戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              DIF analysis is not only proving very useful for differe
2                                              DIF may confound interpretation of subgroup differences.
3                                              DIF-1 (also known as interferon regulatory factor-2 bind
4                                              DIF-1 expression rescues breast cancer cells from NRIF3/
5                                              DIF-1 is a chlorinated alkyl phenone that is synthesized
6                                              DIF-1 is a transcriptional repressor that mediates its e
7                                              DIF-1 sensitivity may, therefore, not be characteristic
8                                              DIF-6, but not DIF-7 or PSI-2, appears to have an essent
9           Differentiation-inducing factor 1 (DIF-1) is a polyketide-derived morphogen which drives st
10 l inducer Differentiation inducing factor 1 (DIF-1), or are subjected to hyper-osmotic stress.
11           Differentiation-inducing factor-1 (DIF-1) is a polyketide that induces Dictyostelium amoeba
12  to this factor as DD1-interacting factor-1 (DIF-1).
13                                   However, a DIF-less mutant showed normal PdL activity during develo
14                                         In a DIF-1 induction assay the lrrB- mutant is profoundly def
15 ed to establish or rule out a diagnosis of a DIF-positive oral vesiculobullous disease.
16 removal of MybE or DimB reveals an alternate DIF-1 activation pathway, for pstU differentiation, that
17                                 (4) Although DIF-1 has little effect on its own synthesis in short-te
18 y was induced in cell suspension by cAMP and DIF acting in synergy.
19                                   Dorsal and DIF act downstream of Toll, whereas Relish acts downstre
20 ut not of the other cell types examined, and DIF-1 also protects these cells from H89-mediated apopto
21 ed by a telling synergy between c-di-GMP and DIF-1.
22 ation, based on conventional microscopic and DIF analysis, was tabulated.
23 entified as a transcriptional repressor, and DIF-1 knockdown leads to apoptosis of breast cancer cell
24 restalk region of the Dictyostelium slug and DIF-1 is a low molecular weight signalling molecule that
25 g to dissect growth dynamics under +DIF and -DIF in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana
26                          Differences between DIF-positive and -negative patients in demography, sites
27 negative direct immunofluorescence biopsies (DIF) in patients with clinically typical ocular mucous m
28 nduce stalk cell differentiation by blocking DIF-1 export, causing DIF-1 to build up within cells.
29 clinical and microscopic findings as CDG but DIF staining is negative.
30  in the absence of diagnosis confirmation by DIF.
31              The ecmA gene is not induced by DIF-1 in a mybE-strain.
32  result also indicates that the induction by DIF and cAMP as seen in cell suspensions is not essentia
33 yclic-AMP and this induction is inhibited by DIF-1.
34 extracellular cAMP, but surprisingly, not by DIF-1, a soluble molecule thought to be essential for th
35 l differentiation, is greatly overinduced by DIF in Dd-STATa null cells.
36     gtaC expression is directly regulated by DIF, and GtaC rapidly translocates to the nucleus in res
37 bitors, and this effect could be reversed by DIF-1.
38 hallmark of mutants aberrant in signaling by DIF-1, the polyketide that induces prestalk and stalk ce
39 that, in the presence of extracellular cAMP, DIF-1 causes DimB to associate with the ecmA promoter in
40 rentiation by blocking DIF-1 export, causing DIF-1 to build up within cells.
41 uld use caution with items that demonstrated DIF.
42  positive day/night temperature difference (+DIF).
43 (negative day-night temperature difference [-DIF]) inhibit hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis (Arabidops
44 and two inducing stalk cell differentiation (DIFs 6 and 7) were resolved.
45                              It also directs DIF-inducible gene expression.
46                          Models disregarding DIF underestimate the actual alpha.
47 y typical ocular MMP disease with documented DIF results who were followed for at least 1 year at the
48                                      Dorsal, DIF, and Relish are NF-kappaB-related transcription fact
49 sis and auxin signaling were reduced during -DIF.
50 cription factor, which is required for every DIF-1 response investigated.
51 e to do so in vitro in response to exogenous DIF (a morphogen required for prestalk and stalk cell di
52 as rescued by complementation with exogenous DIF-1.
53 by the stalk differentiation-inducing factor DIF-1 and is restricted to a subset of prestalk cells (p
54 enes by the differentiation inducing factor (DIF).
55 alk inducer differentiation inducing factor (DIF-1), a chlorinated hexaphenone.
