コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 DWI (SE/EPI) was performed in the axial plane using b-va
2 DWI can be an effective diagnostic method for distinguis
3 DWI can be used to characterize renal lesions; the ADC o
4 DWI can contribute to differential diagnosis of chronic
5 DWI characteristics of lesions were noted, and their app
6 DWI had a sensitivity of 93.1% (27 of 29 lesions), a spe
7 DWI in conjunction with conventional imaging can potenti
8 DWI in PET/MR imaging has no diagnostic benefit for whol
9 DWI was also performed in vivo over 5 days.
10 DWI was post-processed using kurtosis (ADC(k), K), mono-
11 DWI+ lesions explain only a small proportion of the tota
12 DWI+ lesions explain the majority of incident lacunes an
13 DWI+ lesions preceded 4 of 5 incident lacunes and 3 of 1
14 DWI-FLAIR lesion mismatch was rated and NWU was measured
15 DWI-FLAIR mismatch was more prevalent than PWI-DWI misma
16 DWI/ADC is useful in differentiating high-risk patients
17 ween groups I and II (ADC values, P < .0001; DWI quotients, P < .0001; postcontrast quotients, P = .0
18 nd groups II and III (ADC values, P < .0001; DWI quotients, P = .016; postcontrast quotients, P = .04
20 ng 'b' values of 300, 500, and 1000 s/mm(2), DWI signal intensity scores and ADC values are effective
26 simplified approach to assess results from a DWI protocol sensitive to the intravoxel incoherent moti
27 13%) had a double mismatch, 151 (35%) only a DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and 54 (13%) only a PWI-DWI mismatch
28 ment benefit of alteplase in patients with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch seems to be driven not merely by the
29 d a stroke with unknown time of onset with a DWI-FLAIR or perfusion mismatch, intravenous alteplase r
35 nt ischemic attack occurred more often among DWI+ patients (12 of 62) than among DWI- patients (6 of
36 en among DWI+ patients (12 of 62) than among DWI- patients (6 of 62), with a cumulative 5-year incide
40 brain revealed unknown features of FLASH and DWI with potential applications in characterizing the st
41 ystematically (T1w, T2w, T2*w, T1w + Gd, and DWI), in order to discern a specific pattern of inflamma
42 on was calculated between DCE MR imaging and DWI parameters, and the potential of the different DWI-d
43 For combined analysis of DCE MR imaging and DWI, the BI-RADS-adapted reading algorithm, which adapte
49 ssection underwent DCE-MRI, dynamic PET, and DWI using a PET-MR scanner within one week prior to thei
52 No correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake and DWI could be found across patients, but within individua
59 MCA or within DWI lesions, FLAIR-HAs beyond DWI lesions were associated with better outcome (0.67, 9
63 of bone metastases assessed with whole-body DWI can potentially be used as indicators of response to
65 ating stage pT1-2 and pT3-4 tumors from both DWI techniques was assessed by receiver operating charac
66 h percentiles, skewness and kurtosis of both DWI sequences in patients with pT1-2 as compared to thos
70 ghted images/apparent diffusion coefficient (DWI/ADC) images of 86 lymph nodes from 31 cancer patient
72 e clinical reference standard and to compare DWI to contrast material-enhanced MRI for the detection
74 ness of reverse phase encoding in correcting DWI geometric distortion for multimodal PET/MRI voxelwis
77 rameters, and the potential of the different DWI-derived parameters for differentiation between malig
82 nt (alpha) obtained at stretched exponential DWI, ADC obtained with DKI modeling (ADCDKI), kurtosis w
83 l monoexponential DWI, stretched exponential DWI, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and diffusion-ten
88 ers from rFOV DWI (r: -0.741-0.682) and fFOV DWI (r: -0.449-0.449), besides parameters of ADCmin (0.3
90 more advantageous than the one based on fFOV DWI in differentiating T staging of rectal cancer and th
92 tal number of regions involved and the FLAIR/DWI score did not vary significantly between both groups
94 s Sensitivity for detection of arthritis for DWI was 93% (13 of the 14 participants with arthritis we
95 sis of ischemic stroke patients screened for DWI-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch
98 tes of local fiber orientation obtained from DWI data that is unlikely to be overcome by improvements
99 the integrated PET/MR scanner, the VOIs from DWI and (18)F-FDG PET were both within the target volume
100 acquisition of both anatomic and functional DWI sequences provides an intrinsically "hybrid" dimensi
101 ged lymph nodes or peritoneal implants, high DWI signal greater than that in endometrium, and ADC les
103 e quality of standard SE echo-planar imaging DWI with two high-spatial-resolution alternatives, RS ec
104 maging (PWI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) allow for more detailed analysis of brain tumors in
105 uate the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at
107 nance (MR)-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) est
108 -encoding (MUSE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and single-shot DWI for lesion visibility and diffe
109 c performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) applied to the whole body largely contribute to the
110 Brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are frequently found after carotid artery stenting
112 with established diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared with traditional single-parameter evaluati
114 Remarkably, 3D diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) delivered unprecedented contrast within the modular
115 ication value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PP
116 ate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing between benign and malignant ren
119 nhanced (DCE) or Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) have been included in the evaluation of this patien
