ライフサイエンスコーパス: Arrhenius

1 Arrhenius activation parameters for the aldol addition r

2 Arrhenius analyses of the rate constants of opening free

3 Arrhenius analysis demonstrated that in the mutants fewe

4 Arrhenius analysis of the data gives similar activation

5 Arrhenius analysis of the temperature dependent excited

6 Arrhenius analysis of the turbidity data reveals two kin

7 Arrhenius analysis reveals two kinetic phases, a slower

8 Arrhenius analysis shows that 1 M NaCl stabilizes the di

9 Arrhenius behavior of the forward and anti-Arrhenius beh

10 Arrhenius behavior was observed, with activation energie

11 Arrhenius plots for the uncatalyzed deamination of cytos

12 Arrhenius plots of the ratio of hydrogens exchanged at 5

13 Arrhenius pre-exponential factors and activation energie

14 Arrhenius rate expressions were determined for beta-scis

15 Arrhenius rate expressions were determined for the abstr

16 Arrhenius-type plots of PIEs on protonation of 4-MeO-1 a

17 determined to be E(a) = 25 +/- 7 kJ mol(-1) (Arrhenius equation), DeltaH(double dagger) = 23 +/- 7 kJ

18 same linear relation on an lnk versus T(-1) (Arrhenius) plot.

19 k(i)(T) (i = 1,2) calculated from the above Arrhenius expressions have estimated accuracies of +/- 1

20 ndent, while above 2.5 K thermally activated Arrhenius behavior is apparent with U(eff) = 21(1) cm(-1

21 (down to ca. 77 K), the thermally activated (Arrhenius) ET process dissipates revealing a tunneling m

22 es (down to ~77 K), the thermally activated (Arrhenius) ET process dissipates, and the ET rates becom

23 rements on beta-1b and beta-1a have afforded Arrhenius activation energies of 8.3 and 19.6 kcal mol(-

24 An Arrhenius analysis of diffusion constants was also carri

25 An Arrhenius analysis of these lifetimes from 1150 to 1320

26 An Arrhenius function for reaction of the Cp2Ti(III)Cl-H2O

27 An Arrhenius plot was constructed from the k(cat) values an

28 An Arrhenius plot was constructed from the kcat values and

29 An Arrhenius-type equation was applied to determine the act

30 An Arrhenius-type relationship is used to simultaneously an

31 In addition, an Arrhenius plot was constructed from k(cat) values measur

32 b) were measured in various solvents, and an Arrhenius function for reaction of 5a in THF was determi

33 utyldodecyl radical (1) were studied, and an Arrhenius function over the temperature range -20 to 47

34 nd a van't Hoff plot for complexation and an Arrhenius plot for the oxidation reaction were construct

35 Since CtNHase is stable to 25 degrees C, an Arrhenius plot was constructed by plotting ln( k cat) vs

36 ecause PtNHase is stable at 60 degrees C, an Arrhenius plot was constructed by plotting ln(k(cat)) ve

37 1 K were collected and used to construct an Arrhenius plot that revealed temperature-independent rel

38 ectron spin resonance spectra and display an Arrhenius temperature dependence.

39 ps to the carbamate linkages and exhibits an Arrhenius activation energy of 111 +/- 10 kJ/mol, which

40 The slow relaxation time exhibits an Arrhenius behavior with no signs of criticality, demonst

41 gly dependent upon temperature, featuring an Arrhenius relationship.

42 Instead, they follow an Arrhenius-like behavior, commonly used to describe secon

43 obile surface liquid layer, which follows an Arrhenius dynamic and is able to dominate the flow in th

44 gh temperature viscoelastic phase follows an Arrhenius law and depends significantly on the salt cont

45 COF-5 formation follows an Arrhenius temperature dependence between 60-90 degrees C

46 ence of elementary noise events, we found an Arrhenius activation energy E(a) of 25 +/- 7 kcal/mol (m

47 the preexponential factors obtained from an Arrhenius analysis of the rate constant versus temperatu

48 r folding of these peptides obtained from an Arrhenius analysis of the rates imply a primarily entrop

49 preexponential factors (An) obtained from an Arrhenius analysis of the unsubstituted OPE k(n)0 versus

50 reement with the value of D inferred from an Arrhenius plot of the magnetic relaxation time versus th

51 of parent radical 3a (aryl = phenyl) gave an Arrhenius function with log k = 9.2 - 4.4/2.3RT (kcal/mo

52 r in glycine) have very similar slopes in an Arrhenius plot of the unfolding rates but very different

53 -line temperature measurements and use of an Arrhenius model for the estimated rate constant gave sig

54 to a semiclassical model based solely on an Arrhenius prefactor ratio.

