ライフサイエンスコーパス: American Heart Association

1 from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association.

2 r disease and will remain a priority for the American Heart Association.

3 lar health concept recently described by the American Heart Association.

4 tional Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and American Heart Association.

5 and direction for further involvement by the American Heart Association.

6 M) of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association.

7 re the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2013 guidelines with those in

8 e, and smoking were defined according to the American Heart Association 2020 Strategic Goals, assigne

9 The American Heart Association 2020 target of improving card

10 For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcommittee i

11 f the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) for the treatment o

12 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European So

13 ate, the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guideli

14 current 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guideli

15 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guideli

16 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Managem

17 The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol treatme

18 ared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) CVD risk algorithm

19 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline expands r

20 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guideline for the P

21 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines expanded

22 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for chol

23 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the

24 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines introduc

25 ared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

26 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort risk

27 y of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk

28 from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommend lipid scr

29 (USPSTF) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendations in

30 2013, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released a clinical

31 g to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) risk assessment and

32 mption and proportion meeting targets of the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 continuous diet sc

33 The American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 Strategic Impact G

34 evidence-based scientific statement from the American Heart Association (AHA) and American Academy of

35 The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol management

36 The American Heart Association (AHA) commends the recently r

37 Despite a recent American Heart Association (AHA) consensus statement emp

38 The American Heart Association (AHA) defined a new concept,

39 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) guideline class I trigg

40 he 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend pr

41 The American Heart Association (AHA) has defined the concept

42 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have been developing cl

43 tween the consumption of foods that met 2014 American Heart Association (AHA) Heart-Check Food Certif

44 to each slice using methods consistent with American Heart Association (AHA) plaque classification s

45 American Heart Association (AHA) public policy advocacy

46 This American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement pr

47 The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Practice

48 can College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), American Heart Association (AHA), American Association f

49 d publications of abstracts presented at the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Ca

50 he American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and collaborating soci

51 joint American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and Heart Rhythm Socie

52 The American Heart Association (AHA), Institute of Medicine

53 ion (NYHA) functional classification and the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Car

54 complete or incomplete KD as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA); group II, treated for

55 Recent recommendations from the American Heart Association aim to improve cardiovascular

56 orce, comprising the World Heart Federation, American Heart Association, American College of Cardiolo

57 The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

58 meet statin treatment criteria under the new American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

59 The recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

60 The new American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

61 ed risk factor management (RFM) according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

62 Primary analyses will include adherence to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

63 Mediterranean diet as emphasized by the 2013 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

64 oagulation (OAC) was recommended in the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

65 ordant with 11 recommendations from the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

66 y of Cardiology guidelines compared with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiolog

67 Although the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Me

68 nes, care systems, and quality programs, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association i

69 The mission of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association i

70 palliative care interventions align with the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association m

71 The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association r

72 s adequate or inadequate BP control based on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association r

73 In February 2014, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association r

74 In addition, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association w

75 cardiovascular health of all Americans, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association w

76 ared the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2004 Adult Treatment Pane

77 In 2013, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardi

78 r Disease: 2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardi

79 The American Heart Association and American College of Cardi

80 ew of current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and American Stroke Associati

81 This observational study used data from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Associati

82 In a joint effort from the American Heart Association and American Thoracic Society

83 In a joint effort from the American Heart Association and American Thoracic Society

84 Authors were commissioned by the American Heart Association and included experts from gen

85 Institute public information, data from the American Heart Association and international organizatio

86 patients with acute coronary syndrome by the American Heart Association and other health organization

87 The American Heart Association and the American College of C

88 hite Award for Excellence in Teaching by the American Heart Association and the Distinguished Science

89 cation in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of C

90 elines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of C

91 ls for lowering the burden of CVD set by the American Heart Association and the Million Hearts Initia

92 e National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, and European Society of Card

93 The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Society for Cardiovascul

94 cardiovascular health (CVH), defined by the American Heart Association, and specific cardiovascular

95 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association appropriate use criteria reco

96 ines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, as well as those from the Ve

97 tion, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD Pooled Cohort Risk Equa

98 Adherence with 4 American Heart Association CAD, 2 HF, and 1 AF performan

99 mm (peak, 45.6 mm), suggesting that the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation

100 Furthermore, we studied the impact of 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation

101 than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease Pooled

102 The American Heart Association Cardiovascular Health (CVH) s

103 A higher American Heart Association cardiovascular health score (

104 The American Heart Association Cardiovascular Health score (

105 roves 24-hour survival compared with optimal American Heart Association care in a porcine model of as

106 ations by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines (Class

107 n of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines hinges

108 d in the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines to the

109 mplexity (American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association class A/B1 vs. B2/C).

110 ed to receive American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I guideline-recommended

111 ients with an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I indication (left vent

112 ients with an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I indication for each m

113 an American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Class I recommendation for pe

114 11 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Class IIa recommendation for

115 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of recommendat

116 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of recommendat

117 The American Heart Association classification system was use

118 Evidence was graded using the American Heart Association classification system.

119 fication (Cohen kappa test) according to the American Heart Association classification were performed

120 d, as are the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines.

