コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 AVF blood flow rate at 1 day is usually more than 50% of
2 AVF draining vein diameter and blood flow rate were asse
3 AVF performance was significantly better along the horiz
4 AVF provides the appropriate parameter to account for pa
5 AVF success was defined as dialysis initiation using the
11 ctively in 69 patients within 4 months after AVF placement; adequacy for dialysis was known in 54.
14 gative group when mfERG was verified against AVF suggests that mfERG may have the ability to detect c
17 eral jugular vein was connected to create an AVF, and CorMatrix scaffold was wrapped around the outfl
18 r (during 2004-2012) who subsequently had an AVF (n=295) or AVG (n=105) placed or no arteriovenous ac
19 g with an HC while awaiting maturation of an AVF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.76-0.79; P <
20 s study, our results suggest that placing an AVF >6-9 months predialysis in the elderly may not assoc
23 atients receiving an AVG, those receiving an AVF had more frequent surgical access procedures per yea
25 tems are significantly more likely to use an AVF at initiation of HD than patients with other insuran
26 of a patient beginning hemodialysis using an AVF by 11-fold (odds ratio, 11.42 [95% CI, 10.93-11.93];
27 4.9% of subjects initiated dialysis using an AVF, and 45.1% of subjects used a catheter or graft.
30 greater odds of initiating dialysis with an AVF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.3; 95% confidence inte
32 anic patients initiated hemodialysis with an AVF less frequently despite being younger and having les
33 persistently initiated hemodialysis with an AVF less frequently than white patients (P < .05 for all
34 tients tend to initiate hemodialysis with an AVF less frequently than white patients despite being yo
36 s in this cohort, first hemodialysis with an AVF ranged from 11.1% to 22.2% depending on the ESRD Net
37 hite patients initiated hemodialysis with an AVF than black patients or Hispanic patients (18.3% vs 1
41 d histomorphometry of of the bone in cAF and AVF was significantly superior to bone grafts with a hig
43 increases in 6-week AVF blood flow rate and AVF diameter (per absolute 10% difference in FMD: change
44 with greater 6-week AVF blood flow rate and AVF diameter (per absolute 10% difference in NMD: change
45 s (180 women and 422 men, 459 with upper-arm AVF and 143 with forearm AVF) from seven clinical center
46 rvention prior to week 2, 70% with upper-arm AVFs (302 of 433) and 77% with forearm AVFs (99 of 128)
47 orearm AVFs (68 of 124) and 83% of upper-arm AVFs (341 of 411) in surviving patients without thrombos
48 9 of 459), and 87% (401 of 459) of upper-arm AVFs and in 40% (58 of 143), 73% (104 of 143), and 77% (
49 o be involved in the conversion of averufin (AVF) to versiconal hemiacetal acetate (VHA), in Aspergil
53 initiation using the AVF, with time between AVF placement and dialysis start as our primary variable
55 school performance in children with cerebral AVF and the American Spinal Injury Association impairmen
56 of gene mutations in pediatric cerebrospinal AVFs, and show the predominance of RASA1 over HHT mutati
58 estored the ability of the mutant to convert AVF to VHA and to produce aflatoxins B(1), G(1), B(2), a
66 when compared with automated visual fields (AVFs), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and optical cohere
71 dialysis (HD) with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in countries with universal health care systems com
75 f death, high rate of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure, and poor vascular access outcom
77 hemodialysis (HD) via arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) vs hemodialysis cathet
81 through an autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF), 49% through a prosthetic graft (AVG), and 23% thro
82 rebral or spinal pial arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and to describe their clinical characteristics.
84 1 year were 16% for arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and 23% for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts.
