ライフサイエンスコーパス: urinary retention

1 bine, were used to treat epilepsy but caused urinary retention.

2 s infection, cancer, urinary obstruction, or urinary retention.

3 r development of secondary sequelae, such as urinary retention.

4 ORT: A 50-year-old male presented with acute urinary retention.

5 was associated with asymmetric weakness and urinary retention.

6 d lethality correlated with severe fecal and urinary retention.

7 dulla was responsible for the development of urinary retention.

8 showed signs of unbalanced hesitant walk and urinary retention.

9 lure, pneumonia, anastomotic leak, ileus, or urinary retention.

10 ess in the understanding of the causation of urinary retention.

11 Another patient had urinary retention.

12 d injury and also treat LUT symptoms such as urinary retention.

13 f concerns that they may predispose to acute urinary retention.

14 urinary flow rate, prostate volume, or acute urinary retention.

15 hyperplasia and the associated risk of acute urinary retention.

16 itis with quadriparesis, hyperaesthesia, and urinary retention.

17 rly effective in the treatment of women with urinary retention.

18 or painful distention of the bladder due to urinary retention.

19 g are effective in relieving obstruction and urinary retention.

20 a feeling of incomplete bladder emptying and urinary retention.

21 e, and reduces the risk of surgery and acute urinary retention.

22 resulted in a reduction in the rate of acute urinary retention (1.6% vs. 6.7%, a 77.3% relative reduc

23 Seven minor complications were urinary retention (4), transient brachial plexus injury,

24 er operation, the avulsed group demonstrated urinary retention, absence of bladder contractions and e

25 The risk of urinary tract infection and urinary retention after chemodenervation of the bladder

26 espiratory failure, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, anastomotic leak, and postoperative i

27 nstrated a milder phenotype with evidence of urinary retention and gastrointestinal dysmotility.

28 our understanding of the pathophysiology of urinary retention and incontinence where sensory feedbac

29 nary tract symptoms (LUTS) may lead to acute urinary retention and need for BPH-related surgery.

30 have all been linked to progression to acute urinary retention and need for surgery.

31 re post-MUS and pelvic organ prolapse repair urinary retention and obstruction, and urinary retention

32 has a role in the treatment of nonobstructed urinary retention and overactive bladder syndrome, espec

33 n but can cause urological disease including urinary retention and prostatitis.

34 ent quality of life and often leads to acute urinary retention and surgical intervention.

35 The risks of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy were

36 de alone reduced the long-term risk of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy.

37 continence but had higher rates of transient urinary retention and urinary tract infections.

38 anglionic sudomotor dysfunction, 9 of 11 had urinary retention and xeropthalmia, and 6 of 8 had xeros

39 wo patients developed small abscesses, 1 had urinary retention, and 1 had minor bleeding during lipos

40 , one man was admitted to hospital for acute urinary retention, and another had stricture interventio

41 the risk of arterial hypotension, pruritus, urinary retention, and motor blockade.

42 adder, resulting in bladder hyperdistension, urinary retention, and overflow incontinence.

43 Rates of hematoma, infection, urinary retention, and recurrence were not different bet

44 e effects were those of pilomotor reactions, urinary retention, and supine hypertension.

45 Such outcomes include hypotension, acute urinary retention, and the neuroleptic malignant syndrom

46 isease states, such as voiding postponement, urinary retention, and underactive or overactive bladder

47 se, prior history of urogynecologic surgery, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence.

48 ceration, paralytic ileus, pain, presyncope, urinary retention, and vomiting) and one patient had a g

49 nse criteria (aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.46), urinary retention (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.18-2.96), fatigu

50 Voiding difficulty and acute urinary retention are infrequently reported across all s

51 ical finding that both urge incontinence and urinary retention are responsive to this intervention.

52 taking anabolic steroids who presented with urinary retention, arthralgias, and peripheral edema, su

53 ely recruited 10 patients who presented with urinary retention as a neurological deficit that was att

54 Recognition of fever and urinary retention as prodromes of irreversible paraplegi

55 Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urological emergency

56 obstruction runs the risk of inducing acute urinary retention, because of the inhibitory effect of a

57 current urinary tract infections, refractory urinary retention, bladder stones, or renal insufficienc

58 Interestingly, these drugs also cause urinary retention, but it was unclear how.

59 tients presented with prodromes of fever and urinary retention, but were misdiagnosed by physicians o

60 e mechanisms by which retigabine could cause urinary retention: by decreasing smooth muscle excitabil

61 age, anticholinergic medication, history of urinary retention, constipation, out-of-hours surgery, i

62 or complications (such as bladder stones or urinary retention) develop.