121 Strict adherence to the American Heart Association conflict of interest policy w

122 ocardial infarction defined according to the American Heart Association criteria and treated accordin

123 Few patients met American Heart Association criteria for ideal activity (

124 not meet the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association criteria for initiating stati

125 ure >/=38.0 degrees C) for 3-10 days and met American Heart Association criteria for Kawasaki disease

126 viors and factors was estimated according to American Heart Association criteria for poor, intermedia

127 We then use existing American Heart Association criteria to assess the streng

128 ized as poor, intermediate, or ideal PA with American Heart Association criteria.

129 using histological analysis according to the American Heart Association criteria.

130 ed on the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association CVD prevention guidelines is

131 Age-specific American Heart Association-defined BP categories.

132 idence interval, 1.07-5.65; P=0.034) for the American Heart Association definition, 2.73 (95% confide

133 The prevalence of FH was 2.5% with the American Heart Association definition, 5.5% with the Sim

134 cal criteria according to 3 definitions: the American Heart Association definition, the Simon Broome

135 vascular Prevention & Rehabilitation and the American Heart Association developed a joint document wi

136 ed the hypothesis that adherence to the 2006 American Heart Association Diet and Lifestyle Recommenda

137 that reflect American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association disease-based guidelines.

138 Minnesota, since the publication of the 2007 American Heart Association endocarditis prevention guide

139 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association endorses statins for adults w

140 est compression depth of 51 mm with standard American Heart Association epinephrine dosing.

141 est compression depth of 33 mm with standard American Heart Association epinephrine dosing; or 3) Dep

142 National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association, European Regional Developmen

143 The American Heart Association Evidence-Based Scoring System

144 delines from the American Cancer Society and American Heart Association for disease prevention in rel

145 y the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for treatment recommendations

146 calls occurring on the general wards in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Medic

147 Using data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Strok

148 Using the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Strok

149 TS: Observational study, using data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Strok

150 he 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association Guideline (AHA) on the Treatm

151 tatins by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline but not taking them

152 greater than 20 mm Hg (BP care); or optimal American Heart Association Guideline care consisting of

153 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the treatment of

154 e tables and developed recommendations using American Heart Association guideline procedures and leve

155 ality and are American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommended.

156 posite use of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline-recommended therapi

157 tation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) Registry

158 ementation of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) registry

159 tation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) registry

160 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines advise waiting 5 t

161 per the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and 2016 U.S. Prev

162 rventions showed the highest compliance with American Heart Association guidelines but was not signif

163 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines define severe AS a

164 The "2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonar

165 This focused update to the American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonar

166 or in combination, improves compliance with American Heart Association guidelines for CPR that are a

167 13 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines for patients with

168 The American Heart Association guidelines for prevention of

169 d on the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for treatment of b

170 The 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for valvular heart

171 53.0% (79/149) felt current American Heart Association guidelines help them in decid

172 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines indicate that pati

173 Current American Heart Association guidelines recommend standard

174 Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend transfer

175 Although the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommended statin

176 nion from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines suggest holding an

177 The 2010 American Heart Association guidelines suggested an incre

178 eview, including 2 published after the "2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiop

179 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were more likely t

180 In 2007, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were revised for p

181 ecommended by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines).

182 METHODS AND To revise the previous American Heart Association guidelines, a multidisciplina

183 etermined per American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and subclinical c

184 d by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and use was defin

185 most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the new AUC for c

186 onals fail to perform CPR within established American Heart Association guidelines.

187 was based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

188 11 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines.

189 according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

190 We rated the level of evidence using the American Heart Association guidelines.

191 he American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines.

192 olated M2 segment occlusions as reflected in American Heart Association guidelines.

193 cardiovascular health of all Americans, the American Heart Association has a unique role in advocati

194 The American Heart Association has defined a new metric of i

195 The American Heart Association has defined ideal cardiovascu

196 ecently, national organizations, such as the American Heart Association, have focused on promoting by

197 , American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, Heart Failure Society of Ame

198 , American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, Heart Failure Society of Ame

199 prevalence of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association HF stages among older individ

200 ines indicate that patients without class I (American Heart Association high risk) or class II cardia

201 National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association, Howard Hughes Medical Instit

202 udy of awareness of CVD was conducted by the American Heart Association in 2012 among US women >25 ye

203 iovascular health as recently defined by the American Heart Association in young adulthood to middle

204 Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer.

205 the 2007 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association infective endocarditis (IE) g

206 The American Heart Association is committed to improving the

207 The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association issued the guideline on the b

208 can College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association jointly published their most

209 American Heart Association, Joseph Drown Foundation, and

210 diographic monitoring in accordance with the American Heart Association Level of Evidence grading alg

211 Evidence was graded using the American Heart Association level-of-evidence guidelines.

212 or American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology.

213 wed American Red Cross methods, 55% followed American Heart Association methods).

214 cular health in adulthood, as defined by the American Heart Association metrics.

