ライフサイエンスコーパス: win

1 tubule density at this site, while kinesin-1 wins at anterior and lateral positions because they have

2 Donald Trump's 2016 win despite failing to carry the popular vote has raised

3 orithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the

4 A win was signaled if all three lights were set to on, whe

5 A win-win platform was thus attained, on which Cu was reco

6 from conservation agriculture by achieving a win-win outcome of enhanced C sequestration and increase

7 estoration of wetlands has been invoked as a win-win strategy for humans and nature, yet evidence fro

8 ng for 'concave' trophic pyramids might be a win-win for people and ecosystems, by providing higher-v

9 Incentivizing carbon storage can be a win-win pathway to conserving biodiversity and mitigatin

10 lete set of distinct coupons is considered a win.

11 d accounting for pest control demonstrates a win-win for biodiversity and coffee farmers.

12 In contrast, decision-making following a win was characterized as relatively slow and relatively

13 e insect dispersal, there is potential for a win-win outcome in which both timber production and fore

14 s each patient with every other patient in a win-lose-tie for each comparison.

15 rtunity to do better science that matters, a win-win for both fields.

16 ceable size restriction of >30 cm provides a win:win outcome in the short term, delivering both ecolo

17 This preference was not attributable to a win-stay-lose-shift heuristic and reversed as the enviro

18 orcement by developing an approximation to a win-stay/lose-shift rule.

19 xisting fisheries' regulations may lead to a win-win situation.

20 that organic amendments were necessary to a win-win strategy for both SOC sequestration and maize pr

21 ryozoan colonies involved in contests with a win/loss outcome, leading to death of the loser) was thr

22 thms, with a fitness function to determine a winning solution from many.

23 To this end, L.U.St implements a winning sites test allowing ranking of a collection of a

24 Here, we present a winning algorithm in the 2017 NCI-CPTAC DREAM Proteogeno

25 Bayesian model selection revealed a winning model, the architecture of which revealed bidire

26 Here, we quantify how a 'win-win' community-based resource management program ind

27 and why people enjoy gambling and care about winning.

28 We should instead aim to achieve win-win conservation strategies that address multiple th

29 d in carbon credit calculations, to achieve "win-win" outcomes, deliberate decisions about project de

30 region in which activity predicted adaptive win-stay/lose-shift behavior.

31 Here, we determined whether adding win-associated audiovisual cues to a rat gambling task (

32 not known whether global warming will affect winning times in endurance events, and counterbalance im

33 Also, after wins, feedback-related, mid-frontal EEG activity reflect

34 ssive Bully line of flies that almost always win fights against the parental wild-type Canton-S stock

35 m damage and multiple scattering will always win over increased contrast at the lowest energies.

36 exclusion, in which the same species always wins, mounting evidence suggests that competitive exclus

37 In win ratio analysis, win ratio was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.97-1.13; P=0.20).

38 describe an instrumental loss-avoidance and win-gain reinforcement learning functional magnetic reso

39 on + loss anticipation) versus baseline, and win anticipation versus loss anticipation.

40 to strategically redesign existing drugs and win the race against mutations that lead to drug resista

41 ales displayed higher numbers of lunges, and won more fights against their AS opponents.

42 Despite an apparent win-win between conservation and profitability at the ag

43 Drug resistant bacteria are winning the fight over antibiotics with some bacteria no

44 Given that many elections are won by small margins, our results suggest that a search

45 offs, what distinguishes locations that are "win-win" exceptions from other locations?

46 70 to reduce the classification of losses as wins suggests that D(4) antagonists could be effective i

47 Understanding how bacteria win wars is important for the goal of manipulating the h

48 They expect conflicts to be won by larger individuals [14], those with more allies [

49 emory technology of the future and have been winning a great deal of attention due to their ability t

50 ccuracy on the high-probability pair, better win-stay performance (selection of the previously reward

51 there was no significant difference between win and loss trials.

52 e rate and dynamics of adaptation and biases winning mutations toward those with the largest selectiv

53 n in which researchers and participants both win.

54 We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce

55 y" and when the subject expected to lose but won, the trial was defined as "lucky".

56 rlying the nervous system changes induced by winning and losing bouts during agonistic encounters.

