ライフサイエンスコーパス: zooplankton

1 etween them via their shared prey community (zooplankton).

2 omass inferred by density and body length of zooplankton.

3 sed to characterize the genetic diversity of zooplankton.

4 is the chitinous exoskeletons of crustacean zooplankton.

5 respiration of carnivorous and detritivorous zooplankton.

6 ucidate pathways by which climate influences zooplankton.

7 ass and production of both phytoplankton and zooplankton.

8 diversity and abundance of large gelatinous zooplankton.

9 a total of nine diPAPs were only detected in zooplankton.

10 is a relatively low-quality food source for zooplankton.

11 olism of carbon rich lipids by overwintering zooplankton.

12 to support visual prey capture of UV-bright zooplankton.

13 rstanding the speciation process for oceanic zooplankton.

14 een shown to accumulate in phytoplankton and zooplankton.

15 e they were fed with indigenous contaminated zooplankton.

16 pact of anadromous alewife on populations of zooplankton.

17 fast-sinking particles accessible to larger zooplankton.

18 rface waters and propagated up through large zooplankton.

19 astics are ingested by, and may impact upon, zooplankton.

20 the dinoflagellates by deterring grazing by zooplankton.

21 MMHg increased with larger size fractions of zooplankton.

22 external carapace and appendages of exposed zooplankton.

23 ique to this study we also find (110 m)Ag in zooplankton.

24 ntly driven by the negative effects of MP on zooplankton.

25 thought to be the primary food resource for zooplankton.

26 spores), rendering this carbon accessible to zooplankton.

27 ich have close relationships with gelatinous zooplankton.

28 4)-10(5.9)) are more variable than those for zooplankton (10(4.6)-10(6.2)) across ranges in DOC (40-5

29 Communities of zooplankton, a critical portion of aquatic ecosystems, c

30 y the environmental drivers of REE levels in zooplankton, a key component in plankton food webs, acro

31 up) associations between primary production, zooplankton abundance and fish stock recruitment, this s

32 Zooplankton abundance was reduced the greatest in bluegi

33 oplankton bloom is followed by a peak in the zooplankton abundance.

34 nkton periods, and may help explain elevated zooplankton abundances in tidal wetlands and other detri

35 measured concentrations in phytoplankton and zooplankton across diverse sites from the Northwest Atla

36 erefore needs to be considered as "baseline" zooplankton activity in a changing Arctic ocean [6-9].

37 earlier for all metrics and trophic levels: zooplankton advanced most, and fish least, rapidly.

38 creased mortality of amphibians, gastropods, zooplankton, algae and a macrophyte (reducing taxonomic

39 Zooplankton allochthony (proportion of carbon from terre

40 local physical forcing affect phytoplankton, zooplankton and an apex predator along the West Antarcti

41 to thousands of km) layers comprise fish and zooplankton and are readily detectable using echosounder

42 imary and secondary production likely caused zooplankton and fish MeHg decreases via algal and growth

43 We show that Prymnesium attaches to zooplankton and fish, causing mortality, whereas exposur

44 surface and subsurface waters, as well as in zooplankton and fish, off Japan in June 2011.

45 ma-derived Cs isotopes were also detected in zooplankton and mesopelagic fish, and unique to this stu

46 n D(3), which is suggested to originate from zooplankton and microalgae.

47 The vertical migration of zooplankton and micronekton (hereafter 'zooplankton') ha

48 f ammonium, namely, the daytime excretion by zooplankton and micronekton migrating from the surface t

49 owed that larger fish tended to feed less on zooplankton and more on benthic invertebrates than did s

50 ed in the Lake Mjosa food web in Norway from zooplankton and Mysis to planktivorous and piscivorous f

51 Transparent zooplankton and nekton are often nearly invisible when v

52 tic nanoparticles reduce survival of aquatic zooplankton and penetrate the blood-to-brain barrier in

53 Predation by Mysis shifted zooplankton and phytoplankton community size structure.

54 ng to quantify interaction strengths between zooplankton and phytoplankton over time within and acros

55 prey population of herring and, indirectly, zooplankton and phytoplankton via top-down control.

