known to cause crown gall tumours at

156 ansgenic plants expressing the Agrobacterium tumefaciens isopentenyltransferase (ipt) gene that encod

157 strate that this biocontrol agent targets A. tumefaciens leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS), an essential

158 plasmid constructs, transformation of the A. tumefaciens line, and ELISA and Bradford assays to asses

159 ant transformants generated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation.

160 tabacum) NT1 cell lines, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated DNA delivery of a binary vector con

161 taken me from bacteriophage to Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated DNA transfer to plants to the plant

162 e independent groups described Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation at the Miami

163 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation is an effici

164 We used transient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated in planta expression, transformatio

165 cellular survival, we utilized Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated mutagenesis, and screened for H. ca

166 ispensable component of modern Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant genetic transformation system

167 histone H2A-1 is important for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation.

168 We have now used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated protein expression in Nicotiana ben

169 in the genome of transgenic plants during A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation are still poorly und

170 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation conditions were esta

171 lopment of various methods for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thali

172 a protocol for high-throughput Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Penium margaritac

173 sformed into soybean plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

174 capsulatum by optimization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

175 um (tobacco) cell line NT-1 by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

176 ed into the tobacco genome via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation.

177 We used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient assays to test the abilit

178 usion in this process, we used Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient coexpression in Nicotiana

179 We took advantage of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression assays (agroin

180 iverse organisms, we performed Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression assays in Nico

181 a as a model host plant to use Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression in con

182 istance protein, we adopted an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression system

183 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient transformation has been a

184 A/VirG two-component system in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, mediates the expression of virulence genes

185 visR, activators of flagellar motility in A. tumefaciens, now found to inhibit UPP and cellulose prod

186 ity of flies inoculated with E. faecalis, A. tumefaciens, or S. aureus.

187 traction of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, or the plant growth promoting Bacillus subt

188 The A. tumefaciens pathogen hijacks the conserved host infrastr

189 Agrobacterium tumefaciens pathogens genetically modify their host plan

190 us, although the core architecture of the A. tumefaciens pathway resembles that of C. crescentus ther

191 nsistent with this prediction, Agrobacterium tumefaciens PecS specifically binds urate, and urate att

192 Strains A6 and C58 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens produce a lactonase, BlcC (AttM), that can d

193 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens produces a unipolar polysaccharide (UPP) adh

194 In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, quorum sensing regulates the replication an

195 n reported for homologues from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rajashankar et al., unpublished results) an

196 arge integral membrane HK from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, regulates the expression of virulence genes

197 Plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens replicate using the products of the repABC o

198 mour-inducing (Ti) plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens replicate via the products of the repABC gen

199 To the best of our knowledge, A. tumefaciens represents the first example of profligate b

200 ul transformation of plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens requires that the bacterial T-complex active

201 ic transformation of plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens requires the import of bacterial T-DNA and v

202 The plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens responds to three main signals at the plant-

203 lifestyle, such as divisome components in A. tumefaciens resulting from that organism's different gro

204 ansformation of plant cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens results from the transfer of DNA and protein

205 Transmission electron microscopy of A. tumefaciens revealed the presence of filaments, signific

206 es of two Alphaproteobacteria, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobiales) and Brevundimonas subvibrioide

207 y studied pathogens and pests: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Rhodococcus fascians, Xanthomonas citri, Ps

208 nite [As(III)] oxidation in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens soil isolate, strain 5A.

209 A. tumefaciens specific pole-organizing protein (Pop) PopZA

210 Agrobacterium tumefaciens stands as one of biotechnology's greatest su

211 The Ti plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 15955 carries two alleles of traR tha

212 were dipped into a solution of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1 harboring the beta-glucuronidase

213 We have shown recently that Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58 contains an uronate dehydrogenase

214 rons PCR cloned from the genome-sequenced A. tumefaciens strain C58 resulted in complementation back

215 on infection with the virulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58, highly expressed AtLTPI-4 Crown

216 Pseudomonas putida KT2440, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58.

217 s of vir gene inducers, we constructed an A. tumefaciens strain carrying a PvirB-gfp fusion.

218 the multi-chromosome genome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404.

219 Expression of a cloned avsI gene in A. tumefaciens strain NT1 resulted in synthesis of long-cha

220 ification of a novel enzyme from the same A. tumefaciens strain, which we named Galactarolactone cycl

221 quantify metabolic changes in Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain 5A) upon exposure to sub-lethal conc

222 vestigated the effect of three Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and five transferred (T)-DNA origins

223 Engineering universal Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains and recruiting other microbes, such

224 e set of TraR-regulated genes in isogenic A. tumefaciens strains containing an octopine-type or nopal

225 Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains either deleted for bioZ or which enc

226 na benthamiana leaves with two Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains: one contains the target sequence em

227 egative phylum Proteobacteria: Agrobacterium tumefaciens (syn.

228 e biotin synthesis is tightly controlled, A. tumefaciens synthesizes much more biotin than needed for

229 suggested that integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA into the plant genome occurs preferent

230 of magnitude over conventional Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA.

231 fter proteins of the canonical Agrobacterium tumefaciens T4SS.

