ライフサイエンスコーパス: DRI

1 DRI equations for girls predict well for the group.

2 DRI measurement was also collected at 3 and 12 months.

3 DRI SS OCT provides a topographic map of choroidal thick

4 DRIs were derived from total energy expenditure (TEE) me

5 ed and status evidence available to the 1997 DRI Committee for several of the life-stage groups, 2) i

6 metabolism and supports the use of the 2002 DRIs.

7 A DRI of > or =1.7 was classified as ECD.

8 We developed a DRI for AA with HCV with the goal of enhancing graft los

9 s as defined by the ETDRS-style grid using a DRI SS OCT, and line measurements of subfoveal choroidal

10 Rejected grafts had the highest DMT and DRI compared to all groups (59 mum and 2.1; P < .001).

11 DMT and DRI showed excellent accuracy, significantly better than

12 In actively rejecting grafts, DMT and DRI were significantly greater than controls and clear g

13 ic of graft rejection as measured by DMT and DRI.

14 Both WHO and DRI recommendations are based on an underestimated physi

15 scientific debate about the most appropriate DRI values to use in establishing Daily Values on food l

16 critical thinking about the most appropriate DRI values to use in food labeling.

17 For the most promising compounds such as DRI-C21045, activity (IC50) in the low micromolar range

18 clamp in Houston, donor pancreata arrived at DRI and the isolation process began within 6.5 hr in all

19 Pancreatic islets were isolated at DRI after enzymatic ductal perfusion (Liberase-HI) by th

20 it has proved to be more challenging to base DRI values on chronic disease endpoints; deviations from

21 is showed no significant interaction between DRI and MELD score of the recipient.

22 TEE predicted by DRI equations agreed with observed TEE (+34 kcal/d or 3%

23 ing review of the 1997 vitamin D and calcium DRI values, the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center per

24 work were often required, and in some cases, DRI values were not established for intakes that affecte

25 tent could contribute up to 55% of consumers DRI.

26 to the current DRIs to a future IOM-convened DRI committee.

27 erformed a systematic review for the current DRI Committee to use early in its deliberations.

28 Current DRIs for energy overestimate energy requirements of pres

29 search will result in changes to the current DRIs to a future IOM-convened DRI committee.

30 -source optical coherence tomography device (DRI-OCT1 Atlantis; Topcon).

31 lso present in the yeast SWI1 and Drosophila DRI proteins.

32 The approaches used to establish DRIs on the basis of classical nutrient deficiencies and

33 Studies carried out to evaluate DRI values need to be conducted under the most controlle

34 rch was available for reviewing the existing DRIs for vitamin D while leaving the decision of whether

35 and liver graft failure risk, accounting for DRI.

36 ived from Cox regression models adjusted for DRI, recipient MELD, age, sex, ethnicity, diagnosis, and

37 reased to 1.6 (p < 0.001) after matching for DRI.

38 estimated energy requirements predicted from DRI equations (Pearson's r = 0.78, P < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.

39 s, 2) what intake-response models can future DRI committees consider when using chronic disease endpo

40 nd using chronic disease endpoints in future DRI reviews, 2) what intake-response models can future D

41 include chronic disease endpoints in future DRI reviews?

42 e neuron as it enters the pattern generator, DRI presents a striking example of single neuron control

43 sponsored by the Canadian and US government DRI steering committees met from November 2014 to April

44 tematic review of the 51 nutrients that have DRIs has limited feasibility, and many DRIs have not bee

45 to the transplantation of low-quality (high DRI) or high-quality (low DRI) livers.

46 es despite higher odds of receiving a higher DRI graft.

47 anning is an efficient method of identifying DRI nutrients that are most in need of either a new or a

48 tegorize the physical activity level used in DRI equations.

49 Disability Rating Index (DRI; score range, 0 [no disability] to 100 [complete dis

50 En/DM rejection index (DRI) was computed to detect the relative En/DM thickenin

51 The Donor Risk Index (DRI) predicts graft loss but is neither race- nor diseas

52 The donor risk index (DRI) was calculated as previously reported.

53 Recently, the disease risk index (DRI) was developed and validated to stratify clusters of

54 The Disease Risk Index (DRI) was developed for this purpose.

55 Donor risk index (DRI) was used as a donor quality measure.

56 s determined by the kidney donor risk index (DRI), and was compared between AA and Caucasian recipien

57 luated using the refined Disease Risk Index (DRI), developed to stratify disease risk across histolog

58 x values of < 1; the dose reduction indices (DRIs) ranged from 3.1 to 26.2 at 90% neutralization.

59 Facility of the Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) at the University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

60 developed the 2002 Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) estimated energy requirements (EER) noted that DLW

61 Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for energy aim to balance energy expenditure at a l

62 The most recent Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) (2002) for energy were based on pooled data from c

63 of developing the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) and provides a synopsis of the micronutrient statu

64 Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) are fundamental to inform national nutrition polic

65 wances (RDAs) and dietary reference intakes (DRIs) are not specific for women living to advanced ages

66 Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) are used in Canada and the United States in planni

67 determination of Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for calcium, especially in children, has relied in

68 The symposium "Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for Food Labeling" explored the scientific debate

69 for 2005 titled "Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for Food Labeling" served as a platform to address

70 compared with the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for healthy children, CF recommendations, and data

71 , the most recent Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for macronutrients reflect expanded guidance for a

72 applying the new Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) in labeling.

