戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              ERPF was measured concurrently with gamma-camera imaging
2    RLX-infused rats showed increased GFR and ERPF with decreased ERVR.
3                                 The baseline ERPF was a significant predictor of graft survival in bo
4  of this level led to a model including both ERPF and R20:3.
5 s of this image-based method for calculating ERPF correlated well with the values obtained from blood
6                                 In contrast, ERPF was reduced and effective renal vascular resistance
7  for estimating effective renal plasma flow (ERPF in units of milliliters per minute) from the full t
8 creases GFR and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and decreases effective renal vascular resistance
9  NO synthase on effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in chronicall
10  RLX 2 (rhRLX), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increased by
11 s estimation of effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) from a single plasma sample in addition to imaging
12 ely review 1626 effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) measurements in 197 patients with paraplegia or qu
13                 Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) response to angiotensin II (AngII) challenge, a ma
14 s inhibition led to the equalization of GFR, ERPF, and ERVR in conscious virgin and pregnant rats.
15                                  The fall in ERPF in response to AngII was less in patients with seve
16 l ester completely abrogated the increase in ERPF and GFR elicited by chronic administration of purif
17 in several respects: (a) marked increases in ERPF and GFR with a mediatory role for nitric oxide; (b)
18 s rats over several hours failed to increase ERPF and GFR.
19                A scintigraphic estimation of ERPF without blood samples using time-activity data from
20 he single-patient linear regression lines of ERPF versus time.
21                                Single-sample ERPF measured in the immediate post-transplant period, w
22 nstrated decreased renovascular sensitivity (ERPF, -153 +/- 79 vs. -283 +/- 31 ml/min; P = 0.004) (fi
23 efore combined to obtain the SD for a single ERPF measurement, which was 49 mL/min.
24 ctive value at the 95% confidence level than ERPF or R20:3 alone, some statisticians suggest a 75% co
25                                          The ERPF calculated by the product of fERPF and plasma volum
26 ned from patient weight, was compared to the ERPF as calculated by blood samples and the Schlegel and
27 sample methods (converting MAG3 clearance to ERPF by means of a correction factor).
28 earance was divided by 0.53 to convert it to ERPF.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。