56 conducted on lower trophic levels including zooplankton and the subsequent transfer to predators, wh

57 eir main prey), and sediments, while pelagic zooplankton and water were dominated by lower chain acid

58 ations in water and biota (phytoplankton and zooplankton) and the variability of bioconcentration (BC

59 gnified by a factor of 4 from microseston to zooplankton, and both concentrations of MMHg and the fra

60 ations in pore water, benthic invertebrates, zooplankton, and fish (Leuciscus idus melanotus).

61 multiple pathways involving microbes, other zooplankton, and krill predators.

62 sive, intense aggregations of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and micronekton exhibited strong diel patte

63 motaxis and phototaxis, sperm, algae, marine zooplankton, and other microswimmers move on helical pat

64 als and different fish as well as amphipods, zooplankton, and phytoplankton were specifically investi

65 mum), including marine snow, large migrating zooplankton, and their fast-sinking fecal pellets, repre

66 fferent relationships between phytoplankton, zooplankton, and their physical environment appear subje

67 e and open sea, where vertical migrations of zooplankton are driven by lunar illumination.

68 However, spatio-temporal distributions of zooplankton are notoriously difficult to quantify from s

69 Across boundary currents, zooplankton are subject to strong oceanographic gradient

70 Pelagic zooplankton are susceptible to consuming microplastics,

71 period of suboptimal feeding conditions for zooplankton at a time of year when their metabolic deman

72 Layers of zooplankton began to disappear within 20 minutes of the

73 olynya an ideal site in which to examine how zooplankton behavior responds to climate fluctuations.

74 East Lakes were observed, likely because of zooplankton being exposed to more contaminated food in W

75 n the bioaccumulation factor for PCB/OCPs in zooplankton between West and East Lakes were observed, l

76 (< 0.3) had wide ranges of phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass and production, depending on P load

77 plankton without apparent growth dilution or zooplankton biomass dilution.

78 the ecological succession, phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass dynamics produced bioaccumulation me

79 jellyfish, small pelagic fish and crustacean zooplankton biomass from four major ecosystems within th

80 Zooplankton biomass increased with P load and responded

81 barcoding was positively correlated with the zooplankton biomass inferred by density and body length

82 s with particular local importance where the zooplankton biomass is high and the ocean depth is great

83 on growth rates, leading to no net change in zooplankton biomass or trophic cascade strength.

84 quent summer for some nutrient variables and zooplankton biomass.

85 scular periods when light permits feeding on zooplankton, but limits visual detection by piscivores.

86 scular periods when light permits feeding on zooplankton, but limits visual detection by piscivores.

87 OS and PFCA concentrations, respectively, in zooplankton, but not in fish and guillemot eggs.

88 ded as trophic dead-ends mostly inedible for zooplankton, but substantial evidence shows that some gr

89 Moonlight may enable predation of zooplankton by carnivorous zooplankters, fish, and birds

90 dependently reduced the average body size of zooplankton by up to 30%.

91 Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and the zooplankton Calanus finmarchicus.

92 The PCBs in the lipids of zooplankton Calanus were in equilibrium with those in th

93 Like most zooplankton, Calanus hyperboreus undergoes seasonal migr

94 hat graze on phytoplankton, as well as other zooplankton can accumulate and mediate the transmission

95 that high concentrations of astaxanthin-rich zooplankton can degrade the performance of standard blue

96 We know that zooplankton can form large aggregations that visibly cha

97 rs and polyethylene (PE) beads on freshwater zooplankton Ceriodaphnia dubia.

98 0 and 100 nm nanosilver stocks to freshwater zooplankton (Ceriodaphnia dubia) in presence and absence

99 se in PAHs, elevated primary production, and zooplankton changes, these oil sands lake ecosystems hav

100 and adherence of microplastics in a range of zooplankton common to the northeast Atlantic, and employ

101 We conducted a mesocosm experiment with zooplankton communities and their fish predators from la

102 Modern pelagic zooplankton communities are now much different compared

103 Zooplankton communities can be strongly affected by cyan

104 The species composition of zooplankton communities determined by metabarcoding was

105 ing the influence of environmental change on zooplankton communities under field-conditions is hinder

106 of metabarcoding for taxonomic profiling of zooplankton communities was validated by the morphology-

107 dels with size-structured representations of zooplankton communities.

