ライフサイエンスコーパス: vole

1 formation in the socially monogamous prairie vole.

2 to the specialized life style of the prairie vole.

3 us vole species, the meadow vole and montane vole.

4 ulate pair bonding in the monogamous prairie vole.

5 of experiments using the monogamous prairie vole.

6 tion of pair bonds in the monogamous prairie vole.

7 species of mammalian research, and the bank vole.

8 is the alternate cusp offset present in the vole.

9 ring approach to either a partner or a novel vole.

10 e vole, but not in the non-monogamous meadow vole.

11 , used to index pair-bond formation) by male voles.

12 rent neurobiological actions in male prairie voles.

13 er immunocompetence (NBT) than did wild-born voles.

14 itry mediate selective aggression in prairie voles.

15 between prairie voles and polygamous meadow voles.

16 quences on social behavior in female prairie voles.

17 effects of AMPH treatment in female prairie voles.

18 scles in adult male, but not female, prairie voles.

19 rence would be similarly distinct in prairie voles.

20 perience in socially monogamous male prairie voles.

21 ed in an unknown wild mammal, probably field voles.

22 ty and social behavior in prairie and meadow voles.

23 associated with pair bonding in male prairie voles.

24 s found in a chemosensory pathway in prairie voles.

25 rdU) in the amygdala and DG than did prairie voles.

26 standardised immune challenge in wild field voles.

27 but not in the pMeA or DG, than did prairie voles.

28 oles compared to congener promiscuous meadow voles.

29 c modifications that may emerge in HC and LC voles.

30 in pair bond formation in monogamous prairie voles.

31 l (pMeA) nuclei, in meadow, but not prairie, voles.

32 ve reproductive phenotypes among male meadow voles.

33 tor (V1aR) in a large sample of wild prairie voles.

34 ical for pair-bond formation in male prairie voles.

35 d selective social behaviors in male prairie voles.

36 n the preference for hind nipples in prairie voles.

37 xtended amygdala than asocial, nonmonogamous voles.

38 s distribution in this population of prairie voles.

39 ickness at postnatal Day 1 (P1) in HC and LC voles.

40 pecies, including monogamous and promiscuous voles.

41 of PUUV-infected and uninfected female bank voles.

42 (an index of pair bonding) in female prairie voles.

43 Using a large compilation of time series of vole abundances, we demonstrate consistent cycle amplitu

44 In male voles, all 3 drugs had an inverted-U dose-response curve

45 Prairie voles also exhibit natural variation in the level of tac

46 Prairie voles also match the fear response, anxiety-related beha

47 These voles also showed a significant upregulation in nucleus

48 with paternal care in consistently paternal voles, also may be associated with paternal care (when p

49 conserved neural mechanisms between prairie vole and human.

50 g differences between the monogamous prairie vole and its promiscuous congeners.

51 and two promiscuous vole species, the meadow vole and montane vole.

52 of two monogamous vole species, the prairie vole and pine vole, and two promiscuous vole species, th

53 In specific vole and primate species the neuropeptide oxytocin plays

54 A distinct patterning difference between the vole and the mouse molars is the alternate cusp offset p

55 galitarian and monogamous ones, like prairie voles and humans, when there is no perceived cost to sel

56 a-IR in the MeA than male montane and meadow voles and in the BST relative to montane males.

57 to deteriorating extrinsic conditions (fewer voles and more goshawks), owls appeared to breed more fr

58 echanisms underlying pair-bonding in prairie voles and paves the way to further our understanding of

59 e expression have been found between prairie voles and polygamous meadow voles.

60 ehavior parallel differences between prairie voles and promiscuous congeners.

61 brains of closely related monogamous prairie voles and promiscuous meadow voles, and compare receptor

62 tus montanus) and meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) voles and the monogamous pine vole (M. pinetorum), and t

63 atural variation in food availability (field vole) and predator abundance (northern goshawk) to quant

64 mous vole species, the prairie vole and pine vole, and two promiscuous vole species, the meadow vole

65 ogamous prairie voles and promiscuous meadow voles, and compare receptor densities across sexes and s

66 behavioral effects of AMPH in female prairie voles, and found that conditioning with low to intermedi

67 renting in juvenile and adult female prairie voles, and oxytocin receptor antagonist infused into the

68 ion of partner preferences in female prairie voles, and suggest that oxytocin receptor expression in

69 Here, we show that prairie voles are susceptible to mule deer CWD prions in vivo an

70 cilitation of pair bond formation in prairie voles, as well as potential sex differences in the CRF m

71 n on partner preference formation in prairie voles, as well as the interaction between the MC and OT

72 efined site quality from the survivorship of voles at the sites and the time at which they commenced

73 nd RMRt of 75 free-living short-tailed field voles at two time points in late winter.

