ライフサイエンスコーパス: vaginal delivery

1 a =-1.93; 95% CI: [-3.64, -0.22], reference: vaginal delivery).

2 pse is strongly associated with a history of vaginal delivery.

3 e was delivered at full term via spontaneous vaginal delivery.

4 ay (>/=6 days; 3.5, 1.6-7.6) than those with vaginal delivery.

5 , 1.2-1.4) than among women with spontaneous vaginal delivery.

6 l HSV infection who gave birth to infants by vaginal delivery.

7 erved during caesarian sections or premature vaginal delivery.

8 rnal head compression associated with normal vaginal delivery.

9 eding, than usual care among patients having vaginal delivery.

10 cational level, prolonged breastfeeding, and vaginal delivery.

11 t CRC compared with individuals born through vaginal delivery.

12 illomavirus (HPV) presumably acquired during vaginal delivery.

13 e born by cesarean delivery and 763 (78%) by vaginal delivery.

14 n uneventful perinatal course after a normal vaginal delivery.

15 for postpartum hemorrhage in patients having vaginal delivery.

16 evels of S100A8-A9 than from infants born by vaginal delivery.

17 orn by CS differed clearly from mice born by vaginal delivery.

18 cal treatment of retained placenta following vaginal delivery.

19 and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.12) for operative vaginal delivery.

20 She was born at full term via spontaneous vaginal delivery.

21 pregnant multiparous women with a successful vaginal delivery.

22 of obesity than did their siblings born via vaginal delivery.

23 ence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.36] compared to vaginal delivery.

24 ery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to planned vaginal delivery.

25 ation rather than proceeding with a plan for vaginal delivery.

26 neonatal morbidity, as compared with planned vaginal delivery.

27 The outcome was cesarean (versus vaginal) delivery.

28 All births were inborn vaginal deliveries.

29 5.5 to 9.3% (p < 0.01) for all non-operative vaginal deliveries.

30 f episiotomy, particularly for non-operative vaginal deliveries.

31 f complications such as preeclampsia and non-vaginal deliveries.

32 re supporting this practice is from low-risk vaginal deliveries.

33 ate of severe perineal tears in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries.

34 ors associated with its use in non-operative vaginal deliveries.

35 We used propensity scores to match CD with vaginal deliveries (1:1) and prelabor CD with unschedule

36 onsmoker, had undergone uncomplicated normal vaginal delivery 15 years earlier, was not taking oral c

37 D) age at follow-up was 17.7 (4.1) years for vaginal delivery, 16.6 (4.2) years for planned CD, and 1

38 aneous vaginal delivery, 31% after operative vaginal delivery, 27% after scheduled cesarean delivery,

39 rineal tear rate was reduced in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries (3.3% versus 3.6%, adj. OR 0.92; 95%

40 seline to week 12 were 19% after spontaneous vaginal delivery, 31% after operative vaginal delivery,

41 s. 385 minutes, P<0.001), as was the time to vaginal delivery (398 minutes vs. 479 minutes, P<0.001).

42 was also strongly associated with unassisted vaginal delivery (93.8%, vs. 71.9% with planned in-hospi

43 Among women planning a vaginal delivery, a single oral dose of azithromycin res

44 rol phase involving 210,132 women undergoing vaginal delivery across 78 secondary-level hospitals in

45 th a slightly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (adjRR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 0.02

46 OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 2.03-2.23]) and women with vaginal deliveries (adjusted OR, 2.60 [95% CI, 2.41-2.80

47 Cesarean-section (CS) birth, as opposed to vaginal delivery, affects early mother-to-infant transmi

48 The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decre

49 pmental disorders compared to those born via vaginal delivery, although mechanisms remain unclear.

50 with stays that were "too short" (<24 h for vaginal deliveries and <72 h for cesarean-section delive

51 There were 4 vaginal deliveries and 2 cesarians.

52 rom 1.3 to 6.6 d: 0.5 to 6.2 d for singleton vaginal deliveries and 2.5 to 9.3 d for cesarean-section

53 taying too short ranged from 0.2% to 83% for vaginal deliveries and from 1% to 75% for cesarean-secti

54 Ten percent of claims involved vaginal deliveries and minor non-body cavity procedures,

55 s according to whether a woman has any prior vaginal deliveries and the number of prior cesarean sect

56 aried according to whether she had any prior vaginal deliveries and, in the case of length of postnat

57 Of these, 181 mothers had a vaginal delivery and 143 had a CS delivery (60 with and

58 ht (44 male and 44 female) neonates (65 with vaginal delivery and 23 with cesarean delivery) complete

59 ncluding an estimation of the probability of vaginal delivery and an ultrasound estimation of the ris

60 is, six vs 13; and jaundice, ten vs 12 after vaginal delivery and caesarean section, respectively).

