戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              DSEK produces excellent visual outcomes with minimal cha
2                                              DSEK provides quicker visual rehabilitation and an impro
3  by 6 months (PK, P = 0.008; DLEK, P = 0.03; DSEK, P < 0.001), with continued improvement between 6 m
4 ocedures(2%) were performed; in Group II, 37 DSEK (41%), 51 PK (57%), and 2 keratoprosthesis procedur
5                               A total of 835 DSEK cases performed by a single surgeon between Decembe
6                                        After DSEK, HCVA correlated with the 50% width (r = 0.48, P <
7  [5433] cells/mm(3) [n = 23]; P = .99) after DSEK.
8 erated option to restore visual acuity after DSEK in cases with significant lens opacities.
9 provement in uncorrected visual acuity after DSEK.
10 as a source of decreased visual acuity after DSEK.
11  contribute to decreased visual acuity after DSEK.
12 ay light correlated with recipient age after DSEK (r = 0.67, P < 0.001, n = 30), but not after PK (r
13 es of the eye with older recipient age after DSEK can be attributed to the retained host cornea.
14 nce in the power of the eye before and after DSEK surgery.
15 hs' dystrophy were examined before and after DSEK, and were compared with 52 eyes of age-matched cont
16    Total HOAs were compared before and after DSEK, and with those of age-matched controls, by using g
17 nically important with respect to BCVA after DSEK, with meta-analysis suggesting a weak relationship.
18                  The refractive change after DSEK is determined by calculating the difference in the
19                                Changes after DSEK were analyzed using generalized estimating equation
20 sured and predicted refractive changes after DSEK.
21          The most common complications after DSEK were graft detachment (mean, 14%; range, 0%-82%), e
22 ard scatter in eyes with clear corneas after DSEK.
23              The linear decline in ECD after DSEK was consistent with shorter-term endothelial kerato
24 l fibrosis and scarring become evident after DSEK.
25  change in refractive power of the eye after DSEK.
26  width was higher in pseudophakic eyes after DSEK or PK compared with otherwise normal pseudophakic e
27 ent a secondary DMEK for graft failure after DSEK from March 1, 2012, through February 28, 2013.
28            Patients with graft failure after DSEK had a mean (SD) age of 79.4 (7.2) years (range, 70-
29  choice in patients with graft failure after DSEK.
30              The improvement is faster after DSEK than after PK, and this might be explained in part
31 le domain of the point-spread function after DSEK suggests that aberrations contribute to decreased v
32 months, the composite score was higher after DSEK than after PK (P = 0.006).
33 rincipal planes of the cornea and lens after DSEK.
34                           Mean EC loss after DSEK was 37% at 6 months.
35 e of graft-rejection episodes is lower after DSEK compared with standard penetrating keratoplasty, po
36 d at fixed intervals through 60 months after DSEK.
37 al high-order aberrations at 12 months after DSEK.
38 al cell loss were assessed at 6 months after DSEK.
39 es might be related to visual outcomes after DSEK.
40 tep for estimating the hyperopic shift after DSEK.
41 s article reviews refractive surgeries after DSEK to address this problem.
42                  Between 1 and 5 years after DSEK, BSCVA continues to improve such that at 5 years, m
43                             At 2 years after DSEK, total HOAs (0.26+/-0.13 mum) did not differ from p
44 per year between 6 months and 10 years after DSEK.
45  (67%) and remained present at 3 years after DSEK.
46 efore and at intervals through 2 years after DSEK.
47 ols, and remain higher through 2 years after DSEK.
48 6 months and 3 years after PK (P = 0.01) and DSEK (P = 0.004).
49 repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the learning curve for DMEK.
50 ICERs) comparing PK with no intervention and DSEK with PK.
51  (logMAR) (Snellen equivalent, 20/56) before DSEK to 0.09+/-0.13 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/25) a
52 of the host stroma in Fuchs dystrophy before DSEK (mean [SD], 22 030 [6479] cells/mm(3) [n = 41]) rem
53                   In Fuchs' dystrophy before DSEK, total HOAs (4 mm optical zone) from the anterior c
54  eyes (P < 0.001) but did not differ between DSEK and PK (P = 0.36).
55 erformed to assess the relationships between DSEK timing and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (
56 omparable in surviving clear grafts for both DSEK and PK.
57                                         DMEK/DSEK hybrids and 'thin' DSEK also can provide better vis
58                           Performing earlier DSEK for pseudophakic corneal edema appears to be associ
59      Our aim is to determine whether earlier DSEK is associated with improved visual outcomes.
60 on and $5209 per QALY for the more expensive DSEK relative to PK.
61                       Histologically, failed DSEK graft lenticels presented condensations of collagen
62 ble to treat refractive compromise following DSEK.
63 tervention was 0.128 QALYs (P<0.001) and for DSEK relative to PK was 0.046 QALYs (P = 0.031).
