戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  approaching the level inferred prior to the violent 1914 Plinian eruption.
2 re also less likely to ever have committed a violent act (ARR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98).
3 xperienced any of the following triggers for violent acts between January 1, 2001, and December 15, 2
4 mpare the risk of the individual engaging in violent acts in the week following the exposure to a tri
5 orders, but the contribution of triggers for violent acts to these risks is uncertain.
6  disorder) have elevated risks of committing violent acts, particularly if they are comorbid with sub
7                   In explaining variation in violent aggression across populations, the age structure
8 nd 25 are disproportionately responsible for violent aggression in every society, and increases in vi
9 y with psychopathic traits, who present with violent and antisocial behaviors, tend to value other pe
10 2012 in the Netherlands were followed up for violent and any reoffending over 2 years.
11 n probation to stratify their risk of future violent and any reoffending.
12     We estimate that 7803 Rohingya died from violent and non-violent causes associated with the Augus
13                             Exposure to both violent and nonviolent civil insecurity had negative ass
14                                              Violent and nonviolent criminal convictions and medical
15 ound between low systolic blood pressure and violent and nonviolent criminality and for assault injur
16 trate the emergence of semantically distinct violent and nonviolent trial genres.
17 e we propose a Bayesian model to explore how violent and property crimes are related not only to soci
18 ecialists for treatment more often occur for violent and sexual offenses than for other offenses.
19                       Have humans evolved as violent and warlike?
20 , drug-related crime, less severe crime, and violent arrest), and was stronger in patients who were p
21 her after initial self-harm events involving violent as compared with nonviolent methods (hazard rati
22 rrorist organizations to claim casualties in violent attacks.
23 o 0.23%]; interaction P = .01), a history of violent behavior (1.04% [95% CI, 0.35% to 1.73%] vs 0.00
24 esion protein) are associated with extremely violent behavior (at least 10 committed homicides, attem
25 behavior at baseline significantly predicted violent behavior (RR=13.9, p=0.001; RR=8.3, p=0.003, res
26 gitudinal study of violent ideation (VI) and violent behavior (VB) among 200 youths at clinical high-
27 ated whether psychosis increased the risk of violent behavior among released prisoners and whether tr
28 nt behavior and violent ideation and outcome violent behavior and conversion to psychosis in at-risk
29 o examine the relationships between baseline violent behavior and violent ideation and outcome violen
30 ta on risk factors at an initial wave and on violent behavior at 1-year follow-up were collected in t
31                    Both violent ideation and violent behavior at baseline significantly predicted vio
32  active symptoms of psychosis at the time of violent behavior explained associations between untreate
33                                              Violent behavior is infrequent among individuals with sc
34                                              Violent behavior occurred within 7 days (SD 35 days) of
35  risk for psychosis for violent ideation and violent behavior using the Structured Interview for Psyc
36 olent ideation at baseline, 12 (6%) reported violent behavior within 6 months pre-baseline, and 8 (4%
37  the relationships between violent ideation, violent behavior, and early, particularly attenuated, ps
38  factors in the etiology of extreme criminal violent behavior, and imply that at least about 5-10% of
39 luding anxiety, tachycardia, hallucinations, violent behavior, and psychosis.
40 eir adverse effects, which include delirium, violent behavior, and suicide ideation in severe cases.
41                                              Violent behavior, police brutality, and racial discrimin
42  to recidivistic violent offending or severe violent behavior, such as homicide.
43  associated with substance use disorders and violent behavior.
44  the intact dlPFC could treat aggressive and violent behavior.
45 nt violent victimization on future injurious violent behavior.
46 y different than their subsequent targets of violent behavior.
47 s medical consequences, including psychosis, violent behaviors, tachycardia, hyperthermia, and even d
48 ere at particularly high risk for expressing violent behaviors.