108 pulations of the most abundant member of the zooplankton community (calanoid copepods) were reduced 2

109 e, NY, are strongly driven by changes in the zooplankton community and body size.

110 n clearly distinguish the composition of the zooplankton community between lake and river ecosystems.

111 se from fishless lakes, resulting in greater zooplankton community biomass and larger average size.

112 Our study demonstrates that changes in zooplankton community composition confound the biodiluti

113 of taxonomic aggregation, phytoplankton and zooplankton community composition showed few systematic

114 e concurrent changes in nutrient loading and zooplankton community composition.

115 principally through lake-specific impacts on zooplankton community composition.

116 ysed a data set containing phytoplankton and zooplankton community data from 131 lakes through 9 year

117 oad range of ecosystem properties, including zooplankton community structure and nutrient cycling.

118 on on the establishment and persistence of a zooplankton community when introduced in the presence of

119 were largely replaced by a two trophic level zooplankton community.

120 lower variability in MeHg concentrations in zooplankton compared to phytoplankton.

121 toplankton are driven by top-down effects on zooplankton composition and abundance, but not richness.

122 effects on lower trophic levels), community (zooplankton composition, abundance and biomass) and popu

123 tic MeHg concentration by approximately 90%, zooplankton concentrations by 30 to 50%, and in some fis

124 ressed SWS1 (89%), which may serve to detect zooplankton, conspecifics and the host anemone.

125 er, unlike the shells of foraminifera, their zooplankton counterparts, coccoliths remain underused in

126 The keystone zooplankton Daphnia magna has recently been used as a mo

127 e show that during phytoplankton deficiency, zooplankton (Daphnia magna) can benefit from terrestrial

128 al change for phytoplankton (chlorophyll a), zooplankton (Daphnia) and fish (perch, Perca fluviatilis

129 EE] in fish, benthic macroinvertebrates, and zooplankton declined as a function of their trophic posi

130 ted decline, we observed a small increase in zooplankton densities in response to our experimental in

131 Furthermore, warmer waters and declining zooplankton densities may act together to lower carrying

132 sity occurred in mid-winter, whereas maximum zooplankton density was observed in summer.

133 ature and, as a proxy for food availability, zooplankton density.

134 phytoplankton biovolume and 25.3% of summer zooplankton density.

135 ts have shown how OA can dramatically affect zooplankton development, physiology and skeletal mineral

136 ilability of cyanobacteria to filter feeding zooplankton (e.g. cladocerans).

137 ting the dynamics of nutrients-phytoplankton-zooplankton ecosystems and enhancing accumulation of pho

138 an alter the properties and sinking rates of zooplankton egests and, (3) faecal pellets can facilitat

139 Extensive experiments on zooplankton feeding in laboratories show non-sigmoid nat

140 furthers our understanding of the impacts of zooplankton filter feeding on viral inactivation and sho

141 thus suggest that circadian clocks increase zooplankton fitness by optimizing the temporal trade-off

142 ant fish species in Windermere and important zooplankton food resources may ultimately affect fish su

143 rcury uptake and transfer exclusively within zooplankton food webs in northern marine waters.

144 (lakes and rivers), seawater, snow, air, and zooplankton for a range of legacy polychlorinated biphen

145 evealed the seasonal significance of pelagic zooplankton for somatic growth and gonad development.

146 ariant r(-3) to r(-4)) than that produced by zooplankton for which feeding and propulsion are the sam

147 We suggest that this occurs because zooplankton fragment and ingest half of the fast-sinking

148 strict distinction between phytoplankton and zooplankton from a global model of the marine plankton f

149 Water and zooplankton from a lake that had received (202)Hg-enrich

150 We found higher REE bioaccumulation in zooplankton from lakes with lower pH and higher REE to d

151 Further, mass sinking of zooplankton from the surface waters and accumulation at

152 croplastic debris can negatively impact upon zooplankton function and health.

153 population genetic structure of the keystone zooplankton grazer, Daphnia pulicaria, using dormant egg

154 eractions between a structured population of zooplankton grazers and their predators.

