ライフサイエンスコーパス: Brassicaceae

1 wild population of Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae).

2 ) preceded the diversification of crucifers (Brassicaceae).

3 lier, inbreeding, colonizer Cakile edentula (Brassicaceae).

4 selenium (Se) hyperaccumulation in Stanleya (Brassicaceae).

5 and conserved in SARD1 orthologs within the Brassicaceae.

6 fferent degrees of diploidization across the Brassicaceae.

7 ly of cytochrome P450 enzymes is specific to Brassicaceae.

8 have marked the evolutionary history of the Brassicaceae.

9 and signaling events that underlie SI in the Brassicaceae.

10 tbreeding mode of sexual reproduction in the Brassicaceae.

11 Cleomaceae is the family closest to Brassicaceae.

12 imary dormancy induction mechanism(s) in the Brassicaceae.

13 he self-pollen rejection response within the Brassicaceae.

14 the second intron of AG orthologs throughout Brassicaceae.

15 large sesterterpene repertoire in the wider Brassicaceae.

16 era stricta, but not in less closely related Brassicaceae.

17 belongs to one such group, the plant family Brassicaceae.

18 y contribute to reproductive barriers in the Brassicaceae.

19 giosperm lineages, including the Poaceae and Brassicaceae.

20 some that are specific to Arabidopsis or the Brassicaceae.

21 in the self-incompatibility response of the Brassicaceae.

22 death and defense across the Solanaceae and Brassicaceae.

23 the diversification of plant architecture in Brassicaceae.

24 lyses indicated that the BPEPs are unique to Brassicaceae.

25 romosome regions in 21 species of the family Brassicaceae.

26 n that differs from the ancestral one in the Brassicaceae.

27 activity between members of the Poaceae and Brassicaceae.

28 in Arabidopsis and some other members of the Brassicaceae.

29 nent of the extracellular pollen coat in the Brassicaceae.

30 ated in Arabidopsis and other members of the Brassicaceae.

31 ng oleosin-like proteins is described in the Brassicaceae.

32 hock on genomic components of Brassica nigra Brassicaceae.

33 e been conserved during the evolution of the Brassicaceae.

34 of new LD organelles, such as tapetosomes in Brassicaceae.

35 udied POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX2 (PRC2) in Brassicaceae.

36 c), the causal agent of black rot disease of Brassicaceae.

37 nctional divergence of the PRC2 complexes in Brassicaceae.

38 ration of seed dormancy functions across the Brassicaceae.

39 lready present early in the evolution of the Brassicaceae.

40 species, Plutella xylostella, which feeds on Brassicaceae.

41 rgoing tandem duplication in the ancestor of Brassicaceae.

42 n vivo investigation of the roles of MatR in Brassicaceae.

43 unction for a VRN2-like VEFS gene beyond the Brassicaceae.

44 ay does not show cross-reactivity with other Brassicaceae.

45 obscured by the loss of the SoPIN1 clade in Brassicaceae.

46 m segmental and tandem duplication events in Brassicaceae.

47 logy, and ecophysiology in Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae), a perennial forb native to the Rocky Moun

48 d with leaves and roots of Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae), a perennial wild mustard.

49 We propose that during early evolution of Brassicaceae, a duplicate oleosin gene mutated from expr

50 the largest variation in floral structure in Brassicaceae, a family in which the floral ground plan i

51 In Brassicaceae, a tandem oleosin gene cluster of five to n

52 al species, including various members of the Brassicaceae and Apiaceae family.

53 BSU1-type genes are exclusively found in the Brassicaceae and display a remarkable sequence divergenc

54 at RPM1 evolved before the divergence of the Brassicaceae and has been deleted independently in the B

55 rsely, AtPOT1b and other POT1b homologs from Brassicaceae and its sister family, Cleomaceae, naturall

56 mic data elucidate early genome evolution in Brassicaceae and pave the way for future whole-genome se

57 y of SINEs, named BoS, that is widespread in Brassicaceae and present at approximately 2000 copies in

58 They occur in the Brassicaceae and related families.

59 ervation of inherited resistance in both the Brassicaceae and Solanaceae suggests that this trait may

60 ibuted flowering plant families (Asteraceae, Brassicaceae and Solanaceae).

61 arious time periods through the evolution of Brassicaceae and that active elements may still reside i

62 n response in Sisymbrium irio (Lineage II of Brassicaceae) and tobacco, indicating that activity of t

63 plants of the Poaceae, Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae that were given l-(35)S-

64 ht into the conservation of ABI1 function in Brassicaceae, and understand better its regulatory effec

65 this short conserved sequence, including the Brassicaceae, and we propose an evolutionary scenario to

66 chitectures of the endosperms of two related Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and the

67 The Brassicaceae are also outliers in the sense that they ha

68 T oleosins in Brassicaceae are encoded by rapidly evolved multitandem

69 y dated major splits within the evolution of Brassicaceae are essential.