120 ostic benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in an (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging protocol for whole-b
124 tingly, although diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is more frequently used to examine white matter tra
125 c resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is sensitive to small acute ischemic lesions and mi
127 determinants of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions on high-resolution magnetic resonance imagi
128 tions related to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) limit the evaluation of voxelwise multimodal analys
129 ate quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters derived from conventional monoexponentia
130 me and number of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) positive/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) dark
131 a comprehensive diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol and characterized the white matter diffusi
133 te (rs)-fMRI and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) scans were undertaken before unilateral ballistic w
134 3 to 4 based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) score of 5; and 71.7%-72.7% of lesions in both zone
135 connectome style diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence to quantify white matter integrity in both
137 weighted MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) val
138 ss of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess the response of bone metastases to treatm
139 tested by using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to construct whole-brain white-matter connectomes.
140 gular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to evaluate the structural integrity of the CC in h
141 maging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to identify the brain structure correlates of the s
143 e the utility of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values i
147 CTP and 24-hour diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was then undertaken to define the optimum CTP thres
148 us, longitudinal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was used to investigate WM abnormalities in youth a
150 e imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and 1,356 large-format cellular resolution (1 micr
151 aging (DCE-MRI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) for
152 mpMRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD), tissue-o
153 parameters from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel inc
154 ived SUVmean and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-derived ADCmin was introduced as a combined variabl
158 by absence of a diffusion weighted imaging [DWI] positive lesion on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]
163 A statistically significant difference in DWI signal scores was detected between benign and malign
165 educes the 90 days' recurrent stroke risk in DWI-positive TIA patients but not in DWI-negative patien
169 olvement and the role of brain MRI including DWI and PWI in the evaluation of brain focal lesions.
170 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including DWI at 3 Tesla using the following b values - 0, 500 and
171 ignal intensity and a low or an intermediate DWI signal less than that in endometrium or lymph nodes
172 investigate whether periprocedural ischemic DWI lesions after CAS or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) ar
174 nderwent multiparametric MRI, including IVIM DWI and gadoxetic acid DCE MRI before (n = 24) and 6 wee
180 y ischaemia occurred in 40 (66%) with a mean DWI/ADC volume 8.6 mL (0-198 mL) and lesion number 4.3 (
181 rospective study (2016-2018), three 5-minute DWI protocols were acquired at 3.0 T, including standard
182 rs derived from conventional monoexponential DWI, stretched exponential DWI, diffusion kurtosis imagi
183 tients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR)-DWI and MR-defecography were retrospectively reviewed.
184 ractography based on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is widely used for mapping the structural connectio
185 compartment model of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to characterize the relationship between RT and mic
186 his study was to use diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to noninvasively quantify spatial-temporal changes
188 MRI included high-resolution multishell DWI, and 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recove
190 nificant differences were found between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI in the mean, maximum, and minimu
191 t, and quantitative differences between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI were assessed using the Mann-Whi
192 ional review board-approved study, both MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI sequences were first optimized i
193 gle-shot DWI (kappa = 0.70).Conclusion: MUSE DWI is a promising high-spatial-resolution technique tha
194 esulted in better lesion visibility for MUSE DWI over single-shot DWI (kappa = 0.70).Conclusion: MUSE
195 ficance was defined at P < .05.Results: MUSE DWI yielded significantly improved image quality compare
198 To determine whether positive or negative DWI TIA patients could get benefits from HST we conducte
199 fold increase compared to that with negative DWI (7 d, 10.9 versus 1.8, p < 0.001 and 90 d, 18.3 vers
201 patients with (DWI+) and without (DWI-) new DWI lesions on the post-treatment scan in the CAS and CE
202 llowing this initial success, the ability of DWI to detect inherent tissue contrast began to be explo
203 Purpose To study the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for the detection of arthritis compared with the cli
207 this study was to assess the feasibility of DWI in the early period after kidney transplantation.