61 Birth by assisted vaginal delivery and primiparity were marginally signifi

62 l for recovery of pelvic organ support after vaginal delivery and that disordered elastic fiber homeo

63 nsive disorder in pregnancy, and spontaneous vaginal delivery and the proportion of individuals who s

64 e initial postpartum opioid prescribed after vaginal delivery and the subsequent total dose of opioid

65 dy included mother-child dyads who underwent vaginal delivery and were exposed to neuraxial labor ana

66 ood allergy in early childhood compared with vaginal delivery and whether these associations were med

67 98.2% were singleton pregnancies, 68.8% were vaginal deliveries, and 52.1% were covered by private in

68 Compared with vaginal delivery, and after controlling for measured cov

69 , including oxytocin augmentation, operative vaginal delivery, and cesarean delivery (aRR, 1.33; 95%

70 utures for perineal injury after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and many millions more worldwide.

71 e and married and had a full-term pregnancy, vaginal delivery, and no clinical conditions.

72 er occurs in up to a third of women at first vaginal delivery, and of these a third have new bowel sy

73 ed by its association with chorioamnionitis, vaginal delivery, and pneumonia.

74 ational diabetes, labor induction, operative vaginal delivery, and previous cesarean delivery increas

75 OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.22) compared with vaginal delivery, and the magnitude of the association w

76 deliveries (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.36) and vaginal deliveries (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.77).

77 .07; 95% CI 8.11-17.97), or had an operative vaginal delivery (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI 1.32-4.70), pre-lab

78 rematurity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.5), vaginal delivery (AOR, 2.9), low NK cell percentage (AOR

79 Parturition: Complications during vaginal delivery are rare.

80 ack of experience of the proceduralist and a vaginal delivery are two risk factors that increase the

81 retrospective analysis suggested complicated vaginal delivery as a modifying risk factor in DYT1.

82 dren delivered by acute and elective CS with vaginal delivery as the reference were calculated by usi

83 actic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at five hospitals in Burkina Faso, Egyp

84 actic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at four hospitals in Ecuador, Egypt, an

85 The direct cost of an uncomplicated vaginal delivery at HUM was US$62 and the direct cost of

86 n with a singleton fetus who were attempting vaginal delivery at more than 36 weeks of gestation and

87 strative records of singleton live births by vaginal delivery between April 1, 2006, and March 31, 20

88 Compared with vaginal delivery, birth by cesarean delivery was not ass

89 rates, emergency cesarean section, operative vaginal delivery, birth weight, Apgar score, and various

90 cy: planning another caesarean or attempting vaginal delivery, both of which are associated with pote

91 reased towards term, were higher 1 day after vaginal delivery but declined towards pre-term levels by

92 007, planned cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (but not compared with unscheduled cesa

93 entral adiposity compared with those born by vaginal delivery, but associations did not remain after

94 in neonatal acquisition of microbiota during vaginal delivery, but not Cesarean delivery.

95 Compared with vaginal delivery, caesarean delivery had a protective as

96 ur induction; modes of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery, caesarean section, or instrumental del

97 Compared with vaginal delivery, CD was associated with higher body mas

98 Compared with a plan for vaginal delivery, CDMR may be associated with lower rate

99 ument trends in elective deliveries (induced vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery with no labor trial,

100 ory activities, showed a twofold increase in vaginal delivery compared to CS with or without labor (a

101 nce of antimicrobial peptide upregulation in vaginal delivery compared to CS with or without labor.

102 microbial peptides (AMP) were upregulated in vaginal delivery compared to CS with or without labor.

103 ong the risk factors examined in this study, vaginal delivery compared with cesarean section (odds ra

104 y and significantly lower in infants born by vaginal delivery compared with those born by elective ce

105 rean sections, deliveries without labor, and vaginal delivery complications.

