ライフサイエンスコーパス: visual stimulus

1 gle or negative-angle rule (depending on the visual stimulus).

2 ex, influencing processing of a simultaneous visual stimulus.

3 mber of prospects on a branching multivalued visual stimulus.

4 tory target's timecourse matched that of the visual stimulus.

5 is greater if reward is associated with the visual stimulus.

6 al regions implicated in the transmission of visual stimulus.

7 when to perform an action following a brief visual stimulus.

8 ed to the specific orientation of the moving visual stimulus.

9 alry by promoting dominance of the congruent visual stimulus.

10 followed by a short lateralized auditory or visual stimulus.

11 xation is modulated by the presentation of a visual stimulus.

12 orded waves of activity elicited by a moving visual stimulus.

13 de while discriminating the motion of a cued visual stimulus.

14 strongly dependent on the parameters of the visual stimulus.

15 the same temporal phase relationship to the visual stimulus.

16 TMS alone, without the need for the physical visual stimulus.

17 ither excited or inhibited by the onset of a visual stimulus.

18 humans appear to improve many aspects of the visual stimulus.

19 e and negative BOLD associated with a simple visual stimulus.

20 the eyes to make a saccade in response to a visual stimulus.

21 ientation and the direction of motion of the visual stimulus.

22 to elicit escape, even in the absence of any visual stimulus.

23 ed repeated presentations of a nonreinforced visual stimulus.

24 d by cocaine injections and a cocaine-paired visual stimulus.

25 ocal features, respectively, of a reversible visual stimulus.

26 that sound is localized toward a coincident visual stimulus.

27 ex in response to the abrupt appearance of a visual stimulus.

28 n hemoglobin concentrations in response to a visual stimulus.

29 redicts the perceptual fate of a forthcoming visual stimulus.

30 prior to and following the presentation of a visual stimulus.

31 ten observed after the cessation of a bright visual stimulus.

32 late early visual areas in the presence of a visual stimulus.

33 visual areas, but only in the presence of a visual stimulus.

34 nsion will push them away from the expanding visual stimulus.

35 which faces may represent a special class of visual stimulus.

36 nd even if the goal does not correspond to a visual stimulus.

37 visual occipital activity before an expected visual stimulus.

38 than during fixation, despite the lack of a visual stimulus.

39 ally on the spatiotemporal properties of the visual stimulus.

40 tagonistic or integrative depending upon the visual stimulus.

41 e generally to emphasize novel features of a visual stimulus.

42 ts responded to the color or the motion of a visual stimulus.

43 onal activity of the retina in response to a visual stimulus.

44 (CCD) camera in response to a green (540 nm) visual stimulus.

45 with (cued by), but not directed toward, the visual stimulus.

46 , this must be investigated as a function of visual stimulus.

47 g cells that are preferentially-tuned to the visual stimulus.

48 rm a spatial cognitive operation on a static visual stimulus.

49 of observed spike responses to a stochastic visual stimulus.

50 influence how long it takes to respond to a visual stimulus.

51 ed time-varying responses to a novel natural visual stimulus.

52 tina to the brain transmit the position of a visual stimulus.

53 energy (local variance in intensity) in the visual stimulus.

54 n which juice was substituted with a neutral visual stimulus.

55 -stimulation or to a subsequent low-contrast visual stimulus.

56 description of how these neurons encode the visual stimulus.

57 s unaffected by the presence or absence of a visual stimulus.

58 to occur at the same time within a repeated visual stimulus.

59 es the objective, physical properties of the visual stimulus.

60 vey its selectivity for the orientation of a visual stimulus.

61 ward (pro-reach) or away (anti-reach) from a visual stimulus.

62 utton-presses each produced a specific audio-visual stimulus.

63 t alter the classical mislocalization of the visual stimulus.

64 x during (activation) and after (recovery) a visual stimulus.

65 ions in the properties and complexity of the visual stimulus.

66 cts reached away from rather than toward the visual stimulus.

67 redicting the occurrence, timing and type of visual stimulus.

68 we demonstrate that presentation of a novel visual stimulus (a single oriented grating) causes immed

69 To investigate how repeated exposure to a visual stimulus affects its representation in mouse prim

70 ed whether the semantic content of a looming visual stimulus affects perceived time-to-collision by m

71 sition of aversive emotion associated with a visual stimulus) affects the activities in visual cortic

72 he sound originates from the location of the visual stimulus, an illusion known as the ventriloquism

73 ssociation between the drug and a tactile or visual stimulus and (iii) a test that offers a choice be

74 e other 12 trials the tone was preceded by a visual stimulus and not reinforced.

