ライフサイエンスコーパス: weight-bearing

1 ructed to avoid walking for 6 weeks (delayed weight-bearing).

2 d with the current standard of care (delayed weight-bearing).

3 e the wrist with the stability necessary for weight bearing.

4 n including knee radiographs obtained during weight bearing.

5 ing only rats that never developed hind limb weight bearing.

6 tin plays a role in the skeletal response to weight bearing.

7 an objective clinical measure for return to weight bearing.

8 omedial foot pain, which was made worse with weight bearing.

9 artment-specific but not strictly related to weight bearing.

10 scle undergoing remodeling due to changes in weight bearing.

11 adiograph of both knees were obtained during weight bearing.

12 necessary and sufficient for sensitivity to weight-bearing.

13 CI 0.53 to 8.32, p=0.026) in favour of early weight-bearing.

14 aceflight, and recovery with subsequent full weight-bearing.

15 se while walking with and without additional weight-bearing.

16 adult ages, when locomotor behaviour becomes weight-bearing.

17 n weight bearing (femur and humerus) and non-weight bearing (2(nd) lumbar vertebra and calvarium) bon

18 Conversely, weight-bearing 3 or more days postoperatively was associ

19 py-confirmed radiographs of the TF joint and weight-bearing, 30 degrees flexion, axial views of the P

20 bed when disuse was interrupted by 10 min of weight bearing (-61%).

21 e evaluated before and 2 weeks after altered weight bearing achieved with overpronation of one foot.

22 re associated with pain, specifically during weight-bearing activities.

23 The findings of this study suggest that weight-bearing activity is associated with incident knee

24 Higher weight-bearing activity was associated with increased od

25 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.35; P < .001), but non-weight-bearing activity was not (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-

26 ratified by LMI tertiles, the association of weight-bearing activity with incident osteoarthritis was

27 tance phases, which suggests that additional weight-bearing affects the stability of the AJC.

28 during skeletal growth and on maintenance of weight bearing and balance training in the later years.

29 This may be related to weight bearing and epiphyseal maturation and should not

30 les, i.e. loss of external strain related to weight bearing and internal strain related to activation

31 of pain in the hip that usually worsens with weight bearing and leads to functional disability involv

32 Articular cartilage enables weight bearing and near friction-free movement in the jo

33 g is preferred, and allowing early protected weight bearing and rehabilitation of children with ambul

34 n, the mean OMAS score was 65.9 in the early weight-bearing and 61.2 in the delayed weight-bearing gr

35 ntify differences in genetic effects between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing joints.

36 Therefore, weight-bearing and periodic high-intensity loading exerc

37 fferent functional zones and in the anterior weight-bearing and posterior non-weight-bearing regions

38 ension), disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of weight bearing, and disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of

39 he increased demands that limbed locomotion, weight-bearing, and corrective movements place on sensor

40 with time, but only at the higher levels of weight-bearing, and independently of training.

41 vement, (2) ordinal scales of paw placement, weight-bearing, and limb flexion, and (3) the lowest lev

42 Total, weight-bearing, and non-weight-bearing recreational phys

43 rns in articular cartilage are higher in the weight-bearing anterior medial condyle as compared with

44 rospective study analyzed hip joints seen on weight-bearing anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs fro

45 n) were evaluated (15 364 hip joints on 7738 weight-bearing anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs).

46 In the first, weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral knee rad

47 demonstrated, limitation of the conventional weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) knee radiograph, in

48 Subjects were then asked about knee pain and weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral knee radiogra

49 Radiographic films (weight-bearing anteroposterior and skyline views) were r

50 Participants underwent standard weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiography and post

51 were asked about knee pain and had bilateral weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiography to defin

52 ing on the surface of articular cartilage in weight-bearing areas was estimated by digital imaging.

53 However, the low-weight-bearing articular cartilage from these patients s

54 opsy samples were also removed from the high-weight-bearing articular cartilage of the femoral condyl

55 Biopsy samples were obtained from the low-weight-bearing articular cartilage of the intercondylar

56 The primary outcomes of interest encompassed weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) on postoperative day

57 MIA treatment produced weight bearing asymmetry and cold hypersensitivity which

58 eyes closed and with feedback on inter-limb weight bearing asymmetry.

59 Pain behavior was measured as weight-bearing asymmetry.

60 After isograft transplantation, weight bearing began by day 17-25 after surgery.

61 Weight bearing began by day 30, but was incomplete in tw

62 mulation are correlated with the recovery of weight-bearing bipedal locomotion and may reflect activa

63 rrent gold standard for the treatment of low weight bearing bone defects.