155 The primary zooplankton grazers decreased, and in the more transpare

156 teractions involving phytoplankton and their zooplankton grazers play a large role.

157 nce acts as a defence that reduces losses to zooplankton grazers, such as copepods [2,3].

158 higher trophic levels, particularly for the zooplankton grazers, whose main food source is composed

159 Moreover, we propose a role for top-down zooplankton grazing control in shaping the global patter

160 lver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) had an impact on zooplankton grazing on their prey, specifically phytopla

161 sting stronger top-down control, mediated by zooplankton grazing played an important role.

162 ith phytoplankton as well as the capacity of zooplankton grazing to modulate the algal standing crop.

163 ater loss rates (likely from viral lysis and zooplankton grazing).

164 tween cell size and (1) nutrient uptake, (2) zooplankton grazing, and (3) phytoplankton sinking.

165 , three phytoplankton functional groups, and zooplankton grazing.

166 tion dynamic are present in the major marine zooplankton group, the graptolites, during the Ordovicia

167 Here we show that one significant zooplankton group, the radiolaria, underwent a severe de

168 Zooplankton growth dilutes their MeHg body burden, but t

169 oplankton growth was associated with earlier zooplankton growth.

170 at EhVs can accumulate in high titers within zooplankton guts during feeding or can be adsorbed to th

171 Intriguingly, the passage through zooplankton guts prolonged EhV's half-life of infectivit

172 However, diel vertical migration (DVM) of zooplankton has been shown to occur even during the dark

173 n of zooplankton and micronekton (hereafter 'zooplankton') has ramifications throughout the food web.

174 e changes of copepods, the dominant group of zooplankton, have affected biogenic carbon cycling.

175 Copepods comprise the dominant Arctic zooplankton; hence, their responses to OA have important

176 Sediment, water, zooplankton, herring, sprat, and guillemot eggs were ana

177 Zooplankton (Holopedium, Daphnia, and Leptodiaptomus) ar

178 l outbreaks (Metschnikowia bicuspidata) in a zooplankton host (Daphnia dentifera) among lakes.

179 atives when fit to experimental data using a zooplankton host (Daphnia dentifera) that consumes spore

180 ress this issue using a planktonic system (a zooplankton host, Daphnia dentifera, and its virulent fu

181 nutrient concentrations, resulting in lower zooplankton (i.e., food) densities for the fish.

182 l methylation and multiple trophic levels of zooplankton in a vertically restricted zone.

183 e organic carbon (TPOC) on phytoplankton and zooplankton in five whole-lake experiments.

184 , and will speed the loss of these important zooplankton in lakes where calcium levels are in decline

185 (Utricularia gibba and U. australis) capture zooplankton in mechanically triggered underwater traps.

186 utcome of grazing control of algal blooms by zooplankton in nutrient-rich ecosystems.

187 hose of baleen whales feeding on herbivorous zooplankton in the Arctic.

188 sent a case study on a community of fish and zooplankton in the Barents Sea to illustrate how a mass

189 association between jellyfish and crustacean zooplankton in the Black Sea, we found no evidence of je

190 ules released by copepods, the most abundant zooplankton in the sea, which play a central role in foo

191 seasonal vertical migration and abundance of zooplankton in the seasonally varying sea ice is correla

192 luctuations affect the vertical migration of zooplankton in the Southern Ocean, based on multi-year a

193 The synergy between microbes and zooplankton in the twilight zone is important to our und

194 een 5 and 40 mg/L suggesting that cladoceran zooplankton in these lakes may already be experiencing n

195 Zooplankton in this region migrate seasonally and overwi

196 C, and N to estimate terrestrial support to zooplankton in two contrasting lakes.

197 racteristics due to increased DOC may impact zooplankton in ways that differ from those observed in s

198 We show that zooplankton, in which feeding and swimming are separate

199 nt studies have demonstrated that a range of zooplankton, including copepods, can ingest microplastic

200 MeHg concentrations in zooplankton increased with an increase in body size and

201 The viral-zooplankton interactions observed in these studies indic

202 odeling establishment rates of nonindigenous zooplankton introduced by ballast water across different