75 trated elevated activity in the absence of a visual stimulus and reduced signal-to-noise ratios in re

76 tronger in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the visual stimulus and response hand.

77 xygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity to the visual stimulus and the area responding to the central 3

78 lus, both psychophysical sensitivity to that visual stimulus and the responsiveness of high-order neu

79 specifically, to express the delay between a visual stimulus and the reward that it portends.

80 nt plan across the network in the absence of visual stimulus and then generating the required muscle

81 r estimates of the hemodynamic response to a visual stimulus and, under the conditions of a calibrate

82 rve block with the location and pattern of a visual stimulus, and a control injection of saline with

83 in activity time-locked to the onset of the visual stimulus, and inhibitory responses.

84 ains depends on the frequency content of the visual stimulus, and that 'relative', not absolute, prec

85 in the direction of the spatially disparate visual stimulus, and the aftereffect did not transfer ac

86 l bases of the interaction between a dynamic visual stimulus approaching the body and its expected co

87 rceptions of the whole and of the parts of a visual stimulus are mediated by different brain regions.

88 fect on pursuit speed and direction when the visual stimulus arises from the coherent motion of a hig

89 re motion or (shape) trajectories before the visual stimulus arrives.

90 where the participants always perceived the visual stimulus as having come first.

91 button-press generated either the same audio-visual stimulus as learned initially, or the pair associ

92 ntion, but we could decode the location of a visual stimulus as well as the endpoint of saccades towa

93 100 ms were temporally linked to an attended visual stimulus, as reflected by robust cross-modal spre

94 at when humans and monkeys were provided the visual stimulus asynchronously with the sound but as fee

95 behavioral task in which they attended to a visual stimulus at one location while remembering a seco

96 When interrupted by a visual stimulus at random intervals, participants scored

97 The time course of the response to the visual stimulus at the paired RF location is altered, wi

98 Directing attention toward a visual stimulus at the receptive field of the recorded n

99 sites that encode the retinal location of a visual stimulus before and after a saccade.

100 robust BBA before and after the onset of the visual stimulus but not during the arm movement.

101 not only in the retinotopic location of the visual stimulus, but also at the occipital pole (OP), co

102 ear-nonlinear model that operates not on the visual stimulus, but on the afferent responses of a popu

103 ly enhance behavioral performance based on a visual stimulus, but the degree to which attention modul

104 ust to changes in the temporal contrast of a visual stimulus by imaging activity in vivo.

105 However, repetition of a visual stimulus can also be considered in terms of the s

106 onsciously know and report the identity of a visual stimulus can be dissociated in the brain from the

107 A salient visual stimulus can be rendered invisible by presenting

108 iod between two presentations of an oriented visual stimulus can be used to decode the remembered sti

109 stimulation (TMS) shortly after the end of a visual stimulus can cause a TMS-induced 'replay' or 'vis

110 Microsaccades during a brief visual stimulus can impair perception of that stimulus.

111 on in visual cortex and suggest that a prior visual stimulus can influence subsequent perception at e

112 Repeated experience with a visual stimulus can result in improved perception of the

113 ered architecture of the brain for different visual stimulus categories is one of the most fascinatin

114 lized regions for processing faces and other visual stimulus categories.

115 ptual expectation effects vary for different visual stimulus categories.

116 rvae develop an enhanced motor response to a visual stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) when it is pa

117 depended on the retinotopic position of the visual stimulus, confirming that the effect was due to t

118 ctile stimuli also promoted dominance of the visual stimulus congruent with the supramodal frequency.

119 of perceptual decisions (independent of the visual stimulus), consistent with a role for MT in provi

120 ere strikingly reproducible across different visual stimulus contexts.

121 nerally showed response suppression when the visual stimulus contrast was high whereas this effect wa

122 nse and this effect was not changed when the visual stimulus contrast was varied.

123 We further show that, across visual stimulus contrasts, retinal circuits continued to

124 spatial location and orientation of a local visual stimulus coupled to a deep layer of neurons that

125 ht, the initial pause after the onset of the visual stimulus decreased.

126 Using a visual stimulus detection task, we provide evidence from

127 ponsive to synaptic burst stimuli, improving visual stimulus detection.

128 Furthermore, we found that the same visual stimulus did not affect performance in auditory c

129 A visual stimulus display was created that enabled us to e

130 We used an immersive visual stimulus dome that allowed us to present spatiote

131 scriminate one of the features that define a visual stimulus (e.g., its orientation) can transfer to

132 In the absence of a visual stimulus, electrical stimulation of the electrode

133 The presentation of a visual stimulus elicits a trial-by-trial stimulus-locked

134 ess is binocular rivalry, wherein a constant visual stimulus evokes a varying conscious percept.