57 We propose a novel measure, called "win percentage", for assessing the suitability of machin

58 -art homology detection methods and the CASP-winning template-based protein structure prediction meth

59 , and being equipped with multiple challenge-winning text mining algorithms to ensure the quality of

60 tion stores memories of host-pathogen combat won by the virus.

61 is a web service implementing a competition-winning approach utilizing word and syntactic analyses b

62 DD/healthy control subjects) and conditions (win/loss anticipation).

63 However, how certain connections win the competition with others and are subsequently mai

64 ents with OCD outperformed healthy controls, winning significantly more points.

65 ude some possibility that Joseph Biden could win in the Electoral College while barely losing the pop

66 Subjects in the CTL group could win vouchers in prize-bowl drawings, but HIV care behavi

67 We define win percentage as the probability a classifier will perf

68 ell competition, we find that eB3 determines winning and losing neurons in a contest for synapses.

69 ict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders.

70 are-associated infections (HAIs) as a double-win that can both improve health outcomes and reduce hea

71 During win events the striatum was underactive in major depress

72 ntromedial prefrontal cortex activity during winning outcomes.

73 and PRM, Gd@C(82)(OH)(22) is shown to easily win the competition over PRM in occupying the active sit

74 patory cues to respond to a target to either win money or avoid losing money.

75 of effort to improve their chances of either winning or avoiding the loss of money.

76 trade-offs exist under the all-encompassing "win-win" claims.

77 that are better adapted to their environment win the competition for common resources from less well-

78 could help achieve an economic-environmental win-win state through globalization.

79 ERGC wins only when one of the genomes (referential or target

80 is unlikely to affect how animals experience winning and losing.

81 fighters, and for both percentage of fights won and an objective measure of fighting ability.

82 antly associated with reduced activation for wins compared with losses in bilateral ventral striatum,

83 This suggests a high potential for 'win-win' forest management strategies, where overall mul

84 Because neither goal wins complete control of behavior, the result may be tha

85 The states and Federal government won't give any grants, and we can't raise rates." Applyi

86 ince then, the field has progressed greatly, winning two Nobel Prizes and seeing the implementation o

87 the National Academy of Sciences, or who had won a major career award--trained significantly fewer wo

88 stic understanding and drug development hard-won by FOP researchers to pediatric neurooncology.

89 ast 5 years underscore the fragility of hard-won gains against malaria.

90 pharmacological S1P receptor antagonist has won approval to control autoimmune neuroinflammation in

91 HCD wins in number of matched peptide-spectrum-matches (958

92 HCD wins together with EThcD in cross-link site calling prec

93 By revealing how win-win decisions elicit responses in dissociable brain

94 However, how winning synapses emerge through competition remains uncl

95 Further, we conducted experiments to test if winning and losing probabilities are affected only by th

96 In win ratio analysis, win ratio was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.97-1.1

97 brain connectivity among regions involved in win/loss anticipation in depressed individuals with bipo

98 ptimize management practices that result in "win-win" outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and h

99 of the well-known IPD strategies, including win-stay-lose-shift.

100 d magnitude and partial valence information (win vs. loss) but not outcome (favourable vs. unfavourab

101 Instead, win percentage captures the non-zero probability that ea

102 care?," "I'm afraid that my health insurance won't pay for a clinical trial," and "I'm worried that I

103 nd NMDA receptors causing first winner keeps winning of granule cells, illustrate how fundamental pro

104 r lose money on each trial given three known win probabilities (25, 50, or 75%).

105 there was no distinction between risky/large wins and safe/small wins.

106 with larger decreases following risky/large wins compared with safe/small wins.

107 ons for folklists, and clarify how the lists win the credence of otherwise skeptical people.

108 MeSHLabeler won the first place in Task 2A of 2014 BioASQ challenge,

109 MeSHProbeNet won the first place in the latest batch of Task A in the

110 This model won the first place in the 2020 Syngenta crop challenge

111 Each picture was paired with a monetary win or loss either congruently or incongruently.

112 value information to maximize their monetary wins and minimize their losses.

113 encodes value (greater response to monetary wins than losses during fMRI), while the ventral SN conn

114 rarely entering non-rewarded arms, and more win-stay responses by returning to recently rewarded arm

115 systematically outperform those with narrow wins in the longer run.