55 They can be approximated by a Ferry or an Arrhenius relation, are much reduced or absent in dehydr

56 erature for all chain lengths, permitting an Arrhenius analysis.

57 The dynamic annealing rate shows an Arrhenius dependence with two well-defined activation en

58 This corresponds to an Arrhenius factor that decreases from approximately 45 k(

59 degrees C, the rate constants fit well to an Arrhenius straight line with, however, an unexpectedly l

60 We used an Arrhenius-type model (Q10) to describe how the rate of a

61 urfaces are traditionally described using an Arrhenius equation with energy barrier and pre-exponenti

62 ing is highly temperature sensitive, with an Arrhenius activation energy 2-3-fold greater than other

63 e availability and microbial biomass with an Arrhenius-type nonlinear temperature response function.

64 The ionic conductivity and Arrhenius activation energy were explored for the LiOH-L

65 Absolute rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for hydrogen abstractions (from car

66 The rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for reactions of 3b indicated that

67 R was employed to measure rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for their dissociation to CO2 and m

68 de of the KIEs is temperature dependent, and Arrhenius analysis of the rate constants reveals that de

69 Eyring and Arrhenius analyses yield Delta H++ = 12.9 (4) kcal.mol (

70 rmined at 0.2 mM according to the Eyring and Arrhenius formalisms suggested that the quantum mechanic

71 Eyring and Arrhenius parameters were determined for the thermal clo

72 llowing reaction kinetics to be followed and Arrhenius activation energies (E(a)) to be measured.

73 The scan rate dependence of T(m) and Arrhenius analysis of the kinetic data suggest an activa

74 have essentially the same reaction order and Arrhenius apparent activation energies (28 kJ/mol).

75 Arrhenius behavior of the forward and anti-Arrhenius behavior of the reverse rate constant is a kin

76 This apparent anti-Arrhenius behavior was caused by a decrease in the surfa

77 When protein folding follows anti-Arrhenius kinetics, we observe a speed limit for the num

78 and k(obs,f) correspond to the same apparent Arrhenius prefactor and activation energy (logA(app,f) (

79 ield of 1 kOe, tau more closely approximates Arrhenius behavior over the entire temperature range.

80 and unfolding pathways, activation barriers, Arrhenius plots, and rate-limiting steps lead to several

81 eds what is predicted from temperature-based Arrhenius calculations.

82 l pressures, the predicted viscosity becomes Arrhenius with a single temperature-independent activati

83 f PhCCl or F5-PhCCl to 1-hexene gave bimodal Arrhenius correlations.

84 The bimodal Arrhenius behavior is proposed to result from carbene-al

85 Here we use the Boltzmann-Arrhenius equation, published estimates of activation en

86 veals that 87% are fit well by the Boltzmann-Arrhenius model.

87 chanism of ATP hydrolysis can be achieved by Arrhenius analysis.

88 ships established more than 100 years ago by Arrhenius.

89 sis of Ru(2)(D(3,5-Cl(2))PhF)(4)N(3), and by Arrhenius/Eyring analysis of the conversion of Ru(2)(DPh

90 dependence on temperature well described by Arrhenius kinetics.

91 eavage and trans-splicing were determined by Arrhenius plots to be 12.5 and 8.9 kcal/mol, respectivel

92 barrier for thermal relaxation was found by Arrhenius plot analysis to be approximately 71 kJ/mol, s

93 33 degrees C from 167.7 to 201.6 degrees C, Arrhenius parameters, Ea = 32.8 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1) and

94 Above 35 degrees C, Arrhenius plots of diffusion were parallel for CLSE and

95 ustrates a novel adaptation of the classical Arrhenius equation that accounts for the microscopic ori

96 xception of two carbene/alkene combinations, Arrhenius correlations of ln kaddn vs 1/T were unimodal

97 vation energy (E(a)) and abolish the concave Arrhenius plot normally seen for Schiff base hydrolysis

98 Reaction rate constants, Arrhenius constants, and activation energies have been d

99 ay studies, and these were used to construct Arrhenius plots from which was obtained the effective ba

100 racterized by non-Arrhenius and conventional Arrhenius-type DW motions.

