コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 atient required removal of the system due to wound infection.
2 t rates among patients with an uncomplicated wound infection.
3 %) of all PD readmissions were attributed to wound infection.
4 e generator, transient oscillopsia and minor wound infection.
5 t can accomplish through gastrointestinal or wound infection.
6 n of wound or bone healing or treatment of a wound infection.
7 and culture-confirmed Pythium aphanidermatum wound infection.
8 reimplantation of the neurostimulator due to wound infection.
9 One patient developed a wound infection.
10 on on meat products, and potentially towards wound infection.
11 ia in a model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infection.
12 e primary outcome variable was postoperative wound infection.
13 red a permanent neurologic deficit, none had wound infection.
14 clinically relevant murine model of surgical wound infection.
15 ne regeneration, inflammatory reactions, and wound infection.
16 eutrophils in FL-mediated resistance to burn wound infection.
17 cal role in FL-mediated resistance to a burn wound infection.
18 terations in B and T lymphocyte responses to wound infection.
19 outcome of rats in response to a lethal burn wound infection.
20 , almost entirely due to increasing rates of wound infection.
21 wound, and further increased in response to wound infection.
22 se of antibiotics prior to insertion reduces wound infection.
23 in mouse models of abdominal sepsis and burn wound infection.
24 nt with IL-6-deficient MCs failed to control wound infection.
25 immunization of mice against Pf prevents Pa wound infection.
26 nosa in a clinically relevant mouse model of wound infection.
27 ial artery, but did increase risk of sternal wound infection.
28 besity was associated with increased risk of wound infection.
29 he pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa during burn wound infection.
30 or renal replacement therapy or deep sternal wound infection.
31 he primary endpoint was the rate of surgical wound infection.
32 d in wound cultures in patients with post-PD wound infections.
33 tococci are considered predominant causes of wound infections.
34 lated from canine pyoderma and postoperative wound infections.
35 ese ecologic changes may affect the risk for wound infections.
36 nvolvement in nosocomial and especially burn wound infections.
37 omplications is mostly caused by superficial wound infections.
38 s also associated with blood, placental, and wound infections.
39 e were no deaths, strokes, renal failure, or wound infections.
40 treatment of methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) wound infections.
41 biofilm-forming bacteria frequently found in wound infections.
42 stent biofilm-associated infections, such as wound infections.
43 ureus being a major complication of diabetic wound infections.
44 g human pathogen that causes pharyngitis and wound infections.
45 he treatment of antimicrobial resistant burn wound infections.
46 ice and are associated with chronic human Pa wound infections.
47 ted because three patients developed delayed wound infections.
48 ctions, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and wound infections.
49 spatial and temporal monitoring of potential wound infections.
50 coexist for long periods together in chronic wound infections.
51 re susceptible to horizontal transmission of wound infections.
52 k and 95% CIs were derived for postoperative wound infections.
54 or endometritis, 1.2% (95% CI 1.0%-1.5%) for wound infection, 0.05% (95% CI 0.03%-0.07%) for sepsis,
55 pticemia, 0.5% [n=99]; isolated deep sternal wound infection, 0.5% [n=96]; isolated harvest/cannulati
57 d significantly (P<0.05) higher incidence of wound infections (12.7% vs. 7.3%), pneumonia (7.6% vs. 3
58 5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%]; P = .77), deep sternal wound infection (14/753 [1.9%] vs 19/749 [2.5%]; P = .37
59 lood (60%), followed by lung (21%), skin and wound infections (14%), abscess (1%), and other (4%).