232 In vitro, A. tumefaciens T6SS could kill Escherichia coli but trigger

233 stallization of a proteolytically cleaved A. tumefaciens tadA (missing the last eight amino acids at

234 tated by pathogenic strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens that cause crown gall tumors.

235 a more fundamental cellular asymmetry in A. tumefaciens that influences and is congruent with its at

236 romosomally encoded protein in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that mediates a sugar-induced increase in vi

237 e transcriptional regulator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens that positively regulates the octopine catab

238 In Agrobacterium tumefaciens the ispD and ispF genes are fused to encode

239 eloped on the basis of a double mutant of A. tumefaciens (the DeltabioR DeltabioBFDA mutant), the bet

240 Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the causative agent for crown gall disease

241 er K84 that targets pathogenic strains of A. tumefaciens, the causative agent of plant tumours.

242 vision cycle of C. crescentus and that of A. tumefaciens, the functional conservation for this presum

243 These studies suggest that in A. tumefaciens, the Irr protein is most active under low-ir

244 homologues of T4SS genes from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the majority have no known function or homo

245 studied archetypal vir T4SS of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the Rickettsiales vir homolog (rvh) T4SS is

246 In the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the signalling cascades regulating the acti

247 of Vibrio fischeri and TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, there is no endogenous autoinducer for SdiA

248 bacteria, c-di-GMP turns down the T6SS in A. tumefaciens thus impacting its ability to compete with o

249 d for conjugal transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid are regulated by the quorum sensi

250 t the replication origin of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid resides fully within its repC gen

251 depend on disarmed strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to deliver the created gene construction int

252 e that VtlR is involved in the ability of A. tumefaciens to grow appropriately in artificial medium,

253 involved in the attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to its plant host.

254 olerance of the soil bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens to phenazines.

255 m (T4SS) and subsequently the capacity of A. tumefaciens to transform plant cells.

256 signals based on the use of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens traG-lacZ biosensor.

257 Integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transferred DNA (T-DNA) into the plant genom

258 Agrobacterium tumefaciens transferred DNA (T-DNA) transfer requires th

259 The VirB/D4 apparatus of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers DNA and proteins to plant cells.

260 This project utilized Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and the transposon-tagging co

261 Agrobacterium tumefaciens translocates DNA and protein substrates betw

262 A. tumefaciens translocates single-stranded DNA-binding pro

263 Agrobacterium tumefaciens translocates T-DNA through a polar VirB/D4 t

264 A. tumefaciens translocates the ssDNA-binding protein VirE2

265 The vir genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmids direct the tran

266 cell pole is the site of assembly of the A. tumefaciens type IV apparatus.

267 g homologous components of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV secretion system.

268 wever, in an in planta coinfection assay, A. tumefaciens used Tde effectors to attack both siblings c

269 imental analyses indicate that Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses a pathway involving nonphosphorylated i

270 Agrobacterium tumefaciens uses a type IV secretion (T4S) system compos

271 lpha-proteobacteria, including Agrobacterium tumefaciens Using an activity-based approach, we identif

272 Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB proteins assemble a type IV secretion a

273 el conjugation systems and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 T4S system.

274 Using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/D4 type IV secretion system (T4SS), a r

275 The A. tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 OMCC, solved by transmission elec

276 scherichia coli pKM101 Tra and Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 systems are completely dispensabl

277 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system is compo

278 of the IMCpKM101 joined to OMCCs from the A. tumefaciens VirB/VirD4, E. coli R388 Trw, and Bordetella

279 Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB10 couples inner membrane (IM) ATP energ

280 nd -4) that are 3- to 10-fold larger than A. tumefaciens virB6.

281 cent protein- or nVenus-tagged Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirE2 and VirD2 proteins and the C-terminal

282 The GALLS protein can complement an A. tumefaciens virE2 mutant for tumor formation, indicating

283 e to the GALLS gene, which complements an A. tumefaciens virE2 mutant for tumor formation.

284 The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirG response regulator of the VirA/VirG two

285 ppropriately in artificial medium, and an A. tumefaciens vtlR deletion strain is defective in motilit

286 e cellular abundance of these proteins in A. tumefaciens was measured using Western immunoblots and O

287 The cell cycle of A. tumefaciens was monitored by time-lapse and superresolut

288 s and also confirmed that no plasmid from A. tumefaciens was present in the sporophyte tissues.

289 thologues of these proteins in Agrobacterium tumefaciens was shown to be regulated by two sRNAs, call

290 Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used for delivery of genes encoding Cas9

291 Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used to induce tumours in potato disks.

292 n system homologous to that in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, was required for restoration of entry and i

293 nate dehydrogenase cloned from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, we developed an assay for D-glucuronate wit

294 Rhodopseudomonas palustris and Agrobacterium tumefaciens were expressed in Escherichia coli (Deltarib

295 Homologous enzymes in P. putida and A. tumefaciens were identified based on a similarity search

296 re difficult to transform with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, whereas other transgenesis methods, such as

297 nosa, Campylobacter jejuni and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which absolutely require polyamines for gro

298 fusion and IspE proteins from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which covert MEP to the corresponding eight

299 Agrobacterium tumefaciens wild-type strain (GW4) was studied to determ

300 es) were stably transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens with constructs containing the P. vittata ac