74 In socially monogamous male prairie voles, AVP acts centrally via vasopressin V1a receptor (

75 rmation of social attachment in male prairie voles, because administration of haloperidol blocked, wh

76 tion) as proxies for animal welfare in water voles being reintroduced to the Upper Thames region, Oxf

77 licated by the fact that OTRs in finches and voles bind not only forms of OT, but also vasopressin (V

78 In male prairie voles, both vasopressin and dopamine act in the ventral

79 nd that sPMCA amplification of CWD prions in vole brain enhances the infectivity of CWD for this spec

80 appa- and mu-opioid receptors in the prairie vole brain.

81 alization of estrogen receptors in the adult vole brain.

82 Prairie vole breeder pairs form monogamous pair bonds, which are

83 partner preference formation in the prairie vole, but not in the non-monogamous meadow vole.

84 e BST of male and female hamsters and meadow voles, but not in rats.

85 in male and female hamsters and male meadow voles, but not rats.

86 ding to residues 120-144 of human (Hu), bank vole (BV), and Syrian hamster (SHa) prion protein, from

87 Interestingly, bank voles (BV) exhibit an unprecedented promiscuity for dive

88 formation in the socially promiscuous meadow vole by using viral vector V1aR gene transfer into the v

89 was not facilitated in nonmonogamous meadow voles by introducing oxytocin receptor into the nucleus

90 atric disorders, discoveries made in prairie voles can direct novel treatment strategies for disorder

91 rtain PrP(C) sequences, such as that of bank vole, can be converted by a remarkably broad array of di

92 A-seq, we show that another rodent, the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus, possesses three transcript

93 study, field voles (Microtus agrestis), bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus), and wood mice (Apodemus

94 We found high frequencies of cataracts in voles collected from different areas in Chernobyl.

95 redator (tawny owl) and its main prey (field vole) collected in Kielder Forest (UK) where vole dynami

96 o be disproportionately large in the prairie vole compared with other rodents.

97 CART mRNA and peptide in monogamous prairie voles compared to congener promiscuous meadow voles.

98 uence of oxytocin on affiliative behavior in voles could also be of importance for humans.

99 we also observed striking sex differences in voles: CRFR(2) binding was higher in the encapsulated be

100 ors are likely to be threatened by dampening vole cycles throughout Europe.

101 We found the observed dampening vole cycles, characterized by low spring densities, dras

102 were sought from the extensive literature on vole cycles.

103 glings were higher in years with high spring vole densities and negative wNAO (i.e. colder and drier

104 d adult survival were positively affected by vole density in autumn but relatively insensitive to wNA

105 Breeding propensity increased with vole density, although increasing goshawk abundance redu

106 a support the hypothesis that captive meadow voles develop selective and enduring same-sex social bon

107 Male and female montane voles did not differ.

108 hydration and body condition of captive-bred voles differed between their pre-release measures and bo

109 of PrP (PrP(RES)) in the brains of affected voles differed from those in cervidized transgenic (CerP

110 Male and female meadow voles differed in the ventromedial hypothalamus, with fe

111 s experiments were performed on male prairie voles displaying affiliation or aggression.

112 vole) collected in Kielder Forest (UK) where vole dynamics shifted from a high- to a low-amplitude fl

113 These results suggest that other vole-eating predators are likely to be threatened by dam

114 However, its impact on guilds of vole-eating predators remains unknown.

115 dministration in sexually naive male prairie voles enhanced V1aR expression in the AH and induced agg

116 Both male and female voles exhibit alloparental behavior, but its neurobiolog

117 Conversely, bank voles exposed to radionuclides host more similar gut mic

118 relation in telomere length among tissues in voles exposed to radionuclides.

119 indicate that, in both male and female pine voles, exposure to an opposite-sex conspecific is suffic

120 Male pine voles expressed lower levels of ERalpha-IR in the MeA th

121 s asparagine at position 170, our red-backed voles expressed serine and refute previous suggestions t

122 Meadow voles had a higher density of cells labeled with the cel

123 Virgin male prairie voles had a large number of TH-immunoreactive cells in a

124 Virgin female prairie voles had far fewer TH-immunoreactive cells in these sit

125 posed controls, prenatal VPA-exposed prairie voles had lower body weight throughout postnatal develop

126 Meadow voles had more ERalpha-labeled cells in the pCorA and VM

127 Both OT and OTA voles had significantly higher levels of social contact

128 pair-bonds, the socially monogamous prairie vole has emerged as an excellent model to study the neur

129 Bank voles have a high number of Asn and Gln residues and a h

130 Furthermore, prairie voles have higher densities of oxytocin receptors in the

131 Social, monogamous voles have more OT receptors in the extended amygdala th

132 Comparative studies in voles have suggested that a polymorphic microsatellite u

133 n CB1 densities across species, with prairie voles having higher CB1 binding in regions implicated in

134 The bank vole HBA-T3 gene is distinguished from each HBA-T1 and H

135 on relaxation of purifying selection on bank vole HBA-T3.

136 nt influences CART expression in the prairie vole in a region- and stimulus-specific manner.

137 ch, the author observed 8 litters of prairie voles in a seminatural environment to confirm the prefer

138 in forebrain V1aR expression of male prairie voles in mixed-sex seminatural enclosures.

139 and site quality suggested that in February voles in poorer sites had higher energy demands, indicat

140 The LVs were isolated from bank voles in Sweden during a search for an infectious agent

141 lates were distinct from those isolated from voles in the 1930s in Great Britain, they had a high deg

142 rtner preference formation in female prairie voles in the absence of mating.

143 ticus (wood mice) and Myodes glareolus (bank voles) in the UK and confirmed that several Bartonella s

144 highly conserved between prairie and meadow voles, including many subnuclei examined within the hypo

145 on and impair social bonding in male prairie voles) increased D1, but not D2, receptor mRNA in the NA

146 In addition, voles inoculated orally with sPMCA products developed cl

147 Prairie voles inoculated with sPMCA products developed clinical

148 The prairie vole is a socially monogamous rodent that is an excellen

149 The prairie vole is a socially monogamous species in which breeder p

150 Unlike most mammalian species, the prairie vole is highly affiliative, forms enduring social bonds

151 of the natural red colouration in adult bank voles is affected by ionizing background radiation, and

152 ctive aggression in pair-bonded male prairie voles is associated with increased release of vasopressi

153 rmation of monogamous pair bonds, by prairie voles, is facilitated by activation of dopamine (DA) D2-

154 Among monogamous prairie voles, levels of vasopressin receptor (encoded by the ge

155 ennsylvanicus) voles and the monogamous pine vole (M. pinetorum), and two species of cricetines that

156 uce distinct pathological phenotypes in bank voles (M. glareolus), irrespective of the presence of 21

157 re harbored within the nuclear genome of the vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis.

158 hmicity in whole blood samples of the common vole (Microtus arvalis), taken from 10 ul tail-nick bloo

159 established the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) as an animal model with whic

160 The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) exhibits parental behavior i

161 The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) is a socially monogamous rod

162 Here we show, using a prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) model of social bonding, how

163 asal OT given developmentally in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), a socially monogamous roden

164 es, the highly social and monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), greatly increases partner-d

165 In the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), mating induces enduring pai

166 Using the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)--a socially monogamous roden

167 g-induced social deficits, using the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)-a socially monogamous rodent

168 ocial attachment of the "monogamous" prairie vole (Microtus orchrogaster).

169 In this study, field voles (Microtus agrestis), bank voles (Clethrionomys gla

170 Relative abundance of voles (Microtus mexicanus) increased in exclosure draina

171 ssion of pro-social behavior in male prairie voles (Microtus ochragaster), predicting that inhibition

172 es sympatric with cervids, including prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and field mice (Peromyscus

173 pairs the formation of pair bonds in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and zebra finches (Taenioyp

174 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are a valuable model for st

175 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are exceptional among roden

176 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous and, like hu

177 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous rodents that

178 Although prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are socially monogamous, ma

179 somatosensory cortex was examined in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by using electrophysiologic

180 After pair-bonding, male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) display aggression toward n

181 Male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) display mating-induced pair

182 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exhibit a monogamous social

183 mmunoreactivity (IR) was compared in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) from Illinois (IL), which a

184 Male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) spontaneously exhibit high

185 The authors exposed male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) to novel females in a multi

186 n of sexually nai;ve male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) triggers a cascade of physi

187 Male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) were cohabitated with an op

188 Female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) were exposed to 1 hour immo

189 Pair-bonded male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) were infused with a retrogr

190 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), like humans, are biparenta

191 were used to enhance ERalpha in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), which display high levels

192 socioreproductive behaviors in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

193 to form a partner preference in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

194 A exposure in the social, monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

195 pair bonding) in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

196 and population dynamics were studied in root voles (Microtus oeconomus).

197 re in nature, whereas closely related meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) are solitary and polygam

198 Female meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) are territorial during w

199 Nonmonogamous meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), which exhibit seasonal

200 competition, respectively, among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).

201 rentally inexperienced or experienced meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).

202 ial transmission of food preferences in pine voles (Microtus pinetorum) and whether food items had to

203 Paternal and nonpaternal voles (microtus) have different arginine-vasopressin (AV

204 In voles (Microtus), central oxytocin (OT) receptor pattern

205 of a 25-year study of the monogamous prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in Illinois, USA.

206 Here we show that male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, increase their sperm inv

207 Vole molars cultured without the braces lose their cusp

208 length (TL) in different tissues of the bank vole Myodes glareolus, collected from the Chernobyl Excl

209 ncies of cataracts are found in eyes of bank voles Myodes glareolus collected from natural population

210 ting a capture-mark-recapture survey of bank voles Myodes glareolus in areas that contrast in levels

211 radiation among natural populations of bank voles Myodes glareolus in Chernobyl affected expression

212 number of expressed MHC molecules, the bank vole (Myodes glareolus).

213 mother and offspring condition, in the bank vole (Myodes glareolus).

214 soil, earthworms (Eisenia fetida), and Bank voles (Myodes glareolus) from a skiing area in Trondheim

215 nvolving transmission and adaptation to bank voles (Myodes glareolus), we found that prions causing C

216 Group sizes varied from 8 to 15 voles (n = 89 voles total).

217 Group sizes varied from 6 to 8 voles (N = 98 total).

218 ons of DA neuroanatomy and tissue content in vole NAcc, and mating appeared to induce a 33% increase

219 ded conversion of PrP(c), but human and bank vole NTDs did the opposite.

220 After interacting with a demonstrator vole, observer voles preferred cocoa-flavored food as co

221 Previous studies revealed that adult prairie vole offspring who received either high (HC) or low (LC)

222 advanced by the findings from two species of vole, one of which is monogamous and pair bonds whereas

223 In monogamous prairie voles, OT and dopamine interact to promote partner prefe

224 s species pairs of Peromyscus mice, Microtus voles, parid songbirds, dendrobatid frogs, and Xenotilap

225 TH-immunoreactive cells in the male prairie vole pBST and MeAPd, an effect that could be reversed wi

226 length of 2-5 yr, peak densities of 100-350 voles per ha and trough densities of 0-25 ha(-1), ratio

227 Continent-scale dampening of vole population cycles, keystone herbivores in many ecos

228 occurrence of a catastrophic collapse in the vole population followed by a prolonged low phase.

229 Within the normal prairie vole population, both the type and the amount of interac

230 of approach ensembles for partner and novel voles predict bond strength.

231 teracting with a demonstrator vole, observer voles preferred cocoa-flavored food as compared with eit

232 or diverse prion isolates, arguing that bank vole PrP (BVPrP) may be inherently prone to adopting mis

233 the amino-terminal domain of human and bank vole PrP(c)s requires interaction with the rest of the m

234 facilitates conversion of the human and bank vole PrP(c)s to the prion forms.

235 Additionally, full-length human and bank vole PrP(c)s were more likely to be converted to amyloid

236 do not promote the propagation of mouse and vole PrP(Sc) molecules.

237 Prairie vole pups (Microtus ochrogaster) in laboratory cages pre

238 Prairie vole pups in seminatural environments preferred hind nip

239 Adult male prairie voles received a sham surgery, were gonadectomized, or w

240 sterone, a stress hormone, in female prairie voles recovering alone but not the female prairie voles

241 In addition, we treated immobilized female voles recovering alone with oxytocin or vehicle and fema

242 ng alone with oxytocin or vehicle and female voles recovering with their male partner with a selectiv

243 recovering alone but not the female prairie voles recovering with their male partner.

244 in OvPrP with V136, R154, and Q171 and bank vole recPrP, where Cu(II) is coordinated by three residu

245 h V136, R154, and Q171 polymorphism and bank vole recPrP.

246 of OT directly into the mPFC of AMPH-exposed voles restored partner preferences, and altered NAcc DA

247 er extended cohabitation with a female, male voles showed behavior indicative of pair bond maintenanc

248 ota of sympatric small mammal species (mice, voles, shrews) across multiple habitats.

249 putative CB1 in the brain was similar across vole species and followed the pattern of CB1 expression

250 Further examination of CRF receptors in vole species may reveal a novel role for CRF in social b

251 of change throughout Europe and grass-eating vole species suggests a common climatic driver.

252 ; the onset of disease was faster in the two vole species than the two Peromyscus spp.

253 irie vole and pine vole, and two promiscuous vole species, the meadow vole and montane vole.

254 and CRFR(2) in the brains of two monogamous vole species, the prairie vole and pine vole, and two pr

255 forebrain of monogamous than in promiscuous vole species, whereas dopamine receptor distribution is

256 bution, correlate with the social systems of vole species.

257 microsatellite structure and monogamy in 21 vole species.

258 erminalis in males than females for all four vole species.

259 inding densities, as is the case in multiple vole species.

260 ation, sexual differentiation of the prairie vole spinal cord differs from that found in most other l

261 We confirmed the presence of CB2 in prairie vole spleen tissue using [3H] CP-55,940.

262 Studies of rats and voles suggest that distinct pathways emanating from the

263 y, these data are consistent with reports in voles suggesting that the combined disruption of SCN and

264 Counter to key predictions of the AKP, bank voles that are not exposed to radionuclides harbour vari

265 hat had not interacted with demonstrators or voles that had been exposed to odors.

266 -flavored food as compared with either naive voles that had not interacted with demonstrators or vole

267 Adult female prairie voles that overexpress oxytocin receptor in the nucleus

268 vioral consequences of exposing male prairie voles to a pup.

269 nectivity, and cortical thickness in newborn voles to appreciate when differences in HC and LC offspr

270 Here, we used male prairie voles to examine the effects of drug exposure on pair bo

271 udy, we confirm the unique susceptibility of voles to infection with M. microti and the relative resi

272 We housed male-female pairs of pine voles together for 0, 2, 6, 12, or 24 h before collectin

273 roup sizes varied from 8 to 15 voles (n = 89 voles total).

274 In prairie voles, trade-offs in the fitness consequences of social

275 Few studies of vole tuberculosis have been undertaken since then, and l

276 Mycobacterium microti (vole tuberculosis) infections in small wild mammals were

277 We monitored a natural population of field voles using longitudinal and cross-sectional sampling mo

278 crosatellite in the 5' region of the prairie vole vasopressin 1a receptor (avpr1a) gene modify gene e

279 ow the behavioral repertoire of male prairie voles via a DA receptor-specific mechanism in the NAcc,

280 A demonstrator vole was fed cocoa-flavored food, a nonpreferred food.

281 and six nuclear markers in Myodes glareolus voles was examined, including populations that show mtDN

282 A group of gonadally intact female prairie voles was included to reveal possible sex differences.

283 rthermore, the number of offspring in female voles was negatively correlated with cataract severity.

284 in vivo Ca(2+) imaging in monogamous prairie voles, we found that pair bonding does not elicit differ

285 Here, male prairie voles were administered intracerebroventricularly a V1aR

286 Captive-bred voles were assessed pre-release, and each month post-rel

287 Wild-born voles were captured in the field and assessed from two m

288 ochrogaster) and meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) voles were compared to examine neural cell proliferation

289 Reproductively naive, adult male prairie voles were implanted with radiotransmitters used for rec

290 Male and female adult prairie voles were placed in a cage either alone, or with a nove

291 Adult male prairie voles were transfected with ERalpha in the MeA (MeA-ERal

292 igated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well-characterized OXT system.

293 ation factor (BMF) > 1 was detected for Bank vole(whole)/earthworm(whole) for perfluorooctansulfonate

294 and genomic tools for this species, prairie voles will likely maintain their current trajectory beco

295 n acute increases in social behavior in male voles with familiar partners, as seen in humans.

296 We treated voles with one of three dosages of intranasal OT, or sal

297 Overall, our data indicate that the prairie vole would be a useful model for exploring how individua

298 othesized that PR expression in male prairie voles would differ from that described in other male rod

299 Comparative research in voles yields a model based on interspecies and intraspec

300 Prairie vole young on hind nipples, however, were dislodged less