135 at a single scalar feature computed from the visual stimulus experienced by the animal is sufficient

136 wn about the neural representation of simple visual stimulus features (for example, orientation, dire

137 s behavior, from the detection of particular visual stimulus features and the timescales of sensory p

138 spatial receptive fields and sharp tuning to visual stimulus features including orientation and spati

139 ate lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) encodes visual stimulus features while they are perceived and wh

140 lationships to value, movement direction, or visual stimulus features.

141 representing reward properties together with visual stimulus features.

142 ponse in the hemisphere contralateral to the visual stimulus, followed by a remapped response in the

143 PFC of monkeys remembering the location of a visual stimulus for an eye movement response.

144 e task that required the crows to remember a visual stimulus for later comparison.

145 levant sounds occurring synchronously with a visual stimulus from a different location was larger whe

146 d by a saccade as saccadic omission [1]: the visual stimulus generated by the saccade is omitted from

147 The appearance of a novel visual stimulus generates a rapid stimulus-locked respon

148 was performed on a color monitor driven by a visual-stimulus-generating video board, with stimulus pa

149 We found that exposure to an uninformative visual stimulus (i.e. white light) while simultaneously

150 However, a change of visual stimulus immediately preceded reach onset, raisin

151 VTA microstimulation with a task-irrelevant visual stimulus improved the subject's capacity to discr

152 Head movements followed the visual stimulus in as little as 10 ms-a delay similar to

153 cotine infusions or a moderately-reinforcing visual stimulus in daily 1-h sessions.

154 between reported visual awareness ("I see a visual stimulus in front of me") and the social attribut

155 itive control on the initial processing of a visual stimulus in humans.

156 more often perceived an inherently ambiguous visual stimulus in one of its perceptual instantiations.

157 ponses are no longer driven primarily by the visual stimulus in the receptive field, but by the broad

158 e (1) highly responsive to the presence of a visual stimulus in the RF, (2) heterogeneous, and (3) no

159 so activity-regulated in vitro or induced by visual stimulus in the visual cortex, suggesting that th

160 The use of video playback as a visual stimulus in this experiment permitted complete is

161 VTA microstimulation with a task-irrelevant visual stimulus increased fMRI activity and improved cla

162 stimulation, OND RGCs respond earlier as the visual stimulus increases in size.

163 n were larger in the presence of a competing visual stimulus, indicating a role for the mouse SC in v

164 e drugs induce characteristic alterations in visual stimulus-induced and/or spontaneous eye movements

165 ctations about the identity of a forthcoming visual stimulus influence the neural mechanisms of perce

166 vector average, but the contribution of the visual stimulus inside the affected field was decreased,

167 ual event can be dramatically reduced if the visual stimulus is accompanied by a startling sound.

168 Repeated exposure to a visual stimulus is associated with corresponding reducti

169 ors affecting the time taken to respond to a visual stimulus is contrast, and studies of reaction tim

170 Analysis of the movement of a complex visual stimulus is expressed in the responses of pattern

171 emovements made in the Wheeless task, when a visual stimulus is followed after a short delay by anoth

172 hows that paying attention to the color of a visual stimulus is manifested by an early endogenous sca

173 Consequently, when the same visual stimulus is presented repeatedly, postsynaptic cu

174 When a salient visual stimulus is presented shortly before a saccade, t

175 ivity when a non-informative, suprathreshold visual stimulus is presented, there are highly consisten

176 monstrated that the bottom-up signaling of a visual stimulus is subserved by interareal gamma-band sy

177 Because the visual stimulus itself is unchanged, this variability in

178 controlled trial-to-trial differences in the visual stimulus itself, potentially confounding this dis

179 d that their response after the removal of a visual stimulus lasting 1 min was similar in amplitude a

180 Spikes in bipolar cells encode a visual stimulus less reliably than spikes in ganglion ce

181 ts received nonreinforced presentations of a visual stimulus (light) during the 1st training session,

182 Male rats were trained either to associate a visual stimulus (light) with footshock or were exposed t

183 press or completely eliminate responses to a visual stimulus located inside the RF in nitrous oxide s

184 es a continuous representation of remembered visual stimulus locations with respect to constantly cha

185 t concurrently encodes spatial (auditory and visual stimulus locations), decisional (causal inference

186 wing spectral pattern: before the onset of a visual stimulus, low-frequency oscillations (beta, 12-20

187 cyclovergence, its decay in the absence of a visual stimulus may be incomplete.