63 Acute urinary retention developed in 99 men (7 percent) in the

64 Urinary retention developed mainly when the lesions invo

65 elop transient gastrointestinal dysmotility, urinary retention, dilated pupils, reduced heart rate va

66 A 10-year-old girl presented with ileus, urinary retention, dry mouth, lack of tears, fixed dilat

67 of sling takedown in the management of acute urinary retention following MUS procedures.

68 emergency department with a history of acute urinary retention, gross hematuria, and left flank pain

69 luded headache, myalgia, epididymo-orchitis, urinary retention, hematemesis, pneumonitis, and circula

70 rred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%.

71 outh in 8 of 79 (10%) vs 12 of 78 (15%), and urinary retention in 6 of 26 (23%) vs 3 of 18 (17%), res

72 The risk of urinary retention in a future pregnancy after mid-urethr

73 ostoperative bowel obstruction and 1 case of urinary retention in the LA group.

74 The incidence of urinary retention in the simple hysterectomy group was a

75 rved: 1 intraabdominal abscess and 1 case of urinary retention in the TVA group; 1 early postoperativ

76 address cause, diagnosis, and management of urinary retention in women.

77 This article describes a specific cause of urinary retention in young women, associated with a fail

78 s a description of the condition of isolated urinary retention in young women.

79 ulation, and clinical manifestations include urinary retention, incontinence, and recurrent urinary t

80 ces was assessed in 299 scenarios, including urinary retention, incontinence, wounds, urine volume me

81 ch as motor weakness, difficulty ambulating, urinary retention, increased nausea and vomiting, may de

82 potentially preventable conditions, such as urinary retention, infection, and pain.

83 ce of any adjudicated prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, invasive prostate surgical procedure,

84 the incidences of any prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, invasive surgical procedures, prostat

85 Post-operative urinary retention is a medical condition where patients

86 eed for surgery and the development of acute urinary retention, is not known.

87 re not associated with a substantial risk of urinary retention nor with a substantial increase in res

88 Postoperative urinary retention occurred in 5.8% of male patients (n =

89 There was no urinary retention or fecal incontinence.

90 aused by neuropathy or nerve damage, such as urinary retention or incontinence, as well as for the de

91 d flow rates, and reducing the risk of acute urinary retention or the requirement for benign prostati

92 Serious adverse events such as infection, urinary retention, or dyspareunia or other pain, excludi

93 ions, including spinal or epidural hematoma, urinary retention, or hemodynamic alterations, are advan

94 ficantly increased risk of repair breakdown, urinary retention, or residual incontinence up to 3 mont

95 epair urinary retention and obstruction, and urinary retention owing to detrusor underactivity.

96 Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a well-recognized complicati

97 e superior hypogastric plexus, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) may not be an uncommon problem.

98 Bar(Vglut2) ablation replicates the profound urinary retention produced by conventional lesions in th

99 a presumed protection against postoperative urinary retention (PUR), one of the most common complica

100 77%] of 564, OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.65]), urinary retention requiring catheterisation (LATP 35 [6%

101 The incidence of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization was low (tol

102 ransient difficulty falling asleep, and mild urinary retention (requiring early morning voiding).

103 contrast, the implanted group showed reduced urinary retention, return of reflexive bladder voiding c

104 tension (RR, 1.91 [CI, 1.60 to 2.28]), acute urinary retention (RR, 1.98 [CI, 1.63 to 2.40]), and all

105 h bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruct

106 in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruct

107 re conversion), postoperative complications (urinary retention, seroma), and need for overnight stay

108 rostatic hyperplasia, the incidence of acute urinary retention, the impact of therapy on the risk of

109 l haemorrhage (in six [2%] of 261 patients), urinary retention (three [1%]), and hypertension (three

110 1%] in the active surveillance group), acute urinary retention (three [2%] vs one [<1%]) and erectile

111 treated with HAL), two in the HAL group had urinary retention, two in the HAL group had vasovagal up

112 Acute urinary retention (UR) is common, yet variations in diag

113 toms for all types of sling erosions include urinary retention, urge and mixed incontinence, but synt

114 Urological Association symptom score, acute urinary retention, urinary incontinence, renal insuffici

115 ology, dysfunctional voiding patterns, acute urinary retention, urine collection techniques, diagnosi

116 but are not limited to voiding dysfunction, urinary retention, vaginal extrusion and urinary tract e

117 Acute urinary retention was a predictor of lower IPSS after PA

118 Acute urinary retention was assessed through review of communi

119 s were not significantly affected, and acute urinary retention was rare.

120 Postoperative urinary retention was the primary reason for 27.8% of un

121 One serious procedure-related adverse event, urinary retention, was reported.

122 ilateral PAE, lower baseline IPSS, and acute urinary retention were predictors of better clinical out

123 wo serious adverse events, polycythaemia and urinary retention, were considered related to siltuximab

124 t quality of life and may be associated with urinary retention, which can cause kidney insufficiency,