ライフサイエンスコーパス: urine culture

1 ure with matching organisms within 3 days of urine culture).

2 ity and susceptibility of a current positive urine culture.

3 can be diagnosed without an office visit or urine culture.

4 e laboratory assessment using urinalysis and urine culture.

5 tifying the infectious microorganisms is the urine culture.

6 ary tract, defined by either stone or pelvic urine culture.

7 owed 37% ID agreement with the gold standard urine culture.

8 s within a 1 hour timeframe when compared to urine culture.

9 between those who did and did not undergo a urine culture.

10 ack of consensus definitions of UTI based on urine culture.

11 d diagnostic tools, including urinalysis and urine culture.

12 and urinalysis (UA) were determined against urine culture.

13 t persons for asymptomatic bacteriuria using urine culture.

14 0.1%) were, respectively, positive by UA and urine culture.

15 ection relative to 33% detection by standard urine culture.

16 only 84 (48%) of these women had a positive urine culture.

17 ility of organisms in a patient's subsequent urine cultures.

18 Twelve patients (15%) had positive urine cultures.

19 lovir-resistant isolate from either blood or urine cultures.

20 lococcus aureus infection, catheter use, and urine cultures.

21 isolated from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine cultures.

22 ng bacterial vaginosis and interpretation of urine cultures.

23 was associated with a decline in unnecessary urine cultures.

24 that included results from a urinalysis and urine cultures.

25 e resistance was detected in 2,182 (5.3%) of urine cultures.

26 muridarum-inoculated male mice had positive urine cultures.

27 nd cost associated with inappropriate repeat urine cultures.

28 coli grew from 56% (145/259) of the positive urine cultures.

29 olone resistance was detected in 2182 (5.3%) urine cultures.

30 s were common and not predictive of positive urine cultures.

31 but these did not correlate to isolates from urine cultures.

32 infection is often preceded by inappropriate urine culturing.

33 se (adjusted risk ratio [RR] per doubling of urine culturing, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1

34 m 10 subjects with Escherichia coli-positive urine cultures, 26 subjects with confirmed non-TB tropic

35 Out of 1265 urine cultures, 264 (20.9 %) had no growth, 694 (54.9 %)

36 neral care medicine patients with a positive urine culture among 46 hospitals participating in a coll

37 uce hands-on time and materials required for urine culture analysis.

38 ompared with a reference method comprised of urine culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the sensitiv

39 eudoporcinus isolates were identified from a urine culture and a posthysterectomy wound culture.

40 rine samples were plated using both standard urine culture and expanded-spectrum EQUC protocols: stan

41 iation between performance of a preoperative urine culture and lower risk of postoperative UTI or SSI

42 esting for Ureaplasma spp was performed with urine culture and PCR pre-transplant.

43 esting for Ureaplasma spp was performed with urine culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) pretra

44 ce of symptoms, urinary leucocytes, positive urine culture and symptom resolution during antibiotic t

45 was treatment success, defined as a negative urine culture and the absence of fever and of subsequent

46 penem, respectively, had a positive baseline urine culture and were eligible for the primary efficacy

47 nitrite and leukocyte esterase tests, using urine culture and/or dipslide with species identificatio

48 re positive, with a sensitivity of 73.1% for urine cultures and a lower limit of detection of 10 CFU/

49 r a mean of 38.8 months to analyze data from urine cultures and antibiograms.

50 ip for ASB was associated with a decrease in urine cultures and antibiotic use when implemented at mu

51 The results support the deimplementation of urine cultures and associated antibiotic treatment prior

52 Blood and urine cultures and cultures of the left chest soft tissu

53 ry, many clinicians still order preoperative urine cultures and prescribe antibiotics for treatment o

54 e health departments led to reductions in NH urine cultures and total infections.

55 For urine culture processing, conditional urine cultures and urine white blood cell count as crite

56 included the clinicians who order or collect urine cultures and who order, dispense, or administer an

57 including history and physical examination, urine culture, and postvoid residual measurement, does n

58 of symptoms, urinary leucocytes, a positive urine culture, and symptom resolution during antibiotic

59 , antibiotic consumption, number of negative urine cultures, and emergence of bacterial resistance in

60 , antibiotic consumption, number of negative urine cultures, and emergence of bacterial resistance in

61 sical examination, urinary dipstick testing, urine cultures, and simple blood tests can provide direc

62 The ideas behind the reflex urine culture are to limit laboratory workload by not pe

63 Urine cultures are among the most common specimens recei

64 Urine cultures are nonspecific and often lead to misdiag

65 ries from UCLA supports the idea that reflex urine cultures are of value and describes what reflex pa

66 A patient's prior urine cultures are often considered when choosing empiri

67 Urine cultures are the highest volume specimen type for

68 Urine cultures are the most common microbiological test

69 lei reports that are currently observed from urine culture as a consequence of samples containing low

70 identified from the same patient's positive urine culture as a function of time elapsed from the pre

71 tive predictive values were calculated using urine culture as the gold standard.