70 Initial pollen-pistil interactions in the Brassicaceae are regulated by rapid communication betwee

71 in the Se hyperaccumulator Stanleya pinnata (Brassicaceae) by comparing it with the related secondary

72 a indicate that oilseed plants in the family Brassicaceae contain at least one to three seed-up-regul

73 The angiosperm family Brassicaceae contains both the research model Arabidopsi

74 or for enhancing root defense systems of non-Brassicaceae crops.

75 Diversification of the Brassicaceae crown group started at the Eocene-to-Oligoc

76 The clade diverged from other Brassicaceae crown-group clades during the Oligocene, fo

77 zed analyses of comparative genomics data in Brassicaceae (crucifer) plants.

78 The Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) family, owing to its remarkabl

79 , or the Hesperis clade, is one of the major Brassicaceae (Crucifereae) clades, comprising some 48 ge

80 In self-incompatible members of the Brassicaceae (crucifers), the inhibition of "self"-polle

81 the beta- and alpha-WGD events shared by all Brassicaceae, cytogenetic and transcriptome analyses rev

82 , which are typical of the > 3000 species of Brassicaceae, develop from a gynoecium that consists of

83 Brassicaceae display extensive variation in the mixture

84 ith other exocyst subunits, functions in the Brassicaceae dry stigma to deliver cargo-bearing secreto

85 Four varieties of Brassicaceae (Duchy, Scots Kale, Kale, Kalorama) and Pru

86 Two Brassicaceae (Eruca sativa, Brassica oleracea var. sabau

87 ploidy, and lineage separation events during Brassicaceae evolution are clustered in time around epoc

88 A number of species within the Brassicaceae express sporophytic self-incompatibility, u

89 ombined into four databases to represent the Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Gramineae and Solanaceae familie

90 sponse to eMax seems to be restricted to the Brassicaceae family and also varied among different acce

91 Although the Brassicaceae family evolved from other eudicots at the b

92 xtending this method to other species in the Brassicaceae family identified centromere-linked clones

93 The Brassicaceae family includes the most important plant mo

94 of T. goesingense SAT in the nonaccumulator Brassicaceae family member Arabidopsis was found to caus

95 e-step hydrothermal method using a series of Brassicaceae family members (i.e. radish, cabbage, brocc

96 Of these, almost one-quarter are Brassicaceae family members, including numerous Thlaspi

97 RCO evolved in the Brassicaceae family through gene duplication and was los

98 racterize the flowers of most species in the Brassicaceae family, and this phenotype is generally rob

99 Members of the Brassicaceae family, including Arabidopsis thaliana and

100 vy metal hyperaccumulator model plant in the Brassicaceae family, is a morphologically and phenotypic

101 latory changes in fruit evolution within the Brassicaceae family.

102 ng issues in the evolution of species in the Brassicaceae family.

103 thogen entry and are lineage specific to the Brassicaceae family.

104 log expression dominance relationships among Brassicaceae genomes have contributed to selection respo

105 alyses with preset karyotype patterns of the Brassicaceae genomes.

106 Comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae has largely focused on direct comparisons b

107 The Brassicaceae have reduced CHG methylation levels and als

108 ances the water storage capacity of infected Brassicaceae host plants.

109 gical races that each specialize on distinct Brassicaceae host species.

110 cillium longisporum invades the roots of its Brassicaceae hosts and proliferates in the plant vascula

111 ults give a detailed anatomic description of Brassicaceae hydathodes and highlight the efficient use

112 ing a number of A. thaliana relatives within Brassicaceae identified a clear phylogenetic co-occurren

113 elf-incompatibility system characteristic of Brassicaceae, in which complicated dominance interaction

114 The Brassicaceae include several major crop plants and numer

115 a small gene family in most plant taxa, the Brassicaceae, including Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thalian

116 resent in all sampled angiosperms except for Brassicaceae, including Arabidopsis.

