戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ular communications in CCA and their role in tumor progression.
2 ellular stress but, paradoxically, it favors tumor progression.
3  the presence of oncostreams correlates with tumor progression.
4 equence of MAGEA6 degradation contributes to tumor progression.
5 elopment in fallopian tubes through stepwise tumor progression.
6 ribute detrimental and beneficial effects on tumor progression.
7 al blood facilitates on-demand monitoring of tumor progression.
8 ifferent aneuploidies can uniquely influence tumor progression.
9 iminating between pseudoprogression and true tumor progression.
10 ology of the postpartum mammary gland drives tumor progression.
11 ck their fate in multiclonal mixtures during tumor progression.
12 umorigenesis and an inverse association with tumor progression.
13 g a neomorphism model paradigm for targeting tumor progression.
14 s of the gene p107 significantly accelerates tumor progression.
15 on and divergent lineage dependencies during tumor progression.
16 inhibition of tumor-induced neurogenesis and tumor progression.
17 derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can promote tumor progression.
18 tumor microenvironment (TME) and its role in tumor progression.
19 l, underscoring its potential importance for tumor progression.
20 ggesting a possible role of this receptor in tumor progression.
21      Intercellular communication is vital to tumor progression.
22  to initiate oncogenic signaling and promote tumor progression.
23  normal mammary gland development and breast tumor progression.
24 lished and may suggest strategies to prevent tumor progression.
25 ene networks are up regulated throughout the tumor progression.
26 rkers, when co-expressed with PD-L1, predict tumor progression.
27  response to increasing ECM stiffness during tumor progression.
28 astases in contrast to its impact on primary tumor progression.
29 ascularization and, consequently, augmenting tumor progression.
30 while ASPP2-mediated YAP activation enhances tumor progression.
31 ant to platinum-based chemotherapy and drive tumor progression.
32 e processes, especially during infection and tumor progression.
33 henotypic modulations of these subsets along tumor progression.
34 ne expression, many of which are involved in tumor progression.
35 stinct molecular attributes and hallmarks of tumor progression.
36 hibit critical, but often opposing, roles in tumor progression.
37 aling between astrocytes and glioblastoma in tumor progression.
38 exert their effector functions and influence tumor progression.
39 e MBNL-based alternative splicing to promote tumor progression.
40  thus likely conferring growth advantage for tumor progression.
41 rative effects in T-cell-mediated control of tumor progression.
42 tinocytes promotes MDSC influx into skin and tumor progression.
43 involved in mammary gland transformation and tumor progression.
44 ntributing to the promotion or inhibition of tumor progression.
45 pression in tumor cells in arbitrating brain tumor progression.
46 vels and whether ICMT overexpression affects tumor progression.
47  to uncover mechanisms and key biomarkers of tumor progression.
48 ld-type cells could be valuable in arresting tumor progression.
49 sed in cancer and have been shown to support tumor progression.
50 s may be associated with high rates of local tumor progression.
51 eath mechanisms that would otherwise inhibit tumor progression.
52             Chronic inflammation facilitates tumor progression.
53 thway for Tam resistance, carcinogenesis and tumor progression.
54 land that was sustained during HR(+) mammary tumor progression.
55 vironmental IL-1beta as a master cytokine in tumor progression.
56 nown mechanism of ILEI signaling that drives tumor progression.
57 te both contrasting and synergistic roles in tumor progression.
58 r insights into the immune mechanisms during tumor progression.
59  the implication of both Sema4D and CXCR4 in tumor progression.
60 ome maintenance program required for mammary tumor progression.
61 , or different 3,4-dihydroquinazolines) slow tumor progression.
62 pressive barriers is an essential feature of tumor progression.
63 that constrains AR binding/function to limit tumor progression.
64  can suppress antitumor immunity and promote tumor progression.
65 nt (TME) can dampen their ability to control tumor progression.
66  signaling, independently of WNT, to promote tumor progression.
67 tic instability, altered gene expression and tumor progression.
68  invasion, and metastasis, thereby affecting tumor progression.
69 criminate between pseudoprogression and true tumor progression.
70  creating feedback loops in cells to enhance tumor progression.
71 AC and the consequences of its disruption on tumor progression.
72 /NF-kappaB-driven primary-to-metastatic lung tumor progression.
73 egulated splicing events are associated with tumor progression.
74  cells in Rag1 mutants does not alter SHH-MB tumor progression.
75  require high DPAGT1 expression in order for tumor progression.
76 lated integrin beta(3)-KRAS signaling drives tumor progression.
77 uggesting a critical role for these pDGVs in tumor progression.
78 issue microenvironment may enhance malignant tumor progression.
