ライフサイエンスコーパス: venation

1 genera, has so far been based mainly on wing venation.

2 perfamily Elateroidea based on the hind wing venation.

3 30 genera with laminar leaves and reticulate venation.

4 twings retain noticeably more wild-type wing venation.

5 iterature on a wide range of aspects of leaf venation.

6 opment of M. truncatula, in addition to leaf venation.

7 evolutionary dynamics of succulence and leaf venation.

8 aped, or fused cotyledons), and altered leaf venation.

9 s, but it diverges markedly in leaf form and venation.

10 L2 in multiple downstream pathways affecting venation.

11 commonness of reticulate, hierarchical leaf venation.

12 al information about leaf shape and existing venation.

13 olecular and genetic mechanisms of C(4) leaf venation 1262 III.

14 ial resistance-32% and 49%- was in the minor venation, 18% and 21% in the major venation, and 14% and

15 parl1 mutants display parallel leaf venation, aberrant localization of the provascular marke

16 Although a hierarchical-reticulate venation also occurs in some groups of extinct seed plan

17 Venation and apposition of the wing surfaces are process

18 Three C(3) species have both increased venation and enlarged bundle sheath cells, and there is

19 cribe the development and plasticity of leaf venation and its adaptation across environments globally

20 ance, leaf hyponasty, and inhibition of leaf venation and lateral root development.

21 ntogeny, directly impacting features such as venation and leaf bases.

22 e correlations in the ontogenies of parallel venation and linear stomatal files in monocots, and the

23 Here we summarize current knowledge of leaf venation and review recent progress in understanding mol

24 dicots, most monocot leaves display parallel venation and sheathing bases wherein the margins overlap

25 ith maximum photosynthetic rate through leaf venation and substantiate the theory that an increase in

26 mplications for the molecular development of venation and tissue differentiation, as well as the evol

27 the minor venation, 18% and 21% in the major venation, and 14% and 4% in the petiole.

28 traits relating to lamina and xylem anatomy, venation, and composition, but gs was not plastic with g

29 n three independent groups with hierarchical venation: angiosperms, Gnetum (gymnosperm) and Dipteris

30 e findings point to a new functional role of venation architecture and small leaf size in drought tol

31 Additionally, venation architecture determines the sensitivity of K(le

32 d highlights the importance of leaf size and venation architecture for grass performance in past, pre

33 Variation in Kleaf arose from differences in venation architecture that influenced xylem and especial

34 d leaves of woody angiosperms of contrasting venation architecture to severing treatments in vivo, an

35 aves vary enormously in their size and their venation architecture, of which one major function is to

36 ever been demonstrated for contrasting major venation architectures, including the most basic dichoto

37 The design and function of leaf venation are important to plant performance, with key im

38 ning of veins 3 and 4 and to prevent ectopic venation between them.

39 The large proportion of resistance in the venation can explain why stomata respond to leaf xylem d

40 he leaf resulted in the pathways outside the venation comprising only 36% and 26% of R(leaf).

41 , originally identified by its aberrant leaf venation, corresponds to the Arabidopsis nucleolin gene.

42 to develop wing models that include complex venations, corrugations and camber.

43 The repeated evolution of 3D venation decouples leaf water storage from hydraulic pat

44 nalysis we identified five genes that showed venation defects.

45 nd size of stomata and subsidiary cells, and venation density for a sample of extant angiosperms and

46 Reticulate and parallel venation: extending the model?

47 Leaf shape is associated with venation features that affect desiccation resistance.

48 leaves from fragments by calculating a "leaf venation fingerprint" from topology and geometry.

49 icted to provascular and procambial cells as venation forms.

50 grams have been developed for the reticulate venation found in dicots.

51 ated image analysis program for the parallel venation found in monocots has yet to be developed.

52 assessed are C(3) plants but have increased venation in leaves.

53 ptomics as a candidate regulator of parallel venation in maize (Zea mays) leaves.

54 he auxin efflux carrier PIN1, highly reduced venation, initiation of multiple cotyledons, and gradual

55 ange of plant biologists to incorporate leaf venation into their research.

