コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nt binding, causing a shift toward CSPGs for viral attachment.
2 his led to elevated sialylation and enhanced viral attachment.
3 ced JCPyV internalization but did not affect viral attachment.
4 1-positive cells and occurs within 60 min of viral attachment.
5 nize a variety of host receptors, leading to viral attachment.
6 ks the normal hemagglutinin-mediated mode of viral attachment.
7 nt of the identity of the receptors used for viral attachment.
8 tion by modulating gangliosides required for viral attachment.
9 paran sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG), promoting viral attachment.
17 many of the molecular processes involved in viral attachment and entry have been resolved, the popul
18 strategies such as microbicides that target viral attachment and entry into mucosa-resident target c
19 oprotein of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mediates viral attachment and entry into target hepatocytes and e
20 eins, VP4 and VP7, which are responsible for viral attachment and entry, are targets for protective n
21 ays are widely used to measure inhibition of viral attachment and entry, the ability of diverse antib
28 rliest stages of viral infection, preventing viral attachment and exerting a mild virucidal action.
29 dase (HN), an envelope protein essential for viral attachment and for fusion mediated by the other en
30 that determine reciprocal specificity of the viral attachment and fusion (F) proteins have not been i
31 oviruses requires an interaction between the viral attachment and fusion (F) proteins to enable recep
35 oV-NL63 to heparan sulfates was required for viral attachment and infection of target cells, showing
36 virus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) mediates viral attachment and infection, but its physiologic func
40 then used a genetic approach to identify the viral attachment and penetration protein, VP4, as a dete
41 avirus/vector interactions, serves a role in viral attachment and possibly in entry into arthropod ve
48 steps in reovirus replication subsequent to viral attachment are required for reovirus-induced apopt
50 mation by competing with cell surface HS for viral attachment, binding studies were also performed.
51 that receptor affinity has little impact on viral attachment but is nevertheless a key determinant o
54 entry is a multistep process that comprises viral attachment, co-receptor interactions and fusion.
58 ied up to a 10,480-fold higher expression of viral attachment factors AXL, GAS6, and PROS1 and a 3880
65 receptors ephrin B2 and/or ephrin B3 via the viral attachment glycoprotein G, and the concerted effor
66 in alpha(v)beta3 on the COOH terminus of the viral attachment (H) protein and rescued the replication
71 ery of functional virus, indicating that the viral attachment mechanism is a primary distinguishing f
72 ucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV), is involved in viral attachment, mediates membrane fusion during virus
74 inhibits infection primarily at a step after viral attachment, potentially by blocking envelope glyco
75 wo mutations, an amino acid change in the E2 viral attachment protein and a deletion within the 3'-UT
77 fy thrips proteins that bind directly to the viral attachment protein and thus may play a role in the
79 s provide evidence of a relationship between viral attachment protein encapsidation efficiency and vi
82 plinary approach to study the binding of the viral attachment protein G to its host receptor ephrinB2
84 hment to cells is mediated by the binding of viral attachment protein sigma 1 to junctional adhesion
85 he S1 gene is bicistronic, encoding both the viral attachment protein sigma-1 and the nonstructural p
86 First, while the S1 gene. which encodes the viral attachment protein sigma1 (as well as a nonstructu
87 The S1 gene is bicistronic, encoding the viral attachment protein sigma1 and the nonstructural pr
88 s infections are initiated by the binding of viral attachment protein sigma1 to receptors on the surf
96 een the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral attachment protein spike from two IBV strains with
97 n AF15561, we identified a residue in the E2 viral attachment protein that is a critical determinant
98 ractions and, along with GP2a, serves as the viral attachment protein that is responsible for mediati
99 tion of an amino acid polymorphism in the E2 viral attachment protein using a mouse model of CHIKV mu
102 E2 glycoprotein, which is thought to be the viral attachment protein, interfered with virus attachme
103 he T3C/96 S1 gene segment, which encodes the viral attachment protein, sigma 1, confirmed the serotyp
104 Using structural homology modeling of the viral attachment protein, we infer that three of the fiv
110 ts provide new insights into the function of viral attachment proteins in the initiation of infection
111 g properties underlying the nanomechanics of viral attachment proteins offers perspectives in the dev
112 ly high affinity that all available receptor-viral attachment proteins were destined to bind at stead
115 f the large HBV surface protein is the major viral attachment site on hepatocytes and thus offers a t
116 yofibers is not a consequence of the loss of viral attachment sites on the surfaces of mature muscle
118 surface of the protein and new insights into viral attachment through binding to membrane protein rec
119 annot infect rhesus macaques by proving that viral attachment through gp350 is not the mechanism for
121 f the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein mediates viral attachment to ACE2 receptor and is a major determi
122 Initiation of infection is mediated through viral attachment to alpha2,6-sialic acid-containing lact
129 nated mosPTP-1, recruits mosGCTL-1 to enable viral attachment to cells and to enhance viral entry.
136 cellular matrix proteins, thereby increasing viral attachment to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and in
138 is the viral envelope protein that mediates viral attachment to host cells and elicits membrane fusi
140 spike (S) glycoprotein is required for both viral attachment to permissive cells and for fusion of t
141 T antigen into ts13 cells, and thus neither viral attachment to receptors, viral tegument proteins,
143 viruses solve the conflict between optimized viral attachment to target cells and efficient egress of
144 ct, aggregation of viruses, or inhibition of viral attachment to target cells and the subsequent endo
145 protection is associated with a decrease of viral attachment to target cells and viral entry due to
149 ts directly inhibit extracellular virions or viral attachment to the human host cell as well as inhib
151 ell-surface proteoglycans is involved in the viral attachment to these CD4-negative epithelial cells.
152 stems from the compound's potential to block viral attachment, virus-cell fusion, or virus entry into