ライフサイエンスコーパス: water deficit

1 ty (higher local rainfall and lower climatic water deficit).

2 f TF networks involved in plant responses to water deficit.

3 erant maize and for modeling grain yields in water deficit.

4 ain abortion causes large yield losses under water deficit.

5 plants also displayed enhanced tolerance to water deficit.

6 n deposition in root vascular tissues during water deficit.

7 concentration or leaf water potential under water deficit.

8 sponses of the growth of different organs to water deficit.

9 hanced tolerance of the transgenic plants to water deficit.

10 Stomatal closure is generally induced by water deficit.

11 t on ABA signalling in the plant response to water deficit.

12 es including salt stress, osmotic stress and water deficit.

13 a precipitation-induced decline in climatic water deficit.

14 re shifting downslope to maintain a constant water deficit.

15 ontrol of photosynthesis during growth under water deficit.

16 Dalpha3 alter plant response to salinity and water deficit.

17 ide-chains maintain cell wall flexibility in water deficit.

18 manner in response to ABA, high salinity and water deficit.

19 d from completing germination by dormancy or water deficit.

20 can execute growth arrest when challenged by water deficit.

21 hic seedling is arrested under conditions of water deficit.

22 l and molecular mechanisms to survive severe water deficit.

23 mperature or in detached leaves subjected to water deficit.

24 scription in response to low temperature and water deficit.

25 tivity and regulate plant resistance against water deficit.

26 ny was higher in sites with greater climatic water deficit.

27 sts synchronously experienced their greatest water deficit.

28 in fact are detrimental under conditions of water deficit.

29 is essential for Selaginella survival during water deficit.

30 n tolerance, with massive upregulation under water deficit.

31 d AtLEA4-5 protein expressed in plants under water deficit.

32 rance to salinity, and were more tolerant to water deficit.

33 ly, irrigation has primarily focused on soil water deficit.

34 ific expression patterns were not changed by water deficit.

35 in root ABA content in poplars subjected to water deficit.

36 lating rice (Oryza sativa) root growth under water deficit.

37 ect wall extensibility maintain growth under water deficit.

38 le in adapting plant growth to conditions of water deficit.

39 otypically similar responses to various soil water deficits.

40 case of carbon shortage or under very severe water deficits.

41 a results in enhanced performance under soil water deficits.

42 cid and impaired stomatal closure induced by water deficits.

43 te at low theta(crit) and show adaptation to water deficits.

44 uctions in most forests, despite substantial water deficits.

45 hanges in tropical dry periods and ecosystem water deficits.

46 than guar and mothbean, respectively, across water deficits.

47 y pertain to warmer ecosystems with periodic water deficits.

48 acks, longer growing seasons, and associated water deficits.

49 epair are not routine and mainly occur under water deficits.

50 o 60% FC but diminished with the more severe water deficit (40% FC).

51 Under water deficit (50% of soil water-holding capacity), tota

52 : the response of isoprene emission to plant water deficit; a possible relationship between concentra

53 idopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to concurrent water deficit (abiotic stress) and infection with the pl

54 Given increasing water deficits across numerous ecosystems world-wide, it

55 no detectable change in mean wood density or water deficit affiliation at the community level, despit

56 ntrations): maximum tree size, biogeographic water-deficit affiliation and wood density.

57 This study examines the effects of water deficit after during the grain filling period on p

58 With nearly 40% Pro, RePRP is induced by water deficit and abscisic acid (ABA) in the root elonga

59 his is due to variables such as temperature, water deficit and disturbance regimes.

60 tes are projected to drastically increase in water deficit and drought frequency by the end of the ce

61 Notably, mean annual climatic water deficit and elevation were not associated with pin

62 The responses of growth to soil water deficit and evaporative demand share an appreciabl

63 large consequences for plant modeling under water deficit and for the design of breeding programs.

64 phic stressors such as freezing temperature, water deficit and high solar irradiance.

65 ollowed over 25 to 30 d under four levels of water deficit and in four hybrids in two experiments.

66 to sample ordered structures because milder water deficit and macromolecular crowding induce high al

67 cutin monomer amount (by 65%), whereas both water deficit and NaCl altered the proportional amounts

68 as activated in response to a combination of water deficit and nematode stress, with 50 specifically

69 ssion was significantly down-regulated under water deficit and posttranscriptionally regulated by mic

70 es turgor maintenance independently of plant water deficit and reveal carbon allocation tradeoffs bet

71 Several stresses, including water deficit and salinity, regulate the synthesis of cu

72 -resistance (i.e., lower transpiration(min), water deficit and SLA), but these trends were most clear

73 onian forests spanning gradients in seasonal water deficit and soil fertility.

