ライフサイエンスコーパス: FISH

1 FISH analysis indicated that SOD knockdown moderately in

2 FISH analysis indicated the presence of Rickettsia bacte

3 FISH analysis revealed that the dominant anammox species

4 FISH and 3C should therefore give the same views of geno

5 FISH data are implemented in the revised International S

6 FISH directly visualizes the spatial relationship of seq

7 FISH sizes of SAR86 cells were at least threefold smalle

8 ated, including t(4;14) and deletion of 17p (FISH), EMC92, and UAMS70 (GEP classifiers), and ISS.

9 histochemistry 3+; 3 immunohistochemistry 2+/FISH amplified), whereas 7 were HER2- (3 immunohistochem

10 reas 7 were HER2- (3 immunohistochemistry 2+/FISH nonamplified; 4 immunohistochemistry 1+).

11 enome structures that are consistent with 3D FISH data and known knowledge about the human chromosome

12 onally, we confirmed by in situ analysis (3D-FISH [three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridizati

13 By 3D-FISH analyses, we demonstrated that the volume and surfa

14 patient with childhood-onset melanoma had a FISH aberration compared with 4 patients with adult-onse

15 The development of a FISH-based assay for cccDNA tracking provided the first

16 h a FISH ratio >/= 2.0, 1.3% (n = 35) with a FISH ratio >/= 2.0 despite a HER2 signal < 4.0, and 3.0%

17 verall, 11.8% (n = 339) were positive with a FISH ratio >/= 2.0, 1.3% (n = 35) with a FISH ratio >/=

18 scence staining combined with filter-adapted FISH after filtration enrichment.

19 error rates in the second round for both ALK FISH and ALK IHC, although the error rates were still hi

20 Participation in ALK FISH testing included the interpretation of four digital

21 culating tumor cells (CTC) with aberrant ALK-FISH patterns [ALK-rearrangement, ALK-copy number gain (

22 Aberrant ALK-FISH patterns were examined in CTCs using immunofluoresc

23 erall) became HER2-positive upon alternative FISH probe testing.

24 coupled with tyramide signal amplification (FISH-TSA), that this gene is located in the distal regio

25 ngly paradoxical relationship between 3C and FISH, both in minimal polymer models with dynamic loopin

26 rine HoxD locus with 3C carbon copy (5C) and FISH in different developmental and activity states and

27 es with sSMCs were characterized by aCGH and FISH.

28 s indicate that cross-validation of Hi-C and FISH should be carefully designed, and that jointly cons

29 rate views from 3C, or genome-wide Hi-C, and FISH is far from solved.

30 is a valuable partner to GEP classifiers and FISH.

31 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and FISH results revealed presence of the CLL-associated del

32 lts were available from routine cytology and FISH with UroVysion probes.

33 nomic amplification, mutation detection, and FISH.

34 Although methods like FACS and FISH-FC can characterize and isolate cells from heteroge

35 ices (all of which are dependent on IGHV and FISH results) to all patients with newly diagnosed CLL.

36 atment effect was found for all ER, IHC, and FISH levels, except for the ER-positive/HER2 low FISH ra

37 s were selected for immunohistochemistry and FISH.

38 ed algorithm to faithfully register live and FISH images.

39 ization, mate pair and cloned sequences, and FISH analyses, we have identified in multiple myeloma ce

40 HiBA-FISH (High-throughput break-apart FISH) combines high-throughput imaging with the measurem

41 There was a linear relationship between FISH cell size and incorporation of leucine for all bact

42 BONCAT-FISH offers a fast, inexpensive and straightforward fluo

43 d fluorescence in situ hybridization (BONCAT-FISH).

44 rst application, to our knowledge, of BONCAT-FISH and BONCAT-FACS within an environmental context, we

45 ions, we demonstrate the potential of BONCAT-FISH to study microbial physiology in situ.

46 SOE for quantitative NMP22, qualitative BTA, FISH, and ImmunoCyt; low SOE for others).

47 u co-examination of chromosome aneuploidy by FISH and immunostaining of multiple biomarkers displayed

48 Conclusion EGFR CNG assessed by FISH appears to identify a subgroup of patients with eso

49 so able to reduce biofilm as demonstrated by FISH and microcalorimetry.

50 ed minor fusions that were not detectable by FISH.

51 > cogain > polysomy > disomy) as detected by FISH, and evaluated on a semiquantitative scale (modifie

52 port the original categorizations of HER2 by FISH status in BCIRG/Translational Research in Oncology

53 d by Hi-C, and spatial distance, measured by FISH, are often assumed to quantify the same phenomena a

54 utant tumors are classified as "negative" by FISH or immunohistochemistry assays.

