ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual attention

1 ed at the stimulation site, was amplified by visual attention.

2 teractions between cortical loci controlling visual attention.

3 thalamus in the interplay between memory and visual attention.

4 intriguing link between spatial hearing and visual attention.

5 al and audiovisual stimuli under auditory or visual attention.

6 ions, with higher ASSRs during auditory than visual attention.

7 er movement, in analogy to current models of visual attention.

8 a form of competitive selection required for visual attention.

9 ap for control of saccadic eye movements and visual attention.

10 ual stimuli under distributed versus focused visual attention.

11 tion and has been a focus of many studies on visual attention.

12 nificant role individual differences play in visual attention.

13 ed audiovisual attention relative to focused visual attention.

14 d context dependence of socially transmitted visual attention.

15 ints on the functional brain organization of visual attention.

16 ributed audiovisual attention versus focused visual attention.

17 on that is modulated by perceptual input and visual attention.

18 ature processing interfaces with its role in visual attention.

19 and disrupt the goal-directed allocation of visual attention.

20 ive connectivity of cerebellar crus I during visual attention.

21 efrontal cortex in the bottom-up guidance of visual attention.

22 es, and that the choice process is guided by visual attention.

23 on times, and reduced latencies to disengage visual attention.

24 man subjects as a marker for the strength of visual attention.

25 t saccades and by the visual system to guide visual attention.

26 gly contradictory findings on the effects of visual attention.

27 selection for saccades and the generation of visual attention.

28 key (macaca mulatta) is affected by top-down visual attention.

29 yers outperform non-players on some tests of visual attention.

30 d explain the link between microsaccades and visual attention.

31 ty limitations predicted by most theories of visual attention.

32 tial improvement in psychomotor function and visual attention.

33 ed focus on efficient coding in the field of visual attention.

34 y a key role in controlling the spotlight of visual attention.

35 id not support a high-level understanding of visual attention.

36 other information, a process referred to as visual attention.

37 ortex, and FEF modulates IPS, in relation to visual attention.

38 w details about neuronal interactions during visual attention.

39 graphic variables, miles driven, vision, and visual attention.

40 y deafness causes enhancements in peripheral visual attention.

41 increased demands on the limited capacity of visual attention.

42 impairments reflect temporal constraints on visual attention.

43 consider evidence for cholinergic support of visual attention.

44 between subcortical and cortical control of visual attention.

45 howing an auditory-phasic alerting effect in visual attention.

46 ly involved in decision-making and selective visual attention.

47 entifying the neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

48 connection between cholinergic signaling and visual attention.

49 own to play a crucial role in the control of visual attention.

50 es but does depend on cognitive factors like visual attention.

51 specialized for the control of feature-based visual attention.

52 Visual attention affects both perception and neuronal re

53 es in humans have shown rapid modulations of visual attention after conditioned threat vs. safety cue

54 Selective visual attention allows the brain to focus on behavioral

55 Here we present evidence that human visual attention also includes a high-level category-spe

56 trate that CK1delta OE mice exhibit impaired visual attention and a lack of D-amphetamine-induced pla

57 f emotional perception and how it relates to visual attention and awareness is likely to require furt

58 nds as far as contributing to the control of visual attention and awareness.

59 e compared to chimpanzees, suggesting higher visual attention and curiosity.

60 e the temporal and spatial features of human visual attention and distinguish expertise level.

61 implications of this view for understanding visual attention and eye movement control.

62 ith all visual areas, has been implicated in visual attention and in control of eye movements.

63 the specific prefrontal circuits controlling visual attention and its neural correlates within the pr

64 cantly associated with poorer performance in visual attention and learning/concentration.

65 We argue that visual attention and number word knowledge influence eac

66 conscious face perception in particular and visual attention and perceptual awareness in general.

67 activation in neural regions associated with visual attention and salience (e.g., precuneus, r = -0.3

68 part in the neuronal changes resulting from visual attention and stimulus salience.

69 could not be explained by global changes in visual attention and were specific to value and reward p

70 rtical dorsal attention network responses to visual attention and working memory tasks.

71 with deterioration in cognitive performance (visual attention and working memory).