79 nome structure upon cell differentiation and tumor progression.
80 ntinuous clonal evolution is often linked to tumor progression.
81 or microenvironment that can limit or worsen tumor progression.
82 lations for locally and remotely suppressing tumor progression.
83 le single deficiency of each protein limited tumor progression.
84 er from normal vessels and play key roles in tumor progression.
85 we identified that TME-derived IGF1 promotes tumor progression.
86 mulates microglia to produce IGF1 to promote tumor progression.
87 tially restricting tumorigenesis, can induce tumor progression.
88 al hip arthroplasty surgery because of local tumor progression.
89 olic stress that has the potential to impact tumor progression.
90 condensation patterns to different stages of tumor progression.
91 associated with genetic instability favoring tumor progression.
92  for understanding the mechanisms underlying tumor progression.
93 sed to identify patients at highest risk for tumor progression.
94 tumor microenvironment (TME) is critical for tumor progression.
95 ular alterations that support oncogenesis or tumor progression.
96 ith ISFI + C-TUS showed a 62.6% reduction in tumor progression, a 50.0% increase in median survival t
97 mics of the mutational time series governing tumor progression, allowing accurate prediction of the m
98  and that elevated SRSF3 was associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis for patients with
99 /Globo-H and the FAK/CAV1/AKT/RIP complex in tumor progression and apoptosis and suggests a direction
100 F signaling with TGF-beta signaling to drive tumor progression and chemoresistance.
101  major mechanism by which stroma can promote tumor progression and confer resistance to immune-based
102  ARID1A inactivation accelerates endometrial tumor progression and dissemination, the major causes of
103 a cells the invasive properties required for tumor progression and dissemination.
104 nd the effects of nerve-cancer cross-talk on tumor progression and dissemination.
105  niche microenvironment that is required for tumor progression and drug resistance.
106 f action of anti-MARCO antibody treatment on tumor progression and further show that this is potentia
107 ent stages of HCC revealed the mechanisms of tumor progression and helped to identify biomarkers of r
108  germline variants as a major determinant of tumor progression and highlight the importance of integr
109  we show that IL-1alpha inactivation impairs tumor progression and immune cell infiltration without a
110  in KRAS and NRAS are common in CRC, driving tumor progression and influencing efficacy of both cytot
111 t targeting epigenetic elements that promote tumor progression and inhibit immune cell activity can e
112 in (mTOR) plays a pivotal role in growth and tumor progression and is an attractive target for cancer
113 trated actin polymerization is essential for tumor progression and maintenance of tumor tissue integr
114  protects against ischemia but also enhances tumor progression and malignancy.
115 ctive fluid transport and may play a role in tumor progression and malignancy.
116 the importance of nerve-cancer cross-talk to tumor progression and may provide the foundation for dev
117 s to respond to changing environments during tumor progression and metastases and facilitates treatme
118 rowth, migration, and invasion in vitro, and tumor progression and metastasis in vivo.
119 f the biochemical alterations that accompany tumor progression and metastasis is necessary to inform
120               However, the role of IQGAP1 in tumor progression and metastasis remains unclear.
121                           CIC contributes to tumor progression and metastasis through direct transcri
122 s to be driven by adenosine that accelerates tumor progression and metastasis via ECM remodeling.
123                                       During tumor progression and metastasis, both tumor and stromal
124 normal melanocyte proliferation/motility, in tumor progression and metastasis, its genetic alteration
125                    In experimental models of tumor progression and metastasis, Ms4a4a deficiency in m
126 ical role for collagen cross-linking in OSCC tumor progression and metastasis, which may provide insi
127 y impart a resistance to cancer by hindering tumor progression and metastasis.
128 c studies identified Notch3 as a promoter of tumor progression and metastasis.
129 ellular matrix (ECM) plays critical roles in tumor progression and metastasis.
130 ained in the tumor microenvironment promotes tumor progression and metastasis.
131 es have since shown that NETs play a role in tumor progression and metastasis.
132 spartic protease, plays an important role in tumor progression and metastasis.
133  proteases, which may co-conspire to promote tumor progression and metastasis.
134 a11-deficiency led to a drastic reduction of tumor progression and metastasis.
135 enesis is a hallmark of cancer that promotes tumor progression and metastasis.
136 he extracellular matrix (ECM) contributes to tumor progression and metastasis.
137 macrophages and cancer cells, which promotes tumor progression and metastasis.
138 tion of lncRNAs, and their important role in tumor progression and metastasis.
139   These enzymes have also been implicated in tumor progression and metastatic disease and have thus b
140  discovered common early events that promote tumor progression and migration to different metastatic
141 ype in women with RCC, with implications for tumor progression and outcomes in CRC patients.