73 ased thinking and Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) may help ensure an adequate diet in the sense that

74 cess for deriving Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) suggest that determining the need for a new nutrie

75 t in men, and the dietary reference intakes (DRIs) were accurate to 0 +/- 14% (P = 0.1).

76 Attending to the dietary reference intakes (DRIs), these fish species are a good source of Se and th

77 o the recommended Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs).

78 Here, we identify a single interneuron, DRI (for dorsal ramp interneuron), that (i) conveys the

79 2 could be utilized for direct reduced iron (DRI) production and the solid residuals of sludge ash an

80 new research meeting the criteria for 4 key DRI questions.

81 The latest DRIs and nutrient intakes are shown for iron, zinc, calc

82 low-quality (high DRI) or high-quality (low DRI) livers.

83 have DRIs has limited feasibility, and many DRIs have not been reviewed in >15 y.

84 ioeconomic and immunologic covariates), mean DRI was 1.25 for Caucasians and 1.28 (p = 0.02) for AA.

85 77 African Americans in the study, with mean DRI of 1.17 versus 1.27 (p < 0.001), respectively.

86 The mean DRIs of the quadruple combination were approximately twi

87 The R package is available under the name 'DRI' at http://cran.r-project.org/.

88 industry's perspective on the use of the new DRIs in food labeling, and differing opinions on whether

89 ns associated with implementation of the new DRIs on the food label.

90 We assessed the accuracy of DRI prediction equations for determining daily energy ne

91 n that will be used for the establishment of DRI values.

92 race/ethnicity, we found that the impact of DRI on graft failure rates was significantly reduced for

93 Using an interaction model of DRI and race/ethnicity, we found that the impact of DRI

94 wever, flexibility within the application of DRIs to include consideration of the AMDR provides a sou

95 " served as a platform to address the use of DRIs in food labeling, a change that could affect the pr

96 ficiency states are avoided, the emphasis on DRIs may not capture many important nutritional issues a

97 ing 3282 patients compared with the original DRI or other existing schemes.

98 provement P = 0.04) compared to the original DRI.

99 ted as case studies: thiamin and phosphorus (DRIs were last set in 1998 and 1997, respectively).

100 This validated and refined DRI can be used as a 4- or 3-group index, depending on t

101 By refined DRI group, low (n = 71), intermediate (n = 241), and hig

102 This refined DRI had improved prediction ability for the remaining 32

103 oscopy (UV), and differential refractometry (DRI) coupled online to the separation method.

104 termine whether a revision of the nutrient's DRI is an immediate priority but would not supplant a co

105 2009-2012 and compared them to age-specific DRIs as applicable.

106 The DRI is a simple, robust pre-alloHSCT risk stratification

107 The DRI OCT-1 Atlantis 3D SS OCT (Topcon Medical Systems, Oa

108 The DRI stratified patients into 4 groups with 2-year overal

109 The DRI was validated as being significantly predictive of O

110 The DRI-predicted energy requirements underestimated measure

111 of children with intakes below and above the DRI were also estimated.

112 On multivariable analyses, the DRI was statistically significantly associated with rela

113 spond to an in vitro glucose stimulus at the DRI before shipment and at TMH after shipment and final

114 Total preformed retinol intake exceeded the DRI tolerable upper intake level in 78% of the subjects

115 ghly correlated (r = 0.93) with EER from the DRI equations.

116 However, the DRI has not been tested for smaller cohorts or cohorts w

117 statistically significant difference in the DRI score at 3 months in favor of nail fixation (mean sc

118 statistically significant difference in the DRI score at 6 months between groups (mean score, 29.8 i

119 This study corroborates the use of the DRI equations for EER.

120 We reexamined the DRI for energy for preschool-age children.

121 roup of 9849 patients was used to refine the DRI, using a multivariable regression model for OS.

122 Using randomized patient subsets, the DRI stratified a cohort of 100 patients (OS, P=0.010; PF

123 This analysis demonstrates that the DRI effectively risk stratifies recipients of NMA HLA-ha

124 level of obesity, and to compare TEE to the DRI EER.

125 one of four risk categories according to the DRI.

126 When simulating shorter follow-up, the DRI stratified a cohort (n=322) with a median follow-up

127 d calibrate with local data before using the DRI to estimate absolute OS, PFS, and CIR and understand

128 Because the DRIs and WHO recommendations underestimated PAL, new pre

129 er important distinction is that because the DRIs are comprised of 4 reference values -the Estimated

130 y Allowances (RDAs) would be replaced by the DRIs, which would address several issues that the RDAs d

131 ilable since the 1997 IOM publication of the DRIs for vitamin D.

132 rals can give a relevant contribution to the DRIs in a balanced diet.

133 rocess for revising labeling relative to the DRIs, the food industry's perspective on the use of the

134 g swept source optical coherence tomography (DRI SS OCT).

135 the Cirrus 5000, RTVue XR Avanti, and Triton DRI OCT platforms with default layer segmentations were

136 Ultimately, DRI values must be chosen based on an attempt to achieve

137 Applying the SEC/MALS/QELS/VISC/UV/DRI method to the study of a poly(acrylamide-co-N,N-dime

138 mending the Dietary Reference Intake values (DRIs) for US and Canadian populations.

139 f the endogenous peptides that interact with DRI are therefore either more restricted in conformation