72 r colliculus are involved in the guidance of visual attention, and describe the priority map model, w

73 ucidate relationships between eye movements, visual attention, and insight, all of which are employed

74 g contrast adaptation, surround suppression, visual attention, and multisensory integration.

75 vity was primarily associated with selective visual attention, and not oculomotor preparation.

76 he functioning of neural networks subserving visual attention, and that these changes are related to

77 ously, TRN activity is modified by shifts of visual attention, and these attentional changes could in

78 Neuronal signals related to visual attention are found in widespread brain regions,

79 Shifts in visual attention are known to covertly enhance processin

80 on mechanisms--collectively termed selective visual attention--are guided by intrinsic, bottom-up and

81 ced changes in catecholamine transmission in visual attention areas (eg, occipital and superior parie

82 on of human white matter pathways subserving visual attention, as assessed by diffusion magnetic reso

83 on between bumping while walking and divided visual attention, as measured by the useful field of vie

84 It is now well established that visual attention, as measured with standard spatial atte

85 ociated with worse executive functioning and visual attention at 12 months.

86 ations, for example, auditory enhancement of visual attention (AV) and visual enhancement of auditory

87 so suggest a separate and additional bias of visual attention away from the affected hand.

88 us is suspected to have an important role in visual attention, based on its widespread connectivity w

89 re unveiled, and a representative successful visual attention behavior for each stage of the operatio

90 s gaze response will lead to the transfer of visual attention between crowd members, but it is not su

91 que was compared with training that requires visual attention but not exploration.

92 ditory attention, showing a reduction during visual attention, but no change during auditory attentio

93 arly deafness does not enhance all facets of visual attention, but rather its effects are quite speci

94 cortex are associated with eye movements and visual attention, but their specific contributions are p

95 t, while cholinergic enhancement facilitates visual attention by increasing activity in extrastriate

96 using a hierarchical approach to determining visual attention, by making an immediate decision based

97 d LTD-like plasticity suggest that voluntary visual attention can exert an important influence on the

98 ration of low-level perceptual responses and visual attention can explain microsaccade rate and direc

99 Visual attention can improve behavioral performance by a

100 Here, we investigated whether visual attention can modulate neural responses to other

101 It has been long debated whether visual attention can shift covertly, decoupled from prog

102 er a wide range of conditions, including how visual attention changes the gains of neurons in visual

103 mpromise, and reduced phase synchrony during visual attention compared with healthy children.

104 hypothesis that the mechanisms implicated in visual attention continue to modulate occipital cortex i

105 V1), and cuneus; neural phase synchrony to a visual attention cue during visual-motor task; and react

106 FSI activity was modulated by visual attention cues during feature-based learning.

107 achieved a key sleep function by correcting visual attention defects brought on by sleep deprivation

108 ic potential that durably improves resistant visual attention deficits after brain injury.

109 selectivity accounts for previously reported visual attention deficits in schizophrenia.

110 This modulation of visual attention dependent on whether pedestrians are in

111 Previous studies have shown that visual attention depends on the phase of oscillatory bra

112 Selective visual attention describes the tendency of visual proces

113 Visual attention dramatically improves individuals' abil

114 Visual attention dramatically improves the perception of

115 determine whether the neuronal correlates of visual attention during neutral cueing are similarly int

116 r search behaviors and methods of allocating visual attention during polyp identification.

117 Visual attention enables an observer to select specific

118 Visual attention enables observers to select behaviorall

119 Selective visual attention enables organisms to enhance the repres

120 Visual attention enhances the responses of visual neuron

121 g/memory, auditory attention/working memory, visual attention/executive function, and speeded languag

122 d spatial behavior, including the control of visual attention, eye movements, and reaching.

123 To determine the role of vision and visual attention factors in automobile crash involvement

124 we trained monkeys to covertly deploy their visual attention from a central fixation point to one of

125 ich participants were required to move their visual attention from face or nonface central fixation s

126 g toddlers had more difficulties disengaging visual attention from faces than toddlers with ASD.