49  history of Self-Harm behaviour (SHb) and/or Violent behaviour against other people (Vb) in relation
50 emographic and clinical characteristics, (b) violent behaviour during a 1-year FU, (c) predictors of
51  withdrawal, and withdrawal by physician for violent behaviour).
52  making among family members, as well as non-violent behaviour.
53                                         This violent birth determines the initial structure and long-
54 that 7803 Rohingya died from violent and non-violent causes associated with the August, 2017, attacks
55 ssociations between localized nonviolent and violent civil insecurity during key child nutritional pe
56 s should be visible in the multigenerational violent conflict between Palestinians and Israelis which
57  However, little work has focused on whether violent conflict, in turn, might fuel greater religious
58 tes climate anomalies with increased risk of violent conflict.
59 riven by events related to oil production or violent conflict.
60 ve resulted in competition for resources and violent conflict.
61 ootage from a murder or broadcast replays of violent contact in professional football demonstrate tha
62 tion toward violence in both samples and for violent convictions among our black sample.
63 ithout affecting deportations of people with violent convictions.
64 ithin 12 months were conviction for previous violent crime (adjusted odds ratio 5.03 [95% CI 4.23-5.9
65 domestic violence (beta, 0.088; P = .12) and violent crime (beta, 0.029; P = .006).
66                Self-harm was associated with violent crime (odds ratio=3.50, 95% CI=2.61-4.70), even
67                              Conviction of a violent crime according to the Swedish penal code.
68                  Main Outcomes and Measures: Violent crime after release from prison.
69 rtunities, thus elevating aggregate rates of violent crime and homicide.
70 ide risk, premature mortality, homelessness, violent crime and incarceration.
71 ores, and violence as measured by reports of violent crime and reports of domestic violence, operatio
72 cally since the 1970s, its effects on future violent crime are poorly understood(2).
73 HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34, p < 0.001), non-violent crime arrests (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20, p <
74 ween SSRIs and violent crime convictions and violent crime arrests varied by age group.
75 in those aged 15 to 24 y were also found for violent crime arrests with preliminary investigations (H
76 , 2.22 to 5.32]) to have been arrested for a violent crime before hospitalization.
77 2015, we compared the rates of commission of violent crime committed by individuals sentenced to pris
78 e hazard ratio was 4.9 (95% CI, 4.8-5.0) for violent crime conviction in exposed individuals compared
79 was an overall association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19, 95%
80 HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.41, p < 0.001), non-violent crime convictions (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34,
81            The association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions and violent crime arrests vari
82  a significant association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions for individuals aged 15 to 24
83  a significant association between SSRIs and violent crime convictions for males aged 15 to 24 y (HR
84                               Information on violent crime convictions was extracted from the Swedish
85 ers, of whom 2657 (6.5%) were convicted of a violent crime during the study period.
86 ds when participants were not on medication, violent crime fell by 45% in patients receiving antipsyc
87 ength by 0.006 for each additional report of violent crime in a 500-m radius of a child's home (beta
88 mply that at least about 5-10% of all severe violent crime in Finland is attributable to the aforemen
89 was to examine the effect of imprisonment on violent crime in the community among individuals on the
90 vents were associated with increased risk of violent crime in the week following exposure.
91  In developed countries, the majority of all violent crime is committed by a small group of antisocia
92               Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of violent crime occurring in the week following the exposu
93 isers were associated with a reduced rate of violent crime only in patients with bipolar disorder.
94 t show negligible or undetectable impacts on violent crime or officer safety.
95  demographics; 2) race-specific county-level violent crime strongly predicts the race of the civilian
96          The largest 1-week absolute risk of violent crime was observed following exposure to violenc
97                                  The rate of violent crime was significantly associated with a decrea
98                        Notable reductions in violent crime were also recorded for depot medication (H
99 x regression analyses to compare the rate of violent crime while individuals were prescribed these me
100 ]; P = .04), as did children exposed to more violent crime within 500 m of their home (beta [SE] -0.0
101 nia, bipolar disorder, substance misuse, and violent crime) were highly heritable (h(2)=53-71%).
