ライフサイエンスコーパス: urinary catheter

1 repeat urine specimen obtained from the same urinary catheter.

2 ound infections, and 1 had C. difficile in a urinary catheter.

3 with a long-term (> or =30 days) indwelling urinary catheter.

4 , and 100% among patients with diabetes or a urinary catheter.

5 (Fg), into the bladder, which deposit on the urinary catheter.

6 perineum and proximal 6 inches (15.24 cm) of urinary catheters.

7 asymptomatic bacteriuria and frequent use of urinary catheters.

8 ominantly occurs in patients with indwelling urinary catheters.

9 stones or to encrust or obstruct indwelling urinary catheters.

10 rinary tract infections were associated with urinary catheters.

11 with ventilators, and fungal infections with urinary catheters.

12 spital-acquired infections, particularly for urinary catheters.

13 central venous catheters (0.85 [0.81-0.90]), urinary catheters (0.84 [0.80-0.88]), antimicrobials (0.

14 e-copy fim(+) plasmid increased adherence to urinary catheters 10-fold, and addition of an 18-copy fi

15 dents; 95% CI, 56.9-68.3) or with indwelling urinary catheters (19.1 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 16.4-

16 =2 of these factors (older age, diabetes, or urinary catheter), 24% of all urinalysis-positive urine

17 Our results indicate that improving urinary catheter adherence augments the bacterial interf

18 usted odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.1-0.2) and urinary catheter (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.1

19 ents in the treatment arm had placement of a urinary catheter after induction of general anesthesia a

20 atrophy had shorter latency to reach use of urinary catheter and longer latency to residential care

21 asound can reduce the need for an indwelling urinary catheter and the risk of catheter-associated uri

22 Adherence to urinary catheters and ability to prevent uropathogenic E

23 dence on wheelchair for mobility, the use of urinary catheters and placement in residential care were

24 n of balloon expandable device, avoidance of urinary catheter, and early removal of temporary pacemak

25 of appropriateness of indwelling venous and urinary catheters, and concordance between sedation orde

26 Urinary catheters are commonly placed during laparoscopi

27 Indwelling urinary catheters are commonly used in the management of

28 Urinary catheters are effective to establish bladder dra

29 Urinary catheters are used extensively in hospitals and

30 About 100 million urinary catheters are used globally each year.

31 we describe a rodent model for the study of urinary catheter-associated Candida albicans biofilm inf

32 o significant difference in monthly facility urinary catheter-associated infection rates, a non-equiv

33 ve microorganisms are more likely to cause a urinary catheter blockage owing to the urease activity o

34 ematuria resolved after insertion of a 3-way urinary catheter, but flank pain persisted.

35 . infect medical devices, such as venous and urinary catheters, by adhering to the surface and formin

36 ding to fair-quality evidence, antimicrobial urinary catheters can prevent bacteriuria in hospitalize

37 ighlight the potential of the copolymer as a urinary catheter coating for preventing CAUTIs.

38 In vitro, urinary catheter colonization by avirulent Escherichia c

39 ng the pathways by which bacteria colonise a urinary catheter could guide strategies to mitigate infe

40 versus 57%, respectively; and the number of urinary catheter days per patient decreased by 44% versu

41 duced by 63% (5.9 to 2.2), and the number of urinary catheter days per patient was reduced by 37% (1.

42 nificantly reduced CAUTI infection rates and urinary catheter days.

43 nificantly reduced CAUTI infection rates and urinary catheter days.

44 I/1000-catheter days by 63% (5.9 to 2.2) and urinary catheter days/patient by 37% (1.1 to 0.69, all P

45 Rates of CAUTI and urinary catheter device utilization ratio.

46 r, comorbidities (intravenous central lines, urinary catheters, diabetes mellitus, AIDS, end-stage re

47 Intraoperative urinary catheters did not reduce the risk of PUR after l

48 y introduces a novel smart sensor system for urinary catheters, enabling digital, continuous, automat

49 been developed to detect the early stages of urinary catheter encrustation and avoid the clinical cri

50 2.3%), wheelchair (9.6%), oxygen (9.0%), and urinary catheter equipment (4.2%) were among the most co

51 and form crystalline biofilms on indwelling urinary catheters, frequently leading to polymicrobial i

52 I, 1.43-29.4; P = .02) and the presence of a urinary catheter (HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.06-13.8; P = .04)

53 In the setting of a functioning, indwelling urinary catheter in a rat, Candida proliferated as a bio

54 omplicated UTI affecting patients who have a urinary catheter in place, often hospitalized patients o

55 ich can prevent encrustation and blockage of urinary catheters in a physiologically representative in

56 The efficacy of antimicrobial urinary catheters in hospitalized patients is poorly def

57 te the associated risks, an understanding of urinary catheter indications, placement and removal tech

58 Infection and blockage of indwelling urinary catheters is significant owing to its high incid

59 Indwelling urinary catheters (IUC) are the primary cause of urinary

60 hows a low efficacy of adherence to silicone urinary catheter material, possibly because the fim oper

61 g those from vascular catheter, denture, and urinary catheter models as well as uninfected devices.

62 rinary incontinence with the requirement for urinary catheters [multiple system atrophy versus Lewy b

63 Urinary catheters often become encrusted and blocked by

64 , history of prior UTI, or the presence of a urinary catheter or other urinary tract abnormality.

65 ludes 5271 elderly adults without indwelling urinary catheter or urostomy who were admitted to 534 Ko

66 ion, use of central venous catheters, use of urinary catheters, perception of team work, and percepti

67 Those in the control arm had no urinary catheter placement.

68 roved chest tube (PRE 24.3%->POST 54.8%) and urinary catheter (PRE 20.1%->POST 65.1%) removal by post

69 e measurements (esophageal probe, indwelling urinary catheter, pulse contour cardiac output monitorin

70 fter developing hospital-onset pneumonia and urinary catheter-related infection during hospitalizatio

71 test campus implemented a protocol requiring urinary catheter removal prior to urine sampling from a

72 Presence of an indwelling urinary catheter represents a significant risk factor fo

73 atical model for bacterial colonisation of a urinary catheter that integrates population dynamics and

74 ibe a novel infection-responsive coating for urinary catheters that provides a clear visual early war

75 Interventions to reduce urinary catheter use involve lists of "appropriate" indi

76 Urinary catheter use is prevalent in health care setting

77 and bedside efforts to reduce inappropriate urinary catheter use.

78 infection and its complications in long-term urinary catheter users.

79 lded no substantial improvements in CAUTI or urinary catheter utilization.

80 After OLIF, the indwelling urinary catheter was immediately removed, and every pati

81 .4-3.7) for both genders, and for indwelling urinary catheters was 1.6 (1.3-1.9) in men and 2.3 (1.9-

82 ment, early ambulation, and early removal of urinary catheter) was implemented in five academic and c

83 /or urinary incontinence with the need for a urinary catheter) was more frequent in clinically atypic

84 alization, and presence of central venous or urinary catheters were independently associated with HAI

85 revent uropathogenic E. coli from colonizing urinary catheters were studied by use of a sonication as

86 isability milestones (frequent falls, use of urinary catheters, wheelchair dependent, unintelligible

87 ere we report the results of impregnation of urinary catheters with a combination of rifampicin, spar

88 al venous catheters, respiratory support, or urinary catheters within 3 days preceding infection.