56               Desmin intermediate filaments (DIFs) form an intricate meshwork that organizes myofiber
57                  Thus, MybE is necessary for DIF-1 responsiveness and for the correct differentiation
58 etic selection to isolate genes required for DIF signal transduction, we found a mutant (dimC(-)) tha
59 ing diffusion-induced isotope fractionation (DIF) and implementing different parameterizations of loc
60 sure exhibits differential item functioning (DIF) by disease (atopic dermatitis versus psoriasis), ge
61 d significant differential item functioning (DIF) for 7 of 48 items (two mobility tasks, four reading
62 dy to examine differential item functioning (DIF) in 2 versions of the Experiences of Discrimination
63 ed to examine differential item functioning (DIF) on the Everyday Discrimination Scale by race/ethnic
64      gtaC(-) null cells showed some hallmark DIF signalling defects.
65 ory of patients should be accepted as having DIF-negative MMP, for clinical management purposes, with
66 on is induced by the chlorinated hexaphenone DIF-1.
67                                     Ignoring DIF-1 and not becoming prestalk should allow cells to ch
68 tained to perform direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and histologic analyses.
69                   Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing is a useful adjunct for the diagnosis of im
70 CDG) are shown by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) to be immune mediated diseases.
71 atients, who have direct immunofluorescence (DIF)-negative biopsies, be excluded from a diagnosis of
72  cases of DG using direct immunofluorescent (DIF) in conjunction with histology and clinical evaluati
73 ) mutant, which is specifically defective in DIF-1 synthesis.
74 at of more severe central corneal disease in DIF-negative patients.
75 gs was demonstrated by a similar increase in DIF-associated PLD activity after stimulation of intact
76 hows that DimB binds to the ecmB promoter in DIF-induced cells.
77 dent phosphatase calcineurin plays a role in DIF-1 signaling to the DimB prestalk transcription facto
78 thylene application restored leaf growth in -DIF conditions, and constitutive ethylene signaling muta
79 ot respond typically to the prestalk inducer DIF-1.
80 nscriptional regulator required to integrate DIF-1 signaling and subsequent patterning in Dictyosteli
81  with the scale, including misfitting items, DIF by disease, age, and gender, disordered response thr
82 stablishing a definitive diagnosis for known DIF-positive diseases.
83 oxylin and eosin-stained slides of the known DIF-positive specimens without knowledge of the DIF resu
84 y differentiate normally in a mutant lacking DIF.
85                                        Large DIF was observed for 2 of 7 racial/ethnic discrimination
86              The authors also observed large DIF by race/ethnicity for 3 of 7 gender discrimination i
87                                    The large DIF by race/ethnicity in the index for racial/ethnic dis
88               The approximately twice larger DIF effect for chlorine than for carbon together with th
89                         At the global level, DIF-1 causes a major shift in the phosphorylation/dephos
90 ifferentiation of prestalk-O cells by making DIF-1, and that this is one of the regulatory loops that
91 ation, and language of interview, meaningful DIF was observed for 3 (out of 10) items: "receiving poo
92 s requires the diffusible signaling molecule DIF-1, and provides an example of a spatial information-
93 ea, in Dictyostelium the signalling molecule DIF acts as a position-independent signal and was though
94                      The signalling molecule DIF-1 is required for normal cell fate choice and patter
95  required to receive the signalling molecule DIF-1 that causes differentiation into prestalk cells.
96 on is induced using the stalk cell morphogen DIF.
97 ells to inhibition by the prestalk morphogen DIF-1.
98  associates with elongated normal and mutant DIFs assembled in vitro.
99 , including those with positive and negative DIF findings.
100  between patients with positive and negative DIF results.
101         The remaining specimens had negative DIF findings and consisted of numerous non-specific infl
102 rature cycles (cold photoperiod/warm night [-DIF]), most species exhibit reduced elongation growth.
103                               DIF-6, but not DIF-7 or PSI-2, appears to have an essential carbonyl gr
104 mB, a marker of pstB differentiation, is not DIF inducible.
105 nsitive to the stalk cell-inducing action of DIF-1 but largely refractory to the repressive effect ex
106 r within the first minutes after addition of DIF-1, using a triple-label SILAC approach.
107 , wild-type cells respond to the addition of DIF-I by induction of the prestalk marker ecmA and repre
108 ng both chlorinations in the biosynthesis of DIF-1.
109 indings do not support the classification of DIF-negative patients, meeting the clinical criteria for
110  by regulating the cellular concentration of DIF-1.
