コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and TcdB are the major virulence factors of Clostridium difficile.
2 nzyme, SrtB, is conserved between strains of Clostridium difficile.
3 of TcdB varies between different strains of Clostridium difficile.
4 tion resistance against pathogens, including Clostridium difficile.
5 creasing susceptibility to pathogens such as Clostridium difficile.
6 a to prevent invasion by pathogens including Clostridium difficile.
7 c Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Clostridium difficile.
8 irculation after infection with the pathogen Clostridium difficile.
9 healthy adults are colonized with toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
10 ation resistance against pathogens including Clostridium difficile.
11 ial infection with Citrobacter rodentium and Clostridium difficile.
12 a, Eggerthella, and the potential pathobiont Clostridium difficile.
13 fluence susceptibility to pathogens, such as Clostridium difficile.
14 re-forming pathogens, Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium difficile.
15 ation among LFAs for influenza, malaria, and Clostridium difficile.
20 nfective aetiology (112/1207 (9.2%)) such as Clostridium difficile (97/1048 (9.3%) tested) or virolog
24 lysis of selected nylon-3 copolymers against Clostridium difficile, an important nosocomial pathogen
25 than 30 residents included those related to Clostridium difficile, anaerobes, Candida spp., Streptoc
26 mice datasets, investigating infection with Clostridium difficile and an immune-modulatory probiotic
27 c use and minimizing adverse events, such as Clostridium difficile and antibiotic resistance, have pr
28 TcdB) are produced by the bacterial pathogen Clostridium difficile and are responsible for the pathol
29 (endospores), such as those of the pathogens Clostridium difficile and Bacillus anthracis, are unique
30 outcomes of hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile and determine the correlation betw
33 nzymatic activity of DisA-like proteins from Clostridium difficile and Methanocaldococcus jannaschii.
34 applies to the CD27L endolysin that targets Clostridium difficile and the CS74L endolysin that targe
36 ssociation of proton pump inhibitor use with Clostridium difficile and ventilator-associated pneumoni
38 a key prevention strategy for resistance and Clostridium difficile Antibiotic stewardship programs (A
39 d mortality rates associated with nosocomial Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD), a seri
50 transplantation (FMT) utilized for relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis successfully eradicated co
51 of leptin in the mucosal immune response to Clostridium difficile colitis, a leading cause of nosoco
52 ated hospital length of stay, development of Clostridium difficile colitis, and total hospital cost.
58 r expressing the HIV-1-derived Gag Ag or the Clostridium difficile-derived toxin B resulted in signif
59 nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for Clostridium difficile diagnosis and their impact on stoo
61 Many factors may cause diarrhoea, including Clostridium difficile, drugs (e.g. laxatives, antibiotic
62 s that are not reported at this institution (Clostridium difficile, enteroaggregative Escherichia col
63 an acquire multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile from inadequately disinfected envi
64 eliable tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from unformed (liquid or soft) sto
71 and metagenomic shotgun sequencing (MSS) for Clostridium difficile identification in diarrhea stool s
72 , drug-product-related impurities of an anti-Clostridium difficile IgG1 mAb drug substance were profi
73 Diego, CA) tests for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in 459 stool samples (9.4% positiv
76 for treatment of recurrent infections (i.e., Clostridium difficile) in the human gut and as a general
78 were rated >6 in all criteria: 2 measures of Clostridium difficile incidence, incidence of drug-resis
79 h daptomycin (MIC90 0.5 vs 2 mug/mL) against Clostridium difficile including NAP1 epidemic strains.
80 8%) of 25 asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic Clostridium difficile, including 93% with skin and/or en
82 ently encountered infectious etiologies were Clostridium difficile infection (13.3% and 11.8%, respec
84 plification tests (NAATs) do not distinguish Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and asymptomatic C
85 e advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and prevention eff
86 es suggest that most cases of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are unrelated to o
87 methods may underestimate the true burden of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) because they fail
93 dences of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been demonstra
94 icrobiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited t
95 igh sensitivity of PCR assays for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has greatly reduce
96 osing to, or modulating disease severity in, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has not been inves
100 The currently available diagnostics for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have major limitat
101 id suppression medication is associated with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults and is i
102 dies on risk factors for and transmission of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in China have been
103 This article defines the risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in hospitalized ch
115 mal therapy for critically ill patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known.