102    The primary outcome was the occurrence of violent crime, according to Sweden's national crime regi
103 among people with a history of self-harm and violent crime, focusing specifically on those with co-oc
104 erse outcomes, including the perpetration of violent crime, is unclear.
105  incidence of death, self-harm, committing a violent crime, or hospitalisation due to interpersonal v
106 arriage and divorce rates to risk-taking and violent crime.
107 e association between nonfatal self-harm and violent crime.
108 of the climatic basis of race differences in violent crime.
109 ficant effects on arrests or convictions for violent crimes after release from prison, but imprisonme
110 35%-44%) higher hazard of being convicted of violent crimes and a 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) higher hazard
111 utor of evidence in investigations involving violent crimes because of the unique composition of prot
112 lcohol is associated with nearly half of all violent crimes committed in the United States; yet, a po
113 ls who were prescribed SSRIs, and subsequent violent crimes during 2006 through 2009.
114  of MALDI MS based methods and deployment in violent crimes involving bloodshed.
115 erved following exposure to violence (70-177 violent crimes per 10000 persons).
116  over 2 times more likely to be arrested for violent crimes, 2.5 times more likely to be arrested for
117  substance use disorders and convictions for violent crimes, between 1973 and 2013, were obtained fro
118 n-individual analyses to compare the rate of violent criminality during the time that patients were p
119                                Self-harm and violent criminality have overlapping causes, but people
120  fifth (21%; 20-22%) of the correlation with violent criminality in bipolar disorder but none of the
121 patterns of increased risk for self-harm and violent criminality were observed in both sexes, althoug
122 scharge, whereas risks for accidental death, violent criminality, and hospitalisation due to violence
123  homicide perpetration, non-fatal self-harm, violent criminality, and hospitalisation following viole
124 ce was associated with an increased risk for violent criminality, nonviolent criminality, exposure to
125 ith a history of hospital-treated self-harm, violent criminality, or both behaviours with those in in
126  associated with substance use disorders and violent criminality.
127 ]) than in men (self-harm: 1.61 [1.53-1.69]; violent criminality: 1.58 [1.53-1.63]).
128 men (self-harm: IRR 1.94 [95% CI 1.85-2.02]; violent criminality: 2.16 [1.97-2.36]) than in men (self
129 l sanctuary policies prevent deportations of violent criminals and increase crime.
130 , we attempt a harmonization of the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) and the American
131 for Disease Control and Preventions National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) for 2003 to 2017
132    The VDC recorded 143 630 conflict-related violent deaths with complete information between March 1
133                 We analysed conflict-related violent deaths with complete information on date, place,
134 ion were increased after all combinations of violent, drug/alcohol-related, and self-inflicted injury
135 dolescents discharged after an admission for violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury
136 ospitalisation for adversity-related injury (violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury)
137 ncy admissions for adversity-related injury (violent, drug/alcohol-related, or self-inflicted injury;
138                    Another mechanism for the violent ejection of mass in massive stars may be require
139 voltage of 0.15 V is reached, at which point violent electrochemical decomposition of the electrolyte
140 ny aimed to separate the effect of recalling violent events from the effect of emotions of fear and a
141                                  Considering violent events in the 95th percentile over a 21-day inte
142                                         More violent events increased EBOV transmission (P = .03).
143                       Exposure was number of violent events per health zone, categorized into Ebola-t
144                               A mean of 2.92 violent events resulted in cumulative absolute increase
145 actors that typically predict endorsement of violent extremism also predict biased hate crime percept
146 ed social factors that instigate and sustain violent extremism and polarizing group conflict.
147                 People may be sympathetic to violent extremism when it serves their own interests.
148 ree surface, resulting in the unclamping and violent 'flapping' of the hanging-wall wedge.