106 s associated with a reduction in spontaneous vaginal deliveries (confounder-adjusted [Cadj] relative

107 p = 0.019) with injury relative to uninjured vaginal delivery controls at 3d.

108 Valsalva maneuver associated with vaginal delivery could explain the occurrence of the hem

109 Among vaginal deliveries, early-term neonates (6.8%) had a sig

110 among a cohort of opioid-naive women with a vaginal delivery enrolled in Tennessee's Medicaid progra

111 Among non-operative vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia, non-reassuring f

112 Compared with women having vaginal deliveries, fully adjusted multivariable analysi

113 In vaginal deliveries, GBS-IAP was associated with higher B

114 nned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery group (2.2% and 1.9%, respectively; odd

115 ivered earlier than did those in the planned-vaginal-delivery group (mean number of days from randomi

116 rean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal-delivery group.

117 arly discharge of newborns following routine vaginal delivery has become common practice, its safety

118 Childbirth, specifically vaginal delivery, has been recognized as the most import

119 seropositivity (JCPyV, HPyV7, HPyV10, CMV), vaginal delivery (HPyV10), breastfeeding (CMV), younger

120 ild mortality rate was lower for CD than for vaginal deliveries (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.89 to 0.91; p <

121 e similar for those born by CD compared with vaginal deliveries (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.10; p =

122 years if they were born via CD compared with vaginal deliveries (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.28; p <

123 Vaginal delivery, hysterectomy, chronic straining, norma

124 study included 205 994 singleton births with vaginal deliveries in a single integrated health care sy

125 ternal sepsis or death in women with planned vaginal delivery in low-resource settings, but whether i

126 with early-onset CRC compared with birth by vaginal delivery in the overall population in Sweden.

127 lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy.

128 ze whether a cesarean section (C-section) or vaginal delivery influence perianal involvement.

129 Retained placenta following vaginal delivery is a major cause of postpartum haemorrh

130 suggest that use of neuraxial analgesia for vaginal delivery is associated with a 14% decrease in th

131 Birth by vaginal delivery is associated with higher antibody resp

132 Use of labor neuraxial analgesia for vaginal delivery is suggested to reduce the risk of post

133 livery, but its effect on those with planned vaginal delivery is unknown.

134 with a previous caesarean section planning a vaginal delivery, it is a rare occurrence.

135 eliveries (SVD) and 3 days post instrumental vaginal deliveries (IVD).

136 taneous vaginal delivery (SVD), instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD), overall CS (OCS) and urgent/emer

137 ollowing a short stay (less than 1 day after vaginal delivery, less than 2 days after cesarean birth)

138 r year of birth, lower 5-minute Apgar score, vaginal delivery, married mother, and region of the stat

139 ing during labor, we hypothesized that among vaginal deliveries, maternal body mass index is associat

140 2.5 morphine milligram equivalents [MME] for vaginal deliveries; median 104.4 vs 75.0 MME for cesarea

141 NKT) cell subset was increased compared with vaginal delivery mice.

142 across calendar years was marginal for both vaginal delivery modes (VDM).

143 D PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal cohort study of vaginal deliveries of singleton live infants born from 2

144 tigated the capacity of nasal, sublingual or vaginal delivery of DNA-PEI polyplexes to prime immune r

145 ittle information is available regarding the vaginal delivery of larger and more polar molecules that

146 Direct vaginal delivery of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) represen

147 However, we found that vaginal delivery of mucoinert nanosuspensions of histone

148 We pursued direct vaginal delivery of sperm-binding monoclonal antibodies

149 uscle rehabilitation (performed either after vaginal delivery or after secondary repair remote from d

150 mental stimulus in 41 infants born by either vaginal delivery or by elective cesarean section.