142 t obesity results in increased immune aging, tumor progression and PD-1-mediated T cell dysfunction w
143 h a BMI1 inhibitor resulted in abrogation of tumor progression and reduced the frequency of CSCs in t
144                   BCL9 subsequently promotes tumor progression and remodeling of the tumor microenvir
145 a-associated fibroblasts (CAF) contribute to tumor progression and resistance to androgen signaling d
146 e heterogeneity of tumors is a key factor in tumor progression and response to chemotherapy.
147 e studies define a causative role for OGA in tumor progression and reveal PKM2 O-GlcNAcylation as a m
148                Fasting-mimicking diets delay tumor progression and sensitize a wide range of tumors t
149 icroenvironment contributes significantly to tumor progression and spread.
150 secretion of IGF-1 and CCL20, which promoted tumor progression and stemness.
151  a crucial role of neutrophils in support of tumor progression and suggest yet unexplored treatment o
152  strongly regulate GBM invasive motility and tumor progression and support further exploration of LIM
153 function in CD8 + T cells may be involved in tumor progression and susceptibility to virus infection
154                                              Tumor progression and the efficacy of immunotherapy are
155 changing nature of these interactions during tumor progression and the impact of the tissue environme
156   Tumor-associated macrophages contribute to tumor progression and therapeutic resistance in breast c
157 3 has a gain of function (GOF) that promotes tumor progression and therapeutic resistance.
158 use models are highly favored for evaluating tumor progression and therapeutic response in a more rea
159 bone loss, as well as VOC-based diagnosis of tumor progression and treatment efficacy.
160 physical traits of tumors that contribute to tumor progression and treatment resistance: (i) elevated
161 nvestigation of glutamine as a biomarker for tumor progression and treatment response.
162 han (18)F-FDG in the differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes in high-
163 t cannot adequately distinguish between true tumor progression and treatment-related changes.
164  to define the adaptive processes underlying tumor progression and treatment.
165 er, but the degree of their enactment during tumor progression and under the selective pressures of i
166 lish whether molecular targets change during tumor progression and, if so, whether this affects preci
167 s tumor cell dissemination is a key event in tumor progression, and clinical significance of DTCs and
168  models, repeated exertion reduces malignant tumor progression, and clinically, exercise can improve
169 g for secondary mutations that contribute to tumor progression, and that these mutations often act in
170 ing the antitumor response with an impact on tumor progression, and will have implications for the de
171  Nonetheless, reported effects of statins on tumor progression are ambiguous, making it unclear wheth
172   The etiology of the effects of exercise on tumor progression are unclear, as are the cellular actor
173 ts contribute not only to cancer risk but to tumor progression as well.
174  new alternative strategy to control ovarian tumor progression based on selectively disrupting a prev
175 herapies that are not only effective against tumor progression but also address comorbidities such as
176 sis, and MDSC recruitment at early stages of tumor progression, but failed to reverse established met
177  models of melanoma, resulting in control of tumor progression, but limited cell killing.
178 racellular matrix (ECM) critically influence tumor progression, but the molecular mechanisms underlyi
179 o the widely held view that this gene drives tumor progression, but this hypothesis has not been rigo
180 el role for CCL2/CCR2 chemokine signaling in tumor progression by altering the microenvironment.
181 diotherapy preceded radiographic evidence of tumor progression by an average of 2.8 months.
182 he literature regarding the role of TIMP2 in tumor progression by analyzing co-expressed genes in tum
183                               N-Myc promotes tumor progression by inducing cell growth and inhibiting
184 uppressed DeltaNp63-low EMT cells influenced tumor progression by leading the invasion of proliferati
185 egulation functionally contributes to breast tumor progression by recruiting macrophages to the tumor
186 at MALAT1 contributes to HCC development and tumor progression by reprogramming tumor glucose metabol
187 an-binding proteins, have broad influence in tumor progression by rewiring intracellular and extracel
188                    Therefore, BAP1 may limit tumor progression by stabilizing LATS and thereby promot
189 suggest that the activation of TLR4 supports tumor progression by stimulating the release of more eff
190                PTEN loss stimulates prostate tumor progression by sustaining AKT activation.
191 gher tumor burden than WT mice and increased tumor progression, characterized by reduced intrahepatic
192  suppression with a significant reduction in tumor progression, compared to saline-treated tumors ass
193 edicted progression in 100% of patients with tumor progression, compared with 71% for only ctDNA dete
194 y a critical role in promoting or inhibiting tumor progression depending on the context.