101 successful model of a reaction with a convex Arrhenius plot should be consistent with the microcanoni

102 The convex Arrhenius curves previously reported for ht-ADH are prop

103 Because of curved Arrhenius plots and negative E(X) values, empirical stru

104 type, weakly activated transport with curved Arrhenius plots, a room-temperature resistivity of ~1 Om

105 mined by competition methods and demonstrate Arrhenius parameters typical of rearrangements of this k

106 elaxation displayed a temperature-dependent, Arrhenius-like kinetics, suggestive of the crossing of a

107 8 degrees C, on extrapolation by the derived Arrhenius equation, lead to 8-14 at 25 degrees C.

108 tion water with 100-200 ps dynamics displays Arrhenius behavior and does not undergo a phase transiti

109 nformation, such as kinetic solvent effects, Arrhenius parameters, and kinetic isotope effects.

110 To this end, Arrhenius parameters were measured for dissociation of g

111 is observed has enabled us to fit the entire Arrhenius curve simultaneously to three distinct relaxat

112 endency of the methane production to extract Arrhenius parameters for the failure modes of PDMS.

113 luoride, chloride, nitrate, and nitrite face Arrhenius energy barriers during transport through nanof

114 below 100 degrees C, facilitating the first Arrhenius analysis of HDL denaturation by circular dichr

115 ture dependency of relaxation times followed Arrhenius kinetics as temperatures decreased well below

116 ontaneous but thermally activated, following Arrhenius behavior over a broad experimental temperature

117 pressure independent and gave the following Arrhenius equation: log[(k/(cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1))] =

118 drogenases (ht-ADH), presenting evidence for Arrhenius prefactor values that become enormously elevat

119 yeast cytoplasmic dynein showed a break from Arrhenius behavior at a lower temperature ( approximatel

120 ent activation energies were determined from Arrhenius analyses.

121 ermal reversion of 2Q-4Q, as determined from Arrhenius and Eyring plots, are found to correlate nicel

122 nt relaxation and coercivity, deviation from Arrhenius behaviour and blocking of the relaxation, domi

123 activation energy of 0.35 eV extracted from Arrhenius plots of resistance versus temperature.

124 The activation barriers obtained from Arrhenius plots are significantly less than anticipated

125 opposes proton surface-to-bulk release from Arrhenius plots of (i) protons' surface diffusion consta

126 ogen shift in alkyl radicals are compiled in Arrhenius format for x = 2-5.

127 With curvature in Arrhenius plots being one of the three types of experime

128 al procedure for estimating uncertainties in Arrhenius parameters based on a small number of rate con

129 and has a very large temperature-independent Arrhenius activation energy [E(act)(2)= 34(+/-2)kcal].

130 Individual Arrhenius plots, obtained at intervals between pH 4.8 an

131 83 degrees C for both mAbs and divided into "Arrhenius" and "Stochastic" regimes.

132 a strong temperature dependence with inverse Arrhenius behavior and a temperature-dependent enthalpy

133 ependence turns particle dominated, that is, Arrhenius-like, when the silica loading increases to app

134 rogen transfer reactions displaying isotopic Arrhenius prefactor ratios (A(H)/A(D)) of unity are gene

135 28 degrees C, but at the extremities of its Arrhenius growth profile, namely -2.5 degrees C and 39 d

136 mary deuterium kinetic isotope effect on its Arrhenius activation energy (DeltaGTS), where DeltaGTS f

137 The large Arrhenius factor at low temperature comes about from the

138 iscerning any deviation from a straight-line Arrhenius plot: Ea = 28.7 +/- 0.5 (kcal mol(-1)) and log

139 A linear Arrhenius plot of kcat/KM versus 1/T gives the activatio

140 temperature and are characterized by linear Arrhenius plots with activation energies of 27.0 +/- 1.5

141 translocation exhibited a completely linear Arrhenius function with an activation energy of 35.2 kJ

142 or = T < or = 207 K obeys a different linear Arrhenius relation (logA(app,s) (s(-1)) = 13.9, E(a,app,

143 GSL net transfer were determined from linear Arrhenius and van't Hoff plots, respectively.

144 center, calculations predict a nearly linear Arrhenius plot for the KIE--even with the inclusion of a

145 ween 23 and 35 degrees C, we obtained linear Arrhenius relationships for the turnover rate of hydroly

146 d unusual activation parameters, with linear Arrhenius and Eyring plots over an exceptionally wide te

147 w parallels in insights gleaned from linking Arrhenius and Michaelis-Menten kinetics for both photosy

148 tivated hopping rate with an anomalously low Arrhenius prefactor that we interpret as tunneling from

149 rent kinetic isotope effect, and has a lower Arrhenius activation energy than does ABLM decay.