116 threshold, we compare near-miss with narrow-win applicants, and find that an early-career setback ha

117 We recruit Zambian politicians who narrowly won or lost a previous election to play behavioral games

118 We found no "win-win" areas with highest rubber suitability and lowes

119 Ochoa won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1959 fo

120 -yielding hardy clones expands the amount of win-win areas, as well as suitable areas with high extin

121 ene-pairs, we show that precise estimates of win percentage (within 1%) can be achieved using a small

122 ement, they are often overlooked in favor of win-wins.

123 and connectivity direction as a function of win or loss anticipation.

124 f a behavioural increase in the magnitude of win-stay strategy and a neural modulation of feedback-re

125 s, these results help resolve the paradox of win-win choices.

126 ing reward task that included the periods of win and loss anticipation.

127 operation, because the deterministic rule of win-stay, lose-shift works best.

128 We illustrate the utility of win percentage using synthetic data, and evaluate six cl

129 and when exerting effort in anticipation of winning money.

130 including a voucher for a 1 in 100 chance of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

131 rate was associated with decreased chance of winning.

132 if the extreme strategies have no chance of winning.

133 study 5), cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize (study 6), and endorse unethical behavio

134 heir initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying.

135 action to gambles featuring small chances of winning large amounts (called "positively skewed" gamble

136 biases that create a distorted expectancy of winning.

137 aggressiveness, as well as by experience of winning and losing (so called 'winner-loser effects').

138 aining," in which the repeated experience of winning successive aggressive encounters across multiple

139 ore allies [15], and those with a history of winning [16-18].

140 tions--situations in which the likelihood of winning and losing is unknown.

141 natives differ circularly in their number of winning samples.

142 ting or rejecting gambles with equal odds of winning and losing money.

143 ambler changes bets despite constant odds of winning.

144 Skiers' best performance (in percent of winning time) and number of completed races during the s

145 he skiers, better performance (in percent of winning time) in Vasaloppet was strongly associated with

146 d expectancies with various probabilities of winning or losing different amounts of money in 15 patie

147 f uncertainty (e.g., when the probability of winning or losing is 50/50 and no particular financial c

148 ive team interactions and the probability of winning using historical records from professional sport

149 In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and

150 The probability of winning was conveyed using explicit visual cues (sector

151 sociated with a predetermined probability of winning, which was altered repeatedly to examine neural

152 though switching doubles the probability of winning.

153 f choice to information about probability of winning; while decreasing discrimination according to ma

154 n of effort independently of the prospect of winning or losing.

155 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning marathon times by 2100.

156 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning times by 2100.

157 r, Scissors and by manipulating the value of winning and losing.

158 he outcome is positive and when the value of wins are low, highlighting how vulnerable we can be when

159 t lever, which delivered 10 sugar pellets on win trials but a 10-second time penalty on loss trials,

160 ffects of travel and home-court advantage on winning percentage, shooting accuracy, and rebounding.

161 rtain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a 'jackpot' signal prior to r

162 Marathon to test for an effect of warming on winning times by men and women.

163 t to anticipate effects of future warming on winning times.

164 eas choices on the other type-featuring only wins (gain only)-were exclusively driven by risk aversio

165 to lead to the emergence of a single optimal winning strategy in which individuals maximize their gai

166 social success rather than a single optimal winning strategy.

167 mstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agriculture.

168 That is, if one just lost money or won money, this may impact future decisions.

169 rease the yield gap of farmers who can't -or won't- use nitrogen fertilizer.

170 eriod in each trial when the actual outcome (win or loss) was revealed.

171 ed when certain aspects of the task outcome (win/loss or correct/incorrect) became more salient and h

172 l reward circuitry during a reward paradigm (win, loss, and control conditions), symptom dimensions,

173 Hence influenza A virus has partially won the battle against this newly identified ZAPL antivi

174 In particular, win percentage provides a single measurement that could

175 and how individuals or their component parts win or lose is poorly understood.

176 lphaGo Zero achieved superhuman performance, winning 100-0 against the previously published, champion

177 activation during all anticipation periods (win anticipation + loss anticipation) versus baseline, a

178 Mutualisms can be promoted by pleiotropic win-win mutations which directly benefit self (self-serv

179 ons from transport offers a potential policy win-win; the magnitude of potential benefits, however, i

180 ype of gamble-involving weighing a potential win against a potential loss (mixed)-could be driven by

181 ed FN to unpredicted compared with predicted wins (i.e., intact +RPE) and decreased FN to unpredicted

182 perceived ability (can't) versus preference (won't) for reward.