116 f fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not well-known.
126 innate immune response to the resolution of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains incomplete
130 for the efficacy of probiotics in preventing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but guidelines do
131 (FT) is a promising treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but its true effe
132 polymorphism rs4073/-251T >A predisposes to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but this associat
133 catheter-associated urinary tract infection, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), central line-asso
137 es have evaluated risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), the vast majority
138 ens, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), were also conside
148 h care-onset health care facility-associated Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) is overdiagnose
149 actam (PIP/TAZO) shortage and hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) risk in 88 US m
152 ed hospitalization, and hospitalization with Clostridium difficile infection [CDI]) were associated w
154 ts it has been successfully used in cases of Clostridium difficile infection and IBD, although contro
156 ctors affecting a person's susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection are well-understood, lit
157 tic withdrawal regimen may resolve recurrent Clostridium difficile infection as effectively as fecal
159 s is not observed in subjects with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but is observed in the s
172 eudomembranous enterocolitis associated with Clostridium difficile infection is an important cause of
174 Their use as probiotics for prevention of Clostridium difficile infection is prevalent among consu
181 mine whether the reductions in recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection observed with fidaxomici
184 reports found addressed the use of FMTs for Clostridium difficile infection or inflammatory bowel di
185 Whereas many antibiotics increase risk of Clostridium difficile infection through dysbiosis, epide
187 cohort of 109 subjects treated for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota tr
188 t serious cephalosporin-associated ADRs were Clostridium difficile infection within 90 days (0.91%),
189 ated charges for inflammatory bowel disease, Clostridium difficile infection, and chronic liver disea
190 with outcomes (antibiotic-days, incidence of Clostridium difficile infection, and in-hospital mortali
191 ffective in treating relapsing or refractory Clostridium difficile infection, but practical barriers
192 viously used to cure patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, could also protect agai
193 for the same infection, acute kidney injury, Clostridium difficile infection, or drug-related adverse
194 py, and frequency of complications including Clostridium difficile infection, readmission, and all-ca
195 ation (FMT) is effective in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, where efficacy correlat
196 acious and inexpensive therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, yet its safety is thoug
204 or-associated complication or pneumonia, and Clostridium difficile infection; minor outcomes included
208 ast 50 years for the treatment of refractory Clostridium difficile infections (RCDIs) in adults, it h
209 al microbiota transplantation to face severe Clostridium difficile infections and to perform decoloni
211 biotic-based strategies for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections disrupt indigenous micr
214 han 9000 nosocomial infections, 1000 to 5000 Clostridium difficile infections, and 2 to 6 cases of an
215 den of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections, halting unnecessary an
225 ciated infection with the bacterial pathogen Clostridium difficile is a major cause of morbidity and
229 jor cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile is a serious problem in health car
235 tion with the opportunistic enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile is an increasingly common clinical
253 ntamination, colonization, or infection with Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococ
254 iotic exposures, and the prevalence rates of Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococ
255 ts to the health service and predisposing to Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococ
261 on of spores is critical for the survival of Clostridium difficile outside the host gastrointestinal
265 ACKGROUND & AIMS: Nosocomial infections with Clostridium difficile present a considerable problem des
266 w that toxins A or B of the enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile recapitulate the salient features
270 pansion of several potential pathogens (e.g. Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli)
271 ansplantation led to resolution of recurrent Clostridium difficile, significantly decreased recurrent
272 obiota, which consequently enables toxigenic Clostridium difficile species to proliferate and cause i
273 ective and easy-to-use methods for detecting Clostridium difficile spore contamination would be usefu
274 hotspots associated with mobile elements in Clostridium difficile ST6 and a previously undescribed 3
275 infections (HAIs), including those caused by Clostridium difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomona
281 TcdB is one of the key virulence factors of Clostridium difficile that is responsible for causing se
282 n that we identified from the human pathogen Clostridium difficile The crystal structure shows that t
283 inococcus obeum, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostridium difficile) to quantify, expand, and characte
290 ly from stool specimens: Campylobacter spp., Clostridium difficile (toxin A/B), Plesiomonas shigelloi
292 acid amplification test for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in stool specimens, with th
293 ve and quantitative methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins provide new tools for diagn
296 y additionally produce the binary CDT toxin (Clostridium difficile transferase) that ADP-ribosylates
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。