ライフサイエンスコーパス: ERO

1 ERO calculation by the PISA method was undertaken prospe

2 ctase endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin-1 [ERO-1alpha], JNK, nuclear factor kappaB [NF-kappaB]) com

3 Absolute ERO was not linked to outcome, in contrast to regurgitan

4 Although ERO of MR was univariately associated with reduced FC (2

5 47 +/- 16% vs. 43% +/- 15%, p < 0.0001), and ERO (50 +/- 35 mm2 vs. 41 +/- 28 mm2, p < 0.0001).

6 espectively, both p < or = 0.03) for age and ERO.

7 sment may be misleading because jet area and ERO by flow convergence appear similar to those of holos

8 atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, and ERO (flow convergence).

9 ty of VC-W >/=6 mm for diagnosing severe AR (ERO >/=30 mm(2)) were 95% and 90%, respectively.

10 mL (2.05, P=0.002 and 2.01, P=0.009) and by ERO >/=20 mm(2) (2.23, P=0.003 and 2.38, P=0.004) were h

11 directly to the degree of IMR as defined by ERO and RVol.

12 pace narrowing (JSN), and their combination (ERO + JSN) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

13 y based representation was used to determine ERO energy, phase synchronization across trials, recorde

14 the reproducibility of scoring of erosions (ERO), joint space narrowing (JSN), and their combination

15 First, ERO cakes with properties similar to those baked convent

16 IMR presence and 4.4 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.2) for ERO > or =20 mm(2).

17 R presence and 4.42 (95% CI 1.9 to 10.5) for ERO > or =20 mm(2).

18 9-0.91 for scoring of JSN, and 0.80-0.95 for ERO + JSN; for scoring of progression between baseline a

19 0-0.94 for scoring of JSN, and 0.92-0.95 for ERO + JSN; for scoring of progression between baseline a

20 frequencies in Amyg, (2) reductions in gamma ERO energy and PLI in Fctx, (3) decreases in PDLI betwee

21 a frequency bands in Fctx, (2) reduced gamma ERO energy in Fctx and Amyg, (3) reductions in PLI in th

22 Despite identical ERO (0.25+/-0.15 versus 0.25+/-0.15 cm(2); P=0.53), the

23 Lesions in MS produced: (1) decreases in ERO energy in delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma freque

24 in volume overload (RVol) due to increase in ERO.

25 Lesions in NBM resulted in: (1) increased ERO energy in delta and theta frequency bands in Fctx, (

26 Instantaneous ERO by flow convergence should be interpreted in context

27 ailure is independently determined by larger ERO of IMR.

28 The major determinant of ERO was mitral deformation, ie, systolic valvular tentin

29 olely account for the significant firming of ERO cakes and, hence, other phenomena are involved in ca

30 A wide range of ERO (15+/-14 mm(2), 0 to 87 mm(2)) was observed, unrelat

31 ts at baseline were 0.82-0.96 for scoring of ERO, 0.69-0.91 for scoring of JSN, and 0.80-0.95 for ERO

32 ts at baseline were 0.90-0.93 for scoring of ERO, 0.90-0.94 for scoring of JSN, and 0.92-0.95 for ERO

33 ween VC-W and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area and regurgitant volume recorded by quantitativ

34 me (RVol) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area were 36+/-24 mL/beat and 21+/-12 mm(2), respec

35 well with the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow convergence method (r = 0.90, SEE = 0.1

36 Whether effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow convergence method is similarly linked

37 alculation of effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) of aortic regurgitation (AR).

38 diography the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) of FMR by using 2 methods: mitral deformation (valv

39 tion (RF) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) to define progression of MR.

40 atched for TR effective-regurgitant-orifice (ERO).

41 MR (measuring effective regurgitant orifice [ERO] and regurgitant volume).

42 tation of MR (effective regurgitant orifice [ERO]) and left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic f

43 e baked using an electrical resistance oven (ERO).

44 With increasing FTR severity (ERO >/=40 mm(2)), changes specific to each FTR type were

45 The ERO area can be calculated by the PISA method, but this

46 , the PISA method can be used to measure the ERO with reasonable feasibility.

47 Underestimation of the ERO by PISA may occur in patients with an obtuse flow co

48 ), but a trend toward underestimation of the ERO by the PISA method was noted (24+/-19 vs. 26+/-22 mm

49 rm was used for the signal processing of the ERO data in terms of time-frequency-power.

50 e, PISA provides reliable measurement of the ERO of AR.

51 endent determinant of underestimation of the ERO.

52 % with ERO 1 to 19 mm(2) and 68 +/- 12% with ERO > or =20 mm(2) (all p < 0.0001).

53 y associated with reduced FC (26 vs. 9% with ERO > or =40 vs. <40 mm2), independent determinants of r

54 ion (MR), 53 +/- 7% with IMR, 46 +/- 9% with ERO 1 to 19 mm(2) and 68 +/- 12% with ERO > or =20 mm(2)

55 tio, the VCW showed better correlations with ERO (both p<0.01) and a larger area under the receiver o