203 rs suggest that fish predation on crustacean zooplankton is 2-30 times higher than jellyfish predatio

204 Acidic digestion by zooplankton is a potential mechanism for iron mobilizati

205 Understanding the colonisation process in zooplankton is crucial for successful restoration of aqu

206 tanding and quantifying iron mobilization by zooplankton is essential to predict ocean productivity i

207 Methylmercury bioaccumulation in zooplankton is higher than in midlatitude ecosystems.

208 onditions, modeled growth dilution in marine zooplankton is insufficient to lower their MeHg concentr

209 arctic lakes showed that diet of herbivorous zooplankton is mainly based on high-quality phytoplankto

210 terrestrial support of pelagic crustaceans (zooplankton) is widespread.

211 ensities of marine phytoplankton (1.7-fold), zooplankton (larval fish prey; 3.7-fold), and larval fis

212 The effects of zooplankton layers cascaded even further up the food cha

213 Only around dusk did zooplankton layers overlap with phytoplankton layers.

214 ity, and total abundance of micronekton when zooplankton layers were present with typical patterns re

215 e for each individual more than doubled when zooplankton layers were present.

216 he result of lower particle fragmentation by zooplankton, likely due to the almost complete absence o

217 Zooplankton live in dynamic environments where turbulenc

218 ations in pore water, benthic invertebrates, zooplankton, macrophytes, and fish.

219 ions observed in these studies indicate that zooplankton may improve water quality through viral upta

220 (between 1980 and 2009), we demonstrate that zooplankton MeHg concentrations in Onondaga Lake, NY, ar

221 ly ten-fold greater than in summer; however, zooplankton MeHg concentrations were paradoxically five

222 This result suggests that zooplankton nutrient recycling exceeds grazing pressure

223 gressive model in combination with long-term zooplankton observations off the California coast, we sh

224 The concentration in the zooplankton of all selected PCBs sharply declined from M

225 Calanus finmarchicus is a marine zooplankton of interest for the aquaculture industry, as

226 The zooplankton of the northern California Current are typic

227 Hg in microseston and four size fractions of zooplankton on the continental shelf, slope, and rise of

228 nkton through food webs vis a vis grazing by zooplankton or other pathways.

229 irect effects on higher trophic levels, from zooplankton organisms to marine mammals and seabirds.

230 likely due to the almost complete absence of zooplankton particle interactions in OMZ waters.

231 eaked during the summer, coinciding with the zooplankton peak and the warmest water temperature.

232 can be a vital supplementary food source for zooplankton, perhaps extending survival during low phyto

233 However, for phytoplankton and zooplankton, phenological change was also associated wit

234 Gelatinous zooplankton populations are well known for their ability

235 facilitates the establishment of colonizing zooplankton populations, because fish preferentially con

236 ommercially harvested fish species depend on zooplankton populations.

237 , and 4.4 L/kg (wet weight) for fish muscle, zooplankton, predatory invertebrates, and nonpredatory i

238 Prymnesium parvum can severely harm fish and zooplankton, presumably through the release of allelopat

239 s the impact of a cubozoan predator on their zooplankton prey, predominantly Copepoda, Pleocyemata, D

240 We measured zoobenthic and zooplankton production from the littoral and pelagic hab

241 lake, to test the hypothesis that crustacean zooplankton production should subsequently decrease.

242 ed to the pelagic habitat which decreased in zooplankton production.

243 s provide an expectation for the response of zooplankton productivity as DOC concentration increases,

244 sed DOC concentrations may reduce crustacean zooplankton productivity due to reductions in resource q

245 Zooplankton provide the key link between primary product

246 Aquatic invertebrates (chironomid larvae, zooplankton) provided indicators of MMHg bioaccumulation

247 Zooplankton readily ingest microscopic plastic (micropla

248 Our study suggests that zooplankton REE bioaccumulation is an excellent predicto

249 range of more than an order of magnitude in zooplankton REE concentrations (EREEY 3.2-210 nmol g(-1)

250 Here we synthesize fish stocking records and zooplankton relative abundance for 685 mountain lakes an

251 t influence microplastic ingestion in marine zooplankton remain poorly understood.

