ライフサイエンスコーパス: upper abdomen

1 40 lesions up to 3 cm in size in the lung or upper abdomen.

2 formatted contrast-enhanced CT images of the upper abdomen.

3 phase coronal reformatted CT image shows the upper abdomen.

4 ) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the upper abdomen.

5 ented with pain and discharging sinus in the upper abdomen.

6 ation revealed he was tender to touch in the upper abdomen.

7 ars) underwent equilibrium MR imaging of the upper abdomen.

8 can revealed suspicious findings in the left upper abdomen.

9 dient-echo T1 transverse section through the upper abdomen.

10 CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of the lung and upper abdomen.

11 copy-guided biopsy procedures in the lung or upper abdomen.

12 al low-dose CT examinations of the chest and upper abdomen.

13 lude portions of the lungs, bony thorax, and upper abdomen.

14 formatted contrast-enhanced CT images of the upper abdomen.

15 sustained a bicycle handlebar injury to his upper abdomen 3 weeks before the symptoms appeared and h

16 adrant (RUQ), left upper quadrant (LUQ), and upper abdomen (ABD) regions and trained corresponding se

17 (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous admi

18 (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous admi

19 (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous admi

20 (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous admi

21 and SPECT with integrated low-dose CT of the upper abdomen (acquired with a hybrid SPECT/CT camera).

22 DC values of various anatomic regions of the upper abdomen, ADC values of the gallbladder, pancreas,

23 baseline was replaced by two discrete sites (upper abdomen and pelvis) following hemorrhage, which on

24 be more affected by lower doses than in the upper abdomen, and in single cases large photopenic area

25 patients underwent routine MR imaging of the upper abdomen at 1.5 T; imaging included multiple dynami

26 old male patient presenting with pain to the upper abdomen due to a large FNH was managed with TAE.

27 She also suffers from pain in the upper abdomen, especially when rising from the bed.

28 In 26, fluid was isolated to the upper abdomen: Fifteen had injuries; five were surgical.

29 c PET scan was performed for 60 min over the upper abdomen followed by a whole-body scan for a total

30 ferentially injected pairwise current to the upper abdomen, followed by acquiring the resulting surfa

31 ion data and CT images of the thorax and the upper abdomen for each patient; the second NSCLC dataset

32 of distant disease, by imaging of the chest, upper abdomen, head, and bones as appropriate.

33 time, in consecutive MR examinations of the upper abdomen in 72 patients (age range, 23-87 years) we

34 n delivered with concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen in patients with advanced pancreatic cance

35 nderwent either a 30-min dynamic scan of the upper abdomen including, at least partly, cardiac left v

36 nstrate the feasibility of the approach with upper-abdomen, lung, and head-and-neck computed tomograp

37 Conclusion IVIM parameters in the upper abdomen may differ substantially across MR imagers

38 However, intense uptake in the upper abdomen may limit the diagnostic utility of (11)C-

39 ionated radiotherapy to fields involving the upper abdomen (minimum total dose, 20 Gy; minimum number

40 ) coronal contrast-enhanced CT images of the upper abdomen obtained 12 days before the CT images show

41 ) coronal contrast-enhanced CT images of the upper abdomen obtained 12 days before the CT images show

42 ec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission.

43 ec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission.

44 ec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission.

45 ec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission.

46 ec, 1000/89; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission.Figur

47 1, one must realize that localization in the upper abdomen on SRS may be caused by a gastric carcinoi

48 pt in mind in patients presenting with acute upper abdomen pain and discharging sinus.

49 T fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the lung or upper abdomen performed with (n = 56) and without (n = 5

50 n the distribution of the compounds from the upper abdomen (primarily liver) to the lower abdomen (pr

51 quivalent counting rates than regions in the upper abdomen (SUVmean, -45% and -15% on average in the

52 re obtained in a single breath hold from the upper abdomen (T12 vertebra) to the pubic symphysis with

53 c PET scan was performed for 60 min over the upper abdomen; this was followed by a whole-body scan fo

54 CT of the upper abdomen was also performed ( Fig 4 ).

55 CT of the upper abdomen was also performed.

56 with tumor manifestations in the thorax and upper abdomen were acquired on a simultaneous hybrid PET

57 relevant ablative doses of radiation to the upper abdomen without unacceptable gastrointestinal toxi