ライフサイエンスコーパス: CBCT

1 CBCT image measurements provided lower levels of agreeme

2 CBCT images were acquired at three acquisition protocols

3 CBCT imaging can improve the periodontal diagnostic acum

4 CBCT imaging is an excellent method for detection of dif

5 CBCT is a new emerging imaging technique which uses a co

6 CBCT is an excellent imaging modality for detection of d

7 CBCT is an excellent tool to localize the PSAA because o

8 CBCT is capable of providing more information than stand

9 CBCT measurements underestimated direct measurements in

10 CBCT measurements were an accurate representation of the

11 CBCT scanning, periapical radiography (PA), and direct m

12 CBCT scans were taken immediately and 3 months postextra

13 CBCT technology is rapidly evolving along with the devel

14 CBCT was significantly more effective in detecting PA ra

15 CBCT/PA radiographs were taken at T0 and T12.

16 s- sectional study evaluated a sample of 156 CBCT examinations.

17 ect resolution of 58.28 % (RVG) and 58.24 % (CBCT) was noted in test group when compared to control g

18 Although CBCT has been shown to be a reliable tool for measuremen

19 Clinical and CBCT measurements of both soft tissue and bone thickness

20 ences were observed between the clinical and CBCT measurements of both soft tissue and bone thickness

21 The difference between clinical and CBCT measurements was 0.57 +/- 2.62 mm.

22 owed that general dentists preferred OPG and CBCT compared to other dental practitioners, and OPG was

23 nces between bone sounding, radiography, and CBCT.

24 al physicists and oncologists can best apply CBCT for therapeutic applications.

25 CBCT and substantial experience in applying CBCT to a broad range of clinical scenarios that involve

26 ar canal (IAC) as it appears in the archived CBCT images of the mandible.

27 refore, the aim of this study was to compare CBCT measurements of periodontal defects to traditional

28 al health care professionals should consider CBCT imaging only when they expect the diagnostic inform

29 Mice were imaged with Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) and irradiated (IR) to the marked area using the S

30 2) Does CBCT imaging improve the accuracy of a diagnostic assess

31 L/METHODS: This study was conducted at Elite CBCT & Dental Diagnostics, Pune.

32 flects an increased optimization of emerging CBCT imaging protocols and further highlights its divers

33 hed until August 2015 for studies evaluating CBCT imaging for the diagnosis of and/or treatment plann

34 Two hundred fifty CBCT scans of dental patients were studied.

35 (P<0.001) but no significant difference for CBCT or radiography.

36 A literature search for CBCT applications in implant dentistry was performed usi

37 a significant difference in that most healed CBCT lesions had received Biodentine while most that did

38 f intrabony and/or furcation defects and how CBCT influenced the diagnosis and/or treatment plan.

39 ding the scientific context to understand if CBCT imaging should become the standard of care for pati

40 aluate the association between PA changes in CBCT with various clinical measures.

41 tially aware of common terminologies used in CBCT.

42 Teeth presenting with an initial CBCT PA lesion had a failure rate of 63%, whereas teeth

43 MATERIAL/CBCT images of 200 patients with 800 permanent mandibula

44 MATERIAL/METHODS: CBCT scans of 50 patients (30 males, 20 females) who had

45 other ionizing radiation imaging modalities, CBCT imaging should be used only when the potential bene

46 material injection protocols and multiphasic CBCT techniques.

47 dies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT.

48 There are numerous advantages of CBCT over 2D imaging techniques (OPG).

49 r reviews the most prominent applications of CBCT (linac-mounted) in radiation therapy, focusing on C

50 ographs, the three-dimensional capability of CBCT offers a significant advantage because all defects

51 The corresponding comparison of CBCT images versus direct caliper measurements showed 70

52 Furthermore, the effectiveness of CBCT for such diagnostic tasks has been assessed only at

53 evaluated statistically the effectiveness of CBCT versus PA radiographs in detecting PA changes.

54 ssed bony defects when comparing efficacy of CBCT versus intraoral radiographs (IRs).

55 ents were unsure about radiation exposure of CBCT when compared to other types of imaging.

56 onvened a panel of experts with knowledge of CBCT and substantial experience in applying CBCT to a br

57 essed the potential value and limitations of CBCT relative to specific applications in the management

58 been a drastic increase in the preference of CBCT over OPG in recent times.

59 is to provide a review of the principles of CBCT imaging, including purpose and clinical evidence of

60 inclusion criteria to determine the role of CBCT in diagnosis and treatment of both intrabony and fu

61 vant focused questions regarding the role of CBCT in the management of inflammatory periodontitis.