74 acteristics, likely driven by seasonality in water deficit and solar radiation.

75 Silk growth rate decreased in water deficit and stopped 2 to 3 d after first silk emer

76 These negative effects of water deficit and the alleviating role of GABA applicati

77 BADH1 and BADH15 mRNA were both induced by water deficit and their expression coincided with the ob

78 Water deficit and water excess constitute severe stresse

79 acids in leaves and nodules increased during water deficits and coincided with a decline in N2 fixati

80 ; ATHB7 and ATHB12, both strongly induced by water-deficit and abscisic acid (ABA).

81 ryza sativa) cultivars to high temperatures, water deficit, and agricultural field conditions by syst

82 riven stresses such as extreme temperatures, water deficit, and ion imbalance are projected to exacer

83 Wheat yields are heavily impacted by water deficit, and our identification of this crop as a

84 iota and associated systems: annual climatic water deficit, annual evapotranspiration, average minimu

85 The metabolic adjustments in response to water deficit are complex and involve gene expression mo

86 The signals mediating the WUE response under water deficit are not fully elucidated but involve the p

87 Regional warming and consequent increases in water deficits are likely contributors to the increases

88 divergent trends were found with vegetation water deficit areas significantly expanding, and water s

89 growth, indicating possible seasonal climate water deficit as a constraint on growth.

90 ing strong support for leaf vulnerability to water deficit as an index of damage under natural drough

91 itions into six scenarios of temperature and water deficit as experienced by maize (Zea mays L.) plan

92 o have a central role in cell adaptations to water deficit, as it interacts with pectin through a clu

93 lience of vegetation responds differently to water deficits at varying time scales.

94 re is a rapid vegetation reaction as soon as water deficits below normal conditions occur.

95 after stomatal closure (transpiration(min)), water deficit (% below turgid saturation), and specific

96 rences in functional strategies to cope with water deficit between resprouters (dehydration avoiders)

97 duction of at least a few viable seeds under water deficit but causes major yield loss.

98 Water deficit, but not NaCl, increased leaf cuticle thic

99 GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water deficit, but that (ii) site-to-site variations in

100 berellin (GA) lead to increased tolerance to water deficit, but the underlying mechanism is unknown.

101 robably because plants are able to withstand water deficits, but they lack the rapid response of arid

102 idday leaf water potential (PsiM) under soil water deficit by closing their stomata, anisohydric spec

103 During dry periods, soil-water deficit can limit evapotranspiration, leading to w

104 Soil water deficit can reduce plant survival, and is likely t

105 Water deficit caused by global climate changes seriously

106 According to the deficit thresholds, water deficits caused by anthropogenic impacts every yea

107 as the relative change in trait value under water-deficit compared with control conditions.

108 might help variety improvement for use under water deficit condition.

109 f mechanisms that regulate root growth under water deficit conditions and highlights the spatial diff

110 to, pea and sunflower - were evaluated under water deficit conditions in order to associate the diffe

111 d progeny in primary roots under control and water deficit conditions simulated by polyethylene glyco

112 Under water deficit conditions, 136 differentially expressed g

113 During water deficit conditions, the transgenic plants displaye

114 ional quality of wheat under both normal and water deficit conditions.

115 orn and sugar beet grown under irrigated and water deficit conditions.

116 ompared to untreated Catharanthus growing in water deficit conditions.

117 played SPE complementation under control and water deficit conditions.

118 274 indica genotypes grown under control and water-deficit conditions during vegetative growth, we ph

119 n the regulation of stomatal movements under water-deficit conditions.

120 are regulated by NCR1 under both normal and water-deficit conditions.

121 for developing high-yielding varieties under water-deficit conditions.

122 oRNA397b (miR397b) in roots under normal and water-deficit conditions.

123 Hence, we propose that, under moderate water deficits corresponding to most European drought sc

124 rns to survive severe drought, but prolonged water deficit, coupled with insect damage, may hamper fr

125 eys at 32 sites along a gradient of climatic water deficit (CWD) spanning 350 km of latitude and 1000

126 ibited less clade-wide variation in climatic water deficit (CWD) than did annual or clade-seasonal ni

127 e climate [i.e. 35-year mean annual climatic water deficit (CWD)] and competition (i.e. tree basal ar

128 ure, actual evapotranspiration, and climatic water deficit (deficit) over the contiguous US during th

129 Studies of water deficit, dehydration, salt, and other osmotic stre

130 , which possesses a root system sensitive to water deficit, demonstrated greater resistance to aphid

131 A comparative transcriptome analysis of soil water deficit drought stress treatments revealed the sim

132 ially under abiotic constraints such as soil water deficit (drought [D]) and high temperature (heat [

133 apid dehydration following desubmergence and water deficit during drought.

134 est in western Amazonia experienced a strong water deficit during the dry season of 2005 and a closel

135 s coordinately respond to distinct levels of water deficits (e.g., mild, moderate or severe drought)

136 res, higher annual precipitation levels, and water deficits, elevate the risk of disease outbreaks.

137 ronments in the glasshouse, contrasting soil water deficit, elevated temperature and their interactio

138 4)CO2 pulse-chase experiments confirmed that water deficit enhanced carbon (C) export to the roots, a

139 and NM-77 genotypes can perform better under water deficit environments.

140 hopeiensis exhibits exceptional tolerance to water-deficit environments and is therefore an excellent

141 The water-deficit equation {WD(1) = 0.6 x B(m) x [1 - (140 /

142 not observed in tree species less-adapted to water deficit, even under exceptionally dry conditions.

143 can create phenotypes that resemble those of water deficit experienced by soil-grown plants, it remai

144 rowth environment, including warming-induced water deficits, extended growing seasons, accelerated sn

145 tress, showing maximum vulnerability to soil water deficits following budbreak and becoming more resi

146 In response to water deficit, glycine betaine levels increased 26-fold

147 The yield reductions under low to moderate water deficits (> 65%FI) accompanied by gains in WP may

148 The sensitivity of expansive growth to water deficit has a large genetic variability, which is

149 ion in soybean (Glycine max) L. Merr. during water deficits has been associated with increases in ure

150 d 143 mmol/L corresponding to 1% body weight water deficit [hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interva

151 With increasing climatic water deficit, higher propagule pressure (i.e., smaller

152 en exceeds water intake, resulting in a body water deficit (hypohydration) and electrolyte losses.

153 , and we suggest that the persistence of the water deficit (i.e., the drought time-scale) could be pl

154 Water deficit impairs growth, leading to sugar accumulat

155 Our findings suggest that critical water deficits impeding tissue growth occurred at relati

156 ss of the optimized strategies in mitigating water deficits, improving water quality, and reducing eu

157 ncreasing occurrence of high temperature and water deficit in both agricultural production systems an

158 en genotypes of peach, and also inducible by water deficit in cv. Rio Oso Gem.

159 on with the differential growth responses to water deficit in different regions of the elongation zon

160 If global warming amplifies water deficit in drought-prone areas, tree populations l

161 The deep-water deficit in NO(3)(-) was in near-stoichiometric bal

162 ences the beginning of 2020 growing season's water deficit in parts of southern Africa, with severe c

163 -but-heavy" roots as an adaptive response to water deficit in rice.

164 though all species respond similarly to leaf water deficit in terms of enhanced levels of ABA and clo

165 r polyethylene glycol in culture media or by water deficit in the soil.

166 perature effect to the historic frequency of water deficit in the southwestern United States predicts

167 Some of them also accumulate in response to water deficit in vegetative tissues, which leads to a re

168 from uncertainty in the stomatal response to water deficits in soil and atmosphere.

169 Of these treatments, only water deficit increased the total cutin monomer amount (

170 ngly, bos1 plants have impaired tolerance to water deficit, increased salinity, and oxidative stress.

171 Alternatively, the Water Deficit Index (WDI) was developed for crop water s

172 A) has been implicated as a key component in water-deficit-induced responses, including those trigger

173 f which were shown in previous studies to be water-deficit inducible.

174 gressive reduction in yield as a function of water deficit intensity associated with signaling pathwa

175 For this purpose, progressing soil water deficit is communicated from roots to shoots.

176 her such mechanisms are independent of plant water deficit is not known.

177 Water deficit is one of the main abiotic factors that af

178 ne of the prominent adaptations of plants to water deficits is the maintenance of root growth that en

179 Dehydration (body water deficit) is a physiologic state that can have prof

180 When exposed to root-zone water deficits, line sp12 showed an increase in xylem AB

181 st subjected to a 100-millimeter increase in water deficit lost 5.3 megagrams of aboveground biomass

182 ield loss due to water stress from both soil water deficit (low soil moisture) and atmospheric aridit

183 ayed onset of wilting in plants experiencing water deficit, lower transpiration rates, and improved w

184 When plants were subjected to water deficit, melatonin treatment increased the concent

185 , suggesting that prevalent conditions under water deficit modulate their conformation.

186 these proteins opens the question of whether water deficit modulates their conformation and whether t

187 Other key predictors included climate water deficit, normalized difference vegetation index (N

188 It is maximum for water deficits occurring during flowering in maize (Zea

189 Tolerance to prolonged water deficit occurs along a continuum in plants, with d

190 kingdom that participate in the tolerance to water deficit of different plant species.

191 The effects of water deficit on BADH mRNA expression, leaf water relati

192 The effects of water deficit on carbon and nitrogen metabolism were inv

193 to investigate the effects of end of season water deficit on phenolic content in drought tolerant an

194 essary for repression of root development by water deficit or ABA.

195 terranean rain-fed conditions are exposed to water deficit, particularly during the grain filling per

196 s responses to temperature, solar radiation, water deficit, photosynthesis and cell wall biosynthesis

197 were significantly up-regulated in leaves of water deficit plants, in accordance with the increase in

198 During water deficit, plants produce elevated levels of abscisi

199 Under water deficit, plants reduce transpiration and are able

200 These data demonstrate that, during water deficit, plants respond to growth limitation by al

201 ignificance of root growth maintenance under water deficits, progress in understanding has been hampe

202 Setaria italica plants submitted to five water deficit regimes were analyzed through a phenotypic

203 -induced modifications in plant responses to water deficit remain obscure.

204 oss of COMT on root growth and adaptation to water deficit remain unexplored.

205 nd candidate driver transcription factors of water-deficit responses and xylem development plasticity

206 d maize and searched for signatures defining water-deficit responses.

207 er stress, suggesting that bmr12 may be in a water deficit responsive state even in well-watered cond

208 In total, 152 water deficit-responsive proteins were identified and ca

209 ated in response to diverse stresses such as water deficit, root-knot nematode (RKN) infection, and U

210 pment and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic ac

211 Abiotic stresses such as water deficit, salt, and heat are major environmental fa

212 for 2 y under well-watered and moderate soil water deficit scenarios.

213 ptation of maize (Zea mays) primary roots to water deficit showed that cell elongation is maintained

214 s experiencing greater increases in climatic water deficit since the 1930s, based on a hydrologic mod

215 season, and thus snowmelt likely covers the water deficit so trees are less stressed from the onset

216 s (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants subjected to water deficit, sodium chloride (NaCl), or abscisic acid

217 Dehydration largely refers to intracellular water deficits stemming from hypertonicity and a disturb

218 ere obtained from plants subjected to severe water deficit stress (FC50) and treated with AA.

219 resulted from the moderate (FC75) and severe water deficit stress (FC50) treatments treated with AA.

220 NA clone (lp3) from loblolly pine induced by water deficit stress (WDS) has been isolated.

221 n common bean genotypes that are tolerant to water deficit stress (WDS), foliar applications (0 and 3

222 traits with adaptive plasticity response to water deficit stress and can be used for development of

223 erstand response of root and shoot traits to water deficit stress and identify genotypes with adaptiv

224 rice cultivars with contrasting responses to water deficit stress and wheat cultivars well adapted to

225 Expression of the pLP6 gene is repressed by water deficit stress and wounding.

226 ater scarcity and the increasing severity of water deficit stress are major challenges to sustaining

227 tivity to ABA and to reduce water loss under water deficit stress but had no effect on leaf size.

228 , rice growth is seriously constrained under water deficit stress compared with other dryland cereals

229 irrigation regimes (low, moderate and severe water deficit stress FC100, FC75 and FC50, respectively)

230 Climate change driven water deficit stress impairs crop performance by implica

231 in root and shoot traits was observed under water deficit stress in shoot biomass (60.20%), followed

232 fferent positions along the nodal root under water deficit stress in wheat, whereas they were relativ

233 wild-type plants under normal conditions and water deficit stress indicated that over-expression of A

234 study aimed to understand how BSs influence water deficit stress perceived by savory plants (Saturej

235 pyrophosphatase gene AVP1 increases salt and water deficit stress tolerance and overexpression of the

236 SUMO E3 ligase gene OsSIZ1 improves heat and water deficit stress tolerance in transgenic plants.

237 plant responses to abiotic stresses such as water deficit stress via physiological and molecular pat

238 of root and shoot traits, under control and water deficit stress, Basal root angle ranged from 36.67

239 ssors - thermotolerance, cold hardiness, and water deficit stress, respectively - are not static in t

240 greater amounts of water during the imposed water deficit stress, resulting in a more favorable plan

241 giosperms are capable of acclimation to soil water deficit stress, showing maximum vulnerability to s

242 lasticity, unlike wheat cultivars exposed to water deficit stress.

243 isition strategy through thinner roots under water deficit stress.

244 d recovery of plants from an episode of soil water deficit stress.

245 ys) development is particularly sensitive to water deficit stress.

246 ) can be considered a new tool in mitigating water deficit stress.

247 , root-shoot ratio increased by 89.05% under water deficit stress.

248 6PDH gene expression is affected by cold and water deficit stress.

249 stomatal conductance and rapid wilting under water deficit stress.

250 imation and deacclimation to heat, cold, and water-deficit stress in perennials, focusing on woody pl

251 d respiratory demand treatment slowed as the water-deficit stress increased.

252 he genetic control of rooting behavior under water-deficit stress is essential to breed climate-robus

253 mand can be used as a sensitive indicator of water-deficit stress responses.

254 We predicted 296 (control), 284 (water-deficit stress), and 233 (plasticity) a priori can

255 control conditions, 106 were detected under water-deficit stress, and 76 were detected for trait pla

256 bundance maintained PS levels in response to water-deficit stress, while 40% showed impaired ribosome

257 f homeostasis and translation of mRNAs under water-deficit stress.

258 metabolism (CAM) when exposed to salinity or water-deficit stress.

259 ion, SLW1 and SLW3 RNAs were abundant during water-deficit stress.

260 e response of such communities to increasing water-deficit stress.

261 ssion of stomatal development in response to water-deficit stress.

262 ensity resulting in increased attenuation of water-deficit stress.

263 idation, can help improve rice adaptation to water-deficit stress.

264 patial scales enables plants to acclimate to water-deficit stress.

265 in nonstressed cotton at sunrise compared to water-deficit stressed cotton, potentially predisposing

266 nscripts in the roots was lower than that of water deficit-stressed seedlings.

267 Water-deficit stresses preferentially reduce shoot growt

268 robic methanogen to study the acclimation of water-deficit stresses which de novo synthesize betaine

269 cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) source leaves to water-deficit stresses.

270 eters of transgenic plantlets subjected to a water deficit suggested that plants from line TS4T8An di

271 a greater biomass and a higher resistance to water deficit than the wild-type did.

272 PLDdelta rendered plants less responsive to water deficits than the wild type.

273 Water deficits that coincide with flowering result in le

274 se increasingly severe droughts by enhancing water deficits that could prove challenging for water ma

275 In the absence of water deficit, the heatwave caused only mild effects, in

276 ss-of-function mutations result in increased water deficit tolerance and higher integrated WUE by red

277 The water deficit tolerance of two HbCuZnSOD over-expressing

278 and modelling approaches, we found that the water deficit treatment led to key differences in microb

279 ntially more stable to expression changes by water deficit treatment than other genotype-specific exp

280 Exogenous ureides applied to the soil and water-deficit treatments inhibited N2 fixation by 85% to

281 s related to tree water status, such as tree water deficit (TWD).

282 roaches in sustainable reservoir management: water deficit, undesirable water quality, and eutrophic

283 L.) as a global food crop and the impact of water deficit upon grain yield, we focused on functional

284 fers for a more complete assessment of total water deficits, using high-resolution tools such as seis

285 ncrease in water constraints associated with water deficit was also consistent with a decreasing resp

286 ion to the tolerance of transgenic plants to water deficit was also supported by the increase in tran

287 ne (pLP6) of a gene which is repressed under water deficit was isolated from a loblolly pine (Pinus t

288 western US show that high pre-fire climatic water deficit was related to increased post-fire tree mo

289 9, which possesses a root system tolerant to water deficit, was highly susceptible to aphids.

290 Acclimation to water deficit (WD) enables plants to maintain growth und

291 sent a revised aridity index for quantifying water deficit (WD) in terrestrial environments using too

292 anscriptomic responses of different crops to water deficit (WD) or heat stress (HS) are very differen

293 a major role in the adaptation of plants to water deficit (WD).

294 relate to spatial and temporal variation in water deficit, we analyze data from three forest dynamic

295 atform with contrasting temperature and soil water deficit, we determined the periods of sensitivity

296 on (An) and stomatal conductance (gs) due to water deficit were 79, 35 and 55%, respectively, during

297 kpea cultivars with contrasting tolerance to water deficit were examined.

298 showed that annual rainfall and accumulated water deficit were the main drivers of the distribution

299 rocesses, determines the sink strength under water deficit, whereas photosynthesis determines source

300 nalysis of yield under well-watered (WW) and water-deficit (WT) conditions.