64 -cord compression or impending fracture of a weight-bearing bone, and imaging guidelines are essentia

65 channels, has completely secondary remodeled weight-bearing bones and possesses non-traumatic, non-co

66 lication of treatment, avascular necrosis of weight-bearing bones, is still not known.

67 ates a sensor dependent on osteocytes of the weight-bearing bones.

68 ated as early as 2 days after the removal of weight-bearing, but the transcriptional mechanisms are e

69 from adjacent areas of the leg and lacks the weight-bearing capacity that is only found in the specia

70 f T2 relaxation times for the distal femoral weight-bearing cartilage (including epiphyseal and artic

71 tic resonance imaging T2 relaxation times in weight-bearing cartilage in patients with juvenile idiop

72 was detected in the low- as well as the high-weight-bearing cartilage of patients with late-stage OA,

73 t study was to explore the potential of full weight-bearing clinical computed tomography (CT) to eval

74 damage is commonly more severe in the medial weight-bearing compartment compared to lateral side of t

75 ght-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) of both feet.

76 ges between PCFD patients and controls using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT).

77 lation of betaMyHC gene expression under non-weight-bearing conditions.

78 Weight-bearing cone beam computed tomography (WB-CBCT, o

79 ed to 4-weeks of hindlimb unloading (HLU) or weight-bearing control, and sham (0Gy), 0.75 Gy, or 1.5

80 r BCR-TKA: (1) weight-bearing squat; (2) non-weight-bearing cross-legged sitting.

81 This case-control study focused on using weight bearing CT (WBCT) distance (DM) and coverage maps

82 lusion Joint space mapping of the knee using weight-bearing CT images is feasible, demonstrating a re

83 rials and Methods Two convenience samples of weight-bearing CT images of left and right knees with ra

84 ty, and feasibility of JSM of the knee using weight-bearing CT images.

85 nts without syndesmotic pathology with a non-weight-bearing CT scan (NWBCT; N = 38; Age = 51.6 +/- 17

86 BCT; N = 38; Age = 51.6 +/- 17.43 years) and weight-bearing CT scan (WBCT; N = 43; Age = 48.9 +/- 14.

87 a musculoskeletal modeling program during a weight-bearing deep knee bend.

88 roximal tibia, but the removal of functional weight bearing did not significantly alter BFR.

89 al fat mass (AFM) and bone health beyond its weight-bearing effect.

90 ainst osteoporosis, primarily because of its weight-bearing effect.

91 ion, there are no studies assessing if early weight-bearing (EWB) affects postoperative recovery, and

92 aging upper and lower extremities (including weight-bearing examinations) provides sufficient image q

93 Although prolonged, intense, weight-bearing exercise conducted in extreme conditions

94 of 22 women who reported long-term vigorous weight-bearing exercise had risks of OA similar to those

95 Weight-bearing exercise helps to maintain bone strength

96 Weight-bearing exercise increases bone mass and strength

97 These findings suggest that rhythmic, weight-bearing exercise may be an effective intervention

98 Prescribing effective weight-training and weight-bearing exercise programs for improving bone mass

99 dietary and pharmacologic interventions and weight-bearing exercise to prevent bone fractures.

100 Among daughters, lifetime weight-bearing exercise was a predictor of total and per

101 onsumption, supplemental calcium intake, and weight-bearing exercise were estimated retrospectively b

102 n, calcium intake from supplements, lifetime weight-bearing exercise, and bone mineral density (BMD)

103 eir genetically determined bone mass through weight-bearing exercise, post-menopausal ERT, and adequa

104 intained in adulthood with continued regular weight-bearing exercise.

105 entation and were asked to engage in regular weight-bearing exercise.

106 rgely unaltered by subsequent development or weight-bearing experience.

107 radiographic joint space width (JSW) in the weight-bearing extended and the semiflexed AP views, in

108 JSW in weight-bearing extended-view radiographs of highly sympt

109 ntitative magnetic resonance (MR) T2 maps of weight-bearing femoral and tibial articular cartilage we

110 ant decrease in T2 of the superficial 40% of weight-bearing femoral cartilage after exercise.

111 Tibial and weight-bearing femoral condylar subchondral bone area an

112 bone mass, density and microarchitecture in weight bearing (femur and humerus) and non-weight bearin

113 Anteroposterior weight-bearing films were read for Kellgren and Lawrence

114 an objective measure of fracture healing or weight bearing for lower extremity fractures.

