コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 estimate of the importance of tool use in a wild animal.
2 ains liminal status as both a domestic and a wild animal.
3 ught to have been transmitted to humans from wild animals.
4 e interpretation of stable isotope data from wild animals.
5 e of morbidity and mortality in domestic and wild animals.
6 r pathogens infecting individuals exposed to wild animals.
7 petent mosquitoes feeding on both humans and wild animals.
8 umans and analogous diseases in domestic and wild animals.
9 context of immune phenotype determinants of wild animals.
10 x epidemics causing widespread disease among wild animals.
11 nalysis of predator-induced bodily damage in wild animals.
12 ce known to elicit a variety of responses in wild animals.
13 cesses that produce worse health outcomes in wild animals.
14 duction with energetic status in free-living wild animals.
15 d sources presents a cognitive challenge for wild animals.
16 isk aversion has been difficult to obtain in wild animals.
17 ationship which remains poorly understood in wild animals.
18 hanisms and outcomes of disease avoidance in wild animals.
19 Little is known of these associations in wild animals.
20 uctive senescence and terminal investment in wild animals.
21 ctions of SARS-CoV-2 in various domestic and wild animals.
22 l variation in the change in TL (DeltaTL) in wild animals.
23 pollution on the physiology and behaviour of wild animals.
24 ave been designed to guide and trap herds of wild animals.
25 unctional role in host protein metabolism in wild animals.
26 mating success within a single population of wild animals.
27 of schistosomes to millions of domestic and wild animals.
28 a key mediator of health impacts of ALAN on wild animals.
29 ing advantage in a population of free-living wild animals.
30 ve been documented in domestic, captive, and wild animals.
31 on-skeletal health outcomes in companion and wild animals.
32 ects of disease on the energy expenditure of wild animals.
33 climate change resilience of populations of wild animals.
34 c neuropeptides that regulate food intake in wild animals.
35 locene resulted in environmental changes for wild animals.
36 isease in humans, but can be asymptomatic in wild animals.
37 the physiological condition and survival of wild animals.
38 in fine-scale daily foraging patterns among wild animals.
39 ight pollution on the health of free-ranging wild animals.
40 g partnership between humans and free-living wild animals.
41 metabolism due to a total lack of studies in wild animals.
42 ourists can be both risky and beneficial for wild animals.
43 ecognized in shaping group differences among wild animals.
44 e in the gut microbiota of domestic and semi-wild animals.
45 ons for an independent transmission cycle in wild animals.
46 namic process remains poorly investigated in wild animals,(11-13) where developmental mechanisms can
47 d major influences on the color evolution of wild animals.(2) An under-explored area is commercial ha
48 fidobacterium was the most abundant genus in wild animals (46.7%) while Bacteroides (11.6%) and Prevo
50 cial intelligence, little is known about how wild animals acquire and store information about social
51 ation of changes in oxidative balance within wild animals across time, space and major life-history c
52 periments, analysis of observational data on wild animal and plant populations from areas contaminate
54 genus Brucella infect many domesticated and wild animals and cause serious zoonotic infection in hum
57 ten leading people to interact with and feed wild animals and impacting animal behaviour and ecology.
60 uman research and the importance of studying wild animals and non-industrialized humans for interroga
62 updating the List of National Key Protected Wild Animals and revising the Wildlife Protection Law in
63 lities can be associated with longer life in wild animals and that selection on cognitive abilities c
64 logical pressures interfere with sleep among wild animals and that they must balance the costs and be
65 etracing both the evolutionary trajectory of wild animals and the breeding history of domesticates.
66 ally relevant antibiotic-resistance genes in wild animals and the connectivity of natural, agricultur
69 irus transmission between farmed animals and wild animals, and from humans to farmed animals, indicat
70 ce that noise reduces foraging efficiency in wild animals, and highlights the possible pervasive impa
71 is, a serious disease in domestic livestock, wild animals, and humans, is based on detection of these
76 specimens obtained from humans, domestic and wild animals, and water sources; it examines genotypes,
79 otic viruses, originating from and hosted by wild animals, are most likely shaped by commensalism rel
81 ssorted pathogens of human, and domestic and wild animals, but it is as vectors of arboviruses, and p
82 sted in applying these tools to the study of wild animals, but it is not clear to what extent doing s
83 he most common threats for both domestic and wild animals, but little is known about the effects on t
84 recently recognized as potentially common in wild animals, but the extent to which it shapes modern g
85 are predicted to threaten the persistence of wild animals, but there is little evidence that climate
86 rm weather patterns on I. hexagonus and uses wild-animal cadavers to illustrate the importance of abi
89 ng infectious diseases (EIDs) of free-living wild animals can be classified into three major groups o
90 pathogens arising from humans, livestock and wild animals can be enhanced by genome-based investigati
91 ged between humans, livestock, and wildlife, wild animals can be used as indicators of human-associat
93 E2 orthologs of a wide range of domestic and wild animals can support cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 and th
94 ctions between humans, domestic animals, and wild animals can we sustain natural systems in a world i
95 een finance and conservation by valuing only wild animals' carbon services for which market prices ex
97 y contagious virus that affects domestic and wild animals, causing severe illness with high mortality
98 anized the study of predator-prey ecology in wild animal communities by expanding the scale and diver
100 higher genetic variation than those in semi-wild animals, demonstrating that O. aculeatum is circula
106 ulation fluctuations, settlement density and wild animal exploitation-proxies for these drivers-provi
107 ed that studies on innate immune function in wild animals exposed to a natural profile of infections,
109 riculture; (ii) the domesticability of large wild animals for food, transport, and agricultural produ
110 uses, we have screened blood samples from 14 wild animals from the Democratic Republic of Congo.