150 At lower temperatures, the measured Arrhenius parameters become more normal: Ea = 22 +/- 2 k

151 Three models (Arrhenius, Eyring and Ball) were used to assess the temp

152 was used to develop a single enzyme molecule Arrhenius plot, from which the activation energy of the

153 Non-Arrhenius behavior arises because the number of base pai

154 Non-Arrhenius diffusion behavior is observed in the undercoo

155 trapping in misfolded conformations, and non-Arrhenius folding rates.

156 istinct dynamic regimes characterized by non-Arrhenius and conventional Arrhenius-type DW motions.

157 The kinetics demonstrate non-Arrhenius behaviour, in agreement with DNA hybridization

158 We observe rotational state-dependent non-Arrhenius universal scaling laws in chemi-ionization rea

159 lecular rate constants showed distinctly non-Arrhenius behavior (i.e., essentially no increase with t

160 re dynamically heterogeneous and exhibit non-Arrhenius relaxation.

161 GrpE, an inherent thermosensor, exhibits non-Arrhenius behavior with respect to its nucleotide exchan

162 ix-to-coil transition, and GrpE exhibits non-Arrhenius behavior with respect to its nucleotide exchan

163 vity is frequency dependent and exhibits non-Arrhenius behavior.

164 au(Q) displays a dynamic cross-over from non-Arrhenius behavior for T > T (W) to Arrhenius behavior f

165 The k(on) values are generally non-Arrhenius, tending to increase with decreasing temperatu

166 Together, these variants link non-Arrhenius behavior to specific alteration of an H-bondin

167 ) equation is adopted for describing the non-Arrhenius behavior observed in the undercooled liquid.

168 This non-Arrhenius rate law is a result of a strong, approximatel

169 (LUMO) energy levels; that gives rise to non-Arrhenius temperature dependence of the conductance, aff

170 acter litoralis HTCC2594, reveals unique non-Arrhenius behavior in the rate of dark-state cleavage of

171 come through the observation of a nonlinear Arrhenius plot for the CH4 oxidation, presumably due to

172 tein ET decreases strongly, with a nonlinear Arrhenius plot.

173 In addition, the nonlinear Arrhenius plots are explained by the change in heat capa

174 -dependent ET rate constants, with nonlinear Arrhenius plots, but we find that ET is gated across the

175 Restoration of normal Arrhenius behavior in the ht-ADH reaction occurs at elev

176 erature-dependent studies are used to obtain Arrhenius activation parameters for each step of the mec

177 termination of reaction rate constant and of Arrhenius plot) are illustrated with two examples.

178 ular dynamics simulations and computation of Arrhenius plots.

179 Determination of Arrhenius activation parameters revealed that aldol addi

180 Moreover, the wide range of Arrhenius prefactors (10(9) to 10(11) s(-1)) observed fo

181 KIE, tunneling is suggested by the ratio of Arrhenius pre-exponential factors, log(A(4H)/A(4D)) = -0

182 n energies were determined from the slope of Arrhenius plots.

183 ers between species are reported in terms of Arrhenius E(a) and log A values along with differences i

184 range of temperatures, permitting the use of Arrhenius plots to estimate activation enthalpies and en

185 showed a biphasic temperature dependence on Arrhenius plots.

186 trated here by calculation of high-precision Arrhenius plots and thermodynamic activation parameters

187 The isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors for the intrinsic KIEs were A(H)/A(T)

188 large isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors, and a significant energy of activatio

189 Isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors, and the activation energy, could be r

190 c data over a range of temperatures provided Arrhenius activation energies (DeltaH(double dagger)) an

191 most of the film, while the other is purely Arrhenius, does not depend on local structure, and is st

192 he highest ionic conductivity and reasonable Arrhenius activation energy.

193 lection rules, are the source of the reduced Arrhenius prefactors associated with CO binding in Mb an

194 ntaining 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, and several Arrhenius functions were determined.

195 rgely unaffected by the abasic site, showing Arrhenius-type behavior with an activation energy of app

196 ian kinesin-1, exhibited a break from simple Arrhenius behavior below 15 degrees C-just above the res

197 ts an explanation for the similar steep, sub-Arrhenius temperature-velocity curves observed in many m

198 Subsequent Arrhenius analysis of the TrIQ data suggests that, both

199 temperature range, k(obs,s) displays a super-Arrhenius increase with increasing temperature.