195  either advantageous or deleterious roles in tumor progression, depending on the initial lesion size,
196     However, TAM blockade failed to decrease tumor progression due to a compensatory emergence of gra
197 ssibility to closely screen our patients for tumor progression during therapy, in therapy-free phases
198 umor initiation and/or to the differences in tumor progression (e.g., non-linear, saltatory growth) a
199 ction in melanoma xenografts causes enhanced tumor progression, EMT-transdifferentiation, metastatic
200 ablative RT reduced complications from local tumor progression, fatal gastrointestinal bleeding was o
201  of the tumor microenvironment in regulating tumor progression, few in vitro models have been develop
202 e therapy resulted in complete inhibition of tumor progression for SK-MEL-147 when using nude mice wi
203                           Mechanisms driving tumor progression from less aggressive subtypes to more
204 the different PET tracers in differentiating tumor progression from treatment-related changes in high
205 chemoradiotherapy is associated with risk of tumor progression (growth of local, regional, or distant
206 ted significant suppression of neuroblastoma tumor progression, growth, and viability in a dose-depen
207         A higher proportion of patients with tumor progression had new mutations detected in plasma s
208  Differentiating pseudoprogression from true tumor progression has become a significant challenge in
209 rrently target multiple pathways involved in tumor progression have limited their efficacy.
210  SHH canonical signaling, causally linked to tumor progression, have become rational targets for canc
211  after chemoradiotherapy was associated with tumor progression (hazard ratio, 18.7; P < .0001), forma
212 hin the tumor microenvironment can influence tumor progression; however, genetic alterations in strom
213 rtain tumor damage(s) occurring during early tumor progression (i.e. ischemia) recruits neutrophils t
214     Moreover, NMK-T-057 was found to inhibit tumor progression in a 4T1-BALB/c mouse model.
215 onfirmed that the combined treatment limited tumor progression in a cytotoxic T-cell-dependent manner
216 reased in vivo persistence and inhibition of tumor progression in a leukemia xenograft model.
217        UNC3810A also significantly inhibited tumor progression in a PEL xenograft mouse model that wa
218         Enhanced immune response slowed down tumor progression in a prophylaxis model.
219  now is whether IL-9 and IL-17 contribute to tumor progression in a sequential and stage-specific man
220                               YAP suppresses tumor progression in breast cancer, as YAP knockout incr
221       The assessment of surrogate markers of tumor progression in circulating extracellular vesicles
222 ingly, severe pancreatic atrophy accompanied tumor progression in Ddr1(-/-); KPC mice.
223  the macrophage-derived factors that promote tumor progression in early stage lesions.
224 blished its functional importance in mammary tumor progression in mice and showed that mammary tumor
225 tionally characterized throughout the entire tumor progression in mouse models of cancer.
226  with poor patient survival and promotion of tumor progression in multiple cancers and is a known ris
227 y to disrupt the activity of CPC and inhibit tumor progression in neuroblastoma.
228                 Thus, we recapitulated nerve tumor progression in NF1 and provided preclinical platfo
229 ective treatments that halt tumor growth and tumor progression in NF1.
230 fectors may be a useful therapy for blocking tumor progression in patients with primary or recurrent
231  are responsible for this neoantigen-induced tumor progression in PDAC.
232 -to-matrix binding has been found to enhance tumor progression in several tumor entities.
233 he result showed that knee loading inhibited tumor progression in the loaded tibia.
234 ted macrophages/microglia (TAMs) can promote tumor progression in the sonic hedgehog subgroup of medu
235 te efforts to investigate mechanisms driving tumor progression in this deadly disease.
236 nt of the tumor microenvironment and mediate tumor progression in various cancers.
237 oat1 impairs cell proliferation in vitro and tumor progression in vivo and reveals a mevalonate pathw
238             HSP86-deficient Ret cells slowed tumor progression in vivo associated with decreased freq
239 roduced a robust and sustained inhibition of tumor progression in vivo in a PDX mouse model, greater
240 itor disrupts vascular network formation and tumor progression in vivo without additional effects on
241 ll thickness excisional wounds would inhibit tumor progression in vivo.
242 ion of tumor cell proliferation in vitro and tumor progression in vivo.
243 Pvt1b loss accelerates tumor growth, but not tumor progression, in an autochthonous mouse model of lu
244 )HK2(+) liver cancer cells reduced xenograft tumor progression, in contrast to HK1(+)HK2(+) cells.