111 but in line with prior empirical studies on wild animals, gastrointestinal pathogens decreased as GC
113 lly, this yields an energy contribution from wild animal geomorphic agents of ~76,000 GJ-equivalent t
114 s growing interest in the effects of wind on wild animals, given evidence that wind speeds are increa
116 antelope was collected in 2003 from an Ohio wild-animal habitat during the same outbreak when a bovi
117 opy and molecular results revealed that semi-wild animals had higher Oesophagostomum infection preval
118 oV-2 spillback from humans into domestic and wild animals has been well documented, and an accumulati
119 ation and changes in human interactions with wild animals has increased the likelihood of the emergen
120 markers associated with the human control of wild animals has prevented the documentation of incipien
124 results provide experimental evidence that a wild animal in a natural setting responds adaptively to
125 (QMRA) from fecal pollution of domestic and wild animals in drinking/recreational water catchments.
126 n caused by the different muscle activity of wild animals in response to prolonged movement associate
127 e effects of climate change on morphology in wild animals: in particular, the effects of warming temp
129 e and create an interface where domestic and wild animals interact among themselves and with humans,
132 the complex genetic changes that transformed wild animals into their domesticated forms, and the popu
135 natural system, that survival probability of wild animals is directly related to their level of camou
137 its inter- and intra-individual variation in wild animals is poorly understood, particularly in neona
138 Physiological monitoring of free-ranging wild animals is providing new insights into their adapta
141 n humans, livestock, plants, soil, water and wild animals, is genetically and ecologically diverse.
142 signing experiments involving the capture of wild animals, it may be prudent to employ a single captu
143 simulate zooanthroponotic outbreaks, through wild animals' joint propensities to co-interact with hum
144 ir history shows exposure to domesticated or wild animals known to be potential carriers of this dise
147 ow the attributes and behavior of individual wild animals may influence human-wildlife interactions.
148 ked how conservation or restoration of large wild animals might influence the climate mitigation and
149 ht the potential synergism between trade and wild animal movement in the emergence and pandemic sprea
150 llenging to capture the contact structure in wild animals, new technology has enabled biologists to o
151 here is also a disparity between captive and wild animals of the same species, presumably because of
152 ous process under laboratory conditions, but wild animals often develop in variable and stressful env
153 y in response to changes in temperature, yet wild animals often experience multiple environmental flu
154 he misattribution of COVID-19's origins, the wild animals on sale in Wuhan suffered poor welfare and
155 tuating optimum, across 39 populations of 21 wild animals, one of the largest compilations of long-te
157 cultural norms in foraging techniques in any wild animal, our results suggest a much broader taxonomi
161 ey sexually mature but also demonstrate in a wild animal population that juvenile social play predict
167 distributions have rarely been considered in wild animal populations as an important component of the
168 ood models for investigating the genetics of wild animal populations because they are: (1) widely dis
170 icity and selection shape the persistence of wild animal populations facing human-induced environment
171 identifying what behaviors qualify as new in wild animal populations has inhibited researchers from u
173 In many parts of the world, domestic and wild animal populations interact at the interface betwee
175 imes and the capacity for rapid evolution in wild animal populations suggests the potential for rapid
176 Sexual size dimorphism is widespread in wild animal populations, and for large soaring birds whi
177 cing and pangenome methods for understanding wild animal populations, estimating fitness effects of g
192 rtility have increasingly been documented in wild animal populations: In many species the youngest an
193 g of the degree of immunological flexibility wild animals present, information that is ever more vita
194 ation on behaviour and energy expenditure of wild animals, produce high-resolution multi-dimensional
197 especially enhanced contact among humans and wild animals, provide new opportunities for the spread o
202 the infectious agents that circulate within wild animal reservoirs is essential for several reasons:
204 often circulate as a heterogeneous swarm in wild animal reservoirs prior to their emergence in human
206 nce, which is critical for understanding how wild animals respond to rapid environmental change.
207 yet people have not readapted to living with wild animals, resulting in human-wildlife conflict.
208 y providing an imaging analysis of an awake, wild animal's brain as it performs an adaptive, complex
209 have management deficiencies (e.g., illegal wild animal sales), potentially indicating that increase
210 n species, including domesticated as well as wild animals, serve as zoonotic carriers of this infecti
212 risk of zoonotic spillover of pathogens from wild animals, sparking epidemics and pandemics in humans
213 itical to the long-term conservation of many wild animal species that come into conflict with humans.
214 dentifies white-tailed deer as a susceptible wild animal species to the virus.IMPORTANCEGiven the pre
215 ularis aurea) are one of a limited number of wild animal species to use stone tools, with their tool
221 actors that determine whether, when or where wild animals take risks by interacting with humans and a
222 enemies, these results offer hope that other wild animal taxa threatened by invasive fungi might be r
223 st that M. leprae may be circulating in more wild animals than suspected, either as a result of expos
224 lth,(1) ultimately affecting fitness.(3) For wild animals that sleep in groups, individuals may distu
225 In order for the intraspecific approach with wild animals to be useful for testing evolutionary hypot
228 king source for poultry, access of feral and wild animals to poultry houses) were associated with hig
230 ng individual differences in the behavior of wild animals to test evolutionary hypotheses, this appro
232 ing automated visual field reconstruction of wild animals, we infer the precise sequences of socially
235 ese stressors may perturb the microbiomes of wild animals, with negative consequences for their healt
236 largely relied on transient manipulation of wild animals, without a strategy for stable transgenesis