55 Error rates obtained by FISH were lower than by IHC.

56 g, localization of specific DNA sequences by FISH, and high-resolution segregation of nuclear compart

57 None of the cases studied by FISH harbored an amplicon for C19MC.

58 The method, which we call FISH-Flow, allows for high-throughput multiparametric me

59 ions with bromodeoxyuridine followed by CARD-FISH.

60 ion fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH), we show that only four novel clonal phylotypes we

61 This assay detected aberrant centromeric CO-FISH patterns consistent with sister chromatid exchange

62 e, superresolution imaging of centromeric CO-FISH using structured illumination microscopy implied th

63 tation fluorescent in situ hybridization (CO-FISH).

64 tients (14.2%) who were initially considered FISH-equivocal (ratio < 2.0 with HER2 signal >/= 4.0, bu

65 s cost and time compared to the conventional FISH protocols and opens up new opportunities to investi

66 We present correlation FISH (corrFISH), a method to resolve dense temporal barc

67 ted approach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques

68 0% (n = 86) with HER2 signal >/= 6.0 despite FISH ratio < 2.0.

69 included the interpretation of four digital FISH images.

70 e observed for the interpretation of digital FISH images.

71 Here, we use 3D DNA FISH to assess the spatial organization of chromatin at

72 Use of low resolution single cell DNA FISH and population based high resolution chromosome con

73 loci and then uses sequential rounds of DNA FISH to determine the loci identity.

74 ng of an enigma as beyond low-resolution DNA FISH we do not have the appropriate tools to analyze the

75 Various DNA FISH methods have been developed in the past decades, al

76 A-FISH signals with both a corresponding DNA-FISH signal and an immunofluorescence signal for RNA pol

77 on of genomics and single-locus specific DNA-FISH analysis.

78 EGFR FISH was assessable in 976 patients and 400 patients (41

79 (FISH) using prespecified criteria and EGFR FISH-positive status was defined as high polysomy or amp

80 in patients with advanced NSCLC who are EGFR FISH-positive.

81 .78-1.27; p=0.96; respectively; and for EGFR FISH non-positive 1.00, 0.85-1.17; p=0.97; and 1.03, 0.8

82 ogy regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0.88, 0.68-1.14; p=0.34; and 0.99, 0.78-1.

83 In EGFR FISH-negative tumors, there was no difference in overall

84 linical trials in different settings in EGFR FISH-positive and, in particular, EGFR-amplified esophag

85 In EGFR FISH-positive tumors (20.2%), overall survival was impro

86 th non-squamous histology regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0.88, 0.68-1.14; p=0

87 In the prespecified analysis of EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation with squamous cell histology

88 oup and 198 in the control group in the EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation, progression-free survival d

89 did not differ among patients who were EGFR FISH non-positive with squamous cell histology (HR 1.04,

90 76 patients and 400 patients (41%) were EGFR FISH-positive.

91 gression-free survival in patients with EGFR FISH-positive cancer and overall survival in the entire

92 fied subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR FISH-positive squamous-cell carcinoma cancers are encour

93 It is the first time that the entire FISH assay could be automated on a single chip by using

94 FISH system capable of automating the entire FISH protocol which could be performed within a shorter

95 Expansion FISH (ExFISH) separates RNAs and supports amplification

96 ization (FISH) and extended DNA fiber (Fiber FISH) on K. scoparia chromosomes.

97 g information from optical mapping and fiber-FISH.

98 Here, we use whole-genome sequencing, fiber-FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), and other met

99 Using fiber-FISH, we demonstrate that parents transmitting the de no

100 icrosatellite analysis, read depth and fibre-FISH to demonstrate that human amylase CNV is not a smoo

101 diversity detected by high-resolution fibre-FISH and conclude that extensive molecular analysis is r

102 We also employed Flow-FISH for single-tube analysis of IFN-gamma transcript an

103 sed fluorescence in situ hybridization (Flow-FISH) for IFN-gamma to multicolor flow cytometry that al

104 els of other cytokines, indicating that Flow-FISH helps identify the best cytokine producers during T

105 We conclude that Flow-FISH is a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective method to

106 we developed a sample clearing approach for FISH measurements.