213 se of the study was to evaluate the value of DWI in differentiating benign and malignant solid kidney
214 d positive and negative predictive values of DWI findings were 92% (23 of 25 patients), 62% (16 of 26
215 a (in TZ, upgrading category 3 to 4 based on DWI score of 4 or modified DCE score of positive; in PZ
216 sions upgraded from category 3 to 4 based on DWI score of 4; 33.3%-57.1% for TZ lesions upgraded from
219 are characterised by restricted diffusion on DWI, typically indicate acute or hyperacute ischemic inf
225 JD show increased extent and degree of SI on DWI that correlates with disease duration and the degree
227 cer, but standard spin-echo (SE) echo-planar DWI methods often have poor image quality and low spatia
230 ed stroke risk in TIA patients with positive DWI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [
231 The stroke risk of patients with positive DWI was about a four-fold increase compared to that with
235 e driven not merely by the presence of a PWI-DWI mismatch, although this analysis was underpowered.
240 oup of 208 randomized patients with PWI, PWI-DWI mismatch status did not modify the treatment respons
241 I-FLAIR mismatch was more prevalent than PWI-DWI mismatch (48%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 43-53%
242 tortion were computed from optimal realigned DWI PET data, along with bootstrap confidence intervals.
245 ing and above histogram parameters from rFOV DWI (r: -0.741-0.682) and fFOV DWI (r: -0.449-0.449), be
247 AUCs of 75th and 90th percentiles from rFOV DWI were significantly higher than that from fFOV DWI (P
250 hole-lesion histogram analysis based on rFOV DWI was overall more advantageous than the one based on
251 usion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging's (DWI-MRI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) reveals wa
255 ults aged 25-27 years underwent single-shell DWI, from which a FD measure was derived using convex op
256 ion visibility for MUSE DWI over single-shot DWI (kappa = 0.70).Conclusion: MUSE DWI is a promising h
257 usion-weighted imaging (DWI) and single-shot DWI for lesion visibility and differentiation of maligna
258 oved image quality compared with single-shot DWI in phantoms (SNR, P = .001) and participants (lesion
259 were found between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI in the mean, maximum, and minimum ADC values (P = .9
260 pproved study, both MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI sequences were first optimized in breast phantoms an
261 differences between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test; signifi
263 seen on various MRI sequences (T1, T2, STIR, DWI, post-gadolinium T1 FS) were measured and biopsies w
267 and segmentation approaches, we showed that DWI-based microstructure metrics varied substantially al
270 as determined by comparing the scores of the DWI data set to those of the clinical reference standard
273 st dimension and lesion-average ADC on three DWI methods, reported measurement confidence, and rated
275 -FACBC PET derived parameters (V(T), SUV) to DWI and RAFF derived parameters did not improve LPOCV AU
277 om DCE-MRI (v(e), v(p), PS, F(p), K(trans)), DWI (ADC) and PET (K(i), K(1), k(2), k(3)) to assess if
286 PET/CT in comparison to SSRS SPECT/CT and WB DWI: a significant difference in detectability was noted
291 5 of 32 participants; 95% CI: 60%, 90%) with DWI when contrast-enhanced MRI was considered the refere
293 ith arthritis were correctly classified with DWI; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64%, 100%) and specif
296 as not significantly higher in subjects with DWI+ lesions compared to those without (p = 0.195).
298 me event was compared between patients with (DWI+) and without (DWI-) new DWI lesions on the post-tre
299 trary to FLAIR-HAs at proximal MCA or within DWI lesions, FLAIR-HAs beyond DWI lesions were associate
300 ed between patients with (DWI+) and without (DWI-) new DWI lesions on the post-treatment scan in the