ライフサイエンスコーパス: FFF

1 FFFs are defined by a minimal number of highly conserved

2 The FYF and FFF mutants were defective in phosphorylating all of the

3 n the YFY mutant but was lost in the FYF and FFF mutants.

4 e-based activation motifs FYY, YYF, FYF, and FFF.

5 ecular dynamics trajectories of the Y16F and FFF mutants reproduced the small conformational changes

6 o in the Y16S mutant and one in the Y16F and FFF mutants, with intermittent hydrogen bonding of one w

7 FkappaB activity was enhanced in the YFY and FFF mutants.

8 s and secretion were enhanced in the YFY and FFF mutants.

9 However, as FFF is applied to more difficult samples, such as those

10 ole cells were collected after separation by FFF and further analyzed by MALDI-MS.

11 a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more t

12 icrostructures in comparison to conventional FFF channel geometry with an average 50% reduction in pl

13 DEP-FFF does not involve cell-labeling or cell-modification

14 The extended DEP-FFF theory is widely applicable, and the parameter measu

15 own that the revised theory accounts for DEP-FFF elution behavior over a wide range of conditions and

16 lectrophoretic field-flow fractionation (DEP-FFF) has been used to discriminate between particles and

17 lectrophoretic field-flow-fractionation (DEP-FFF) was applied to several clinically relevant cell sep

18 lectrophoretic field-flow-fractionation (DEP-FFF), a cell-separation technique that exploits the diff

19 l physical characteristics directly from DEP-FFF elution data.

20 An extended theory of DEP-FFF is presented that accounts for HDLF.

21 ubpopulations, and the design of optimal DEP-FFF separation conditions.

22 There were no differences in DM, FFF, or CSS, but OS was higher with wedge.

23 s asymmetrical flow-FFF (AF4) and electrical FFF (ElFFF) in one channel to electrical asymmetrical fl

24 A consumer-grade fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer was used to construct fluidic devices fo

25 etastasis (DM), or freedom from any failure (FFF) between the two groups (P > .16).

26 dom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups

27 sumably a cell exudate, was identified by Fl FFF-ICPMS.

28 We employed hyperlayer flow FFF (Fl FFF) methodology to separate cells of Shewanella oneiden

29 Thus, Fl FFF interfaced with ICPMS detection is a powerful analyt

30 on can be gained because of the versatile Fl FFF separation range and multielement detection capabili

31 xtraction, flow-field flow fractionation (Fl-FFF) rapidly washes the microspheres as well as separate

32 Flow FFF/MALLS reveals that both the extrusion and detergent

33 The bacterial analysis by flow FFF/MALDI-TOF MS was completed within 1 h with only prel

34 exclusion chromatography), hollow-fiber flow FFF coupled with MALS allows a flow-based fractionation

35 composition of carrier liquid used for flow FFF was selected based on retention of bacterial cells a

36 ling the flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) separation technique with detection by matrix-assis

37 ility of flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) to separate cationic lipid-DNA complexes prepared a

38 method, flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF), is coupled on-line with multiangle laser light sca

39 We employed hyperlayer flow FFF (Fl FFF) methodology to separate cells of Shewanella

40 The coupling of flow FFF and MALDI-TOF MS was demonstrated for P. putida and

41 del is evaluated for the application of flow FFF in carrier liquids of low ionic strength, where part

42 The effectiveness of OFSC flow FFF was demonstrated using mixtures of monodispersed sta

43 uch as photon correlation spectroscopy, flow FFF allows a detailed examination of subtle changes in t

44 cattering in analyzing bimodal systems, flow FFF/MALLS is shown to resolve vesicle subpopulations tha

45 nto a narrow band near the inlet of the flow FFF channel.

46 st competing, noninvasive methods, this flow FFF/MALLS technique enables measurement of vesicle size

47 ntrated, and separated in a 1 mL volume flow FFF channel.

48 Flow-FFF of these fractured samples shows very broad size dis

49 utions compared to the original SEC and flow-FFF fractions.

50 s presented which combines asymmetrical flow-FFF (AF4) and electrical FFF (ElFFF) in one channel to e

51 one channel to electrical asymmetrical flow-FFF (EAF4) to overcome the restrictions of pure ElFFF.