188 an escape take-off in response to a looming visual stimulus, mimicking a potential predator [8].

189 linear model with terms corresponding to the visual stimulus, mouse running speed, and experimentally

190 The optokinetic response (OKR) to a visual stimulus moving at constant velocity consists of

191 After the presentation of a visual stimulus, neural processing cascades from low-lev

192 anipulating task difficulty independently of visual stimulus noise, here we test the hypothesis that

193 The visual stimulus of a top predator (coral trout, Plectrop

194 a pronounced decrease in their response to a visual stimulus of different contrasts and orientations.

195 in neural activity due to adaptation when a visual stimulus of the same duration was repeatedly pres

196 icient accuracy to precisely reconstruct the visual stimulus on the retina.

197 In this way, we were able to pit the visual stimulus (one vs. two stimulating directions) aga

198 We found that (1) before visual stimulus onset (-200 to 0 ms), attention to visua

199 applied to left dMFC starting 100 ms before visual stimulus onset and ending 100 ms afterward.

200 raphy to demonstrate that detecting auditory-visual stimulus onset asynchrony activates a large-scale

201 We found that, while the response latency to visual stimulus onset was earlier for V1 neurons than su

202 d perceived direction already emerged before visual stimulus onset, suggesting that the prestimulus s

203 he incorrect response) starting 180 ms after visual stimulus onset.

204 d in the MEG signal as early as 150 ms after visual stimulus onset.

205 rsal intraparietal sulcus (IPS) 100 ms after visual stimulus onset.

206 r analyses revealed that eye acceleration at visual-stimulus onset primarily limited working velocity

207 , neurons across visual areas respond to any visual stimulus or contribute to any perceptual decision

208 tent effect when applied before presenting a visual stimulus or during recovery from motion adaptatio

209 upport processing of elemental features of a visual stimulus or scene, such as local contrast, orient

210 conditions used here, such as the choice of visual stimulus or spike measurement time window, and th

211 tion is focused on an object such as a small visual stimulus or the breath.

212 study this issue, we measured the coding of visual stimulus orientation and of behavioral state by n

213 Selectivity to visual stimulus orientation is a basic cortical function

214 f neuronal responses to the orientation of a visual stimulus (orientation tuning).

215 Two measures of conditioned responding to a visual stimulus, orienting behavior (rearing on the hind

216 Monkeys made saccades in the presence of a visual stimulus outside of the receptive field.

217 perception when the evoked phosphene and the visual stimulus overlapped in time and space in the plac

218 nitric oxide to NVC in humans, we utilized a visual stimulus paradigm to elicit an NVC response in th

219 ould care about an almost infinite number of visual stimulus patterns, but we don't: we distinguish t

220 stronger than any suppression evoked by the visual stimulus per se.

221 introduce trial-to-trial variability in the visual stimulus, potentially confounding such measures.

222 hile monkeys performed a task that modulated visual stimulus predictability.

223 ning engaged upon first encountering a novel visual stimulus predicts the degree of perceptual fluenc

224 Transient pupil dilation was elicited after visual stimulus presentation regardless of target lumina

225 ee epochs of the memory-guided saccade task: visual stimulus presentation, the delay interval, and mo

226 neurons in 24 neurosurgical patients during visual stimulus presentation.

227 wn that the responses of many Ipc units to a visual stimulus presented inside the classical receptive

228 lifting a finger or an arm in response to a visual stimulus presented to either hemifield, this acal

229 d pattern of activation corresponding to the visual stimulus presented.

230 concurrent multiunit firing and facilitates visual stimulus processing.

231 We show that closed-loop control of a visual stimulus promotes temporal coordination across th

232 ways, in a manner that can be dependent upon visual stimulus properties.

233 ms of groups of neurons (channels) tuned for visual stimulus properties.

234 nglion cells in the mouse retina over a wide visual stimulus range.

235 on anti-reaches encoded the location of the visual stimulus rather than the movement goal.

236 Here, we found that brief (50 ms) visual stimulus re-exposure during a repetitive foil tas

237 was that neurons in the FEF report whether a visual stimulus remains stable or moves as a saccade is

238 e focused on identifying which features of a visual stimulus render it salient--i.e., make it "pop ou

239 n3b and the dendritic arbor morphologies and visual stimulus response properties of Brn3c(+) RGC type

240 , two GCaMP5 variants detected twice as many visual stimulus-responsive cells as GCaMP3.

241 hat the task-relevant feature of an upcoming visual stimulus (S2) was, while high-density electroence

242 ain neurons implicated in navigation-display visual stimulus selection.

