ライフサイエンスコーパス: CRRT

1 CRRT represents an essential dialytic modality for the p

2 CRRT was associated with a reduction in serum ammonia le

3 We aimed to design and create a CRRT machine specifically for neonates and small infants

4 nt fluid accumulation at the initiation of a CRRT course and mortality in critically ill children wit

5 In addition, CRRT has been successfully utilized for rapid clearance

6 Among critically ill patients with AKI, CRRT was associated with increased mortality.

7 evidence for a survival benefit afforded by CRRT.

8 The CARPEDIEM CRRT machine can be used to provide various treatment mo

9 ctive, randomized clinical trials to compare CRRT and IHD in severe AKI are needed.

10 alemia and alkalosis occur frequently during CRRT, but they are not associated with increased mortali

11 It was concluded that protein losses during CRRT treatments are substantially lower than previously

12 dialysis, widen the range of indications for CRRT, make the use of CRRT less traumatic, and expand it

13 other hand, for the attainment of intensive CRRT metabolic control (BUNs = 60 mg/dl), required urea

14 mined by assigned initial dialysis modality (CRRT [n = 206] versus IHD [n = 192]) using standard Kapl

15 ivalent to that readily attainable with most CRRT can only be achieved with intensive IHD regimens.

16 In the general surgical group, each day of CRRT was associated with an increased adjusted odds rati

17 nsplant group who required 7 or more days of CRRT died (in-hospital mortality, 59.1%); among the 12 p

18 surgery group who required 7 or more days of CRRT, 12 died (in-hospital mortality, 100%).

19 than 28 mmol/L, during a median of 9 days of CRRT.

20 Duration of CRRT does not correlate with survival among patients awa

21 es significantly with increasing duration of CRRT.

22 bonate and pH levels plateau after 48 hrs of CRRT.

23 or survival to discharge after initiation of CRRT among patients in a surgical intensive care unit (S

24 rent data suggest that earlier initiation of CRRT to prevent excessive fluid accumulation may lead to

25 mong patients in an SICU after initiation of CRRT.

26 nge of indications for CRRT, make the use of CRRT less traumatic, and expand its use as supportive th

27 Persistent acidosis and acidemia while on CRRT was a strong predictor of poor outcome.

28 venous hemofiltration + RAD, and 18 received CRRT alone.

29 volving 58 patients who had ARF and required CRRT was performed.

30 Regression lines of required CRRT urea K (ml/h) versus patient weight for desired BUN

31 nia levels, 61 (18%) were on continuous RRT (CRRT), 59 (17%) were on intermittent RRT (IRRT), and 220

32 ittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous RRT (CRRT), respectively.

33 lticenter pediatric studies demonstrate that CRRT can be provided effectively to all pediatric patien

34 rate was 33% in the RAD group and 61% in the CRRT group.

35 as approximately 50% of that observed in the CRRT-alone group.

36 Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) often are recommended and widely used, although da

37 Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) benefits patients with renal failure who are too h

38 Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become a popular treatment modality but may ha

39 Once continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is initiated, it becomes a major determinant of ac

40 Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the most common dialysis modality provided to c

41 Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) machines are used off label in infants smaller tha

42 tional continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled,

43 ever, confusion still exists with respect to CRRT terminology and the optimal use of this modality ac

44 ohort study included all patients undergoing CRRT from July 1, 2012, through January 31, 2016, in an

45 up of 20 patients who received uninterrupted CRRT for at least 5 days.

46 weights (50 to 100 kg) who received variable CRRT urea clearances (500 to 2000 ml/h).

47 age, etiology, and disease severity, whereas CRRT (odds ratio [OR], 0.47 [95% confidence interval {CI

48 With CRRT outputs of up to 50 L/day, these values would amoun

49 ammonia decreased by 38%, 23%, and 19% with CRRT, IRRT, and no RRT, respectively.

50 the relative risk for death associated with CRRT was 1.82 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.62).

51 o no RRT use, whereas ammonia reduction with CRRT was significant (P = 0.007), with IRRT it was not (

52 ere lower for patients who were treated with CRRT than IHD (survival at 30 d 45 versus 58%; P = 0.006