72 The prevalence of CMV-positive urine cultures at base line was 42 percent; after two mo

73 49) of the patients had concomitant positive urine cultures at biopsy, and in 8 of 16 patients, colon

74 ecommend against performance of preoperative urine culture before nongenitourinary surgery, many clin

75 round times (TATs) for positive and negative urine cultures before and after implementation.

76 The decrease in urine cultures before and after the intervention was not

77 ents hospitalized with pneumonia or positive urine culture between December 2015-September 2017.

78 , with a uUTI diagnosis, an E. coli-positive urine culture between January 2017-December 2019, and su

79 55 % of urine cultures collected in primary care clinics were co

80 nurses' educational capabilities to improve urine culture collection.

81 inical laboratory evaluations for infection (urine culture, complete blood count, blood culture, and

82 Urine culture contamination occurred frequently in our c

83 Health-systems or medical centers starting urine culture diagnostic stewardship should implement co

84 evelop expert guidance on best practices for urine culture diagnostic stewardship.

85 s to enhance the accuracy and reliability of urine culture diagnostics within 1 hour of sample collec

86 In 14 of 49 patients, positive urine culture did not coincide with the biopsy, and in 1

87 %) of whom were treated without performing a urine culture during routine care.

88 oca that were recovered from sterile-site or urine cultures during 2012-2013.

89 Enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) detects live microorganisms in the

90 t, cultivable using an expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) protocol.

91 e sequencing (NGS) and expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC).

92 wardship should implement conditional reflex urine culturing first.

93 either a positive blood culture or positive urine culture for CMV at the diagnosis of retinitis.

94 We have developed a novel method for urine culture for office practice based on the use of fi

95 ; negative LR, 0.6; evidence range, 0.5-0.6; urine culture for urinary tract infection: positive LR,

96 e 18 guidance statements can optimize use of urine cultures for better patient outcomes.

97 Only first-positive urine cultures for each child were included.

98 Only the first positive urine cultures for each child were included.

99 rt study, including 22 019 pairs of positive urine cultures from 4351 patients across 2 healthcare sy

100 By comparison, all urine cultures from the animals with lethal acute renal

101 all of the following criteria were met: (1) urine cultures growing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneu

102 all of the following criteria were met: (1) urine cultures growing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneu

103 crobiological intention-to-treat population (urine culture >=105 colony-forming units/mL; <=2 microor

104 A positive urine culture (>/=105 CFU/mL) with no more than 2 uropat

105 ital 3, which implemented conditional reflex urine culturing had a 39.5% reduction in UTI DOT (95% co

106 Conditional reflex urine culturing had a large decrease on UTI antibiotic D

107 Bladder urine culture has been found to correlate poorly with in

108 onal diagnostic methods, like urinalysis and urine culture, have limitations-urinalysis is fast but l

109 itals should prioritize reducing unnecessary urine cultures (ie, diagnostic stewardship) to reduce an

110 e, with initiation of antibiotic therapy and urine culture if one or both tests are positive.

111 best to predict the likelihood of a positive urine culture in children at risk for urinary tract infe

112 These findings indicate that a negative urine culture in rabbits does not preclude the presence

113 asured as the proportion of residents with a urine culture in the prior 14 days.

114 included; 7.9% of resident assessments had a urine culture in the prior 14 days; this proportion was

115 midstream urine, E. coli grew from catheter urine cultures in 61%.

116 Only 12 (8.1%) of 148 urine cultures in animals with subacute renal candidiasi

117 The significance of quantitative urine cultures in patients at risk for hematogenous diss

118 tic prescribing associated with contaminated urine cultures in primary care clinics.

119 o determine the significance of quantitative urine cultures in renal candidiasis, we studied serial q

120 While reductions in the incidence of urine cultures (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.37; P < .0

121 Of the 14 572 patients with a positive urine culture included in the study (median [IQR] age, 7

122 Predictors for inappropriate repeat urine cultures included collection of the initial urine

123 748 patients (6820 pneumonia; 4928 positive urine culture) included at 48 hospitals.

124 d expanded-spectrum EQUC protocols: standard urine culture inoculated at 1 mul onto 2 agars incubated

125 imes higher than the median cost of $8 for a urine culture (IQR, $8-$16 for Q1-Q3).

126 nalysis is fast but lacks sensitivity, while urine culture is accurate but takes up to two days.

127 itis, empirical therapy without a pretherapy urine culture is often used.

128 able cutoff for identifying infants for whom urine culture is warranted.