127 The pulvinar is an important structure for visual attention function.

128 This makes it impossible to discern if visual attention has an effect on value, or, instead, if

129 Traditionally, research on visual attention has been focused on the processes invol

130 Visual attention has many effects on neural responses, p

131 For this reason, infant visual attention has the potential to be a sensitive mea

132 Effects of visual attention have been observed in both microsaccade

133 Although most studies of visual attention have examined the effects of shifting a

134 Many studies of bottom-up visual attention have focused on identifying which featu

135 Studies of visual attention have implicated oscillatory activity in

136 Recent experiments on visual attention have shown that this modulation can hav

137 rther elucidate the role of SC in endogenous visual attention, high-resolution fMRI was used to demon

138 Models of visual attention hold that top-down signals from frontal

139 cortex are similarly regulated by shifts in visual attention; however, the rules that govern whether

140 Visual attention improves perception for an attended loc

141 Top-down visual attention improves perception of selected stimuli

142 n primates during the flexible adjustment of visual attention in a reversal learning task.

143 results for the first time quantify atypical visual attention in ASD across multiple levels and categ

144 Here, we investigate neural correlates of visual attention in behaving honeybees (Apis mellifera).

145 re we propose neural signatures of selective visual attention in epidural recordings as a fast, relia

146 hat, to understand goal-directed behavior or visual attention in flies, it may be most informative to

147 ts establish changes in different aspects of visual attention in habitual video-game players as compa

148 roach and eye-tracking methodology to assess visual attention in human and macaque infants to faces n

149 us reports of occipital alpha reduction with visual attention in human EEG.

150 ts that the neuronal activity that underlies visual attention in humans is similar to that found in o

151 y used to study neural mechanisms supporting visual attention in humans.

152 lly reduced early preterm birth and improved visual attention in infancy in this sample, no consisten

153 to reduce high-risk pregnancies and improve visual attention in infants during the first year, only

154 Studies of visual attention in monkeys typically measure neuronal a

155 ally affects task-associated response during visual attention in patients and healthy controls.

156 developmental tests and specialized tests of visual attention in pilot trials of prenatal iodine supp

157 served significant and predictable biases in visual attention in response to both forms of stimulatio

158 A role for visual attention in reward-based decisions has previousl

159 ical measurements to study the deployment of visual attention in the brains of humans and nonhuman pr

160 gion for the endogenous control of selective visual attention in the human brain.

161 ously manipulated to control for the role of visual attention in the valuation computation.

162 are discussed within the scope of models of visual attention in which the pulvinar facilitates commu

163 omotor speed as well as indices of selective visual attention in young (mean = 26 years) or old (mean

164 l search paradigm, which is known to require visual attention, in this study the efficacy of the tech

165 The prevailing interpretation is that visual attention increases value.

166 g constructs including selective and divided visual attention, inhibitory control, flexibility, impul

167 Visual attention involves discrete multispectral oscilla

168 The spatial topography of visual attention is a distinguishing and critical featur

169 These data suggest that poor visual attention is a significant risk factor for bumpin

170 re, we ask if this cross-modal plasticity of visual attention is accompanied by an increase in the nu

171 Recent work has demonstrated that visual attention is allocated to stimulus features that

172 Visual attention is attracted by salient stimuli that 'p

173 g the preparation of saccadic eye movements, visual attention is confined to the target of intended f

174 Visual attention is controlled by activity in posterior

175 The development of selective visual attention is critical for effectively engaging wi

176 Visual attention is generally important for resolving co

177 Visual attention is guided to stimuli either on the basi

178 iple stimuli, we show that the allocation of visual attention is influenced significantly by aversive

179 Here we test whether visual attention is necessary to produce rivalry.

180 Visual attention is often understood as a modulatory fie

181 een demonstrated, but it remains unclear how visual attention is recruited during aversive learning,

182 The development of infant visual attention is sensitive to thyroid hormone during

183 In the present study, we investigated how visual attention is shifted during such cuing paradigms

184 Visual attention is the mechanism the nervous system use

185 Visual attention is well-suited to constrain cortical mo

186 Visual attention is widely studied, yet the neural mecha

187 formation for online control was achieved by visual attention, its limited capacity [7] would substan

188 One of the puzzling aspects in the visual attention literature is the discrepancy between e

189 There is evidence from the object-based visual attention literature that the FVF may not process

190 educed resolution of spatial and/or temporal visual attention may underlie perceptual deficits relate

191 Visual attention mechanisms are known to select informat

192 al proposals that cholinergic enhancement of visual attention might operate via gamma oscillations in