107 f PNA probes over their DNA counterparts for FISH and indicate that P-Ca726 may be used advantageousl

108 the Mayo Clinic cytogenetics laboratory for FISH testing (n = 2,851; from November 2013 to October 2

109 PRISE2 can also be used to design probes for FISH and other hybridization-based assays.

110 associated with the increase in requests for FISH testing.

111 Especially, only 2-mul usage for FISH deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) probe was used, which i

112 Cutoff values for FISH with the pancreatobiliary probes were determined us

113 ical and pathology findings and results from FISH.

114 n cases with MYC rearrangement or copy gain, FISH for BCL2 and BCL6 was also performed.

115 Single-gene FISH indicated no major chromosomal rearrangements betwe

116 To generate FISH probes that identify bacteria within mucus-associat

117 . scoparia populations tested (GR1 and GR2), FISH results displayed a single and prominent hybridizat

118 Frequency of HER2 FISH amplification was examined and impact of AC2013 ass

119 Among IHC 2+ patients, HER2 FISH positivity was 11.8% (FDA), 9.4% (AC2007), and 24.1

120 We compared the HER2 FISH amplification frequency using these three guideline

121 Patients and Methods The HER2 FISH status of BCIRG-005/006/007 patients with breast ca

122 ates five different groups according to HER2 FISH ratio and average HER2 gene copy number per tumor c

123 HiBA-FISH (High-throughput break-apart FISH) combines high-th

124 As proof-of-principle, we apply hiBA-FISH to detect with high sensitivity and specificity rar

125 However, FISH analysis of the starved stringent response mutant s

126 both by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and by chromosome conformation capture (5C).

127 umber by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) can identify patients most likely to benefit from

128 tions by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

129 tases by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

130 es using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and extended DNA fiber (Fiber FISH) on K. scoparia

131 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) were used

132 es using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and growth in microfluidic drops demonstrate that,

133 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative PCR demonstrated that F. alocis e

134 ction is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while highly sensitive and specific, it is als

135 (3C) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are two widely used technologies that provide dist

136 ion via a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, which can detect those rearrangements to a

137 (SKY) and fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated coordinate localization and transloca

138 ly by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments and show that active RNAPII is enriche

139 ved from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.

140 using 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.

141 Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, and 18 was used to determine

142 BCL6 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC were performed.

143 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) further confirmed that the dominant Geobacter spec

144 ule mRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) has been established as the standard method for th

145 (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) HER2 testing guidelines in 2007 (AC2007) and updat

146 xpansion, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) imaging of RNA can be performed with high yield an

147 on using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in an additional 87 osteosarcomas, with IGF1 recep

148 ned with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in coastal waters of the west Antarctic Peninsula

149 stry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in distinguishing PNs from childhood and adult-ons

150 terphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with newly diagnosed CLL.

151 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a method that uses fluorescent probes to detect

152 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful single-cell technique for studying n

153 ected on fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is an independent predictor for the development of

154 m (ISS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) markers, and gene expression (GEP) classifiers wer

155 The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method has been providing valuable information on

156 in-line fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of bacterial cells.

157 ected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of pancreatobiliary brush samples with UroVysion p

158 e either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromosome conformation capture (3C) methods.

159 ls using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.

160 ation, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol was established to detect different viral

161 es, HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ratio, and copy number results were available for

162 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed T. denticola clusters in both gingival an

163 ule mRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals that, upon site-specific CTCF disruption o

164 nd (iii) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the ALK rearrangement.

165 rrently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is routinely employed to detect HER2 amp

166 pment of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies enables the quantification of telomer

167 and (3) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for the amplification of the genetic locus

168 performed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to screen 196 independent NPC cases.

169 rmined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using prespecified criteria and EGFR FISH-positive

170 erformed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes targeting CD274, PDCD1LG2, and the ce

171 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) will be required to identify HGBL-DH and will recl

172 then used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with 16S rRNA probes targeting most bacteria as we

173 Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with riboprobes, we also observed that small-diame

174 ected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), an experimental technique especially well suited

175 tex, arc fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and designer receptors exclusively activated by d

176 ry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and mutation analyses were performed in 318 patie

177 analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and RNA-seq to obtain comprehensive three-dimensi

178 targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enabling a direct link between taxonomic identity

179 ed by RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Northern blots, and RNA sequencing-implicates MRP

180 sing RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative PCR and immunostaining.