183 For the Signaled group, presenting win signals effectively blocked value discounting for th

184 We identify influential and prize-winning research topics from the past inside SemNet, thu

185 Root Cause Analysis, an IBI prize-winning module, requires students to use a systematic ap

186 in human intelligence, from how Nobel prize-winning physicists make their discoveries to how childre

187 f its utility, the scope of this Nobel prize-winning reaction is rather limited when applied to aliph

188 ocial experience, Galphai2 deletion promotes winning a novel social competition with an unfamiliar co

189 e tic severity in a placebo-controlled quick-win/fast-fail trial.

190 nagement-intensive grazing, may offer a rare win-win strategy combining profitable food production wi

191 ies, using model-based selection when recent wins signal the appropriateness of the current model, bu

192 reversals completed and selectively reduced win-stay behavior.

193 season, traveling across time zones reduces winning percentage, team shooting accuracy, and turnover

194 essed more pessimistic predictions regarding winning money in the study (d = -0.47) and were less wil

195 onment dictates which of the two replicators wins.

196 s learned to select high probability reward (win pound1) and avoid high probability punishment (lose

197 ed willingness to take risks following risky wins, and spatial 'win-stay/lose-shift' biases.

198 ncreased preference for risk following risky wins, but spared other sequential effects.

199 timate of the tendency of the slot machine's winning probability to change (volatility), increased su

200 ercial gambling products incorporate salient win-paired cues.

201 ed that in the 30-year period, 96 scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine or chemistry for work re

202 ne, a chromosome duplication mutation seemed win-win: it improved cell's affinity for lysine (self-se

203 These data suggest mechanisms to select "winning" inputs by regional reinforcement of postsynapti

204 mary motor cortex (Bayesian model selection; winning model Bayes factors >17).

205 In competitive situations, winning depends on selecting actions that surprise the o

206 ween 1933 and 2004 did not consistently slow winning times because of high variability in temperature

207 es and headwinds on the day of the race slow winning times.

208 ng risky/large wins compared with safe/small wins.

209 tion between risky/large wins and safe/small wins.

210 ificantly more errors in the delayed spatial win-shift task, an mPFC-mediated behavior, which suggest

211 ake risks following risky wins, and spatial 'win-stay/lose-shift' biases.

212 d the circumstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agricu

213 significantly improves the odds of the team winning in all sports beyond the talents of individuals.

214 in-group trust and cooperation, rather than winning (in)direct intergroup competitions.

215 llowing conflicts that were lost rather than won.

216 Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that winning a competition increases the likelihood of winner

217 Our data indicate that winning a competition lead to more dominant behaviour, a

218 The win-stay/lose-shift heuristic appears not to be a unifie

219 The winning models far outperformed our previous effort at m

220 er density, has the potential to achieve the winning combination of a high energy and power density.

221 ernal validity for our learning task and the winning computational model.

222 iate selection of the strongest input as the winning competitor.

223 odeling of splicing) with which we built the winning model of the CAGI5 exon skipping prediction chal

224 d costs (or benefits) of competition for the winning parasitoid reveal that time lags between success

225 n, Fastqz and Samcomp/Fqzcomp, including the winning entry.

226 Moreover, selective photo-ablation of the winning CF (that undergoes dendritic translocation) reve

227 It is based on the winning algorithm in the AstraZeneca-Sanger Drug Combina

228 We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bo

229 ociated microbial communities along with the winning metabolic strategy Salmonella serovars use to ed

230 timal compensation scheme coincides with the winning strategy of the Red Balloon Challenge.

231 unding that can be leveraged to promote the "win-win" environmental and development benefits of impro

232 tion of stove programs that can realize the "win-win-win" of health, local environmental quality, and

233 A class II-specific CD4(+) T cells from the "winning" CBU may contribute to rejection of the "loser"

234 nize with the tectal location receiving the "winning" feedback from Ipc.

235 cipants played a Roulette task in which they won and lost money.

236 To win, one needs to understand the characteristics of an a

237 terms of variation in individual ability to win fights, but many are structured around arbitrary con

238 ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity to win (t = 2.68) (all P < .05, corrected).

239 left middle prefrontal cortical activity to win compared with 20 healthy youth.