111                To assess the contribution of DIF to successful diagnosis, three pathologists examined
112 consider the advantages and disadvantages of DIF adjustment (omitting items, constructing separate me
113                                The effect of DIF on the overall isotope signal attenuation was greate
114 IF-1 and with the known inhibitory effect of DIF-1 on chemotaxis to cAMP.
115 re hypersensitive to the inducing effects of DIF and readily form stalk cells in monolayer assay, the
116 o regulate the cell type-specific effects of DIF.
117 pon pharmacological or genetic inhibition of DIF-1 biosynthesis.
118 ound that cerulenin, a specific inhibitor of DIF-1 biosynthesis, abolished the induction of stalk cel
119                          This interaction of DIF-1, IRF-2BP1, and EAP1 occurs through the conserved C
120   Small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of DIF-1 selectively leads to apoptosis of breast cancer ce
121 cells is caused by a high perceived level of DIF-1 signalling, leading to nuclear localization of Dim
122  they do not accumulate measurable levels of DIF-I, a morphogen that was previously implicated in pre
123 We suggest that both these manifestations of DIF hypersensitivity in the null strain result from the
124 to the prespore cells as the major source of DIF-1.
125 , suggesting that gtaC regulates a subset of DIF responses.
126                 This revealed a new world of DIF-1-controlled signaling, with changes in components o
127  of prestalk development is not dependent on DIF-1 and suggest that the morphogen participates mainly
128  diseases did not yield positive findings on DIF testing.
129 gly, an even larger number of genes are only DIF inducible in mybE- cells, some genes are only induci
130 sitive for respiratory viruses by culture or DIF, 86 (92%) were positive by RT-PCR, including 66 HRSV
131 breast cancer cells from NRIF3 expression or DIF-1 knockdown, while expression of FASTKD2 leads to ap
132  results were negative by viral isolation or DIF.
133 pond to DIF as they are phenocopied in other DIF signalling mutants.
134 the mutant were distinct from those of other DIF signalling mutants, suggesting that gtaC regulates a
135 alk cell-inducing chlorinated alkyl phenone, DIF-1.
136 yostelium cells to the signalling polyketide DIF-1 causes DimB, a bZIPtranscription factor, to accumu
137 c gene, ecmA, is inducible by the polyketide DIF-1 in a monolayer assay and requires the DimB and Myb
138 s in vitro, can be induced by the polyketide DIF-1 or by the cyclical dinucleotide c-di-GMP.
139                                A polyketide, DIF-1, which induces stalk-like cells in vitro, was isol
140 owever, the known stalk-inducing polyketide, DIF-1, could not replace conditioned medium and induce t
141 y 48% of the specimens demonstrated positive DIF findings and consisted of pemphigus vulgaris, mucous
142 ften biopsy of these lesions yields positive DIF results.
143 r, show that purified prespore cells produce DIF-1 at more than 20 times the rate of prestalk cells.
144 utant responds to DIF-1 but does not produce DIF-1; (2) the dimA(-) mutant produces DIF-1 but does no
145 oduce DIF-1; (2) the dimA(-) mutant produces DIF-1 but does not respond to DIF-1; and (3) the dimA(-)
146 tempted to find out which cell type produces DIF-1, a diffusible signal molecule inducing the differe
147                                 The required DIF-1 polyketide could also be endogenous, as shown by t
148        The differentiation-inducing signals (DIFs) currently known in Dictyostelium appear unable to
149                                        Since DIF-1 is the most potent inhibitor of RhT activity, and
150 mens) or direct immunofluorescence staining (DIF) (65 specimens).
151                               Using standard DIF analysis, 11 of the CDG cases were diagnosed as beni
152                                We found that DIF-1 did not affect the expression of the tagB or carB
153                    Our results indicate that DIF-1 plays a key role in breast cancer cell survival an
154 photobleaching of living cells, we show that DIF inhibits the nuclear export of Dd-STATc.
155 hing and molecular analyses, we suggest that DIF-induced dimerisation of Dd-STATc functionally masks
156 activity during development, suggesting that DIF does not control PdL in vivo.
157 breast cancer cells, further suggesting that DIF-1 plays a key role in NRIF3/DD1-mediated apoptosis.
158                               We found that -DIF altered leaf growth patterns, decreasing the amplitu
159                                          The DIF also contained F-actin, vinculin, talin, paxillin, a
160                                          The DIF and Relish complex is detectable in whole animal ext
161                                          The DIF contained PLD1, RhoA, and ARF, and the level of each
162                                          The DIF results were recorded.
163                                          The DIF-1 complex was found to repress FASTKD2, a putative p
164 er DimA activity is required to activate the DIF response pathway in certain cells or is a component
165 Thus, regulation of FASTKD2 by NRIF3 and the DIF-1 complex acts as a novel death switch that selectiv
166 e activity is counterbalanced in vivo by the DIF-1-regulated activity of PTP3, a Tyr922 phosphatase.