149 tial aggressive cognition related to initial violent game play at the beginning of the study than old
150 forming clumps, which are thought to form by violent gravitational instabilities in highly turbulent
151  a previously reported longitudinal study of violent ideation (VI) and violent behavior (VB) among 20
152 ese data suggest that checking carefully for violent ideation and behavior in clinical high-risk pati
153 nships between baseline violent behavior and violent ideation and outcome violent behavior and conver
154                                         Both violent ideation and violent behavior at baseline signif
155 uals at clinical high risk for psychosis for violent ideation and violent behavior using the Structur
156                 The targets of the subjects' violent ideation at baseline were completely different t
157         Fifty-six individuals (28%) reported violent ideation at baseline, 12 (6%) reported violent b
158                            Information about violent ideation was obtained only by indirect, but not
159 ck of insight into the relationships between violent ideation, violent behavior, and early, particula
160 y by indirect, but not direct, inquiry about violent ideation.
161 avior is consistent with the occurrence of a violent impact that produced vapor out of which a thick
162 d four in the control group) and two serious violent incidents (one in each group) were noted, but no
163  abuse, but only a small percentage of these violent incidents are reported to law enforcement, healt
164 m 1.67 to 5.35, compared with 1.25 following violent injury alone (girls: 1.09 to 3.25, compared with
165 ldings, and natural surroundings, and severe violent injury among youth.
166                                              Violent injury contributes significantly to trauma morta
167 ended to drug-related or alcohol-related and violent injury in adolescence.
168 r girls, and 4.51 [3.89-5.24] for boys), and violent injury in boys (1.43 [1.15-1.78]) versus acciden
169                    Given what is known about violent injury in general, the burden of critical violen
170                                              Violent injury is a reoccurring disease, with one-third
171 nt injury in general, the burden of critical violent injury is likely substantial, yet little is know
172  provides an overview of what is known about violent injury requiring critical care, including child
173 ikely substantial, yet little is known about violent injury requiring critical care.
174 the AI group had almost twice the risk for a violent injury requiring ED care within 2 years compared
175 e-third of our AI group experiencing another violent injury requiring ED care within 2 years of the i
176 increased risk of suicide in girls following violent injury versus accident-related injury was not si
177 flicted, drug-related or alcohol-related, or violent injury) affects 4% of 10-19-year-olds.
178 flicted, drug-related or alcohol-related, or violent injury) or accident-related (for which there was
179 or self-inflicted injury (i.e., with/without violent injury), for which age-adjusted hazard ratios fo
180 sity-related injury except for girls who had violent injury.
181 inical care, outcomes, and costs of critical violent injury.
182 nt and mitigate the consequences of critical violent injury.
183  patterns constituted by increased number of violent interactions with the bait, while the frozen bai
184                                 When viewing violent interactions, participants attended significantl
185 eatures influence information gathering from violent interactions.
186  motivator of great apes' (including humans) violent intergroup conflict, but mountain gorillas are n
187 coordination and coalitionary support during violent intergroup conflicts.
188                We demonstrated high rates of violent interpersonal injury (71.6% of intentional injur
189 s a powerful predictor of the propensity for violent interstate conflict.
190  a negative frequency-dependent advantage in violent intrasexual competition giving them a selective
191 transnational terrorism, encompassing mainly violent Islamist revivalism and resurgent racial and eth
192 of LINC01268 was again higher in suicides by violent means (n = 65) than in both nonsuicides (n = 78;
193 c noncoding RNA specifically with suicide by violent means.
194 ulation, aggressive behavior, and suicide by violent means; the underlying biological dynamics may in
195  sex, age, trait aggressiveness, exposure to violent media, interest in guns, and number of guns at h
196 hows that the matter that is expelled in the violent merger of two neutron stars can assemble into he
197 nique hardness, is expected to happen during violent meteor impacts.
198                           Patients who use a violent method for their initial self-harm, especially f
199 completion than men, due in part to the less-violent methods used, they have a higher rate of suicide
200 nts using nonviolent methods, those who used violent methods were at significantly increased risk of
201                                  Unlike more violent methods, which are almost universally fatal, sur
202 hg19: LOC285758) may be linked to suicide by violent methods.