245 to be directly involved in several stages of tumor progression, including primary tumor growth, angio
246                 The results demonstrate that tumor progression is accelerated by hyperoxemia, hypergl
247 ating neutrophils and their modulation along tumor progression is an important advancement in underst
248                  Unfortunately, this mode of tumor progression is difficult to target because the und
249      A possible mechanism behind ESA-induced tumor progression is discussed.
250                              The dynamics of tumor progression is driven by multiple factors, which c
251                                              Tumor progression is recognized as a result of an evolvi
252                                              Tumor progression is regulated by a complex interplay be
253                      The advantage of APA to tumor progression is to induce oncogenes through 3'-UTR
254 e required for cancer cell proliferation and tumor progression, is a key factor mediating Th17 cell d
255  of the endothelin type A receptor (ETAR) in tumor progression leading to the formation of metastasis
256 lex has also emerged as a critical player in tumor progression, leading to the identification of seve
257 he only driver of tumor initiation; and that tumor progression likely occurs via accumulation of CNVs
258                                          The tumor progression locus 2 (TPL2) kinase is induced by LM
259            Here, we identify the MAP3 kinase tumor progression locus-2 (TPL2) as a player contributin
260 t and mechanical signals are observed during tumor progression, malignant transformation, and metasta
261 systems; and taking into account patterns of tumor progression may improve patient selection for ther
262 ese results demonstrate a novel mechanism of tumor progression mediated by OPN released in response t
263 ncer, detection of ctDNA was associated with tumor progression, metastasis, and disease-specific surv
264 e effect of periodontal inflammation (PI) on tumor progression, metastasis, and possible underlining
265  the gangliosides it generates are linked to tumor progression, migration, and suppression of tumor-s
266                      These results support a tumor progression model in which loss of NF1 in Schwann
267    Therefore, a mechanistic understanding of tumor progression must account for evolutionary and ecol
268 ts (7.7%) did not undergo surgery because of tumor progression (n = 1) or adverse events (n = 2).
269 l or mTORC1 inhibitor treatment, ameliorated tumor progression of Ctsk-Cre Lkb1fllfl mice.
270 nfer mutation order and clone origins during tumor progression, rendering the selection of the approp
271  escape this immune surveillance and promote tumor progression represents an outstanding challenge.
272 hed orthotopic tumors dramatically inhibited tumor progression, resulting in significantly prolonged
273 pite the importance of AKT overactivation in tumor progression, results from clinical trials of vario
274 that germline variants play a larger role in tumor progression than has been previously appreciated a
275 se OvCa cells is associated with accelerated tumor progression that can be blocked by an arginase inh
276                   Malignant transformations, tumor progression, the onset of some neuropathies and ot
277 (EpCAM) has previously been shown to promote tumor progression, the underlying mechanisms remain larg
278 ormation are two paramount processes driving tumor progression, therapy resistance, and cancer metast
279 only at diagnosis, the mechanisms underlying tumor progression, therapy resistance, and metastasis re
280      Hippo signaling controls organ size and tumor progression through a conserved pathway leading to
281 l advances and model systems to characterize tumor progression through space and time.
282 dence indicates that MDSC also contribute to tumor progression through their pro-angiogenic activity
283     To test whether loss of TMPRSS13 impacts tumor progression, TMPRSS13 was genetically ablated in t
284                                              Tumor progression to metastasis is not cancer cell auton
285  In glioma patients, differentiation between tumor progression (TP) and treatment-related changes (TR
286 anism by which NRF2 hyperactivation promotes tumor progression via primary cilia degeneration and abe
287 ble to form the membrane attack complex, the tumor progression was unaltered.
288 d how GNA13 contributes to tumorigenesis and tumor progression, we compared the entire transcriptome
289 sing a p53-null model of early stage mammary tumor progression, we found that Gas6 is highly expresse
290 sms by which clotting factors influence PDAC tumor progression, we generated and characterized C57Bl/
291 etal and cytoskeleton-regulatory proteins in tumor progression, we performed analyses of The Cancer G
292 c instability in prostate carcinogenesis and tumor progression, we performed ultrahigh depth exome se
293  of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) with tumor progression, we tested the role of cancer-derived
294 ne cells (T cells and B cells) contribute to tumor progression when present in the tumor microenviron
295  plays an essential role in GBM stemness and tumor progression, where hypoxic responses within the tu
296 ory cancer-associated fibroblasts (iCAFs) in tumor progression, which is significantly related to poo
297 s population of mesenchymal cells supporting tumor progression, whose origin remains to be fully eluc
298 ockdown of GM-CSF in tumor cells also delays tumor progression with decreased accumulation of M-MDSC
299 tabolizing enzymes and dramatically suppress tumor progression without visible toxicity in vivo.
300  in limiting pre-invasive to invasive breast tumor progression, yet their differentiation and perturb

 
Page Top