167                                 However, the DIF was small relative to baseline changes in item diffi
168  genetic selection to isolate mutants in the DIF-1 response pathway.
169 -positive specimens without knowledge of the DIF results.
170 at puberty 1) as important components of the DIF-1 complex mediating both complex stability and trans
171  compromised cAMP-mediated inhibition of the DIF-1 mediated ecmB induction.
172 in Dictyostelium only in the presence of the DIF-1 polyketide or its metabolites.
173 est that they are directly downstream of the DIF-1 signal.
174                                       Of the DIF-positive cases, only pemphigus vulgaris could be dia
175                         The formation of the DIF-Relish heterodimer is particularly interesting becau
176  we specifically tested the functions of the DIF;Relish (a ; sign represents the peptide linker) link
177           Unexpectedly, it also required the DIF-1 polyketide.
178 edge of how cells receive and respond to the DIF-1 signal.
179 ts ethylene biosynthesis and constrains the -DIF-induced phase shift in rhythmic growth.
180 genes that depend on MybE and DimB for their DIF-1 inducibility.
181                                        Thus, DIF-1 regulates DimB activity to generate a gradient of
182                                        Thus, DIF-1 synthesis appears to be required for the induction
183 the nuclei of Dictyostelium cells exposed to DIF, the chlorinated hexaphenone that directs prestalk c
184 tes in the nucleus when cells are exposed to DIF-1, and ChIP analysis shows that, in the presence of
185 r Pyk2, a tyrosine-specific TKL, exposure to DIF-1 does not activate STATc.
186 o, Dd-STATa null cells are hypersensitive to DIF for expression of ST/lacZ, a marker for the earliest
187 e defects are due to a failure to respond to DIF as they are phenocopied in other DIF signalling muta
188 A, which is required for cells to respond to DIF-1.
189 utant produces DIF-1 but does not respond to DIF-1; and (3) the dimA(-) mutant exhibits cell autonomo
190 es exist: (1) the dmtA(-) mutant responds to DIF-1 but does not produce DIF-1; (2) the dimA(-) mutant
191 cAMP receptor that we observe in response to DIF-1 and with the known inhibitory effect of DIF-1 on c
192 tes that are dephosphorylated in response to DIF-1 are phosphorylated in response to extracellular cA
193 y to regulate diverse targets in response to DIF-1 is partly due to their ability to form homo- and h
194 isation of both DimA and DimB in response to DIF-1 suggest that they are directly downstream of the D
195 y translocates to the nucleus in response to DIF.
196 e direct regulators of cellular responses to DIF-1.
197 o position -364 eliminated responsiveness to DIF and cAMP, but normal PdL activity in prestalk cells
198                              In response to -DIF, the phase of ethylene emission advanced 2 h, but to
199 nditions that clinically resembled typically DIF-positive vesiculobullous diseases did not yield posi
200 ed imaging to dissect growth dynamics under +DIF and -DIF in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis
201 tants displayed reduced leaf movement under +DIF, similar to wild-type plants under -DIF.
202 ntain robust leaf movement amplitudes under -DIF, indicating that ethylene signaling becomes limiting
203 on in the basal part of the hypocotyl under -DIF was restored by both 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxyli
204            Indeed, petioles of plants under -DIF had reduced ACC content, and application of ACC to t
205 der +DIF, similar to wild-type plants under -DIF.
206 romoter activity was strongly reduced under -DIF but could be restored by auxin application in an ACC
207 n of several ACC Synthase was reduced under -DIF but could be restored by auxin application.
208 ally suppressed in the petiole region under -DIF conditions.
209  limited auxin and ethylene signaling under -DIF.
210                         We show that, under -DIF, lower auxin biosynthesis activity limits the signal
211    With the exception of pemphigus vulgaris, DIF is essential for establishing a definitive diagnosis
212 etter understanding of the mechanism whereby DIF directs cell type divergence.
213                      Treatment of cells with DIF-1 or exposure to hyper-osmotic stress induces a decr
214 ssion of dmtA; this is again consistent with DIF-1 production by prespore cells.
215                                    Even with DIF analysis, 7 cases could not be definitively assigned
216 se hydrodynamic dispersion (with and without DIF) and aerobic fringe degradation on the evolution of

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top