ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual feedback

1 ation of kinematics (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback).

2 cursor or robotic limb under the guidance of visual feedback.

3 cted to a remembered target location without visual feedback.

4 changes in RT with changes in amplitude and visual feedback.

5 were dissociated by shifting the location of visual feedback.

6 ovements of a cursor on a monitor to provide visual feedback.

7 be minimised significantly more than without visual feedback.

8 ion mechanisms are in play after a period of visual feedback.

9 nternally by the motor system independent of visual feedback.

10 viding intelligent docking of components and visual feedback.

11 tory and at that stage was not influenced by visual feedback.

12 ch reaching can be adapted to distortions in visual feedback.

13 a visual display, we augmented and inverted visual feedback.

14 al and biophysical parameters with real-time visual feedback.

15 rent (CA-VFB) or terminal (TA-VFB) augmented visual feedback.

16 of implicit adaptation under mirror-reversed visual feedback.

17 ack after adapting to the rotation with full visual feedback.

18 nt variability depends on the integration of visual feedback.

19 s can be provided through different forms of visual feedback.

20 ed to make movements while receiving rotated visual feedback.

21 roved for conditions trained with post-trial visual feedback.

22 ctivity and real-time ultrasound imaging for visual feedback.

23 oke) to down-condition the RF H-reflex using visual feedback.

24 running to both self-generated auditory and visual feedback.

25 the corresponding motor unit firing rates as visual feedback.

26 be reduced following training with accurate visual feedback.

27 muth before, during, and after training with visual feedback.

28 intermittent exotropia is not influenced by visual feedback.

29 and experimentally manipulated antennae and visual feedback.

30 lations caused by the delay and high gain of visual feedback.

31 force control and are modified by aging and visual feedback.

32 d against the Teflon surface while receiving visual feedback.

33 ive correlations observed in the presence of visual feedback.

34 pidly adapt their motor output to changes in visual feedback.

35 e onset of the saccade and in the absence of visual feedback.

36 coupling motor output from both inertial and visual feedback.

37 response to instruction and availability of visual feedback?

38 locate an odor source in the absence of rich visual feedback [5].

39 e isolated implicit adaptation using clamped visual feedback, a method known to eliminate the contrib

40 est this hypothesis by manipulating external visual feedback, a putative sensory error signal, in a m

41 er rapid motor responses to perturbations of visual feedback about movement, which mediate low-level

42 'black box', BI-SNN provide quantitative and visual feedback about the related brain activity.

43 Hand grip with visual feedback activated a network of cortical and subc

44 fully compensate for the lack of continuous visual feedback and (b) this non-visual information was

45 in force control related to manipulation of visual feedback and aging.

46 ounced during challenging tasks with limited visual feedback and could not be explained by slower gai

47 ur motor training conditions, varying online visual feedback and explicit verbal feedback.

48 The visual feedback and interactivity make the proposed tool

49 ere experimentally coupled to self-generated visual feedback and locomotion onsets that were not coup

50 , with some participants mostly ignoring the visual feedback and others relying on it almost entirely

51 reaching to locations on the screen without visual feedback and receiving endpoint vowel sound audit

52 nt was virtual, we had full control over the visual feedback and were able to vary the offset between

53 It improved without visual feedback and when instructed to move fast.

54 among speech stimuli, provides auditory and visual feedback, and incorporates progressive training t

55 that in vertebrates is governed by genetics, visual feedback, and possibly intraocular pressure (IOP)

56 target and on the information content of the visual feedback, and that these factors affect the two s

57 justments to ongoing motor behavior based on visual feedback are altered.

58 dination, such as providing instructions and visual feedback, are often inadequate in complex motor t

59 axis) of visual feedback versus rotation of visual feedback around the movement origin.

60 ermine the extent to which they incorporated visual feedback as a function of the offset error.

61 When using visual feedback as the tool for changing movement, howev

62 decreased (improved) following training with visual feedback, but the reliability of the visual feedb

63 eaching movements are dissociated from their visual feedback by rotating the visual field.

64 experienced: those who received 'Persistent' visual-feedback by seeing their hand and trace evolve in

65 t in which the coupling between movement and visual feedback can be altered.

66 Here we ask whether visual feedback can be used to improve the accuracy of f

67 arval zebrafish swimming in virtual reality, visual feedback can be withheld so that swim attempts fa

68 We present a computational model of how visual feedback can stabilize HD information in environm

69 We discovered that visual feedback changed the tuning of head movements acr

70 ance as the visual map, the soft control and visual feedback combination showcases a 5.1% higher accu

71 duced a greater variety of words using audio-visual feedback compared with audio-only feedback and sp

72 Visual feedback compared with no VisF improved depth com

73 e variability of force with magnification of visual feedback compared with young adults (P = 0.05).

