ライフサイエンスコーパス: B. thuringiensis

1 B. thuringiensis is the most used MCA for control of lep

2 oral administration of antibiotics abolished B. thuringiensis insecticidal activity, and reestablishm

3 trains (B. cereus type strain ATCC 14579 and B. thuringiensis strains) lacked Gal and contained N-ace

4 uringiensis subsp. israelensis (ONR-60A) and B. thuringiensis subsp. morrisoni (PG-14) pathogenic for

5 B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis are readily distinguished from B. cereu

6 unclear whether B. cereus, B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis are varieties of the same species or di

7 smid-borne specific toxins (B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis) and capsule (B. anthracis).

8 gens, including B. cereus, B. anthracis, and B. thuringiensis.

9 roup, including B. cereus, B. anthracis, and B. thuringiensis.

10 gene is strongly expressed in B. cereus and B. thuringiensis and weakly expressed in B. anthracis.

11 phic fragments) indicates that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis are the closest taxa to B. anthracis, w

12 Transcription of the B. cereus and B. thuringiensis CDC genes is controlled by PlcR, a tran

13 Even though B. cereus and B. thuringiensis contain the ppk and ppx genes, none of

14 ity, environmental isolates of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis exhibit extensive genetic diversity.

15 rt the proposed unification of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis into one species.

16 B. cereus and B. thuringiensis sigP and rsiP homologues are required f

17 vealed several closely related B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains that carry sap genes with very

18 B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, species closely related to B. anthraci

19 genotype Bacillus anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis isolates.

20 elected several B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis strains and compared their cell wall ca

21 transcribed in B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis.

22 present in both B. cereus 43881 (341 kb) and B. thuringiensis ATCC 33679 (327 kb) that hybridized wit

23 B. anthracis, Y. pestis, Vaccinia virus, and B. thuringiensis kurstaki.

24 ene beads, gram-positive Bacillus anthracis, B. thuringiensis, and B. atrophaeus spores, and B. cereu

25 Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis such as B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (ONR-60A) and B. thu

26 arity of natural disease outbreaks caused by B. thuringiensis.

27 gans characterized to date, the infection by B. thuringiensis shows dose-dependency based on bacteria

28 ) mutants to the Cry5B crystal toxin made by B. thuringiensis.

29 cement of host larvae mortality triggered by B. thuringiensis and a Cry toxin.

30 on similar to those in lepidopteran cadherin B. thuringiensis receptors.

31 ithin a collection of over 300 of B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. anthracis isolates, appear clos

32 pectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range o

33 ents from the exosporium of Bacillus cereus, B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis strains and identified

34 with the nonmotile/quorum-sensing-deficient B. thuringiensis strain, with approximately 90% retinal

35 Co-culturing of Cry5B-expressing B. thuringiensis with B. anthracis can result in lethal

36 ix BA strains (four virulent isolates), five B. thuringiensis (BT) isolates, and one isolate each for

37 roposed HevCaLP as a shared binding site for B. thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1A and Cry1Fa toxins in the mid

38 thod to two closely related toxin genes from B. thuringiensis and created chimeras with differing pro

39 gene, a homologue of vip3A(a) isolated from B. thuringiensis strain AB424 is also reported.

40 from spores of B. subtilis 168, B. globigii, B. thuringiensis subs.

41 re mixtures of B. subtilis 168, B. globigii, B. thuringiensis subs.

42 nomes of two members of the B. cereus group, B. thuringiensis 97-27 subsp. konkukian serotype H34, is

43 is known that the Bt152 gene is expressed in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, we disrupted its fu

44 ortant contribution of host enteric flora in B. thuringiensis-killing activity and provide a sound fo

45 ufficient to replicate a reporter plasmid in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis when ORF156 and ORF1

46 Here we study the effect of Cry proteins in B. thuringiensis pathogenesis of the nematode Caenorhabd

47 this can explain why QS cheaters are rare in B. thuringiensis and its relatives.

48 R spectroscopy and mass spectrometry that in B. thuringiensis, the enzymatic product of Pen and Pal,

49 regulator of secreted enzymes and toxins in B. thuringiensis.

50 nsecticidal protein is the most active known B. thuringiensis toxin against the forest insect pest Ly

51 18 hours after infection, whereas nonmotile B. thuringiensis infections required 30 hours to achieve

52 The defining characteristic of B. thuringiensis that sets it apart from B. cereus and B

53 n of B. sphaericus and to Cry35 and Cry36 of B. thuringiensis, none of which require interaction with

54 quantities of CytA, a cytolytic endotoxin of B. thuringiensis.

55 Surprisingly, the killing mechanism of B. thuringiensis remains controversial.

56 of Bt152, a protein coded for by pBtoxis of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, the plasmid that en

57 x of the seven subgroups and the presence of B. thuringiensis strains in three of the subgroups do no

58 t the finished, annotated genome sequence of B. thuringiensis Al Hakam, which was collected in Iraq b

59 Whole-genome sequencing of B. thuringiensis 97-27and B. cereus E33L was undertaken

60 s, 27 strains of B. cereus, and 9 strains of B. thuringiensis.

61 acycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate cat

62 roximately 100 CFU of wild-type B. cereus or B. thuringiensis or a plcR-deficient mutant.

63 Expression of the B. cereus or B. thuringiensis sigP and rsiP genes in a B. anthracis s

64 thelial cells, which leads to starvation, or B. thuringiensis septicemia.

65 trains, numerous B. cereus strains, and rare B. thuringiensis strains, while clade 2 included the maj

66 s in the midgut microbial community restored B. thuringiensis-mediated killing.

67 A single B. thuringiensis spore was optically trapped in a focuse

68 Strains from some B. thuringiensis serovars were wholly or largely assigne

69 used to discriminate Bacillus spore species, B. thuringiensis and B. atrophaeus, in our previous stud

70 y to distinguish two Bacillus spore species, B. thuringiensis and B.atrophaeus, from one another very

71 Our results demonstrate that B. thuringiensis-induced mortality depends on enteric ba

72 behind this classification is the fact that B. thuringiensis is found in high numbers in environment

73 Here, we report that B. thuringiensis does not kill larvae of the gypsy moth

74 The B. thuringiensis gene encoding E2 was cloned, and the pu

75 s engineered with the cry genes encoding the B. thuringiensis crystal proteins are the most widely cu

76 Thirty-nucleotide segments in the B. thuringiensis cry1Ac1 gene, encoding parts of helix a

77 Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline

78 , while clade 2 included the majority of the B. thuringiensis strains together with some B. cereus st

79 Escherichia coli engineered to produce the B. thuringiensis insecticidal toxin killed gypsy moth la

80 Unlike the B. thuringiensis 5-endotoxins, whose expression is restr

81 igh populations in hemolymph, in contrast to B. thuringiensis, which appeared to die in hemolymph.

82 Infection with wild type B. thuringiensis resulted in complete retinal function l

83 e significantly less virulent than wild-type B. thuringiensis.

84 We find that whereas B. thuringiensis on its own is not able to infect C. ele