60 tes of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious ma
61 ; P = .67), or rehospitalization for sternal wound infection (23/753 [3.1%] vs 24/749 [3.2%]; P = .87
62 was most common (42%), followed by surgical wound infections (29%), mediastinitis (16%), sternal ost
63 The cost of most common complications was wound infection (3.8%, $21,995), renal failure (2.8%, $1
64 ast 1 complication within 90 days, including wound infections (3.6%), pneumonia (2.3%), hemorrhage or
65 group, respectively, in superficial sternal wound infection (49/753 [6.5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%]; P = .77
67 %] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]
70 time, >30 minutes) more often suffered from wound infection (9/63 vs 2/70; P = 0.025), abdominal com
73 spension (FS) (adjusted OR, 5.86; P < .001), wound infection (adjusted OR, 9.45; P = .02), postoperat
75 tenting appears to increase the incidence of wound infection after pancreatoduodenectomy but has no e
79 mouse strains to Pseudomonas aeruginosa skin wound infection and found significantly delayed wound cl
81 enced 1 or more complications with abdominal wound infection and pulmonary complications being the 2
82 ction was identified in 12 patients: 10 with wound infections and 2 with intra-abdominal infections.
83 asons for readmission after 90 days included wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess (n = 75) an
85 significant component in some mixed surgical wound infections and that surgical management and antimi
86 ng death, pulmonary embolus, pneumonia, deep wound infection, and acute myocardial infarction) were a
87 cemia managed with oral hypoglycemics, minor wound infection, and hyperuricemia but no infections.
88 ts a higher prevalence of tracheal stenosis, wound infection, and major bleeding for surgical tracheo
89 athologic response, presence of re-operation/wound infection, and no closure of ileostomy/colostomy.
90 age, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, and pneumonia) with each unfavorable ou
93 er surgery, 4 had perianal abscesses, 13 had wound infections, and 1 had C. difficile in a urinary ca
95 lays an important role in sepsis, pneumonia, wound infections, and cystic fibrosis (CF), which is cau
96 ignificantly more respiratory complications, wound infections, and early postoperative mortality, whe
98 problems; body mass index and allergies for wound infections; and patients' age, resection weight fo
99 lin improves outcome following a lethal burn wound infection are not known, the data suggest that imm
100 ital stays as well as the absence of sternal wound infection are the main advantages of this techniqu
101 under the age of 49 and complications due to wound infection are the primary cause of death in the fi
105 ors associated with delayed healing included wound infection at any point and baseline wound area abo
106 f values were determined for mortality, burn wound infection (at least two infections), sepsis (as de
108 011, the use of SLND + ALND resulted in more wound infections, axillary seromas, and paresthesias tha
109 ed guidelines for the prevention of surgical wound infections based upon review and interpretation of
111 ction, repeat revascularization, and sternal wound infection between propensity score-matched cohorts
112 of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, wound infection, bleeding, amputation, or reoperation.
113 n patients at risk of bacteremia or surgical wound infection but failed to reach their clinical endpo
114 nd 13.5% of the dry dressing group developed wound infection, but this was not statistically signific
115 with Escherichia coli and other pathogens in wound infections, but mechanisms that govern polymicrobi
117 ance of mice to a subsequent burn injury and wound infection by a dendritic cell-dependent mechanism.
118 fter burn injury decreases susceptibility to wound infections by enhancing global immune cell activat
119 extracts of Arabidopsis leaves subjected to wounding, infection by PstAvr, infection by a virulent s
120 r erysipelas, major cutaneous abscesses, and wound infections, can be life-threatening and may requir
121 acter species, accounted for the majority of wound infections cared for on USNS Comfort during Operat
124 new avenue of future topical treatments for wound infections caused by these two important pathogens
125 ociated with nosocomial bloodstream and deep wound infections causing a high mortality rate mainly in
126 hedule, and stratified by type of infection (wound infection, cellulitis or erysipelas, or major absc
127 s of central importance in the prevention of wound infections, colonization of medical devices, and n
131 tectomies were associated with high rates of wound infections, complications, and increased recovery
132 vs 3 [4.5%] in institution B; P = .001) and wound infection cultures (predominant microorganism in i
133 ltured from both the intraoperative bile and wound infection cultures (Streptococcus pneumoniae, 114
138 ith spontaneous chronic multi drug-resistant wound infections demonstrated clearance of bacteria and
139 sing with the required sensitivity for rapid wound infection detection directly from a clinically rel
140 e a mouse model for investigating E faecalis wound infection determinants, and suggest that both immu
141 c surgical patients at high risk for sternal wound infection (diabetes, body mass index >30, or both)
142 lenged in vivo with the polybacterial bovine wound infection 'digital dermatitis', Zn/Cu-shellac adhe
148 mnionitis in labour, puerperal endometritis, wound infection following cesarean section or perineal t
150 hylaxis is effective in reducing the risk of wound infection for all types of surgery, even ones wher