93 , with a mean of 0.64 procedures/patient for AVFs created 6-9 months predialysis compared with 0.72 f
94 459 with upper-arm AVF and 143 with forearm AVF) from seven clinical centers underwent preoperative
97 r-arm AVFs (302 of 433) and 77% with forearm AVFs (99 of 128) maintained at least 85% of their week 2
98 t fraction (i.e., adipocyte volume fraction [AVF]) and not chemical fat fraction, because fat fractio
99 increase in MMP activity in the hearts from AVF mice compared with sham, and treatment with CIMP dec
101 tients initiated dialysis with a functioning AVF or AVG; 46.8% of AVFs were created <90 days before d
110 e calculated the 30-month slope of change in AVF prevalence from monthly facility reports collected b
113 e risk factors associated with a decrease in AVF over time among participants in the Salisbury Eye Ev
115 Compared with sham, CIMP was decreased in AVF mice, and CIMP protein transfer increased plasma and
116 the standard deviation for the difference in AVF over 2 years of 4.3 degrees , two subgroups were cre
117 TS-1 as a mediator of neointima formation in AVF and may result in the development of novel strategie
119 arker of oxidative stress, were increased in AVF mice and decreased in AVF mice treated with CIMP.
127 to compare patient characteristics, incident AVF frequencies, and corrected mortality hazards between
130 ed regional variation in functional incident AVF frequency and risk-adjusted ESRD mortality exists ac
132 reatment is located associates with incident AVF use by patients with ESRD but not with subsequent im
133 s of temporary catheters and the overall low AVF maturation rate explain why a universal policy of AV
137 tcome Measure: Epidemiologic, clinical, OCT, AVF, angiographic, and electrophysiological data at base
140 eoperative VFT to ultrasound measurements of AVF blood flow rate and venous diameter at 1 day, 2 week
146 ysis with a functioning AVF or AVG; 46.8% of AVFs were created <90 days before dialysis initiation.
147 mia, activates Notch in endothelial cells of AVFs, leading to accelerated neointima formation and AVF
153 ical management, with an increased number of AVFs placed and an improved likelihood of selecting the
156 in surviving patients without thrombosis or AVF intervention prior to 6 weeks, at least 50% of their
157 ong surviving patients without thrombosis or AVF intervention prior to week 2, 70% with upper-arm AVF
163 functional properties predict postoperative AVF measurements, patients enrolled in the Hemodialysis
164 ore common in patients receiving predialysis AVF than in patients receiving AVG (46.0% versus 28.5%;
165 /= 70 years) with CKD undergoing predialysis AVF or arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation from 2004 to 2
166 In all, 67% of patients with predialysis AVF and 71% of patients with predialysis AVG creation in
167 contrast, substantial increases in prevalent AVF rates from 30.9 to 38.6% (P < 0.001) among treatment
170 remodeling suggesting that Eph-B4 regulates AVF venous adaptation through an Akt1-mediated mechanism
172 ic artery-superior mesenteric vein (SMA-SMV) AVF in a pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplant recipien
178 These same authors promoted the theory that AVF formation was directly related to procurement techni
182 purposes of this study were to describe the AVF in a large sample of older drivers and identify demo
183 llowed by a synthetic vascular access if the AVF did not mature compared to (2) placing a synthetic v
187 was defined as dialysis initiation using the AVF, with time between AVF placement and dialysis start
190 C57BL/J6 mice, and CIMP was administered to AVF and sham mice by protein transfer into peritoneal ca
192 VA and 11 VB ventral cord motor neurons, two AVF interneurons and in unidentified neurons of the retr
195 , greater NMD associated with greater 6-week AVF blood flow rate and AVF diameter (per absolute 10% d
196 associated with greater increases in 6-week AVF blood flow rate and AVF diameter (per absolute 10% d
197 positively associated with changes in 6-week AVF blood flow rate and diameter, suggesting that native
198 central venous catheters (CVC), but whether AVF are associated independently with better survival is
201 relative hazards (RH) of death compared with AVF were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.2) for C
202 azards associated with CVC, as compared with AVF, were stronger in men (n = 334; RH = 2.0; P = 0.01)
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。