56 esults reveal how the size structure of leaf venation is a critical determinant of the spread of embo

57 Leaf venation is a pivotal trait in the success of vascular p

58 Leaf venation is a showcase of plant diversity, ranging from

59 This benefit for palmate venation is consistent with its repeated evolution and i

60 A principal function of the venation is to deliver water; however, a hydraulic signi

61 This apparent overinvestment in leaf venation may be explained from the selective pressure of

62 Variation in leaf venation network architecture may reflect trade-offs amo

63 Development of the leaf venation network requires the specification of procambia

64 ndamental rule was that within an individual venation network, susceptibility to embolism always incr

65 We find that a leaf venation network, which possesses key characteristics of

66 idopsis thaliana which displays a reticulate venation network.

67 ics and information on the structure of leaf venation networks and areoles.

68 leaves of angiosperms contain highly complex venation networks consisting of recursively nested, hier

69 Leaf venation networks evolved along several functional axes,

70 Leaf venation networks mediate many plant resource fluxes and

71 Leaf venation networks provide an integrative linkage between

72 supply systems, such as power grids and leaf venation networks, are built to operate reliably under c

73 imaging can be successfully applied to leaf venation networks, facilitating research in multiple fie

74 ls to quantify the function and evolution of venation networks.

75 y polarise auxin transporters to specify new venation paths.

76 The avb1 mutation did not affect leaf venation pattern and root vascular organization.

77 that causes leaf hyponasty and reduces leaf venation pattern complexity and auxin responsiveness.

78 The formation of the venation pattern in leaves is ideal for examining signal

79 uire an understanding of how the distinctive venation pattern in the leaves of C(4) plants is determi

80 n suggested by our results could explain the venation pattern, and the vascular hypertrophy caused by

81 wever, had a distinct three-dimensional (3D) venation pattern, which evolved 11-12 times within this

82 n was less prominent, resulting in a palmate venation pattern.

83 present, the mechanisms responsible for leaf venation patterning are primarily characterized in the m

84 developmental mechanisms that regulate leaf venation patterning have a direct impact on physiologica

85 s conclude that AtDOT5 plays no role in leaf venation patterning in Arabidopsis.

86 different mechanism in monocot leaves where venation patterning is parallel.

87 To gain insight into venation patterning mechanisms, we have characterized th

88 The search for genetic regulators of leaf venation patterning started over 30 years ago, primarily

89 leaf primordium initiation, phyllotaxis and venation patterning, and the establishment of complex ma

90 ts are defective in embryogenesis, cotyledon venation patterning, root growth, and root cap developme

91 Procrustes analysis quantitatively describes venation patterning.

92 atterns of blade outgrowth, hirsuteness, and venation patterning.

93 An understanding of how diverse venation patterns are manifest therefore requires mechan

94 ocus on the developmental regulation of leaf venation patterns in angiosperms, comparing patterning i

95 s are unlikely to fully explain how parallel venation patterns in monocot leaves are elaborated.

96 we first provide an overview of the diverse venation patterns that exist in land plants, providing a

97 in the Atdot5-2 locus has no impact on leaf venation patterns when segregated from other T-DNA inser

98 c alleles of these genes also display simple venation patterns, and their double mutant combinations

99 of the full-red pigmentation, red spots, and venation patterns, respectively.

100 lowering plants are characterized by diverse venation patterns.

101 t green bodies and delicate wings with dense venation patterns.

102 n the number of sensory bristles and on wing venation phenotypes induced by modified epidermal growth

103 thus constitutes a new dimension in the leaf venation phenotypic space.

104 ination, larval blood cell development, wing venation, planar polarity in the eye, and formation of o

105 A new study shows independent origins of 3D venation reflect hydraulic advantages for tissue succule

106 3D venation "resets" internal leaf distances, maintaining m

107 Leaf size and venation show remarkable diversity across dicotyledons,

108 aring LVD and other quantitative measures of venation structure across leaves.

109 s including mycorrhizal association and leaf venation, suggesting substantial modifications in fine-r

110 ed directly from a chemically extracted leaf venation system.

111 r suggest that the evolution of hierarchical venation systems in the early Permian, the Late Triassic

112 Designed specifically for parallel venation, this framework automatically segments and quan

113 e we present global scaling relationships of venation traits with leaf size.

114 the geometric morphometrics analysis of wing venation, we have revealed the clear geographic structur

115 ew taxon is characterized by unique forewing venation with the presence of forewing SC, 1-RS almost a