215 elines, including those participating in the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline program fro

216 Analysis based on the 16-segment American Heart Association model was used to evaluate th

217 =2:1 in at least 1 of segments 4 to 6 of the American Heart Association model.

218 arris Poll Online (n=1227), similar to prior American Heart Association national surveys.

219 Metabolic syndrome, as defined by the American Heart Association / National Heart Lung Blood I

220 yndrome components were defined according to American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blo

221 s is the first scientific statement from the American Heart Association on acute myocardial infarctio

222 s is the first scientific statement from the American Heart Association on maternal resuscitation.

223 mes; (2) initiates a conversation within the American Heart Association on the impact of payment and

224 d into Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Heart Association/Pediatric Advanced Life Suppo

225 es, analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of American Heart Association peer review practices, and re

226 peer review practices, describes the current American Heart Association peer review process and those

227 the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equation for th

228 1.12) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations (for

229 Score (FRS), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort equations (PCEs

230 over the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations in pr

231 than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort risk equations

232 N to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohorts Equations for

233 We evaluated implementation of American Heart Association practice standards for ECG mo

234 This American Heart Association presidential advisory on diet

235 Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association primary prevention guidelines

236 The American Heart Association recently defined cardiovascul

237 The American Heart Association recently developed definition

238 The American Heart Association recommendations for adult bas

239 ECG screening criteria for RVH from the 2009 American Heart Association Recommendations for Standardi

240 for the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations on initiating

241 The American Heart Association recommends that children aged

242 astolic blood pressure (DBP) during CPR, the American Heart Association recommends using blood pressu

243 , the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released a clinical practice

244 from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, released in fall 2013, provi

245 herapy, and proportion of patients exceeding American Heart Association reperfusion time guidelines f

246 A writing group appointed by the American Heart Association reviewed the available litera

247 the results before and after 2007, when the American Heart Association revised their recommendations

248 ion aids, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Risk Estimator application as

249 of cardiovascular disease and hence meet the American Heart Association's 2020 goals.

250 The American Heart Association's 2020 Strategic Goals emphas

251 The American Heart Association's 2020 Strategic Impact Goals

252 The guideline supports the American Heart Association's 2020 Strategic Impact Goals

253 To examine the association between the American Heart Association's 7 metrics of ideal cardiova

254 To achieve this goal, the American Heart Association's Council on Cardiovascular D

255 This call to action, on behalf of the American Heart Association's Expert Panel on Payment and

256 er onset (n=50 798) from 2003 to 2011 in the American Heart Association's Get with the Guideline-Stro

257 Data from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines-Cor

258 We analyzed data from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Hea

259 From 2006 to 2010, within the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Res

260 total of 354 hospitals participating in the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Res

261 Using data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Res

262 their caregivers via a web-based portal (the American Heart Association's Heart360, a remote BP monit

263 The American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 initiative

264 The American Heart Association's national goals for cardiova

265 rget: Stroke Phase I, the first stage of the American Heart Association's national quality improvemen

266 nciples detailed in the document reflect the American Heart Association's new dynamic and proactive g

267 Writing group members were approved by the American Heart Association's Scientific Statement and Ma

268 Health Promotion and Disease Reduction: The American Heart Association's Strategic Impact Goal Throu

269 This American Heart Association science advisory reviews the

270 This American Heart Association scientific statement highligh

271 This American Heart Association scientific statement reviews

272 For this American Heart Association scientific statement, the wri

273 METHODS AND For this American Heart Association scientific statement, the wri

274 For this American Heart Association scientific statement, the wri

275 Standard American Heart Association segment-based strain analysis

276 vidence supports the recommendation that the American Heart Association should elevate depression to

277 d delivery system reform, as well as how the American Heart Association should engage in the interest

278 antial revision to the Jones criteria by the American Heart Association since 1992 and the first appl

279 Hospitals will be recruited by regional American Heart Association staff and key stakeholders.

280 sing both the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage and New York Heart Asso

281 y of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association statin eligibility criteria t

282 The American Heart Association supports an association betwe

283 11 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force Guideline for the

284 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force have published new

285 effect, according to the guidelines from the American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidel

286 effect, according to the guidelines from the American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidel

287 2014 atrial fibrillation guideline from the American Heart Association, the American College of Card

288 F by adapting a methodology developed by the American Heart Association to project the epidemiology a

289 is organized and classified according to the American Heart Association to provide specific suggestio

290 eloped by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association to the Jones criteria.

291 nt and other funding agencies, including the American Heart Association, to begin supporting and prio

292 eration, both of which were developed by the American Heart Association under the auspices of the Com

293 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association updated cholesterol guideline

294 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, American Heart Association, US National Heart, Lung, and

295 ssions guided to 33 mm or 51 mm and standard American Heart Association vasopressor dosing.

296 al, intermediate, and poor CVH as defined by American Heart Association was estimated for each of 4 a

297 American Heart Association Western States Affiliate, Nat

298 Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association," which published ahead of pr

299 ke Statistics-2015 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association," which published online Dece

300 of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/World Health Federation Task