152 P < .001) and an increase in readmission for wound infection from 1.4% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.5%) to 3.0% (9
153 present study, we describe 9 cases of mixed wound infection, from a pool of 400 surgical wound infec
155 5 mg/kg (skin photosensitivity [grade 3] and wound infection [grade 3]); thus, the maximum tolerated
156 The development and treatment of surgical wound infections has always been a limiting factor to th
162 l varices haemorrhage, circulatory collapse, wound infection, ileus, cerebrovascular accident [possib
163 nt occurred in 1.8%, hemothorax in 0.3%, and wound infection in 2.9%; 1.4% required surgical drainage
165 abetes mellitus occurred in 10% vs. 45%, and wound infection in 6% vs. 31% of steroid-free vs. cortic
166 ere was no significant difference in sternal wound infection in 63 of 753 patients randomized to the
167 We report a case of A. variabilis invasive wound infection in a 21-year-old male after a self-infli
168 report a case of P. aphanidermatum invasive wound infection in a 21-year-old male injured during com
169 fatal case of S. erythrospora invasive burn wound infection in a 26-year-old male injured during com
170 e outcome following a Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection in a rodent model of severe burn injury.
174 erious adverse events included a superficial wound infection in one patient that resolved with antibi
175 ependent risk factors for development of any wound infection in patients undergoing mastectomy were a
176 there was an increased risk of rejection and wound infection in the obese group, there was no differe
177 ine model of cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus wound infection in young (3-4 mo) and aged (18-20 mo) BA
178 ents were infections of the target wound: 33 wound infections in 25 (20%) patients of 126 in the sucr
179 ) significantly increases resistance to burn wound infections in a DC-dependent manner that is correl
180 ion days, and 3.5 times the relative risk of wound infections in days 91 to 365 (aHR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1
183 ate 1990s, an outbreak of tilapia-associated wound infections in Israel was linked to a previously un
184 al venous catheter-associated infection, and wound infections) in HTx, LTx, and MCS device recipients
185 of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) through postop
187 ween the timing of surgery and postoperative wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, reoperation, o
188 Secondary outcomes included (1) superficial wound infection (involving subcutaneous tissue but not e
189 ng down to sternal fixation wires), (2) deep wound infection (involving the sternal wires, sternal bo
192 elevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and wound infection, length of stay, or 90-day readmission.
193 n to enhance systemic and local responses to wound infections may be protective after burn injury.
198 obial therapies are needed, a S. aureus skin wound infection model was developed in which full-thickn
199 n whole blood, human wound fluid, or a mouse wound infection model was in turn increased after antibi
202 ls, (ii) intradermal infection models, (iii) wound infection models, and (iv) epicutaneous infection
203 The most frequent morbid complication was wound infection, more commonly occurring in the mastecto
204 role in the pathogenesis of PA14 during burn wound infection, most likely by contributing to PA14 sur
208 gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 5; 12.5%), wound infection (n = 2; 5%) thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 2.5
210 ia (n = 16, 4%), reexploration (n = 12, 3%), wound infections (n = 12, 3%), and intraabdominal absces
211 0/56%), foreign body reactions (n = 58/12%), wound infections (n = 45/9, 3%) and fat tissue necrosis
212 , pneumonia, sepsis, anastomotic dehiscence, wound infection, noncardiac respiratory failure, atrial
217 was the strongest predictor of postoperative wound infection (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.58-3.88; P =
219 ificant change in the rates of postoperative wound infection or renal insufficiency during this time
220 splant ascites, posttransplant dialysis, and wound infection or reoperation after transplant should a
222 retained stones (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9), wound infection (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.04-0.2), reoperatio
223 plications (OR: 3.46; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05) and wound infection (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.01-5.94), longer ho
224 n technique worsened the odds of superficial wound infections (OR, 1.71; P = .02) but not septic shoc
225 y outcome was a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event (permanent stroke
226 ary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 w
227 o difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between matched
229 sion, dyspnea, diabetes, renal failure, open wounds/infection, or advanced American Society of Anesth
230 , obese patients displayed increased odds of wound infection: OR (odds ratio) = 1.64 (95% CI: 1.21, 2
231 be an effective intervention for preventing wound infection over a broad range of different surgical
232 ying (P = 0.062), burst abdomen (P = 0.480), wound infection (P = 0.758), and hospital stay (P = 0.48
233 Patients in the SLND + ALND group had more wound infections (P <or= .0016), seromas (P <or= .0001),
242 ates for hernia recurrence and postoperative wound infection rates at 24 months, and the EQ-5D and Sh
244 ients >12 years of age with an uncomplicated wound infection received oral clindamycin 300 mg 4 times
246 tion rates in breast cancer surgery are low, wound infections remain the most common complication.