129 The frequency of this microorganism in urine cultures is unknown.

130 ganciclovir, 11.4% had a resistant blood or urine culture isolate by 6 months of treatment and 27.5%

131 ciclovir-resistant blood culture isolate and urine culture isolate, respectively.

132 2 thresholds for blood culture isolates, for urine culture isolates an IC(50) >8.0 microM appeared to

133 d two annual follow-up examinations included urine culture, measurement of hemoglobin A1c and postvoi

134 This research marks a paradigm shift in urine culture methodology, paving the way for improved c

135 llei detection sensitivity than conventional urine culture methods and resulted in typical colony gro

136 y of the original pathogen to <103 CFU/mL on urine culture (microbiological eradication).

137 Compared to expanded-spectrum EQUC, standard urine culture missed 67% of uropathogens overall and 50%

138 A patient with an index urine culture obtained from an indwelling catheter (aOR,

139 7 mutations identified in both the blood and urine cultures of individual patients were identical in

140 rols over a 3-year period, comparing routine urine cultures of planktonic bacteria with cultures of s

141 Our outcomes were frequency of urine culture on admission and antimicrobial use.

142 Among 1,120 negative index urine cultures, only 4.7% of repeat cultures were positi

143 Combining routine care and study-performed urine cultures, only 84 (48%) of these women had a posit

144 t and >=105 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL in urine culture or the same pathogen present in concurrent

145 the ordering, processing (conditional reflex urine culturing) or reporting stage.

146 The routine performance of urinalysis, urine culture, or both during subsequent febrile illness

147 from office visits among patients who had a urine culture ordered between November 2018 and March 20

148 Additionally, hospital 3 noted fewer urine cultures ordered (22.8% immediate and 35.7% slope

149 oplasty resulted in substantial reduction in urine cultures ordered and antimicrobial prescriptions f

150 Secondary outcomes included rates of urine cultures ordered and performed and, a safety measu

151 und a significant reduction in the number of urine cultures ordered by 3.24 urine cultures per 1000 b

152 nd feedback, significantly reduced inpatient urine culture orders and CAUTI SIR.

153 Urine culture orders and days of antibiotic therapy (DOT

154 twork to determine how well they predicted 3 urine culture outcomes: (1) no microbial growth vs. any

155 the number of urine cultures ordered by 3.24 urine cultures per 1000 bed-days (P = .003).

156 Urine cultures per 1000 resident-days decreased by 0.38

157 (DOT) per 1000 resident-days, the number of urine cultures per 1000 resident-days, and Clostridioide

158 d by the CMS policy, the median frequency of urine culture performance did not change after CMS polic

159 The rate of change in urine culture performance increased minimally during the

160 I were also not associated with preoperative urine culture performance.

161 ective study of adult inpatients who had >=1 urine culture performed during their hospitalization bet

162 ropriate repeat urine culture to be a repeat urine culture performed following a negative index cultu

163 lyzed the proportion of inappropriate repeat urine cultures performed <48 h after the index culture.

164 dicate it is possible to limit the number of urine cultures performed by eliminating those that have

165 a large decrease on UTI antibiotic DOTs and urine cultures performed.

166 between significant growth and no growth of urine cultures plated onto standard blood and MacConkey

167 ] per milliliter of 1 or 2 microorganisms in urine culture) plus pyuria (ie, any number of white bloo

168 The interpretation of a urine culture positive at any concentration, on the othe

169 All urine cultures positive for S. aureus between 2010 and 2

170 A total of 2540 urine cultures positive for S. aureus from 2054 patients

171 ation found between the presence of positive urine cultures, positive tissue cultures, and the histol

172 Varying the bacterial count thresholds for urine culture positivity did not alter best clinical pre

173 The factors that affect repeat urine culturing practices are not well understood.

174 We examined nursing home urine-culturing practices and their association with ant

175 We sought to evaluate how well previous urine cultures predict the identity and susceptibility o

176 or 14 resident characteristics, nursing home urine culturing predicted total antibiotic use (adjusted

177 iscontinuing routine processing of screening urine cultures prior to elective joint arthroplasty resu

178 For urine culture processing, conditional urine cultures and

179 mens reported as "no growth" by the standard urine culture protocol.

180 l microbiology laboratory using the standard urine culture protocol.

181 Reflex urine culture protocols contingent upon a screening dips

182 tions are prone to overdiagnosis, and reflex urine culture protocols offer a valuable opportunity for

183 s with cancer are often excluded from reflex urine culture protocols, especially if they are severely

184 o are culture negative according to standard urine culture protocols.

