コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ive imaging of sentinel lymph nodes in solid tumor staging.
2 in molecular characteristics with pathologic tumor staging.
3 manuals introduced greater granularity to HN tumor staging.
4 hen combined with serum alpha fetoprotein or tumor staging.
5 essed clinical relevance based on changes in tumor staging.
6 tentially reduces additional examinations in tumor staging.
7 the accuracy of CT, MR, and scintigraphy for tumor staging.
8 Both CT and MR perform poorly for local tumor staging.
9 I should be considered for inclusion in CSCC tumor staging.
10 ding real-time monitoring of endocytosis and tumor staging.
11 PET/CT imaging is a significant pitfall for tumor staging.
12 oma would result in inconsistencies in final tumor staging.
14 nts underwent laparoscopy after conventional tumor staging; 89 were also staged with laparoscopic ult
16 copic ultrasonography was superior to CT for tumor staging accuracy (67% vs. 41%; P < 0.001) but equi
17 Interobserver agreement was excellent for tumor staging (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union
19 menopausal status, comorbidity estimate) and tumor staging and characteristics (tumor size, number of
21 t imaging to provide detailed information on tumor staging and grading, evaluating treatment, and det
22 data indicate that locoregional LND improves tumor staging and leads to a favorable oncologic outcome
23 ndergoing eye-preserving therapies relies on tumor staging and molecular analysis of tumor tissue obt
25 ancer cells circulating in blood may improve tumor staging and patient selection for targeted therapy
27 ost-LT surveillance, provide a framework for tumor staging and risk stratification, and select candid
28 calculated any differences in diagnosis and tumor staging and the potential impact of differences in
31 The examinations were performed in terms of tumor staging and, in some instances, also of primary tu
34 iation therapy, and surgery), refinements in tumor staging, and better supportive care have significa
35 ified modified FOLFIRINOX, age, tumor grade, tumor staging, and larger-volume center as significant f
36 n, their distinctive patterns in relation to tumor staging, and their recurrence across different tum
39 uveal melanoma and adequate records to allow tumor staging by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJC
40 to April 1, 2011, adequate records to allow tumor staging by the AJCC criteria, and follow-up for me
41 and a prognostic score-integrating ITA.LI.CA tumor staging, CPS, ECOG performance status, and AFP.
43 s product, C24-Ceramide, was associated with tumor staging, distal metastasis, and worse prognosis.
44 mages from 78 patients who were referred for tumor staging for the presence of vascular (18)F-FDG upt
45 hogenesis of HCC may provide new markers for tumor staging, for assessment of the relative risk of tu
47 r characteristics such as tumor progression, tumor staging, heterogeneity, gene mutations, and clonal
50 e current literature on (18)F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging in children, summarizing questions that ha
51 atures that showed significant increase with tumor staging included age at presentation (57, 58, 60,
52 ole, as it allows the pathologist to provide tumor-staging information necessary for an appropriate c
56 pression in human colon cancer in respect to tumor staging, NOS-expressing cell type(s), nitrotyrosin
59 es of disease, surpassing in accuracy either tumor staging or loss of p27(KIP1) as a negative prognos
60 es who received imaging with (68)Ga-FAPI for tumor staging or restaging between October 2018 and Marc
64 at all stages of the pathway, such as local tumor staging/restaging, creating an imaging-based "road
65 with better patient survival independent of tumor staging, site location, microsatellite instability
66 ITA.LI.CA prognostic system includes both a tumor staging-stratifying patients with HCC into six mai
74 algorithms rendered an 89%-correct rate for tumor staging using genes differentially expressed betwe
76 liary body and choroidal) melanoma, the AJCC tumor staging was stage I in 2767 (36%), stage II in 373
77 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging were identified from a database search.