62 ively or quantitatively evaluated the use of CBCT for the detection of intrabony and/or furcation def

63 nt scientific evidence to justify the use of CBCT for the diagnosis of and/or treatment planning for

64 nterventional trials reporting on the use of CBCT imaging assessing the impact of orthodontic/dentofa

65 o a lack of literature to support the use of CBCT imaging for superior short-term or long-term clinic

66 CBCT, limited evidence supported the use of CBCT imaging improving the execution of therapy for both

67 3) Outcomes: Does the use of CBCT imaging provide superior short-term or long-term cl

68 ation defects can be improved via the use of CBCT, limited evidence supported the use of CBCT imaging

69 the purpose and preference of utilisation of CBCT and OPG by various dental practitioners in their cl

70 hm as a guide for the routine utilization of CBCT during transarterial chemoembolization of liver can

71 limited evidence supports the utilization of CBCT for diagnosis of intrabony and furcation defects.

72 ze the visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT images obtained using different voxel sizes.

73 were willing to attend a hands-on course on CBCT interpretations versus pathology.

74 c-mounted) in radiation therapy, focusing on CBCT-based planning and dose calculation studies.

75 uestionnaire to get to know the knowledge on CBCT among postgraduates in a dental college in India.

76 o evaluate the awareness of and knowledge on CBCT among postgraduates.

77 spondents were lacking adequate knowledge on CBCT.

78 that there is rapidly accruing literature on CBCT, there are still no current evidence-based guidelin

79 ve, cross-sectional study was carried out on CBCT and OPG data of 620 different cases treated by diff

80 an urgent need for more training programs on CBCT which would result in better diagnosis and treatmen

81 oncerned authorities, an anonymous survey on CBCT was conducted in a dental college by using a close-

82 erials in patients with reversible pulpitis, CBCT showed a significant difference in that most healed

83 Radiographically, CBCT analysis showed that with >/=50% of buccal bone des

84 As applied in this study, CBCT was less consistent compared to direct caliper meas

85 The CBCT analysis demonstrated a mean thickness of the facia

86 addition, a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) image was obtained during the second examination t

87 findings from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and clinical symptoms were used to classify each T

88 c efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the diagnosis of and/or treatment planning for

89 Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become a reliable adjunctive tool for both dia

90 pplication of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has grown exponentially across dentistry with a cl

91 Recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has turned this concept into potential reality bec

92 luate whether cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging can be used to assess dentoalveolar anatom

93 etermine when cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is appropriate for diagnostic inquiry in t

94 (PSAA) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

95 The use of Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in radiotherapy is increasing due to the widesprea

96 Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique that provides computed tom

97 major use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is in implant planning.

98 n, a baseline cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained of the site, and a similar scan

99 nd exposed to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans after the insertion of a wrought wire into t

100 Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were screened from the University of Michiga

101 phically with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

102 nt defects by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro bovine rib bone model.

103 ectiveness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus periapical (PA) radiographs in detecting PA

104 /- 0.83 mm in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with defect resolution of 58.28 % (RVG) and 58.24

105 tients, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

106 ns for use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

107 thout RP with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

108 th the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

109 , India using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

110 ages from cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) to direct caliper measurement following surgical e

111 Transversal CBCT images are adequate for linear measurements in the

112 of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mm, and 108 transversal CBCT images were generated, on which two examiners perfo

113 h, 65.4% and 90.4% were deemed healthy using CBCT and PA radiographs, respectively, at T12.

114 establish periodontal bone measurement using CBCT as a valid method.

115 Among the respondents, 54.5% were not using CBCT for diagnostic purposes at their work place.

116 Utilizing CBCT images during interventional procedures bridges the

117 ective cases, however, limited field of view CBCT may be useful for periodontal disease diagnoses due

118 ture reported patient-reported outcomes when CBCT imaging was used.

119 ) clinical situations/conditions exist where CBCT imaging improves diagnostic acumen and subsequent t

120 ) followed by prosthodontists (30%), whereas CBCT was more advocated by general dental practitioners

121 partial denture planning (FPD) 59%, whereas CBCT was highly preferred for implant planning 61%.

122 OPG was advocated for FPD planning, whereas CBCT was advocated for implant planning.

123 progressed radiolucency were 30.8%/9.6% with CBCT/PA radiographs, respectively.

124 se review of the main issues associated with CBCT, such as imaging artifacts, dose and image quality.

125 the underlying bone thickness measured with CBCT (R = 0.429; P <0.05).

126 identifiable and measurable directly or with CBCT.