252 However, gelatinous zooplanktons remain poorly represented in biogeochemical

253 ne food-webs, the impact of microplastics on zooplankton remains under-researched.

254 explained more variance in phytoplankton and zooplankton resource use efficiency (RUE; ratio of bioma

255 mall pelagic fish nor to a common crustacean zooplankton resource.

256 of benthic (macroinvertebrate) and pelagic (zooplankton) resource availability, along with short (da

257 till have an incomplete understanding of how zooplankton respond to temporal increases in DOC concent

258 ess (measured as Pielou's evenness), whereas zooplankton RUE was positively related to phytoplankton

259 Phytoplankton and zooplankton RUE were high and low, respectively, when Cy

260 negative and positive for phytoplankton and zooplankton RUE, respectively, and most slopes did not s

261 From 2011 to 2014, bulk zooplankton samples were collected for REE analysis from

262 Zooplankton should therefore seek to minimize the fluid

263 a Lake and that the presence of large-bodied zooplankton species drives elevated MeHg concentrations.

264 aeuchaeta glacialis, and Themisto abyssorum) zooplankton species from the Canadian High Arctic (Amund

265 iel vertical migration (DVM) of two dominant zooplankton species in the north-eastern Black Sea.

266 ight how the feeding strategies of different zooplankton species may influence their susceptibility t

267 uctions in metal concentrations to increased zooplankton species richness over time (p < 0.01) with a

268 uctions of Cu, Ni, and Zn concentrations and zooplankton species richness.

269 comprehensive view of the distribution of a zooplankton species to date, and alter our understanding

270 making the bloom biomass available to other zooplankton species.

271 moid nature of response for most herbivorous zooplankton species.

272 ur understanding of the behavior of this key zooplankton species.

273 Our study showed that zooplankton, such as Daphnia, naturally harbor microbiom

274 We propose that zooplankton, swimming through topographically adjacent p

275 es (delta(15)N and delta(13)C) in individual zooplankton taxa collected over a period of eight years

276 CARS) microscopy we identified that thirteen zooplankton taxa had the capacity to ingest 1.7-30.6 mum

277 ower and delta(34)S signatures are higher in zooplankton than in sediment-feeding invertebrates, ther

278 Here we show that zooplankton that contacts and feeds on the luminescent b

279 Copepods are a globally abundant class of zooplankton that form a key trophic link between primary

280 roportionally more to the greater biomass of zooplankton that occurred at depth.

281 Zooplankton that prey on species such as C. hyperboreus

282 erally small (millimetres or less) animals - zooplankton - that are adrift on the currents.

283 on rate of microplastics in three species of zooplankton, the copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Acar

284 The predatory zooplankton, the spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longiman

285 highly conserved in the animal kingdom, from zooplankton to human hunter-gatherers.

286 Hence, the sensitivity of zooplankton to ocean oxygen concentrations can have dire

287 the year, but also a seasonal importance of zooplankton to the diet, somatic growth and gonadal deve

288 l data (U.S. Breeding Bird Survey and marine zooplankton) to identify ecological boundaries, and comp

289 estion methodology, previously developed for zooplankton, to explore whether synthetic particles coul

290 pesticides were measured in air, water, and zooplankton tracking the North Atlantic Bloom in May 200

291 to extract microplastics ingested by marine zooplankton under laboratory conditions.

292 Daphnia magna is a keystone indicator zooplankton used in environmental quality assessments.

293 the incorporation of terrestrial carbon into zooplankton was not directly related to the concentratio

294 gill, Lepomis macrochirus) on a shared prey (zooplankton), we conducted a mesocosm experiment.

295 ansferred to the nutritious guts of fish and zooplankton, where they survive digestion and gain effec

296 annual primary production and are grazed by zooplankton, which in turn are suitably sized food items

297 urbances produced by feeding and swimming in zooplankton with diverse propulsion mechanisms and rangi

298 This behavioral response provides zooplankton with the capability to retain the benefits o

299 stic bioavailability to different species of zooplankton, with each species ingesting significantly m

300 on was governing the accumulation of MeHg in zooplankton without apparent growth dilution or zooplank

301 ested this theoretical prediction by using a zooplankton-yeast host-parasite system in which ecologic