151 tumors compared to those born by spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.12-1.62] P-value = 0

152 elevated for cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.47), and, f

153 , 95% CI: 6.09-72.29, p < .001), followed by vaginal delivery (OR = 17.63, 95% CI: 5.59-55.51, p < .0

154 Negative association was found for vaginal delivery (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.61; p < 0.005

155 ed with adverse outcomes following operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is crucial for optimizing obstetr

156 iotomy rates fell from 21.6 to 14.3% for all vaginal deliveries (p < 0.01), and from 15.5 to 9.3% (p

157 e population-based cohort study, we included vaginal deliveries performed in French hospitals (N = 58

158 to include cesarean deliveries and assisted vaginal deliveries (pooled hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1

159 6-year-old male child, born at full term via vaginal delivery, presented with a history of ataxia and

160 had subdural haemorrhages: three were normal vaginal deliveries (risk 6.1%), five were delivered by f

161 itivity included maternal COVID-19 symptoms, vaginal delivery, rooming-in practice, Black race or His

162 nfidence interval [CI], 1.6-1.9) or assisted vaginal delivery (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) than among w

163 y and the postpartum months; (4) spontaneous vaginal delivery should be the aim and actively encourag

164 Among women with assisted vaginal delivery, significant increased risks were seen

165 ame prophylactic agent, trials that included vaginal delivery, single-arm studies, conference abstrac

166 ilk samples from individuals giving birth by vaginal delivery, suggesting that it is not the operatio

167 marks following VD: 2 days after spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD) and 3 days post instrumental va

168 Spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) remained the greatest risk factor

169 h different delivery modes (DM): spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), instrumental vaginal delivery (I

170 Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.33 (95%

171 In males born by vaginal delivery, the expression of Cd36 at PND64 was co

172 Among women planning vaginal delivery, this analysis provides evidence indica

173 s' gestation or more and who were planning a vaginal delivery to receive a single 2-g oral dose of az

174 ulting in CD (TOL-CD), or a TOL resulting in vaginal delivery (TOL-VD).

175 ) on healthy mothers and term newborns after vaginal deliveries (VD) is still inconclusive and little

176 etric mode of delivery defined as unassisted vaginal delivery (VD), assisted VD, elective CS, and eme

177 Newborns were compared by delivery type: vaginal delivery (VD), cesarean section (CS) after labor

178 nce (PND21-P27), compared to animals born by vaginal delivery (VD).

179 a lower rate of breastfeeding compared with vaginal delivery (VD).

180 Complicated vaginal delivery was also a predictor of T1DM (HR, 1.93;

181 Vaginal delivery was associated with a significantly inc

182 Vaginal delivery was attempted by 17,898 women, and 15,8

183 that recovered by 6 months, whilst assisted vaginal delivery was prolonged suggesting persistent neu

184 Prior vaginal delivery was protective against adverse VBAC out

185 Cesarean delivery, as opposed to vaginal delivery, was associated with an increased risk

186 ta on 20,366 mother-infant pairs with normal vaginal deliveries, we measured changes in length of sta

187 For vaginal delivery, we compared children exposed to GBS-IA

188 Women with cesarean and assisted vaginal deliveries were at increased risk for rehospital

189 , gestation <25 weeks, chorioamnionitis, and vaginal delivery were all strongly associated with EOD.

190 Older age, multiparity, and preterm and vaginal delivery were associated with lack of intravenou

191 n aged 15 to 49 years undergoing their first vaginal delivery were included.

192 Cesarean section, induction, and operative vaginal delivery were more common, whereas fetal distres

193 Infants born by vaginal delivery were more likely to serorevert at a you

194 1,107 women with retained placenta following vaginal delivery were recruited.

195 adjusted differences between planned CS and vaginal delivery were significant before 39.5 wk gestati

196 anzania, in which 210,132 patients underwent vaginal delivery, were randomly assigned to the interven

197 ks postpartum from an uneventful spontaneous vaginal delivery who was transferred to our institution

198 We hypothesize that infants born by vaginal delivery will show lower noxious-evoked brain ac

199 1542 women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery with a second-degree perineal tear or e

200 en with prior cesarean section who attempted vaginal delivery with a singleton birth.

201 s women at 6-12 months after birth: Group 1, vaginal delivery with anal sphincter tear (n = 93); grou

202 ation to planned cesarean section or planned vaginal delivery with cesarean only if indicated.

203 Vaginal delivery with obstetrical trauma is a risk facto

204 .14) or in the percentage of women who had a vaginal delivery with the use of forceps or vacuum (115

205 with anal sphincter tear (n = 93); group 2, vaginal delivery without anal sphincter tear (n = 79); a