戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nterior vermis and posterior vermis (nodulus/uvula).
2 sneezing, throat discomfort, swelling of the uvula.
3 raflocculus, bilateral fastigial nuclei, and uvula.
4 sed on the posterior pharyngeal wall and the uvula.
5 ted FOXF2 expression in the developing human uvula.
6     The microflora pattern obtained from the uvula and endoscopic swabs did not correlate well with m
7                    In the lower folia of the uvula and nodulus, Purkinje cell expression of PKC-delta
8               Swabs were also taken from the uvula and the endoscope.
9                         Hypertelorism, bifid uvula, and arterial tortuosity approached statistical si
10 owing: tonsillar zones, larynx, soft palate, uvula, and nasal cavities.
11 eral cerebellar nuclei; and the nodulus, the uvula, and the paraflocculus.
12 pothesize that Purkinje cells in the nodulus/uvula do not generate suppression signals like those obs
13 n of the flocculus/paraflocculus, or nodulus/uvula, included the following: vestibular (e.g., z) and
14 get a particular cell group, nodulus/ventral uvula inhibition targets a large diversity of cell types
15 estibular nuclei targeted by nodulus/ventral uvula inhibition using orthodromic identification from t
16 sterior vermis, encompassing the nodulus and uvula, integrates vestibular inputs from both the otolit
17 l role of the cerebellar nodulus and ventral uvula (lobules X and IXc,d of the vermis) for vestibular
18 ermis (lobules I-V), and nodulus and ventral uvula (lobules X-IX of the posterior vermis).
19 ifestations that included hepatopathy, bifid uvula, malignant hyperthermia, hypogonadotropic hypogona
20 and 10 of the cerebellar vermis (nodulus and uvula), MSTd neurons respond selectively to heading and
21 lesion-depletion studies in which unilateral uvula-nodular lesions caused depletion of PKC-immunolabe
22 lation modulated CFRs and SSs in ipsilateral uvula-nodular Purkinje cells, demonstrating that the pri
23 afferent climbing fibers that project to the uvula-nodulus (folia 8-10).
24 voking CFRs and SSs in Purkinje cells of the uvula-nodulus in chloralose-urethane-anesthetized rabbit
25  and Lugaro cells) and Purkinje cells in the uvula-nodulus of anesthetized mice during vestibular sti
26 fferent mossy fiber input to the ipsilateral uvula-nodulus was not necessary for SS modulation.
27 d climbing fiber signal to the contralateral uvula-nodulus, causing loss of both vestibularly modulat
28 r primary afferent signal to the ipsilateral uvula-nodulus, while leaving intact the vestibular climb
29 te the largest mossy fiber projection to the uvula-nodulus.
30                     The majority (94% to the uvula/nodulus and 100% to the flocculus) innervates the
31 fferent neurons projecting to the cerebellar uvula/nodulus and flocculus lobules in the gerbil.
32     For otolith organ-related afferents, the uvula/nodulus receives strong inputs from primary otolit
33                       The cerebellar nodulus/uvula (NU) has been shown to participate in this computa
34                                  The nodulus/uvula (NU) in the posterior cerebellar vermis is known t
35  posterior vermis [also known as nodulus and uvula (NU)] are thought important for spatial orientatio
36 audal cerebellar vermis (nodulus and ventral uvula, NU) reflect the output of the first set of comput
37 active (Fos-IR) granule cells in the ventral uvula of the cerebellum.
38 ns in lobules X (nodulus) and IXc,d (ventral uvula) of the caudal vermis during vestibular stimulatio
39 ns in lobules X (nodulus) and IXc,d (ventral uvula) of the macaque caudal vermis during vestibular st
40 sity and aneurysms, hypertelorism, and bifid uvula or cleft palate and is caused by heterozygous muta
41               Obtaining a simple swab of the uvula or endoscope itself appears to be a poor substitut
42  = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.8), enlargement of the uvula (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9), and tongue enlargemen
43 eart defects, hypomastia, cleft palate/bifid uvula, progressive scoliosis, and structural brain abnor
44                Purkinje cells in the ventral uvula respond to patterns of optic flow resulting from s
45 ortions of bacteria found when comparing the uvula swab to the esophageal biopsies and when comparing
46 tion within the granule cells of the ventral uvula that may be a common neural substrate for some eff
47 ory feedback from the cerebellar nodulus and uvula, the site of canal-otolith integration.
48 urally lack the structural equivalent of the uvula, we demonstrated FOXF2 expression in the developin
49  the medial half of folium IXcd, the ventral uvula, which spans the medial two stripe pairs (P1+/- to
50 e principal cerebellar projection was to the uvula with a less dense projection to the nodulus.
51 t phenotype characterized by familial absent uvula, with a short posterior border of the soft palate,
52  the labeled fibers were found mostly in the uvula, with fewer afferents in the flocculus and paraflo
53    If our hypothesis is correct, the nodulus/uvula would effectively provide consistent "ground truth