240 rsal anterior cingulate cortical activity to win may reflect heightened reward sensitivity and greate

241 ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity to win may reflect reward insensitivity in youth with disru

242 or cingulate cortical (r = 0.27) activity to win.

243 even if a single trial is almost certain to win.

244 offers flaw tolerance, allowing ductility to win over fracture.

245 articipants were exerting physical effort to win monetary incentives.

246 Specifically, when a subject expected to win but lost, the trial was defined as "unlucky" and whe

247 an agent from a numerically larger group to win in a right-of-way competition against an agent from

248 ies strategically interacted with the IOM to win several favored scientific and regulatory recommenda

249 y and that these sperm may be more likely to win access to oocytes.

250 flicts, such that winners are more likely to win again (the winner effect) and losers more likely to

251 Instead, larger fish were more likely to win contests, especially over fish of the next lower ran

252 their preferred candidate is more likely to win the election.

253 dividuals also did not show FN modulation to win (i.e., impaired +RPE).

254 ed by a decrease in lose-shift as opposed to win-stay probability.

255 pants stop a rotating clock hand in order to win points.

256 As expected, the probability to win predicted the choice to engage in high-effort/high-r

257 f response, but only when the probability to win was the highest.

258 tions in reward magnitude and probability to win.

259 e greater reliance on lose-shift relative to win-stay behaviour shown in previous studies were explor

260 ve any differences in the neural response to win outcomes, either in the GD or sibling analysis compa

261 We measured ERP responses to win and loss feedback in a guessing task and to pleasant

262 We measured ERP responses to win and loss feedback in a guessing task and to pleasant

263 ployment of aggressive medical technology to win the "war" against the pandemic may represent the tri

264 ey may engage in extreme behaviors to try to win acceptance.

265 However, this strategy is unlikely to win appeal among highly selective journals.

266 We often ask ourselves: how likely are we to win or lose?

267 e frame, in which starvation corresponded to winning nothing.

268 atum and encodes salience (equal response to wins and losses).

269 Similar to "win probability" models in other fields, CIRI provides a

270 rafficking mechanisms that pathogens use to "win the fight" over zinc and thrive in an otherwise host

271 onger stimuli, the stimulated side tends to 'win' because excitation from a shorter, trigeminal nucle

272 ght excitation transfer and singlet trapping won over fluorescence, radiation-less decay, and triplet

273 mproved cookstoves (ICS) can deliver "triple wins" by improving household health, local environments,

274 n dynamics substantially clarifies how truth wins in groups.

275 How truth wins in social groups is an important open problem.

276 August Krogh twice won the prestigious international Steegen Prize, for nit

277 t is novel and exciting, and that ultimately wins people over."

278 The time-to-first event, unmatched win-ratio, and days-alive-and-out-of-hospital composites

279 attack each other, the most numerous usually wins.

280 virus (HIV)/SIV infection, the virus usually wins the race, irreversibly crippling the immune system

281 In Experiment 2, we highlighted the utility (win or loss) or performance (correct or incorrect) dimen

282 Myosin-V wins over kinesin-1 at the posterior pole due to low mic

283 d by salience (high versus low) and valence (win versus loss).

284 mes of interactions (e.g., whether coral was winning or losing) were considered.

285 When winning money in the real world, individuals sustaining

286 demonstrate that the effect holds only when winning means performing better than others (i.e., deter

287 ends the children's game to situations where winning or losing can matter more or less relative to ty

288 These papers, which won Krogh an unopposed Nobel Prize for Physiology or Med

289 es, social status matters: it determines who wins access to contested resources, territory, and mates

290 mong the exquisitely talented scientists who won the Sandra K.

291 (potential) targets in the visual scene will win the competition for attentional resources.

292 Win-win choices cause anxiety, often more so than decisions

293 Win-win interventions that satisfy multiple objectives are a

294 stove programs that can realize the "win-win-win" of health, local environmental quality, and climate

295 h wins on accept trials, and negatively with wins on reject trials, consistent with striatal activity

296 in this same region covaried positively with wins on accept trials, and negatively with wins on rejec

297 of the likelihood that each candidate would win.

298 gambling task predicting whether they would win or lose money on each trial given three known win pr

299 or limiting resources and the largest would "win," explaining why yeast cells always make one and onl

300 ess statements about people in general ("You win some, you lose some.").