247 y of Thoracic Surgeons measure: deep sternal wound infection, renal failure, prolonged ventilation >2
249 rbidity (stroke, renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, prolonged ventilation).
253 t causes food poisoning and life-threatening wound infections, secretes the pore-forming toxin hemoly
254 lism, muscle protein synthesis, incidence of wound infection sepsis, and body composition were obtain
255 n of such drug in a murine model of surgical wound infection significantly reduced the bacterial load
256 evention of surgical infections could reduce wound infections significantly; namely to a target of le
259 esistant pathogenic bacteria associated with wound infections: Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneu
260 following 4 organisms commonly implicated in wound infections: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aer
261 f prophylactic systemic antibiotics, sternal wound infection still occurs in 5% or more of cardiac su
262 ponse syndrome, sepsis, acute kidney injury, wound infection (superficial and deep), rate of intraope
265 ere burn injury predisposes patients to burn wound infections that can disseminate, lead to uncontrol
266 wound infection, from a pool of 400 surgical wound infections that we have studied, in which S. moore
267 s or erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, or wound infection) that had a minimum lesion area of 75 cm
268 ve intervention for preventing postoperative wound infection, the level of this effectiveness would a
269 In a subcutaneous infection model to mimic wound infection, the multifunctional autoprocessing RTX
271 the PU area of 40% or greater, incidence of wound infections, the total number of dressings at 8 wee
272 r in the treatment of MSSA and MRSA surgical wound infection through enhancement of the local CXC che
273 iews the lessons learned from combat-related wound infections throughout history and in the current c
274 WED dressing was applied within 2 hours of wound infection to test its ability to prevent biofilm f
275 eus causes diseases ranging from superficial wound infections to more invasive manifestations like os
276 as from a patient with a genitourinary tract wound infection, two B. longum isolates were from abdomi
278 ost commonly associated microbial species in wound infections, very little is known about their inter
283 rdiovascular events, but the risk of sternal wound infection was increased (risk difference, 1.07%; 9
284 was shorter (1 vs. 6 months; P = 0.04), and wound infection was more common in the BMI greater than
286 alters the host immune response to cutaneous wound infection, we developed a murine model of cutaneou
288 common, but keratitis, endophthalmitis, and wound infection were less common among CA-MRSA cases tha
290 L-1beta contributed to host defense during a wound infection, whereas IL-1beta was more critical duri
291 herwise healthy people can experience severe wound infection, which can lead to sepsis and death.
292 Overall, 14 patients (4.4%) developed early wound infections, while 10 (3.2%) developed late wound i
293 y outcome was the incidence of postoperative wound infection (WI), and secondary outcome was the inci
294 ion of techniques and procedures to decrease wound infections will be highly successful, even in pati
295 mation of biofilms in mice, and treatment of wound infections with CAP 3 was able to clear the bacter
296 tal organism that causes both food-borne and wound infections with high morbidity and mortality in hu
298 k of overall postoperative complications and wound infection, without a substantial increase in the o
299 second hypothesis that the relative risk of wound infection would substantially vary over different
300 is associated with an increased incidence of wound infections, wound dehiscence, biliary complication