193 imes) but decreased activation in the normal visual attention network (dorsal parietal, bilateral pre

194 rates that sPCS and iPCS fall within a broad visual-attention network, while tgPCS and cIFS fall with

195 pattern in two additional experiments: (i) a visual attention "oddball" task and (ii) a task-free res

196 nce interval 1.30 to 5.63) and impairment in visual attention (odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interv

197 visual reorientation behavior and amount of visual attention on individual ROIs in each scenario wer

198 er-surround selection mechanism that focuses visual attention on sensory stimuli also selectively mai

199 ty to motion inputs (e.g., through increased visual attention) or direct scaling of motor outputs (i.

200 ylcholine (ACh) is necessary exclusively for visual attention, or if it also contributes to attention

201 could not be explained by motion artifacts, visual attention, or signal quality differences.

202 s little change in intelligence quotient and visual attention over the study period, and children's e

203 03), and trends toward greater impairment on visual attention (P = 0.06) and working memory (P = 0.09

204 Our visual attention paradigm allowed us to investigate how

205 Although visual attention paradigms have been reported to activat

206 contrasts and parallels between auditory and visual attention pathways and mechanisms, the interplay

207 Influential models of visual attention posit a distinction between top-down co

208 Models of selective visual attention posit that these increases in activity

209 Models of visual attention postulate the existence of a bottom-up

210 Models of visual attention postulate the existence of a saliency m

211 optic radiations and neural synchrony during visual attention predict reaction time.

212 eriments, the computational requirements for visual attention processing are often not clearly presen

213 howing that affective sounds could influence visual attention provide evidence that we make use of af

214 Visual attention provides a means of selecting among the

215 rontal regions during auditory compared with visual attention, putatively reflecting suppression of v

216 a pattern of errors that suggested impaired visual attention rather than a deficiency in perseverati

217 ment of the thalamocortical network, and (2) visual attention reduces the magnitude of alpha oscillat

218 associated with reward automatically capture visual attention regardless of intention.

219 ous reports, we found that the cue attracted visual attention regardless of whether it was presented

220 Visual attention selects behaviorally relevant informati

221 Visual attention selects task-relevant information from

222 Individual differences in newborn visual attention significantly associated with individua

223 nd (8-12 Hz) EEG activity has been linked to visual attention since the earliest EEG studies.

224 cerns show atypicality in the development of visual attention skills from the first year of life.

225 thalamic structures strongly associated with visual attention, specifically the mediodorsal nucleus a

226 re observed in the absence of any changes to visual attention, speed of response, or general motivati

227 Analysis of passersby shows that visual attention spreads unevenly in space and that the

228 aims of this study were to (1) describe the visual attention strategies employed by surgeons that ar

229 m to examine if there are common patterns of visual attention strategies employed by surgeons which a

230 There are discernable and quantifiable visual attention strategies used by surgeons during lapa

231 Evidence for this phenomenon arises from visual attention studies (Worden et al., 2000); however,

232 ed two bilateral regions that are biased for visual attention, superior precentral sulcus (sPCS) and

233 e of attention, whereas auditory relative to visual attention suppressed mainly central visual field

234 -motor reaction time (Simple Reaction Time), visual attention (Symbol Digit Substitution), and learni

235 ions associated with the vertebrate 'active' visual attention system.

236 Computational visual attention systems have been constructed in order

237 A subgroup also completed a visual attention task (n = 35; phase 2b) and a brain MRI

238 gic agonist (physostigmine) during a spatial visual attention task in humans.

239 d 23 healthy comparison subjects performed a visual attention task in the presence or absence of dist

240 listened to these signals while performing a visual attention task of either low or high load.

241 ons in area MT in macaque visual cortex in a visual attention task via the strength of synchronizatio

242 or 3.0 mg/kg iv), were tested on a 3-choice visual attention task with an olfactory distractor prese

243 other cohort of DAT KD mice was trained on a visual attention task, and no deficits were observed, co

244 ale, and Cech reported that when tested on a visual attention task, the behavior of juvenile chimpanz

245 nd healthy controls while executing a simple visual attention task, we discovered that CBP patients,

246 om area V4 of two male macaques performing a visual attention task.

247 tention task and to dim checkerboards in the visual attention task.