200 r dynamics is described by the general super-Arrhenius relation.

201 s III is observed at T > 200 K; it has super-Arrhenius temperature dependence and closely follows the

202 ximately 10(-8) Pa, G(T) and D(T) have super-Arrhenius ("fragile") temperature dependences, but both

203 Surprisingly, Arrhenius analysis indicates that the activation energie

204 e roll-over behavior in the rate-temperature Arrhenius plot.

205 The Arrhenius activation energies for binding of the two mRN

206 The Arrhenius activation energies for the dimerization of My

207 The Arrhenius activation energy for the (1)H-substrate radic

208 The Arrhenius dependence attenuates at high temperature due

209 The Arrhenius plot for mutant A86L was apparently biphasic w

210 The Arrhenius plot for proton transfer in the SS channel in

211 The Arrhenius plot for the IC50 is linear with a slope = -80

212 The Arrhenius plot of the adsorption/desorption rate constan

213 The Arrhenius plots show strong curvature, and hence require

214 The Arrhenius prefactor for CO binding to ChCooA and protohe

215 The Arrhenius regimes comprise two thermal regimes whose bre

216 to determine the orders of reaction and the Arrhenius activation energy of polymerization.

217 derived from H-B relation parameters and the Arrhenius equation was applied to describe changes in co

218 emperature is 4 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1), and the Arrhenius function displayed an entropic term (log A ter

219 r this isomerization was determined, and the Arrhenius plots give the activation enthalpy and entropy

220 ith temperature and formulations such as the Arrhenius equation are widely used in earth system model

221 t migration rate could be represented by the Arrhenius equation and therefore can be controlled by th

222 omplicated and could not be explained by the Arrhenius equation.

223 f anthocyanin degradation was modeled by the Arrhenius equation.

224 This is further supported by the Arrhenius-like temperature dependence of the relaxation

225 The resistivity displays the Arrhenius-type activated behavior expected for a semicon

226 Following the Arrhenius model, activation energies were ranged from 51

227 ngly with temperature, closely following the Arrhenius rate law.

228 The OH reaction rate coefficient follows the Arrhenius trend (280-358 K) and could be modeled through

229 The experimental results from the Arrhenius and the kinetic isotope effect studies allowed

230 phase transformation was determined from the Arrhenius expression to be 152 +/- 60 kJ/mol.

231 e activation energy results derived from the Arrhenius plot as well as the NMR spectroscopy data.

232 From the Arrhenius plot for the reactions with p-xylene and p-xyl

233 From the Arrhenius plot of the kinetic isotope effect, the ratio

234 From the Arrhenius plot of the kinetic isotope effect, the ratio

235 ere we present a theory that generalizes the Arrhenius equation to include static disorder of conform

236 However, the Arrhenius activation energy (E(a)) for VCOP derived from

237 ncrease in the thermal energy (k(B)T) in the Arrhenius equation.

238 ther than CH4 fail to exhibit a break in the Arrhenius plot because binding is always rate limiting i

239 that it is possible to induce a break in the Arrhenius plot for the ethane reaction with Q by using a

240 his conclusion by observing curvature in the Arrhenius plot for the rearrangement of 2c.

241 These results and a curvature in the Arrhenius plot of the isotope effects support the recent

242 ic analysis exhibited discontinuities in the Arrhenius plots, distinguishing the unfolding and aggreg

243 is seen at approximately 35 degrees C in the Arrhenius plots.

244 ity is well described by a difference in the Arrhenius pre-exponential factor rather than a change in

245 f flip-flop manifested as an increase in the Arrhenius preexponential factor.

246 tended to reliably predict prefactors in the Arrhenius rate constant for surface reactions involving

247 transport, the G185V enzyme has lowered the Arrhenius activation energy of the transport rate-limiti

248 of the rate constants was found to obey the Arrhenius law in a temperature range of 5-50 degrees C u

249 a two-state Markovian process that obeys the Arrhenius equation.