115 Reduced weight-bearing from either spaceflight or HLU induced an

116 Reduced knee weight-bearing from prescription or sedentary lifestyles

117 limb muscle loading was achieved by removing weight-bearing from the hindlimbs for 10 days followed b

118 and 1,729 community-derived individuals with weight-bearing fully extended tibiofemoral (TF) joint an

119 46 (16%) participants in the early weight-bearing group and 39 (14%) in the delayed weight-

120 early weight-bearing and 61.2 in the delayed weight-bearing group and adjusted mean difference was 4.

121 ht-bearing group and 39 (14%) in the delayed weight-bearing group had one or more complications (adju

122 nal social services in the early and delayed weight-bearing groups were pound 725 and pound 785, resp

123 already present at birth, before continuous weight-bearing had occurred.

124 h scaffold-plus-cells exhibited coordinated, weight-bearing hindlimb stepping.

125 oint motion combining three-dimensional (3D) weight-bearing imaging at different joint positions with

126 Additional treatment approaches include non-weight-bearing immobilization, medications or surgery, b

127 es type II collagen degradation and improves weight bearing in the affected rat joint.

128 Clinicians may consider the use of early weight-bearing in a functional brace as a safe and cost-

129 asting was not found to be superior to early weight-bearing in a functional brace, as measured by ATR

130 ts postoperative recovery, and the timing of weight-bearing initiation following FFF surgery varies c

131 The probability that early weight-bearing is cost-effective exceeded 80%.

132 mass in contrast with the positive effect of weight-bearing itself.

133 Thus, OA in 1 weight-bearing joint appears to influence the evolution

134 ALL therapy in all but one patient, involved weight-bearing joint(s) in 94% of patients, and was mult

135 Application of T2 mapping techniques to non-weight-bearing joints may provide a means for differenti

136 sk factors are particularly important in the weight-bearing joints, and modifying them may help preve

137 e risk factors are particularly important in weight-bearing joints, and modifying them may present op

138 ollagenous tissues, especially cartilages of weight-bearing joints, leading to a severe osteoarthropa

139 In weight-bearing joints, this growth zone comes to be subd

140 isk for the development of osteoarthritis in weight-bearing joints.

141 netic effects between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing joints.

142 Women received anteroposterior weight-bearing knee radiographs at examinations 18 and 2

143 d > or =55 years had baseline interviews and weight-bearing knee radiographs in 1990-1991.

144 es, and acquired posteroanterior and lateral weight-bearing knee radiographs read for Kellgren/Lawren

145 Weight-bearing knee radiographs were obtained in 1983-19

146 maging (MRI) and fluoroscopically positioned weight-bearing knee radiographs.

147 cular cartilage in the anterior, M1, greater weight-bearing location.

148 monkeys, the brain-spine interface restored weight-bearing locomotion of the paralysed leg on a trea

149 , however, regained frequent stepping or any weight-bearing locomotion.

150 alternation, nor does it translate to a non-weight-bearing locomotor activity.

151 d for imaging the extremities, including the weight-bearing lower extremities.

152 l condyle as compared with the posterior non-weight-bearing medial condyle.

153 T1(rho) values of weight-bearing medial femorotibial cartilage in ACL-inju

154 Walking 2 weeks after surgery (early weight-bearing) might be a safe and preferable rehabilit

155 etectors to capture the lower extremities in weight-bearing mode; and dual-energy CT, which operates

156 pitals who were assigned to either a delayed weight-bearing (n=280) or an early weight-bearing rehabi

157 ) of low contact points (LCPs) in WB and non-weight-bearing (NWB) conditions showed no anterior trans

158 conferred mechanical overload (MOV) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) responsiveness to a chloramphenicol

159 s attribute is readily observable in the non-weight-bearing (NWB) soleus muscle, which undergoes a sl

160 e analysis of bone-to-bone motion under full weight-bearing of the hindfoot.

161 er test, and (3) improvements in balance and weight bearing on a horizontal rope.

162 Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing on the ulcer, and treating lower extremit

163 In both weight-bearing open-field tests and nonweight-bearing sw

164 By week 3, full in vivo weight bearing over the fractured femur was achieved.

165 Poor fitness and low levels of weight-bearing physical activity contribute to low bone

166 Current lean mass and weight-bearing physical activity were more important det

167 On the other hand, current lean mass and weight-bearing physical activity were positively associa

168 Weight-bearing posteroanterior, skyline, and lateral rad

169 ined as a Kellgren/Lawrence score > or =2 on weight-bearing radiographs.