203 r climatic extremes may increase the risk of violent mobilization.
204 unsentenced; in female inmates, committing a violent offence against an individual was also a factor.
205 ion sample, 830 (1%) individuals committed a violent offence within 12 months of their patient episod
206 r suicide attempt, and 19 [11.9%] of 159 for violent offence), and functional impairment.
207 or suicide attempt, and 42 [6.6%] of 640 for violent offence), and functional impairment.
208                                       In the violent offender group, striatal 5-HT1BR binding was pos
209                        Nineteen incarcerated violent offenders and 24 healthy control nonoffenders we
210 larly, recidivism (relapse) rates for repeat violent offenders are as high as relapse rates for drug
211  MRI (fMRI) study in 50 men, of whom 12 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder a
212 ersonality disorder and psychopathy, 20 were violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder b
213                      This difference between violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder w
214  observed for either MAOA or CDH13 among non-violent offenders, indicating that findings were specifi
215 31, 2008, we developed predictive models for violent offending (primary outcome) within 1 year of hos
216 , the highest absolute risk observed was for violent offending among individuals admitted to hospital
217 c disease and risks of attempted suicide and violent offending among offspring.
218 rimination and calibration for prediction of violent offending at 1 year using specified risk cutoffs
219                                  For risk of violent offending at 1 year, with a 5% cutoff, sensitivi
220 cal prediction rule to determine the risk of violent offending in released prisoners.
221 al assessment in individuals at high risk of violent offending is required to establish who might ben
222 ave been shown to contribute to recidivistic violent offending or severe violent behavior, such as ho
223                                              Violent offending was assessed using a computer question
224      Risks for offspring suicide attempt and violent offending were elevated across virtually the ful
225 n parental psychiatric disease and offspring violent offending were stronger for female than for male
226                  The strongest predictors of violent offending within 12 months were conviction for p
227 t (suicide attempt, 3.42; 95% CI, 3.29-3.55; violent offending, 3.31; 95% CI, 3.19-3.44).
228 r (suicide attempt, 3.96; 95% CI, 3.72-4.21; violent offending, 3.62; 95% CI, 3.41-3.84) and cannabis
229 e (suicide attempt, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.25-3.92; violent offending, 4.05; 95% CI, 3.72-4.39), and for par
230 , indicating that findings were specific for violent offending, and not largely attributable to subst
231 ntifying those who are at low risk of future violent offending, and those at high risk of violent reo
232 ister enabled ascertainment of self-harm and violent offending, respectively, as adverse outcomes at
233  by identifying those who are at low risk of violent offending.
234  estimated for offspring suicide attempt and violent offending.
235                 Self-harm is associated with violent offending.
236 d with an increased risk of conviction for a violent offense in both sexes.
237 economic status, an almost doubled hazard of violent offense remained (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.8
238 sentences of 2 or more years for a sexual or violent offense were classified into four groups: no psy
239  those disorders involving substance use and violent or aggressive behaviour.
240 ehavior (SB) can be impulsive or methodical; violent or not; follow a stressor or no obvious precipit
241 ng trained alert dogs that warn of impending violent outbursts.
242                             Closing the most violent outlets was not associated with changes in alcoh
243 t that microbial communities exposed to more violent perturbations should have higher diversity.
244 llowed the deep biosphere to thrive, despite violent phases during Earth's history such as the late h
245  beginning in 2018, emerged in a complex and violent political and security environment.
246 -to-single-crystal (SCSC) transformation and violent PS effect.
247 tment after release can substantially reduce violent recidivism among prisoners with schizophrenia.