185 Nursing homes have highly divergent urine culturing rates; this variability is associated wi

186 The questions are, first, whether reflex urine culture reduces workloads significantly and, secon

187 Lab software improved the time to result for urine culture, reducing the average time to result by 4

188 Urine culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis, b

189 Among inpatients, over half of all urine cultures repeated in <48 h were inappropriate.

190 There were 2,060 (7.3%) urine cultures repeated in <48 h.

191 For urine culture reporting, appropriate practices included

192 tegies were recommended to optimize ordering urine cultures: requiring documentation of symptoms, sen

193 ), were immunocompromised, or had a positive urine culture result at index uUTI.

194 urine within 3 days; 3 (27%) had a positive urine culture result first.

195 ; and urinary tract infection after negative urine culture result, 5% (evidence range, 0%-0.11%; P <

196 ; and urinary tract infection after positive urine culture result, 80% (evidence range, 0%-8.3%; P <

197 A patient's prior urine culture results are useful in predicting the ident

198 onstrates that no longer routinely reporting urine culture results from noncatheterized medical and s

199 ofloxacin can be used empirically when prior urine culture results indicate a ciprofloxacin-susceptib

200 der diagnosed with patient with a UTI before urine culture results were known and urine cultures show

201 mptom resolution after treatment by standard urine culture results.

202 Results of urine culture, serologic,and polymerase chain reaction t

203 inely been used as a screening tool prior to urine culture set up.

204 before urine culture results were known and urine cultures showed either no microbial growth or >=10

205 were eligible if they had a febrile UTI and urine culture showing a single uropathogen.

206 biotic therapy in days (LOT) associated with urine cultures, standardized by 1000 bed-days, were obta

207 en overlooked or entirely missed in standard urine culture, stressing the need for novel diagnostic m

208 Current urine culture techniques, while essential, often encount

209 mation not currently reported using standard urine culture techniques.

210 opulation, empirical therapy for UTI without urine culture testing and overdiagnosis of UTI were comm

211 d to examine the incidence of urinalysis and urine culture testing for select diagnoses and patient f

212 Urine culture testing varied by principal diagnosis.

213 We defined an inappropriate repeat urine culture to be a repeat urine culture performed fol

214 neutrophilic tubulitis were correlated with urine culture (U/C) results.

215 ediatric patients with suspected UTI who had urine culture, UA, and urine Gram stain performed from a

216 oning decision tree algorithm for predicting urine culture (UC) positivity based on macroscopic and m

217 The yield of urine cultures varied according to severity and duration

218 The IPTW analysis found that preoperative urine culture was not associated with SSI (adjusted OR [

219 Preoperative urine culture was performed for 10.5% of surgical proced

220 Nursing home urine culturing was measured as the proportion of reside

221 ive value, and negative predictive value for urine culture were 85%, 29%, 31%, and 83%; for leukocyte

222 Charges for urine culture were present for 1197242 (27%) admissions,

223 laboratory charges for inappropriate repeat urine cultures were $16,800 over the study period.

224 cystitis with isolation of E. coli in their urine cultures were assessed.

225 e period was created; patients with positive urine cultures were excluded.

226 e period was created; patients with positive urine cultures were excluded.

227 In comparison I, TATs for 61,157 urine cultures were extracted for two periods correspond

228 atients with A. omnincolens present in their urine cultures were identified.

229 Of these, 1,120 (54.4%) urine cultures were inappropriate.

230 renal candidiasis, more than one-half of all urine cultures were negative for C. albicans.

231 Urine cultures were negative prior to the episodes and a

232 e with the biopsy, and in 19 of 49 patients, urine cultures were negative.

233 The urine cultures were negative.

234 Blood and urine cultures were negative.

235 Overall, 28,141 urine cultures were performed on 21,306 patients.

236 f acute urinary cystitis, 294 patients whose urine cultures were positive with a growth of >10(4) col

237 Periodic urine cultures were taken, daily diaries were kept, and

238 A total of 12,931 urine cultures were tested and analyzed with an overall

239 A total of 1,581 urine cultures were tested.

240 Post-therapy interviews and urine cultures were used to assess clinical and microbio

241 gnosis and optimal treatment often require a urine culture, which takes an average of 1.5 to 2 days f

242 correctly diagnosed E. coli UTI and negative urine cultures, which would help preventing antibiotic m

243 The percentage of patients with a positive urine culture who had ASB (diagnostic stewardship metric

244 ge in percentage of patients with a positive urine culture who had ASB.

245 ositive culture, with patients with positive urine cultures who received antibiotic treatment but did

246 ame pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures) who achieved overall treatment success (

247 A retrospective study of 58 098 urine cultures with a paired dipstick urinalysis with or

248 asymptomatic bacteriuria (the proportion of urine cultures with bacteriuria in asymptomatic women) w

249 Asymptomatic bacteriuria events (urine cultures with colony count 105 CFU/mL of a uropath

250 Performance of urine culture within 30 days prior to surgery.

251 le maintaining high sensitivity and reducing urine culture workload.