170 tests of quadriceps strength, and underwent weight-bearing radiography and magnetic resonance imagin

171 The patient underwent routine weight-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-b

172 Weight bearing ranges at these levels were also signific

173 sion of wild-type Nedd4 in soleus muscles of weight bearing rats caused a decrease in Notch1 protein,

174 or (3) 30 days of HLU, followed by a 49-day weight-bearing readaptation with/without exercise.

175 Total, weight-bearing, and non-weight-bearing recreational physical activities collecte

176 es within the epiphyseal cartilage along the weight-bearing region and posterior condyles.

177 ing the 2nd year, signal intensity along the weight-bearing region decreased.

178 cular bone were most prominent in the higher weight-bearing regions of the femoral head.

179 he anterior weight-bearing and posterior non-weight-bearing regions of the medial femoral condyle (M1

180 a delayed weight-bearing (n=280) or an early weight-bearing rehabilitation strategy (n=281).

181 Altered weight bearing should be added to the list of causes of

182 as observed in cartilage obtained from a low-weight-bearing site.

183 To assess PF OA progression, weight-bearing skyline views of the PF compartment were

184 paB activity and a decrease in fiber size of weight-bearing soleus muscles, while muscles overexpress

185 Weight-bearing sports activity in women is associated wi

186 end activities before and after BCR-TKA: (1) weight-bearing squat; (2) non-weight-bearing cross-legge

187 Spinal-transected cats recovered full weight bearing standing and locomotion after five weeks

188 is novel instrumentation aims to investigate weight bearing standing therapies aimed at determining t

189 stimulation enabled the man to achieve full weight-bearing standing with assistance provided only fo

190 results in 29% (10 of 35) of rats recovering weight-bearing status compared to 0% (0 of 29) of contro

191 o 28 days after injury, with improvements in weight bearing, step taking, and coordination of steppin

192 two key neurotransmitters changes to achieve weight-bearing stepping after spinal cord injury.

193 fractionation of those revealed by sporadic weight-bearing stepping, on the other hand.

194 otor-like movements, spontaneous kicking and weight-bearing stepping.

195 terns of sensory information associated with weight-bearing stepping.

196 hythm, step shape consistency, and number of weight-bearing steps were observed in robotically traine

197 clinical and cost effectiveness of an early weight-bearing strategy compared with a delayed weight-b

198 An early weight-bearing strategy was found to be clinically non-i

199 ght-bearing strategy compared with a delayed weight-bearing strategy.

200 een regions subjected to different levels of weight-bearing stresses are unique.

201 lters gait and the effective transmission of weight-bearing stresses through the foot and ankle.

202 and distal femur epiphyses of mice are both weight-bearing structures derived from chondrocytes but

203 riate quartile of percentage of femoral head weight-bearing surface involvement by both readers (weig

204 ercentage of involvement of the femoral head weight-bearing surface was evaluated subsequently for os

205 Larger lesions beneath weight-bearing surfaces should be approached with cautio

206 ecause of the importance of the hip joint in weight bearing the advent of hip disease in a child with

207 ity, and trabecular microarchitecture at the weight-bearing tibia, commensurate with a decade or more

208 the optimum threshold level of single stance weight bearing to predict fracture and compared to the M

209 Gross motor and sensory reinnervation (weight bearing, toe spread) developed at >60 days in 14/

210 lar and total bone CSA at the tibia 4% site (weight-bearing trabecular bone) were significantly diffe

211 Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing, treating lower extremity ischemia and fo

212 Femoral non-weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular carti

213 showed spatial variation similar to that of weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular carti

214 patellar and distal femoral weight- and non-weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular hyali

215 l plane alignment using photographs of a non-weight-bearing view of both feet of 385 men and women (m

216 ibiofemoral joint on either AP/PA or lateral weight-bearing views, using a semiquantitative scale (wo

217 However, it is not clear how additional weight-bearing walking affects the motion of the AJC com

218 The median (IQR) time to postoperative weight-bearing was 3 (1-5) days.

219 Weight-bearing was removed from the hindlimbs of mice fo

220 This study aimed to clarify the effects of weight-bearing (WB) on in vivo knee kinematics and cruci

221 f the knee in 30 degrees of flexion and with weight bearing were obtained at baseline and at 30 month

222 Anteroposterior radiographs of the knee with weight bearing were obtained on 845 women (ages 44-67) o

223 radiographs of the fully extended knee with weight-bearing were read using a standard protocol and e

224 Radiographs of the knee (with weight-bearing) were read for joint space narrowing (sca

225 it must be balanced with the constraints of weight bearing while walking in a plantigrade posture.