248                                 The risk for violent reinjury among high-risk, assault-injured youth
249 ognitive defense of cultural worldviews, and violent rejection of democratic principles and the rule
250                                              Violent releases of space plasma energy from the Earth's
251 he Dutch prisoner cohort were 16% for 2-year violent reoffending and 44% for 2-year any reoffending,
252 eloped a 14-item derivation model to predict violent reoffending and tested it in an external validat
253 ion for prediction of our primary outcome of violent reoffending at 1 and 2 years using cutoffs of 10
254                                  For risk of violent reoffending at 1 year, sensitivity was 76% (95%
255                                     Rates of violent reoffending during medicated periods were compar
256 ween 2001 and 2009, with 11 263 incidents of violent reoffending during this period.
257 egisters, we developed predictive models for violent reoffending for the cohort.
258  were associated with an increased hazard of violent reoffending in male (adjusted HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.
259 uming causality, up to 20% (95% CI 19-22) of violent reoffending in men and 40% (27-52) in women was
260 rate, at 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66-0.70) for 2-year violent reoffending in prisoners and between 0.65 and 0.
261                                The hazard of violent reoffending increased in a stepwise way with the
262      Of individuals with a predicted risk of violent reoffending of 50% or more, 88% had drug and alc
263 e found some evidence of stronger effects on violent reoffending of alcohol and drug use disorders an
264 ptics were not significantly associated with violent reoffending rates (HR = 1.09 [95% CI, 0.83-1.43]
265 Among released prisoners in Sweden, rates of violent reoffending were lower during periods when indiv
266 violent offending, and those at high risk of violent reoffending who might benefit from drug and alco
267        We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for violent reoffending with Cox regression.
268 uals released from prison have high rates of violent reoffending, and there is uncertainty about whet
269 ajor classes of psychotropic medications and violent reoffending.
270 rders, including substance use disorder, and violent reoffending.
271 ted with a substantially increased hazard of violent reoffending.
272 difference of 23.2 (95% CI, 10.3-34.1) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
273  difference of 36.4 (95% CI, 2.1-54.0) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
274 difference of 39.7 (95% CI, 11.3-57.7) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
275  difference of 42.8 (95% CI, 2.2-67.6) fewer violent reoffenses per 1000 person-years.
276 .4 years), 4031 individuals (18.1%) had 5653 violent reoffenses.
277 behaviour are also typically associated with violent self-harm (e.g., poor self-control).
278 predicted the most informative features of a violent social interaction would be faces, points of con
279 contact points in gathering information from violent social interactions.
280  reward systems in response to aggressive or violent social stimuli.
281 such as loss of coordination, paralysis, and violent spasms.
282 ipants also received lower severity-weighted violent (standardized estimate=-0.37) and drug (standard
283 ntrasting highly stressful, threatening, and violent stimuli versus nonaversive neutral visual stimul
284 nalysis of two decades of data, we find that violent storms and hurricanes contribute less than 1% to
285  The intrinsic resistance of salt marshes to violent storms and their predictable erosion rates durin
286 onditions-such as temperature, rainfall, and violent storms-influence the nature of societies and the
287 rs about differences in risks of suicide and violent suicide among the armed services and may help gu
288 omes (e.g., footage or verbal reports from a violent terrorist attack) without direct experience.
289 olises, criminal activity is much higher and violent than in either small cities or rural areas.
290 g populations, implying that states are less violent than small-scale societies.
291 jurious violence (hazard ratio=4.02), recent violent victimization (hazard ratio=3.52), severity of d
292  we examined the relationship between recent violent victimization and mental health status, mental h
293 ts of baseline injurious violence and recent violent victimization on future injurious violent behavi
294                                     Risk for violent victimization or crime perpetration after firear
295 ciated with a heightened risk for subsequent violent victimization or crime perpetration.
296                                       Recent violent victimization was no longer a significant correl
297 ly associated with experiences of abusive or violent voices (p=0.024).
298                                  Evidence of violent warfare in the Terminal Classic period (800-950
299 ies closer to the equator are generally more violent." We point to the lack of credible empirical evi
300                                          The violent winds of these storms induce deep mixing of the

 
Page Top