250 he ht-W87A mutation results in a loss of the Arrhenius break seen at 30 degrees C for the wild-type e

251 Among bacteria, the prefactor A of the Arrhenius dependence unexpectedly varied exponentially w

252 A fit of the Arrhenius plot data gave E(a) = 15.3 kcal mol(-1).

253 The slopes of the Arrhenius plots for CLSE were steeper below 35 degrees C

254 Linearity of the Arrhenius plots indicated that the same rate-limiting st

255 y values were derived from the slopes of the Arrhenius plots of logarithmic mobility vs reciprocal ab

256 A comparison of the Arrhenius plots of the activities of kumamolisin-As with

257 folding landscape, and the magnitude of the Arrhenius prefactor for protein folding.

258 ts of adsorption entropy and enthalpy on the Arrhenius parameters are discussed.

259 lated variant display isotope effects on the Arrhenius prefactor that are similar (A(D)/A(T) = 0.55-0

260 t al. presented evidence that the KIE on the Arrhenius prefactor varied as a function of protein modi

261 ificant effect on the unfolding rates or the Arrhenius activation energy of the disk denaturation, E(

262 eases the ethane binding rate and shifts the Arrhenius breakpoint into the observable temperature ran

263 a certain threshold temperature and that the Arrhenius activation energy is of the order of 90 kJ mol

264 unusual temperature dependence such that the Arrhenius prefactor KIEs (AH/AD) fall outside of the sem

265 At the same time, the Arrhenius plot of 15 kGy irradiated bones evidenced two

266 s time decay data, and these were fit to the Arrhenius equation to give the effective barrier to rela

267 out-of-phase magnetic susceptibility to the Arrhenius equation yields an effective energy barrier, U

268 be described with an equation similar to the Arrhenius equation.

269 action at elevated temperatures and used the Arrhenius equation to extrapolate the results to room te

270 surrounding cavitation bubbles and using the Arrhenius equation, an effective mean temperature of 340

271 ependent Phia values were analyzed using the Arrhenius equation.

272 onditions by first order kinetics, using the Arrhenius equation.

273 ium triflate, 17e, were calculated using the Arrhenius equation: E(a) = 26.8 kcal/mol, Delta H(++) =

274 s to 37 degrees C was surprisingly weak: the Arrhenius activation energy Ea was only 14 kcal mol(-1)

275 the N[symbol: see text]N distance, while the Arrhenius prefactor indicates that the electron transfer

276 y on binding enthalpy, in agreement with the Arrhenius equation.

277 ve reaction rate constants complied with the Arrhenius equation.

278 st exactly by the yields calculated with the Arrhenius equation.

279 The large KIE(real), along with the Arrhenius parameters, are indicative of extensive tunnel

280 robes at those depths is consistent with the Arrhenius relation for rates found earlier for microbes

281 To remedy this, Arrhenius plots for 14 type species of the family were g

282 ase the rate of dechlorination, according to Arrhenius' equation, and increase the rate of TCE desorp

283 ompensates for the decrease in period due to Arrhenius scaling of the reaction rates.

284 of DNA translocation rates can be fitted to Arrhenius kinetics.

285 s vary with temperature and can be fitted to Arrhenius kinetics.

286 perature dependences, but both cross over to Arrhenius ("strong") behavior with a large activation en

287 The transition from VTF to Arrhenius kinetics occurred between approximately 5 and

288 from non-Arrhenius behavior for T > T (W) to Arrhenius behavior for T < T (W), where T (W) denotes th

289 nal transition state theory, the traditional Arrhenius picture of activation energy as a single point

290 The unusual Arrhenius plots of the very fastest mutant provide an ad

291 The widely used Arrhenius equation describes the kinetics of simple two-

292 range between 65 and 90 degrees C and using Arrhenius plots, to be 96.8 +/- 1.6 kJ mol(-1) (23.1 kca

293 ed in the range of 35 to 60 degrees C, using Arrhenius equation, was determined to be 11.32 kcal mol(

294 h those previously determined at 325 K using Arrhenius analysis.

295 erature regime (T > approximately 3 K) where Arrhenius behavior dominates the relaxation processes, l

296 l for 1 and (4.1 +/- 0.5) kJ/mol for 2, with Arrhenius prefactors of (1.48 +/- 0.04) x 10(8) s(-1) fo

297 influenced by temperature in accordance with Arrhenius law.

298 Our predictions agree with Arrhenius activation energies from experiments using pho

299 versus 1/T in CF(2)ClCFCl(2) is linear with Arrhenius parameters E(a) = 10.9 +/- 0.8 kJ/mol and A =

300 he first step is rate-determining and yields Arrhenius barriers that are lower for dimers (114 kJ/mol