1 based on endoscopy and 48 hours, wireless pH metry.

2 imary outcome was overall discomfort with pH-metry.

3 e to the location of the electrode of the pH-metry.

4                           High-resolution pH-metry (12 sensors) and manometry (36 sensors) were perfo

5             Of the 9 patients with normal pH metry, 2 were found with erosive esophagitis and 7 witho

6 rmal acid exposure, 9 patients had normal pH metry (29%).

7  was confirmed by gastroscopy, manometry, pH-metry and barium swallow.

8  WC insertion is better tolerated than SC pH-metry both overall and during placement.

9 tients with erosive reflux disease (ERD); pH metry contributes to GERD diagnosis and is critical for

10        Recent studies using multiple site pH-metry have attempted to provide evidence for cause and e

11                                  Wireless pH-metry is a safe and tolerable method when investigating

12 cost analysis of the available esophageal pH-metry methods.

13 nts with GERD (diagnosed by endoscopy and pH-metry; n = 203; NCT00291746) had frequent (>/= 3 days/we

14 urface structures allows complex de novo geo-metries of delicate hydrogel materials.

15 ms persisted, patients underwent a second pH metry on PPI and the dose was increased to 40 mg b.i.d.

16  on response to treatment suggesting that pH-metry preferably should be extended to 48 hours.

17                      Costs of 3 different pH-metry strategies were analyzed: 1) ESM + SC, 2) ESM + WC

18                                   48-hour pH-metry was performed in 106 children (50 males, 56 female

19                          Wireless capsule pH-metry (WC) is better tolerated than standard nasal pH ca