52 The SEC fractions are well resolved by flow-FFF.

53 Flow-field flow fractionation (flow-FFF) is used to separate single wall carbon nanotubes (S

54 rations with polymer latex particles in flow-FFF are compared to calibrations of hydrodynamic volume

55 ween sample components compared to pure flow-FFF.

56 e alignment using a "fuzzy functional form" (FFF), a three-dimensional descriptor of the active site

57 al site descriptors, fuzzy functional forms (FFFs), were developed to recognize structurally conserve

58 mometry (VPO), and flow field fractionation (FFF).

59 The coupling of field-flow fractionation (FFF) and multiangle light scattering (MAIS) detectors is

60 of end effects in field-flow fractionation (FFF) channels is simulated and demonstrated for a microf

61 hollow-fiber flow field-flow fractionation (FFF) coupled with multiangle light scattering (MALS) for

62 on for analysis of field-flow fractionation (FFF) data is presented.

63 Field flow fractionation (FFF) is a size-based separation technique applicable to

64 hod and asymmetric field flow fractionation (FFF) shows that the current method provides similar size

65 on of materials by field-flow fractionation (FFF), the experienced analyst understands the importance

66 particles by flow field-flow fractionation (FFF).

67 copy (TEM-EDS) and field flow fractionation (FFF-ICP-MS).

68 at HD lift force played little role in DEP/G-FFF operation.

69 An analysis of the DEP/G-FFF results revealed that the separation exploited the d

70 The DEP/G-FFF technique is potentially applicable to many biologic

71 ravitational field-flow-fractionation (DEP/G-FFF) system using model polystyrene (PS) microbeads is p

72 ravitational field-flow fractionation (DEP/G-FFF) was used to separate cultured human breast cancer M

73 was discussed for the optimization of DEP/G-FFF.

74 Although general FFF theory indicates few advantages from miniaturization

75 These experiments show that a consumer-grade FFF printer can be used to fabricate low-cost fluidic de

76 r importance when the perturbations to ideal FFF theory, such as those due to the effects of hydrodyn

77 the effect of particle-wall interactions in FFF using an empirically determined interaction paramete

78 lated and demonstrated for a microfabricated FFF system.

79 A new FFF method is presented which combines asymmetrical flow

80 d-DNA particles with several combinations of FFF carrier liquids and channel membranes was assessed.

81 andomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and sta

82 Utilizing discrete particle simulations of FFF and optical calculations based on both the Mie theor

83 ve sites, termed "fuzzy functional forms" or FFFs, are created based on the geometry and conformation

84 e level), substitution with phenylalanine (P(FFF)) rendered the protein much less active in transcrip

85 und that flow, electrical, and sedimentation FFF provide adequate separation for accurate particle qu

86 n (CeFFF; more commonly called sedimentation FFF or SdFFF) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

87 ditions and is consistent with sedimentation-FFF when the DEP force is zero.

88 , FAK(Y397F), kinase-defective c-Src, or Shc FFF, all of which express dominant-negative activity.

89 ange much more frequently for WT KSI and the FFF mutant than for the Y16F and Y16S mutants.

90 ther materials through their behavior in the FFF channel.

91 the Y16F and Y16S mutants but absent in the FFF mutant and significantly less probable in WT KSI.

92 reased flexibility in the application of the FFF family of techniques.

93 ithm is described that is independent of the FFF technique (i.e., independent of field type) and mode

94 Again, the FFFs can specifically identify the functional sites of t

95 First, the FFFs are shown to correctly identify their corresponding

96 Thermal FFF's high molecular weight (MW) selectivity and sensiti

97 Next, these FFFs are used to screen for active sites in low-to-moder

98 ize distribution results on LNPs compared to FFF.

99 rence to analytically available solutions to FFF theory, allowing ad hoc variation of field strength

100 e-based, active-site profiling that utilizes FFFs to identify residues located in the spatial environ

101 KSI and the Y16F, Y16S, and Y16F/Y32F/Y57F (FFF) mutants.

102 etreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and

103 between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL.