ライフサイエンスコーパス: water maze

1 sk, finding a visible platform in the Morris water maze.

2 triggered by spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

3 aKO mice exhibited preserved learning on the water maze.

4 ts, and they learned faster to navigate in a water maze.

5 sufficient to improve the performance in the water maze.

6 on of long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

7 t EEG activity and impairments in the Morris water maze.

8 rats underwent training for 1 d in a Morris water maze.

9 performance on the stress-associated Morris water maze.

10 t and long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

11 contextual fear conditioning and the Morris water maze.

12 h learning and memory deficits in the Morris Water Maze.

13 ns acquired analogous versions of the Morris water maze.

14 classical spatial memory task in the Morris water maze.

15 essed by novel object recognition and Morris water maze.

16 pal function, enhancing memory in the Morris water maze.

17 groups performed comparably and well in the water maze.

18 S1 null mice when tested with the radial-arm water maze.

19 in a reversal learning version of the Morris water maze.

20 mance in novel object recognition and Morris water maze.

21 2weeks and 3months post-anesthesia in Morris water maze.

22 l-object recognition tests and in the Morris water maze.

23 slices or spatial performance in the Morris water maze.

24 partially rescued memory performance in the water maze.

25 quisition and retention phases of the Morris water maze.

26 ed spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze.

27 impairment, which was assessed by the Morris water maze.

28 on of spatial learning as assessed by Morris water maze.

29 ound deficits in performance in the Circular water maze.

30 ination task and a visually cued task in the water maze.

31 ed by the impaired performance in the Morris water maze.

32 nd mecamylamine prevented acquisition of the water maze.

33 were tested for spatial learning in a Morris Water Maze.

34 re training improved acquisition on a Morris water maze.

35 ction and cognitive impairment in the Morris water maze.

36 ed swimming and navigational learning in the water maze.

37 did not impair navigational learning in the water maze.

38 ols, but failed to affect performance in the water maze.

39 patial memory was tested by using the Morris water maze.

40 hidden platform in a virtual reality Morris water maze.

41 in the delayed-match-to-place version of the water maze.

42 and impaired spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

43 ng memory when investigated using the Morris water maze.

44 prevents retention of spatial memory in the water maze.

45 to classify spatial strategies in the Morris water maze.

46 st subjected to eight learning sessions in a water maze.

47 rt for the hAPP model and use of the virtual water maze.

48 TP and spatial memory, assayed by the Morris water maze.

49 anced non-spatial cue learning on the Morris water maze.

50 d by two behavioral tests, Y maze and Morris water maze.

51 ng and memory were then tested in the Morris water maze.

52 jury, and improved performance in the Morris water maze 4 weeks after injury.

53 al. present a virtual version of the Morris water maze (a common test of spatial learning and memory

54 long-term memory consolidation in the Morris water maze, a function of TA-CA1 synapses.

55 uded a virtual reality version of the Morris water maze, a task involved participants having to swim

56 ted with deficits in spatial learning in the water maze, a task that requires the integrity of the hi

57 ocentric spatial navigation using the Morris water maze, a task well known to require dorsal hippocam

58 to the hidden platform version of the Morris Water Maze, a test of spatial learning that, in mice, is

59 When examined by Morris water maze, AC8 KO mice showed normal reference memory.

60 rolipram showed a significant improvement in water maze acquisition and retention of both cue and con

61 hicle or rolipram (0.03 mg/kg) 30 min before water maze acquisition or cue and contextual fear condit

62 ry 2 min, either prior to, or after, initial water maze acquisition training.

63 5) was mutated to Ala) mice were tested in a water maze after chronic naltrexone administration.

64 ts indicate that impaired performance in the water maze after hippocampal damage reflects more than a

65 in behavioral flexibility in both the Morris water maze and a delayed nonmatch to place T-maze task,

66 spatial memory task analogous to the Morris water maze and a mirror-tracing procedural memory contro

67 l outcomes as assessed by Rotarod and Morris Water Maze and a reduction in positive Fluoro-Jade B sta

68 and found that spatial memory assayed by the water maze and contextual fear conditioning often does n

69 e Camk2a gene resulted in severe deficits in water maze and contextual fear learning, whereas mice wi

70 mutant mice showed severe deficits in Morris water maze and contextual fear memory tasks, whereas mic

71 tion during the reversal phase of the Morris water maze and deficits in a delayed nonmatch to place T

72 itive evaluation using spatial learning in a water maze and exploration behavior in an open field.

73 gical function was assessed using the Morris water maze and foot fault tests.

74 ction was assessed using the modified Morris Water Maze and footfault tests.

75 f cognition like object recognition task and water maze and in brain microdialysis studies at lower d

76 n the real-space version of the human Morris water maze and in its corresponding computer version.

77 ed rats was found to improve learning in the water maze and in object-place recognition.

78 ut improved reversal learning in both Morris water maze and lever press paradigms.

79 Morris water maze and modified neurological severity scores wer

80 Modified Morris water maze and neurological severity score (mNSS) test w

81 e show normal spatial learning in the Morris water maze and normal context-dependent fear conditionin

82 ts and male C57Bl/6J mice were tested in the water maze and novel object recognition tasks.

83 ansgenic mice, memory was assessed by Morris water maze and novel object recognition.

84 ptors, the observed behavior in the rotarod, water maze and peripheral nerve injury tests was possibl

85 head-turning reflex, visible platform Morris water maze and Rotarod measurements were conducted to te

86 had severe spatial cognitive deficits in the water maze and seizures worsened performance.

87 The Morris water maze and the Barnes maze are the most commonly use

88 aired performance in both the virtual Morris water maze and the CANTAB paired associates learning.

89 trained to spatially navigate in the Morris Water Maze and then exposed to CIE vapor or air 16 h a d

90 on the first day of reversal training in the water maze and they extinguish conditioned fear more slo

91 reversal learning, as measured using Morris water-maze and fear-conditioning assays.

92 ton exposure impaired egocentric (Cincinnati water maze) and allocentric learning and caused referenc

93 its in hippocampal-dependent spatial (Morris water maze) and associative (contextual fear conditionin

94 learning strategies in long-term reference (water maze) and working memory (Y-maze) tasks presented

95 Affective (elevated plus-maze), cognitive (water-maze), and reproductive (sexual) behavior was exam

96 n memory flexibility, assessed in the Morris water maze, and a significant disruption of long-term po

97 hy controls in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning.

98 y using contextual fear-conditioning, Morris water maze, and novel object recognition tests.

99 layed memory enhancement in radial arm maze, water maze, and object recognition tests.

100 On PD 52, subjects were tested on the Morris water maze, and on PD 60, open field activity levels wer

101 ke responses to an open field, learning in a water maze, and reactivity to forced swimming were asses

102 d of training on the spatial version of the water maze, and retention was examined 24 h later.

103 cy to find the target platform in the Morris water maze as compared to vehicle-treated animals.

104 enhanced learning performance in the Morris water maze as learning ability was associated with highe

105 dendrocytes impaired memory consolidation of water maze, as well as contextual fear, memories.

106 mes in motor (rotarod) and cognitive (Morris water maze) assays compared to controls.

107 Cognitive function was assessed via Morris water maze at 2 and 13 weeks postoperatively.

108 and tested memory performance in the Morris water maze at 21 months of age.

109 shown that this mouse shows deficits on the water maze at 52 weeks of age.

110 arning and memory were assessed using Morris water mazes at 3 and 4 months of losartan treatment.

111 We used a water maze beacon discrimination task to characterize yo

112 age-related variability in performance on a water maze beacon task and next-generation sequencing to

113 Morris water maze behavioral test revealed that infection with

114 A visually guided water maze behavioral test under dim light showed signif

115 ype III NRG1 improves deficits in the Morris water-maze behavioral task.

116 US-induced learning impairment in the Morris water maze but not an enhanced depletion of hippocampal

117 and caused reference memory deficits (Morris water maze), but did not affect proximal cue learning or

118 had impaired reversal learning in the Morris water maze compared to their wild-type littermates, whic

119 r spatial learning performance in the Morris water maze compared with control WT littermates.

120 al recovery on elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, concomitant with reductions in elevated proi

121 r activity, novel object recognition, Morris water maze (cued, hidden platform, reduced platform), a

122 BMS-241027 had beneficial effects on Morris water maze deficits, tau pathology, and neurodegeneratio

123 show contextual fear conditioning and Morris water maze deficits.

124 In the Morris water maze, DKO mice showed defective acquisition and me

125 AC-260584 enhanced performance in the water maze during a probe test without a platform after

126 length was inversely correlated with Morris water maze escape latencies (r = -0.757, P < 0.001), and

127 ciate a particular spatial location with the water maze escape platform or food reward is NR2A indepe

128 sensitivity, but did not have any effects on water maze escape, place preference or locomotor activit

129 The 20-mug dose also enhanced water maze escape.

130 e platform technique, and behavioral (Morris water maze, fear conditioning, open field) and biochemic

131 potentiation [LTP]), and behavioral (Morris water maze, fear-conditioning) approaches.

132 When tested in the Morris water maze for spatial orientation abilities, whereas AP

133 ing and memory using the T-maze, Y-maze, and water maze, hippocampal-dependent spatial memory tasks.

134 In the Morris water maze, IDUA(-/-) mice exhibited impaired proficient

135 t change performance in the T maze or in the water maze in adult males or females.

136 e assessed cognitive function as measured by water maze in the Fischer/Brown Norway (FBN) rat, compar

137 Rats performed a searching task in a water maze in which the only task-relevant sensory feedb

138 amyloid with terminal cognitive assessment (water maze) in an AD transgenic mouse model (PS2APP) fro

139 memory deficits, as determined in the Morris water maze, in aged mice.

140 erformance measures of animals in the Morris Water Maze include the escape latency, and the cumulativ

141 Performance in object recognition, Y-maze, water maze, inhibitory avoidance, and contextual-cued fe

142 ly better on the object recognition, Y-maze, water maze, inhibitory avoidance, and cued fear conditio

143 The Morris Water Maze is a widely used task in studies of spatial l

144 s1Rhr/Ts65Dn mice, performance in the Morris water maze is identical to euploid, demonstrating that t

145 performance, as quantified by reduced Morris water maze latencies on Days 29-32 post-ICH.

146 modestly impaired social behaviors, enhanced water maze learning abilities, and increased synaptic in

147 nt models of cognitive aging have focused on water maze learning and have demonstrated an age-associa

148 We found that water maze learning promotes oligodendrogenesis and de n

149 c vocalizations, and deficits in reversal of water maze learning were detected only in some cohorts,

150 Fear conditioning and water maze learning were impaired in En2 null mutants.

151 ed levels of anxiety, impairment in reversal water maze learning, and little memory loss over time.

152 it deficits in pattern separation but not in water maze learning.

153 ared performance in recognition with that in water maze learning.

154 ents in the Object Location assay and Morris Water Maze (MWM) acquisition engaging in nonspatial sear

155 atial memory test in the forms of the Morris water maze (MWM) and contextual fear conditioning at 85

156 al learning and memory performance in Morris water maze (MWM) and Object Location tasks, and alters b

157 deterioration in memory accuracy with Morris Water Maze (MWM) and reduced social memory (SM).

158 ory in two separate behavioral tasks, Morris water maze (MWM) and touchscreen intermediate pattern se

159 The mutant mice learn the Morris water maze (MWM) as well as WT but show deficiency in re

160 The Morris water maze (MWM) is a test of spatial learning for roden

161 The Morris water maze (MWM) is widely used to evaluate rodent spati

162 ace and match-to-place version of the Morris water maze (MWM) over seven consecutive days, and a yawn

163 gnitive function was assessed using a Morris water maze (MWM) paradigm.

164 The Morris water maze (MWM) retrograde amnesia test was conducted o

165 APP(E693Q) mice were studied in the Morris water maze (MWM) task at 6 and 12 months of age.

166 mpairment in the ability to learn the Morris water maze (MWM) task compared to age-matched wild-type

167 To investigate this we utilized Morris water maze (MWM) testing in a group of young (3 months)

168 impairment in marble burying (MB) and Morris water maze (MWM) tests.

169 erity score (mNSS), footfault and the Morris water maze (MWM) tests.

170 We used the Morris water maze (MWM) to test for time of day differences in

171 navigate in spatial tasks such as the Morris water maze (MWM) using a local cue-based reference frame

172 ng and memory were measured using the Morris water maze (MWM), hippocampal metabolites were measured

173 and memory deficits, as determined by Morris water maze (MWM), in aged mice.

174 significantly reduced performance in Morris Water Maze (MWM), long-term memory (LTM) contextual fear

175 ce showed impaired performance in the Morris water maze (MWM), which was accompanied by lower express

176 ical dysfunction was assessed using a Morris water-maze (MWM), a 28-point scale, and a corner test at

177 ampus-dependent working memory in the Morris water maze, novel object recognition, and contextual fea

178 Water maze, open field, and rotarod performance was test

179 cation-specific object memory but not Morris water maze or contextual fear conditioning.

180 Both average latency analysis of Morris water maze performance and assessment of 24-hour memory

181 taPP/PS1 mice develop deficits in radial-arm water maze performance and novel object recognition as e

182 bited a significant impairment in radial arm water maze performance compared with sham KI mice or inj

183 se are necessary to reliably improve spatial water maze performance in aging female mice.

184 r impaired (AI) groups based on their Morris water maze performance relative to young-adult (Y) anima

185 decreased locomotor activity, inferior cued water maze performance, decreased running wheel ability,

186 nly before testing, modafinil did not affect water maze performance.

187 clear anxiolytic actions and did not affect water-maze performance.

188 g mice displayed improved performance in the water maze, preservation of the dendritic structure in t

189 ce memory, as assessed by performance on the water maze probe trial, was correlated with reduced hipp

190 Tests using a Morris water maze procedure indicated that IPN lesions produced

191 without obliterating memory retrieval in the water maze, produces an as large strategy shifting/memor

192 tely following massed training in the Morris water maze, PTK/ZK impaired spatial memory retention tes

193 beacons were hung directly over each of the water maze quadrants, equidistant from each other (multi

194 e to the level of healthy controls in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning

195 The radial arm water maze (RAWM) contains six swim paths (arms) extendi

196 lted in improved cognition on the radial arm water maze (RAWM) test and decreased the level of hyperp

197 Radial arm water maze (RAWM) testing for working memory indicated t

198 FMI), and working memory (using a radial arm water maze, RAWM).

199 assessed using elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, respectively.

200 improved spatial learning performance in the water maze, restored resting-state functional connectivi

201 in cue and contextual fear conditioning and water maze retention.

202 The water maze revealed significant learning (but not motor)

203 In the Morris water maze, rifampicin at 1 mg/day improved memory of th

204 dult-born neurons as spatial learning in the water maze sculpts the dendritic arbor of adult-born neu

205 Intact rats trained in a Morris water maze showed increased c-Fos expression (vs home ca

206 etter on a spatial memory task in the Morris water maze, showing improved learning curves across days

207 xtual fear extinction and reversal of Morris water maze spatial learning and memory, suggesting that

208 g on PD 45, subjects were tested on a Morris water maze spatial learning task.

209 adult Sprague Dawley rats were trained on a water maze spatial task at two different water temperatu

210 the novel-object recognition test and Morris water-maze spatial task compared to sham.

211 present the novel findings that longitudinal water-maze spatial training produces a significant, albe

212 t recognition, fear conditioning, and Morris water maze studies.

213 no alteration in long-term potentiation and water maze, suggesting that Smad4 is not required for sp

214 sks, namely delayed-matching-to-place in the water maze, T-maze alternation and working memory in the

215 learning and memory (hidden platform Morris water maze, T-maze spontaneous alternation, and pavlovia

216 arning strategy selection after a cue-guided water maze task and competition testing performed 1 or 2

217 ed on a working memory version of the Morris water maze task and navigation takes place in a visually

218 cells, acquired the spatial reference memory water maze task as well as controls, despite impairments

219 l learning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze task during 1-5 days after exposure to anesth

220 ernation in the T maze for working memory, a water maze task for escape, the elevated plus maze for a

221 icantly impaired in reversal learning in the water maze task post-TBI.

222 reas those with the best memory in a spatial water maze task remapped the least.

223 of memory in a delayed-match-to-place radial water maze task that can be used to assess proactive int

224 When we ran a spatial discrimination water maze task using two visually identical beacons, Gr

225 tial learning in a delayed matching to place water maze task was also not affected by the loss of FMR

226 e animals were also markedly impaired in the water maze task, a measure of spatial memory.

227 NR2A mutants acquired the SRM version of the water maze task, and the SRM component of the radial maz

228 ts in the rate of acquisition of the regular water maze task, but again had significant deficits in t

229 cognition learning and spatial learning in a water maze task, demonstrating the importance of GLP-1 s

230 xhibit deficits in performance of the Morris water maze task, suggesting that PtdIns(4,5)P(2) dyshome

231 In this study, using the Morris water maze task, we demonstrate that IL-13-deficient mic

232 d mild spatial memory deficits in the Morris water maze task.

233 to controls during acquisition of the Morris water maze task.

234 y on a hidden platform version of the Morris water maze task.

235 memory performance was tested on the Morris Water Maze task.

236 nation ability and improvements on a virtual water maze task.

237 form poorly in the delayed matching to place water-maze task (DMTP).

238 the ReRh, we found normal acquisition of the water-maze task (vs sham-operated controls) and normal p

239 memory in a hippocampal-dependent radial arm water-maze task without inducing mossy fiber sprouting o

240 In rats having learned the water-maze task, lidocaine-induced inactivation of the R

241 oline supplementation on a matching-to-place water-maze task, which was also accompanied by a decreas

242 Wistar rats following a platform search in a water-maze task.

243 entric square field, balance beam, or Morris water maze tasks, but reduced swimming speed.

244 with impaired spatial memory, as measured in water maze tasks.

245 ntion in the inhibitory avoidance and Morris water maze tasks.

246 In the Morris Water Maze test (MWM), mGluR5 knock-out mice exhibited m

247 itine improved behavioral performance in the water maze test and reduced neurodegeneration, abnormal

248 induced cognitive impairment as shown in the water maze test and step-down test.

249 In the Morris water maze test GluD1 KO mice showed no difference in ac

250 e performed the hippocampus-dependent Morris water maze test on mice.

251 The Morris water maze test revealed an impaired learning and memory

252 Morris water maze test showed that both CCI and S-CCI produced

253 lve a cognitive challenge such as the Morris water maze test significantly better than APP, with perf

254 sease resulted in retained cognition (Morris water maze test), decreased amyloid-beta plaque burden,

255 NEIL1 exhibit impaired memory retention in a water maze test, but no abnormalities in tests of motor

256 odynamic efficacy was evaluated using Morris Water Maze Test, Radial Arm Maze Test and AChE activity

257 l learning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze test, whereas free DHA had no effect.

258 emory impairment as determined by radial arm water maze test, which is associated with enhancement of

259 spatial learning as determined by the Morris water maze test.

260 improved spatial learning in the radial arm water maze test.

261 ent in memory deficit assessed by the Morris water maze test.

262 eased spatial reference memory in the Morris water maze test.

263 and fastened neurocognitive recovery in the Water-Maze test (15/26 vs 9/26 mice with competence to p

264 etter spatial memory retention in the Morris water-maze test compared with vehicle-treated animals (C

265 In addition, Morris water maze testing showed increased latency to locate a

266 4 weeks prior to and then throughout spatial water maze testing.

267 s in contextual fear-conditioning and Morris water maze tests compared with wild-type controls.

268 ce performed poorly on the T-maze and Morris water maze tests, which measure short- and long-term spa

269 ceptors, and decreased memory performance in water maze tests.

270 logical severity score, footfault and Morris water maze tests.

271 also exhibited preserved memory function in water maze tests.

272 memory, novel object recognition, and Morris water-maze tests.

273 ts exhibited movement characteristics in the water maze that were similar to movement characteristics

274 he extent to which performance in the Morris water maze - the most frequently used behavioral assay o

275 the hidden-platform component of the Morris water maze, the visual deficits described herein may rep

276 y gender and age) navigated a virtual Morris water maze to find a hidden platform; navigation to a vi

277 All rats underwent testing in the Morris water maze to test spatial memory at 25 days of age (imm

278 production of IL-13, whereas neither Morris water maze-trained IL-4 nor trained IL-13-deficient mice

279 he hippocampus, which was impaired in Morris water maze-trained IL-4- and IL-13-deficient mice.

280 of CA1 pyramidal cells in the hippocampi of water maze-trained rats vs. controls.

281 Moreover, Morris water maze-trained wild-type mice were able to increase

282 before cue and contextual fear conditioning, water maze training and a spatial working memory task.

283 ent addressing this issue, we tested whether water maze training influences the gene expression respo

284 Although water maze training itself also regulated nearly 1800 ge

285 inistration was provided in conjunction with water maze training, combined treatment had no effect on

286 ved CREB or control virus, before undergoing water maze training.

287 Retention of spatial memory in the water maze was enhanced by ingestion of (-)epicatechin,

288 learning and long-term memory in the Morris water maze was impaired by BDE-47 exposure in female Mec

289 d to locate a submerged platform in a Morris water maze was recorded.

290 Using a Morris water maze, we demonstrate that the deletion of mouse Ap

291 cognition, passive avoidance test and Morris water maze were used to assess cognition.

292 ed groups to locate the hidden platform in a water maze with either 1 of 3 or 3 of 3 predictive landm

293 gation scores of the real-space human Morris water maze with its corresponding 2D computer version.

294 and strong motivation observed in the Morris water maze without requiring foot shock or food deprivat

295 etention (but not acquisition) in the Morris water maze, without influencing contextual fear-motivate

296 Visual function was assessed with the cued water maze (WM) behavioral test and the optokinetic refl

297 tested for learning and memory using Morris water maze (WM).

298 We used water-maze (WM) training as a spatial learning paradigm

299 erseveration in several assays including the water maze, Y-maze reversal task, and the novel object r

300 evidenced by poor performance in the Morris water maze, Y-maze, novel objective recognition, step-do