64 resolution (logMAR) units (P<0.001), and for DSEK relative to PK, it was -0.199 logMAR units (P = 0.0
65                       Three-year charges for DSEK and PK were $7476 and $7236, respectively.
66                               Indication for DSEK, surgically managed glaucoma, type and number of pr
67 ely, for DMEK; 8% and 12%, respectively, for DSEK; and 14% and 18%, respectively, for PK.
68 ts with endothelial dysfunction suitable for DSEK.
69               This model was applied to four DSEK cases retrospectively, to compare measured and pred
70                                           FS-DSEK was less effective and more costly compared to both
71 as 52% for DSAEK, 44% for PK, and 43% for FS-DSEK.
72 , and euro7072 (US$8416) in the PK group, FS-DSEK group, and DSAEK group, respectively.
73       The results of this study show that FS-DSEK was not cost-effective compared to PK and DSAEK.
74  were included in the PK group, 36 in the FS-DSEK group, and 42 in the DSAEK group.
75 ell loss than Busin glide donor insertion in DSEK.
76 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (46%), and
77 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) has become a preferred surgical correction for end
78 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in the right eye and Descemet's stripping only in
79 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is rapidly becoming the preferred treatment for co
80 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is rapidly replacing traditional full-thickness pe
81 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is the most popular treatment for endothelial dysf
82 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) or combined cataract surgery with DSEK requires un
83 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 months.
84 scemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
85 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
86 met stripping with endothelial keratoplasty [DSEK], 30 eyes; penetrating keratoplasty [PK], 10 eyes)
87  wound healing is a lesser concern, and many DSEK patients are maintained on low-dose topical steroid
88                    Intraoperatively obtained DSEK graft lenticels were investigated immunohistochemic
89 rformed to determine whether the benefits of DSEK are worth the additional costs.
90 ere compared retrospectively with cohorts of DSEK (n = 598) and PK (n = 30) patients treated at the s
91 ulectomy significantly increased the risk of DSEK endothelial failure.
92    Patients underwent either PK (n = 171) or DSEK (n = 93) from January 2001 through December 2007.
93          Some surgeons now routinely perform DSEK with topical anesthesia.
94 ted to determine the optimal time to perform DSEK in patients with pseudophakic corneal edema.
95                    The ideal time to perform DSEK to prevent permanent changes is unclear.
96                                         Post-DSEK visual acuity was compared in patients who underwen
97                    The power of the eye post-DSEK surgery can be calculated with modified Gullstrand
98           Review of 1005 consecutive primary DSEK procedures by 6 surgeons identified 752 grafts (75%
99 tudies evaluating graft thickness in primary DSEK and visual outcomes.
100 e to achieve greater QALY gains by providing DSEK to as many patients as possible (and nothing to oth
101  most corneas with Fuchs dystrophy requiring DSEK, even in cases with mild edema and in the absence o
102 societal health gains given fixed resources, DSEK should be the preferred strategy.
103                              This simplified DSEK mathematical model can be used as a first step for
104 also can provide better vision than standard DSEK; randomized controlled comparisons with DMEK are ne
105 cant complaint after anatomically successful DSEK.
106 ty in patients who previously had successful DSEK with subsequent refractive errors.
107 isk of experiencing a rejection episode than DSEK eyes (95% confidence limit [CL], 2.0-111; P = 0.008
108  the DMEK group compared with 54 (9%) in the DSEK and 5 (17%) in the PK group.
109                 DMEK/DSEK hybrids and 'thin' DSEK also can provide better vision than standard DSEK;
110                               In contrast to DSEK, which includes posterior donor stroma, DMEK consis
111 ejection rates, DMEK seems to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar su
112 POM6 BSCVA was better in patients with CE-to-DSEK time </=6 months (median 0.18, IQR 0.19) vs >6 mont
113 ificant relationship was found between CE-to-DSEK time and POM6 BSCVA (coefficient = 0.002, P = .033)
114                                 Median CE-to-DSEK time was 8.62 (interquartile range [IQR] 12.28) mon
115 m visual rehabilitation, patients undergoing DSEK may require further refractive surgeries.
116                       Patients who underwent DSEK </=6 months after CE were more likely to achieve PO
117 cuity was compared in patients who underwent DSEK </=6 months vs >6 months after CE.
118  Total of 120 eyes of patients who underwent DSEK for corneal edema following cataract surgery (CE);
119 e within 2 years after surgery compared with DSEK and PK performed for similar indications using the
120 lar surgical risks and EC loss compared with DSEK.
121 omplication rates to levels experienced with DSEK.
122 ding the hyperopic shift that can occur with DSEK and incorporating this correction preoperatively in
123 sty (DSEK) or combined cataract surgery with DSEK requires understanding the hyperopic shift that can

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top