117 psis ind mutant suggesting a general role of Brassicaceae IND genes in preventing valve margin cells

118 Our combined analyses of genomic data for Brassicaceae indicate that extant chromosome number vari

119 bserved for YCF1 function in a member of the Brassicaceae is also true for, e.g., algal and noncanoni

120 The self-incompatibility (SI) system of the Brassicaceae is based on allele-specific interactions am

121 ion of self-pollination in self-incompatible Brassicaceae is based on allele-specific trans-activatio

122 he self-incompatibility (SI) response of the Brassicaceae is mediated by allele-specific interaction

123 The worldwide-distributed genus Lepidium (Brassicaceae) is well suited for cross-species compariso

124 FP) from field-penny cress, Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae), is a representative of specifier proteins

125 germination in three species of Lineage I of Brassicaceae, it did not induce a germination response i

126 een identified in several species across the Brassicaceae, less is known about the conservation of th

127 ed to modulate stress responses in different Brassicaceae lineages.

128 sion shift identified here suggests that the Brassicaceae may have evolved unique pattern-recognition

129 hat the colocalized PT-TPS gene pairs in the Brassicaceae may have originated from a common ancestral

130 arotenoid content and composition changes in Brassicaceae microgreens.

131 Here we show the feasibility of three Brassicaceae oilseeds crambe, camelina, and carinata, no

132 ar-weight (SH; angiosperms), and tapetum (T; Brassicaceae) oleosins.

133 Broccoli belongs to the Brassicaceae plant family consisting of widely eaten veg

134 ciated with explosive pod shatter across the Brassicaceae plant family.

135 of selenate in pakchoi was similar to other Brassicaceae plants such as kale and broccoli.

136 ins of many major clades (e.g., angiosperms, Brassicaceae, Poaceae), suggesting that polyploidy drive

137 RGHs were analyzed, primarily from Fabaceae, Brassicaceae, Poaceae, and Solanaceae species, but also

138 genomes of bacterial isolates from roots of Brassicaceae, poplar, and maize.

139 While most eudicot families including the Brassicaceae possess a single gene that is closely relat

140 result of the phenylpropanoid pathway, many Brassicaceae produce considerable amounts of soluble hyd

141 eviously undescribed family of proteins, the Brassicaceae PSV-embedded proteins (BPEPs), associated w

142 These results demonstrate that Brassicaceae PSVs contain internalized membranes, and ra

143 the tobacco endosperm that are absent in the Brassicaceae representatives are major tissue asymmetrie

144 In the case of the Brassicaceae representatives, the structurally homogeneo

145 The genus Boechera (Brassicaceae) represents an ideal model to test the rela

146 tors controlling self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae, research in this field has focused on unde

147 phyD, are restricted to flowering plants and Brassicaceae, respectively.

148 ts of paralogs (Lal2, SCRL) of the canonical Brassicaceae S locus genes (SRK, SCR), and is situated i

149 -scale seed production from hybrid plants in Brassicaceae seed crops and, more generally, for inhibit

150 ibitor expression play a crucial role during Brassicaceae seed germination.

151 rohabitat data for 37 streptanthoid species (Brassicaceae), soil analyses, and competition experiment

152 et-hedging strategy of plants, in the annual Brassicaceae species Aethionema arabicum Our results ind

153 ted the extent of balancing selection in two Brassicaceae species and highlighted its importance for

154 and confer vernalization requirement in the Brassicaceae species Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabis alp

155 Moreover, conserved noncoding regions among Brassicaceae species are enriched around PRR binding sit

156 romosomes is difficult, since many non-model Brassicaceae species are lacking genetic and/or physical

157 s were shown to be conserved in 17 of the 29 Brassicaceae species by phylogenetic footprinting.

158 The Brassicaceae species have a similar cell wall architectu

159 es of A. thaliana with polyploid and diploid Brassicaceae species have suggested that rapid genome ev

160 ay does not show cross-reactivity with other Brassicaceae species including broccoli, cauliflower, ra

161 e compared pericentromere sequence from four Brassicaceae species separated by <15 million years (Myr

162 The synchronized diversification of Brassicaceae species suggests that polyploid events may

163 me of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum), a Brassicaceae species that experienced a whole-genome tri

164 s in several recently sequenced genomes from Brassicaceae species that had diversified approximately

165 reciprocal gene-swapping experiments between Brassicaceae species we show that the DOG1-mediated dorm

166 oes not show any cross-reactivity with other Brassicaceae species with the exception of white mustard

167 ns from A. thaliana, and from two additional Brassicaceae species, Arabidopsis lyrata and Brassica ol

168 ired for self-incompatibility in two diverse Brassicaceae species, Brassica napus and A. lyrata, and

169 In contrast, Brassicaceae species, including oilseed rape (Brassica n

170 Two Brassicaceae species, Physaria fendleri and Camelina sat

171 dopsis transcriptomes, along with four other Brassicaceae species, revealed a high level of global se

172 Among 29 Brassicaceae species, several other motifs, but not the

173 RBs are always present with the exception of Brassicaceae species, that do not possess member of the

174 y account for the variety of shapes in other Brassicaceae species, thus providing a simplified framew

175 isualized comparative genomics approaches in Brassicaceae species.