243 s by which spike frequency adaptation shapes visual stimulus selectivity in an identified visual inte

244 e information about different aspects of the visual stimulus.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cortex is mul

245 to probe a very large spatial and chromatic visual stimulus space and map functional microarchitectu

246 following repetitive presentation of a given visual stimulus, spatiotemporal activity patterns resemb

247 pants directed their attention to one of two visual stimulus streams located adjacent to each hand.

248 tended selectively to one of two lateralized visual-stimulus streams while task-irrelevant tones were

249 anisms.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Attending to a visual stimulus strengthens its representation in visual

250 presented human observers with an ambiguous visual stimulus (structure-from-motion) that can give ri

251 influenced by the low-level salience of the visual stimulus, such as luminance, contrast, and color,

252 When a visual stimulus suddenly appears, it captures attention,

253 umans lengthened the perceived duration of a visual stimulus, suggesting the rSMG is involved in basi

254 Initiating a movement in response to a visual stimulus takes significantly longer than might be

255 In phase 1 of the DMST, a complex visual stimulus (target) was followed immediately by a f

256 he modes represent localized features of the visual stimulus that are distinct from the features repr

257 is played by a common representation of the visual stimulus that can be applied at different stages.

258 tterns represent specific messages about the visual stimulus that differ significantly from what one

259 In natural viewing, a visual stimulus that is the target of attention is gener

260 g theory to train a discrimination between a visual stimulus that predicted reward (conditioned excit

261 and extent of switching a response toward a visual stimulus that was previously not, but has become,

262 ome, associated with reward (and away from a visual stimulus that was previously, but is no longer, r

263 t for encoding global motion, we developed a visual stimulus that yields a global direction yet inclu

264 The task employs a continuously varying visual stimulus that, for any moment in time, selectivel

265 ntity versus attractiveness) within the same visual stimulus (the face).

266 itations of TMS-induced replay with the same visual stimulus, the replay can be induced by TMS alone,

267 le, when monkeys direct their attention to a visual stimulus, the response gain of specific subsets o

268 ngle of polarization of a linearly polarized visual stimulus, thereby maximizing the polarization con

269 Visual stimulus to be detected was a temporally modulate

270 the efficiency of disengaging from a central visual stimulus to orient to a peripheral one in a cohor

271 surprise associated with the occurrence of a visual stimulus to provide a formal quantification of th

272 show spontaneous oddity preference for all 3 visual stimulus types tested (photos, shapes, and patter

273 s responded very differently to an identical visual stimulus under different visual discrimination ta

274 hen attention is deployed on a high-contrast visual stimulus using a discrimination task.

275 s to mislocalization of the sound toward the visual stimulus (ventriloquism illusion).

276 However, when sound input coincides with a visual stimulus, visual responses are boosted in V1, mos

277 When the visual stimulus was absent or had low contrast, these LF

278 t location was larger when that accompanying visual stimulus was attended versus unattended.

279 he asynchronous condition, but only when the visual stimulus was body related.

280 Around the time of the saccade, a visual stimulus was flashed either at the location occup

281 ficantly predicted whether a threshold-level visual stimulus was later consciously perceived.

282 However, the proportion of V1 active to our visual stimulus was lower for the older observers than f

283 g behavior (rearing on the hind legs) when a visual stimulus was paired with food.

284 ed rats exhibited normal responding when the visual stimulus was presented alone and paired with food

285 In contrast when the visual stimulus was presented synchronously with the sou

286 A visual stimulus was presented to the eye, and responses

287 the left or right hand to indicate whether a visual stimulus was relatively large or small.

288 , we found previously that when a flickering visual stimulus was repeated, individual cells fired act

289 food on some trials, while on other trials a visual stimulus was simultaneously presented along with

290 The strength of the visual stimulus was titrated around psychophysical thres

291 spread," i.e., impulse response to a minimal visual stimulus, was as rapid and retinotopically specif

292 When we repeated the same visual stimulus, we found that the same mode was robustl

293 lty in learning to correct their choice of a visual stimulus when it is no longer associated with rew

294 e enhancement of attentional processing of a visual stimulus when its predictive value was altered.

295 Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle

296 red light in the retinal region exposed to a visual stimulus, which was significant in three of five

297 Following one action the audio preceded the visual stimulus, while for the other action audio lagged

298 ortex are selective for the orientation of a visual stimulus, while the receptive fields of their tha

299 ), we show that association of a directional visual stimulus with reward results in broadened orienta

300 s whose amplitude varied independently and a visual stimulus with varying radius, while manipulating