248 group counterparts exhibited fewer errors in visual attention/task switching at age 9 years (effect s

249 elligence, attention, attention dysfunction, visual attention/task switching, working memory, and aca

250 y paraprofessionals exhibited improvement in visual attention/task switching.

251 with abnormalities in neural response during visual attention tasks in the presence of cross-modal no

252 rrent thermal stimulation (left forearm) and visual attention tasks of titrated difficulty in 20 heal

253 We observed that visual working memory and visual attention tasks robustly recruit cerebellar lobul

254 Each participant performed a set of visual attention tasks with increasing attentional load

255 seronegative [SN] controls) during a set of visual attention tasks with increasing levels of attenti

256 unsupplemented Ts65Dn mice on a series of 5 visual attention tasks, and in fact, on some tasks did n

257 ts display oscillatory brain activity during visual attention tasks, but it is unclear if neural osci

258 schizophrenia subjects' poor performance on visual attention tasks, therefore, is unknown.

259 ietal and occipital brain regions during the visual-attention tasks (all with P < or = 0.001, correct

260 ion-matched control subjects during a set of visual-attention tasks with graded levels of difficulty.

261 rightward shift in the spatial allocation of visual attention, temporarily mimicking spatial deficits

262 onal oscillations clearly appear integral to visual attention, the role of lower-frequency oscillatio

263 This review will examine two aspects of visual attention: the changes in neural responses within

264 (FEF) are known to represent the position of visual attention, their respective contributions to its

265 ases in affiliative behaviors--lip smacking, visual attention to a caregiver, and time in close proxi

266 As a result, deployment of visual attention to a specific spatial location is deter

267 cially relevant, "affective" touch, and (ii) visual attention to emotional faces.

268 ng relevant visual signals but by allocating visual attention to such stimuli.

269 entromedial prefrontal cortex damage impairs visual attention to the eye regions of faces, particular

270 control in response to food cues and greater visual attention to the food cues.

271 he parent's look, extended their duration of visual attention to the object.

272 Directing visual attention toward a particular feature or location

273 Covertly directing visual attention toward a spatial location in the absenc

274 with amygdala and fusiform gyrus to modulate visual attention toward motivationally relevant cues.

275 Bundesen's theory of visual attention (TVA) offers a quantitative analysis of

276 ance was analyzed according to the theory of visual attention (TVA), which provides a computational f

277 parietal cortices to bottom-up and top-down visual attention using electrophysiological measures in

278 Previously, we measured fluctuations in visual attention using the responses of populations of s

279 Most computational analysis methods for visual attention utilize black-box algorithms which lack

280 gnitive load: verbal working memory (WM) and visual attention (VA) tasks.

281 ntagious behaviors, including propagation of visual attention, violence, opinions, and emotional stat

282 rmation, including visuo-spatial perception, visual attention, visuo-motor transformations and other

283 apture by stimuli that match WM content [7], visual attention was biased toward (task-irrelevant) sti

284 Visual attention was evaluated with the Useful Field of

285 ion of the interplay between WM contents and visual attention was mediated by a neuroanatomical netwo

286 To investigate sustained visual attention, we assessed visuocortical alpha suppre

287 inhibition of PIVC is strongly influenced by visual attention, we here examined whether attention net

288 ent-related brain potential (ERP) markers of visual attention, we show that when two targets appear i

289 otential for acetylcholine to play a role in visual attention, we studied nicotinic acetylcholine rec

290 The temporal dynamics of visual attention were measured using rapid serial visual

291 Visual field loss and visual attention were not associated.

292 alyzed by Bundesen's computational theory of visual attention, were related to brain metabolism, meas

293 Healthy subjects tend to exhibit a bias of visual attention whereby left hemifield stimuli are proc

294 Visual attention, which improves perception of attended

295 arent paradox can be resolved by considering visual attention, which is known to enhance basic visual

296 visual cortex during periods of high and low visual attention while participants attended to either t

297 her the use of a sensitive measure of infant visual attention will increase the reliability of such s

298 nt of working memory with an n-back task and visual attention with a Posner cue-target task.

299 We suggest the assessment of infant visual attention, with follow-up examination of childhoo

300 We highlight the need to consider visual attention within sensory ecology and advocate the