74 However, the addition of continuous visual feedback (condition 2) substantially reduced lear

75 extending their wrists and fingers under two visual feedback conditions (i.e., vision and no-vision)

76 t flies adapt flight control under augmented visual feedback conditions during goal-directed bar fixa

77 ' movements towards targets under 60 rotated visual feedback conditions, using either whole-arm reach

78 minutes to hours, electronically controlled visual feedback consistent with a leaky or unstable inte

79 Because there was no visual feedback, corrective saccades could only be drive

80 ction error detected by proprioception and a visual-feedback-dependent process that monitors learning

81 re matched; an adaptation session, where the visual feedback deviated from the actual movement direct

82 ng movements to a 30 degrees rotation of the visual feedback display.

83 However, whether altered visual feedback during limb movement can induce substant

84 ars to be an ASD-specific bias against using visual feedback during motor learning.

85 hile sPOS is a visuomotor area that receives visual feedback during reaching.

86 bilization in moths is mediated primarily by visual feedback during roll movements at lower frequenci

87 Together, these results suggested that visual feedback effectively improved both synergetic coo

88 the dark with only a brief flash (300ms) of visual feedback en route.

89 smatch between intention, proprioception and visual feedback engendered cognitive conflict.

90 ions 3 and 4) a mirror was used that altered visual feedback (factor two) by replacing their left han

91 xtent to which sensory predictions depend on visual feedback features).

92 This article reviews the potential use of visual feedback, focusing on mirror visual feedback, int

93 Most current BMI implementations use visual feedback for closed-loop control; however, it has

94 Our account of visual feedback for HD stabilization provides a novel pe

95 o-motor control, we investigated the role of visual feedback for modulating the effectiveness of a si

96 ity 100 ms after target onset (i.e. prior to visual feedback) for both hand and eye (V100) progressiv

97 uided toward mature vocal forms by real-time visual feedback from adult females that is contingent on

98 al-directed reaching movements are guided by visual feedback from both target and hand.

99 Nursing staff using visual feedback from CBPM technology for 72 hours.

100 Realtime visual feedback from consequences of actions is useful f

101 be autonomously (a) predictive by analysing visual feedback from the environment and preparing its b

102 One is the visual feedback from the hand as it approaches the targe

103 n of studies 1 and 3 (which both manipulated visual feedback from the left hand) confirmed that a ven

104 sual target stimulus, even in the absence of visual feedback from the movement.

105 both control groups, was directed to ongoing visual feedback from the movement.

106 representations for reaching with or without visual feedback from the moving hand, using functional m

107 proportionately directed towards the ongoing visual feedback from the moving hand.

108 entical experimental set-up but manipulating visual feedback from the right hand (instead of the left

109 iptera, such head movements are mediated via visual feedback from their compound eyes that detect ret

110 Removing visual feedback generally reduced the mean slow-phase ve

111 Normal visual feedback gradually retuned persistent firing of i

112 Normal visual feedback gradually retunes the integrator back to

113 rained in a visuomotor adaptation task, with visual feedback gradually shifted.

114 The introduction of visual feedback had an immediate effect on the subsequen

115 The visual feedback helped the users reduce their metabolic

116 r, and to what extent, MNs can code own hand visual feedback (HVF) during object grasping.

117 llowed by feedback: fluid reward if correct, visual feedback if incorrect.

118 those who used the principal component-based visual feedback improved their performance faster and to

119 active generation and passive observation of visual feedback in 18 OCD patients and 18 healthy contro

120 g the relationship between hand movement and visual feedback in 22 individuals with chronic incomplet

121 endent and must be learned based on explicit visual feedback in novel environments.

122 erated mechanosensory feedback nested within visual feedback in the control of head movements.

123 , our findings revealed that the presence of visual feedback increased bilateral motor synergies acro

124 Removal of visual feedback increased normalized power from 0-0.33 H

125 was asked to change H-reflex size, immediate visual feedback indicated whether a size criterion had b

126 edictive mechanism that continuously samples visual feedback information and stores it such that it c

127 come the relatively long delay in processing visual feedback information when pursuing a moving visua

128 cerebellar circuits involved in transforming visual feedback into precise motor adjustments in ASD.

129 l use of visual feedback, focusing on mirror visual feedback, introduced over 15 years ago, for the t

130 le therapies can be devised--of which mirror visual feedback is an example--to restore function.

131 cessary for this antiphasic oscillation when visual feedback is available, indicating that there are

132 erience of coupling between motor output and visual feedback is necessary for the development of visu

133 Previous work has suggested that when visual feedback is perturbed such that straight hand mot

134 ir proboscis, we demonstrate that continuous visual feedback is required and actively sought out to g

135 At adequate light levels, visual feedback is sufficient for head stabilization pri

136 The need for action-contingent visual feedback is well-established in the developmental

137 Short sub-100 ms visual feedback latencies are common in many types of hu

138 to 2 (between the heading of the bee and its visual feedback), local disruption of the OA pathway in

139 s, they remain elusive in arthropods, though visual feedback may be unimportant.(2) How do arthropod

140 The participants were examined on three visual-feedback navigation conditions: none (eyes closed

141 protein (GABARAP) is required in a class of visual feedback neurons, lamina tangential (Lat) cells,

142 n controls (U = 16, P < 0.001) to ignore the visual feedback of a motionless hand and claim that they

143 It provides visual feedback of appropriately versus inappropriately

144 feedback was available, it was impaired when visual feedback of either target location or hand positi

145 The visual feedback of finger position was limited to one or

146 ng at the RT, were performed with or without visual feedback of hand position.

147 Continuous visual feedback of handle rotation position was provided

148 source of information for physicians is the visual feedback of involuntary pain facial expressions i

149 Subjects received visual feedback of lever force levels and were instructe

150 without anosognosia were provided with false visual feedback of movement in their left paralysed arm

151 The first, at 2-3 Hz, was dependent on visual feedback of target and finger tracking positions.

152 orimotor PMBS is modulated by the history of visual feedback of task-relevant errors, and negatively

153 In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variab

154 On random trials we jumped the visual feedback of the hand and found monkeys corrected

155 movements carried out with or without online visual feedback of the hand.

156 Guided by visual feedback of the lever force levels, subjects held

157 for the study of human response to perturbed visual feedback of the orientation of the hand.

158 tion of the presaccadic scene and the actual visual feedback of the postsaccadic visual scene in the

159 hetic, and feedback rate indicates how often visual feedback of the prosthetic is provided to the sub

160 ment," in which they did not receive instant visual feedback of the target moving closer when tugging

161 In this study, subjects had real-time visual feedback of their brain-controlled trajectories.

162 subjects execute reaching movements with the visual feedback of their reaching finger displaced farth

163 totally nonspeech like, involving distorted visual feedback of tongue shape.

164 ata to calculate ADRs and provided real-time visual feedback on endoscopy quality indicators.

165 As such, we directly compared the effect of visual feedback on grip-force tremor and associated func

166 ith torque feedback, and online control with visual feedback on motor unit firing rates.

167 e impact of attentional focus on the ongoing visual feedback on movement performance was evaluated un

168 as a colorimetric dissolution indicator for visual feedback on successful patch insertion and timely

169 The effect of visual feedback on the nature of the MLN waveform was ex

170 le and male human participants were provided visual feedback on the size of motor evoked potentials,

171 ive findings were due to the availability of visual feedback on the subjects' virtual arms and legs.

172 oceptive feedback with a robotic orthosis or visual feedback only.

173 On the navigation assessments with visual feedback, only LPD patients deviated right of cen

174 of internal models (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback or a force field alters limb dynamics),

175 e balance despite distorted somatosensory or visual feedback or vestibular feedback distorted by a pe

176 or response can similarly adapt to augmented visual feedback (partially autonomous) or not (autonomou

177 This raises the question of whether impaired visual feedback pathways in aphantasia also reduce the t

178 Apart from its clinical importance, mirror visual feedback paves the way for a paradigm shift in th

179 plasticity demonstrate that, in this system, visual feedback plays a vital role in gradually tuning t

180 y demonstrate that, in this system, external visual feedback plays a vital role in gradually tuning t

181 In both conditions, we utilized passive visual feedback (pre-recorded video of a real hand displ

182 natural viewing conditions with blur-related visual feedback present, if a possible link between this

183 we investigate if the EEG time-locked to the visual feedback presentation could be used to classify b

184 , we demonstrated significant disruptions to visual feedback processing in children with autism.

185 xperiments in which we control the amount of visual feedback produced by a given motor effort by vary

186 ects of a reaching movement (target, ongoing visual feedback, proprioceptive-motor aspect).

187 However, doctors heavily rely on the visual feedback provided by the endoscope camera, which

188 evel abstracted from the exact nature of the visual feedback provided.

189 est that our novel principal component-based visual feedback provides a method for altering multiple

190 e variability of force with magnification of visual feedback (R(2) = 0.80).

191 iour of birds may actually rely on immediate visual feedback rather than mental simulation or plannin

192 ouched hand (Experiment 1), were deprived of visual feedback regarding the position of the reaching h

193 pants were sometimes provided with incorrect visual feedback regarding the position of the to-be-touc

194 d a precision grip-force task wherein online visual feedback related to force was manipulated across

195 ia is prevented, but the penalty is that the visual feedback required to adjust eye muscle tone to re

196 ion content of visual feedback, with precise visual feedback resulting in postures that minimized mov

197 atterns, those who received 'Non-Persistent' visual-feedback seeing their hand movement but not the e

198 We hypothesized that this difference in visual feedback should engage distinct internal models,

199 ion--trials in which subjects received false visual feedback showing perfect directional performance,

200 d in the motor cortex when macaques received visual feedback signaling a movement perturbation.

201 NS with a surreptitious amplification of the visual feedback signaling the force level.

202 ON-DSGCs may be critical for providing the visual feedback signals that contribute to stabilizing t

203 Increased visual feedback similarly exacerbated force tremor durin

204 jects were exposed to two different types of visual feedback; some saw the entire simulated linkage a

205 visual feedback, but the reliability of the visual feedback stimulus did not change the effects of t

206 a recent study which provided time-advanced visual feedback, suggesting that the low-latency continu

207 With visual feedback sway size could be minimised significant

208 Here, we developed a novel visual feedback system that uses principal component ana

209 h an easily accessible interface and instant visual feedback, TeachEnG will help promote active learn

210 was oriented either toward or away from the visual feedback that defined the error signal.

211 uses a 'guess and check' heuristic in which visual feedback that is obtained after an eye movement t

212 explore the potential of real-time dichoptic visual feedback that may be used to quantify and manipul

213 monitor a summary statistic of the unfolding visual feedback (the peak cursor error) to detect visuom

214 Using visual feedback, the subjects controlled their respirati

215 ariability of reaches made in the absence of visual feedback: there is less variability in direction

216 nt control by altering (phase advancing) the visual feedback they receive from their own self movemen

217 Altered visual feedback through body ownership illusions can inf

218 Y and eight healthy controls reached without visual feedback to a target that either remained station

219 utes a rapid control process on the basis of visual feedback to aIPS.

220 d an active balance simulation task by using visual feedback to control anterior-posterior center of

221 This study investigated the effect of visual feedback to guide the users in adapting their mov

222 ts, a new strategy was implemented that uses visual feedback to induce different levels of frustratio

223 ctively) while mice used dynamic auditory or visual feedback to search for a hidden target within an

224 ant visual error between expected and actual visual feedback to study potential adaptive visuomotor c

225 according to the phase identified, providing visual feedback to the surgeon.

226 An exergame provides visual feedback to the user to assist with upper-body po

227 rn data analysis techniques that incorporate visual feedback to verify the appropriateness of their m

228 ance deteriorated with attention to indirect visual feedback, to accuracy and when instructed to move

229 This result suggests visual feedback training can be useful to facilitate the

230 The results suggest that visual feedback training is helpful to use the exoskelet

231 nal model adaptation, in response to rotated visual feedback, transferred across two contexts where a

232 ct, or indirect visual feedback, without any visual feedback, under three different instruction condi

233 e to wedge prisms depends on the form of the visual feedback used to represent hand and target positi

234 Given multiple formats to present visual feedback, using face as feedback for mediating hu

235 -right reversal over a mid-sagittal axis) of visual feedback versus rotation of visual feedback aroun

236 In contrast, magnification of visual feedback (visual angles of 0.5 degrees and 1.5 de

237 degrees ; and an after-effect session, where visual feedback was again matched to hand motion.

238 While the apraxics' accuracy was normal when visual feedback was available, it was impaired when visu

239 l mapping between actual hand motion and its visual feedback was introduced.

240 Visual feedback was manipulated by changing the visual a

241 tive joystick via a servo motor and accurate visual feedback was provided on an oscilloscope.

242 Immediate auditory and visual feedback was provided upon the choice to inform p

243 dicted behavior in multiple situations where visual feedback was used to change acquisition of new wa

244 , suggesting that the low-latency continuous visual feedback we provided is critical for efficiently

245 d no group differences when reaching without visual feedback, we suggest that the ability to perform

246 action time (RT) when response amplitude and visual feedback were cued prior to the response; and (ii

247 kedly shorter or longer than preferred using visual feedback When one leg was constrained to take a s

248 onditions: (i) speech entrainment with audio-visual feedback where they attempted to mimic a speaker

249 racranial procedures and provided continuous visual feedback, which can be helpful in all stages of n

250 Even under positive visual feedback, which revealed the stability limit of f

251 es, we imposed a rotation/mirror reversal of visual feedback while participants performed a continuou

252 y represent movement direction regardless of visual feedback, while fMRI patterns in visual system ar

253 lso depended upon the information content of visual feedback, with precise visual feedback resulting

254 ipulated images interactively with real-time visual feedback, with use of both internal and surface f

255 ement was performed with direct, or indirect visual feedback, without any visual feedback, under thre