176 r scaffolds based on available karyotypes of Brassicaceae species.

177 ing the active stage of pollen maturation in Brassicaceae species.

178 nelles in tapetum cells of floral anthers in Brassicaceae species.

179 in the adaptive divergence between these two Brassicaceae species.

180 their CArG-boxes were widely conserved among Brassicaceae species.

181 within their long terminal repeats in seven Brassicaceae species.

182 ed on whole-chloroplast sequence data for 29 Brassicaceae species.

183 etic analysis of the Alyssum serpyllifolium (Brassicaceae) species complex that includes populations

184 al and petal identity) gene is thought to be Brassicaceae specific.

185 The reaction is catalyzed by the Brassicaceae-specific cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP7

186 k identifies EIF4E1B/EIF4E1C-type genes as a Brassicaceae-specific diverged form of EIF4E.

187 In addition, the Brassicaceae-specific FIS-PRC2 complex modified the regu

188 FIS2) and MEDEA (MEA), which function in the Brassicaceae-specific FIS-PRC2 complex that regulates se

189 we specifically show that MEcPP promotes two Brassicaceae-specific traits, namely endoplasmic reticul

190 f the glucosinolate-myrosinase system of the Brassicaceae, specifier proteins determine the profile o

191 nt from eIFiso4G1 and is present only in the Brassicaceae, suggesting a recent evolution.

192 udicots and ERS2 homologs appear only in the Brassicaceae, suggesting it is the most recent receptor

193 rates of CYP76C gene duplication and loss in Brassicaceae, suggesting the association of the CYP76C s

194 The appearance of ERS2 in the Brassicaceae suggests ongoing evolution of the ethylene

195 Conservation of the WRKY70 binding among the Brassicaceae suggests that WRKY70 repression of SARD1 is

196 s of plant chemical defense in Streptanthus (Brassicaceae), tested for evolutionary escalation of def

197 amily in Arabidopsis lyrata, a member of the Brassicaceae that has a sporophytic self-incompatibility

198 In Arabidopsis and other Brassicaceae, the enzyme myrosinase (beta-thioglucoside

199 As a unique feature for Brassicaceae, the genome of each member is composed of 2

200 ttle obvious sequence similarity outside the Brassicaceae, the intron from cucumber AG has at least p

201 s found in the pollen coat of members of the Brassicaceae, the pollen coat proteins (PCPs), are emerg

202 In seeds of the family Brassicaceae, the PSVs lack visible crystalloids and hav

203 In all tested self-incompatible Brassicaceae, the S haplotype encompasses two linked gen

204 In the Brassicaceae, the self-incompatibility system is mediate

205 s for two very different fruit shapes in the Brassicaceae: the heart-shaped Capsella rubella silicle

206 Within the Brassicaceae, these outcrossing systems are the evolutio

207 ifornia shield leaf (Streptanthus tortuosus; Brassicaceae) tissue cultures, recognizes an antigen in

208 Sixteen species representing 10 Brassicaceae tribes were analyzed by comparative chromos

209 not differ significantly between Prunus vs. Brassicaceae varieties, but xanthophyll was higher than

210 f-mining specialist on plants in the family (Brassicaceae), was not attracted to yeast volatiles in a

211 o facilitate comparative genomics across the Brassicaceae we recently outlined a system of 24 conserv

212 e with the ecological model system Boechera (Brassicaceae), we discuss advancements possible through

213 ber of plant families, but not in the family Brassicaceae, which includes Arabidopsis.

214 il bomb" is a major defense mechanism in the Brassicaceae, which includes crops such as canola and th

215 as been lost in some plant lineages like the Brassicaceae, which raises the question of what alternat

216 a natural population of Arabidopsis lyrata (Brassicaceae), whose SSI system has recently been descri

217 tibility system (SSI) in cruciferous plants (Brassicaceae), whose structure is unknown.

218 odeling of PIN dynamics in plants outside of Brassicaceae will offer insights into auxin-driven patte

219 Arabidopsis rpl mutant correlated across the Brassicaceae with a point mutation in a conserved cis-el

220 diversification rates on the branch uniting Brassicaceae with its sister families.

221 sociated fungal microbiome of Arabis alpina (Brassicaceae) with the hypothesis that some of its compo

222 psella belong to the tribe Camelineae in the Brassicaceae, with Capsella rubella serving as an outgro

223 er-soluble chlorophyll binding proteins from Brassicaceae (WSCPs).