181 counting fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we found that duty cycles of transcriptional burs

182 fluorescence imaging in situ hybridization (FISH)-based assay for the detection of duck hepatitis B

183 A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based karyotyping cocktail was developed with whic

184 based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-supplemented immunohistochemistry of biopsied tumo

185 cation by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

186 tial DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

187 In addition to ALK fusions identified by IHC/FISH in four cases, two previously known fusions involvi

188 DNA and RNA immuno-FISH reveal that PML NBs are closely associated with act

189 nt subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-FISH (SE-iFISH), to detect a variety of aneuploid circul

190 Here we report two advances in FISH-based imaging.

191 >/=2 probes) were classified as positive in FISH with the UroVysion and pancreatobiliary probes.

192 There was a large variety in FISH enumeration practices.

193 Genetic analyses including FISH confirmed a loss of the critical region 7q11.23, us

194 ohesin SMC1A, and used four-color-interphase-FISH coupled with BrdU incorporation and analyses of sen

195 idize methane as indicated by stable isotope FISH-nanoSIMS experiments and (14)CH4 radiotracer rate m

196 sent FisHiCal, an R package for an iterative FISH-based Hi-C calibration that exploits in full the in

197 ysis of a sample processed using an off-line FISH protocol, the total analysis time was reduced from

198 levels, except for the ER-positive/HER2 low FISH ratio (>/=2 to <5) group (DFS: 3-way ITT Pvalue for

199 hat are ER-positive by IHC analyses with low FISH ratio (>/=2 to <5), or with higher ESR1 levels deri

200 https://sites.google.com/site/lzhanghomepage/FISH.

201 we developed a new, integrated microfluidic FISH system capable of automating the entire FISH protoc

202 The microfluidic FISH chip consisted of a microfluidic control module for

203 on at the single cell level: single molecule FISH (smFISH) and single cell qRT-PCR (or single cell RN

204 Utilizing single molecule FISH, we directly compare the transcriptional activity o

205 Single-molecule FISH (smFISH) has been the gold standard for quantifying

206 cule detection determined by single-molecule FISH (smFISH) or live imaging.

207 Here we show, using single-molecule FISH and structured illumination microscopy, a super-res

208 Single-molecule FISH data showed that the majority of these mutants accu

209 Highly multiplexed single-molecule FISH has emerged as a promising approach to spatially re

210 plied this approach to image single-molecule FISH in combination with immunofluorescence (smFISH-IF)

211 ns in situ and the number of single-molecule FISH probes bound to an mRNA target.

212 e, immunohistochemistry, RNA single-molecule FISH, long-term storage, and microscopy with cellular an

213 Using single-molecule FISH, we further observed that expression of Smad3 targe

214 equencing combined with single molecule mRNA FISH identified the short and highly abundant mRNAs enco

215 Using this new FISH protocol, we can detect >50% of the total target mR

216 wever, background-from off-target binding of FISH probes and cellular autofluorescence-can become lim

217 We identified off-target binding of FISH probes to cellular components other than RNA, such

218 The combination of FISH probes 1q21, 7p12, 8q24, and 9p21 identified cancer

219 An example of FISH-Flow measurements of cytokine mRNA induction by ex

220 Levels of FISH and HER2 copy numbers were significantly higher in

221 AC2013 guidelines led to a larger number of FISH-equivocal patients.

222 the measurement of the spatial separation of FISH probes flanking target genome regions of interest.

223 We tested a set of FISH probes on tumor tissues (cholangiocarcinoma or panc

224 We identified a set of FISH probes that detects cancer cells in pancreatobiliar

225 romatin topographies extrapolated from 5C or FISH data are not compatible.

226 ma from PN using immunohistochemistry and/or FISH.

227 mproved effect of erlotinib, based on IHC or FISH for EGFR, or mutations in genes related to the EGFR

228 request for routine ALK testing using IHC or FISH.

229 at high resolution with either 3C methods or FISH alone must be interpreted with caution and that vie

230 Our FISH protocol with single-fluorophore sensitivity signif

231 t and its two putative progenitors using our FISH-based karyotyping system.

232 ed detection of polysomy by pancreatobiliary FISH (P < .001), a mass by cross-sectional imaging (P <

233 e called this set of probes pancreatobiliary FISH.

234 on cohort of brush samples, pancreatobiliary FISH identified samples from patients with malignancy wi

235 ed and used to evaluate the pancreatobiliary FISH probes.

236 Among accrued patients, FISH group 1 breast cancers were strongly correlated wit

237 we report STAR-FISH (specific-to-allele PCR-FISH), a novel method for the combined detection of sing

238 To test the model, we perform FISH experiments and compare with Capture-C data.

239 acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) and confocal microscopy.

240 acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) probes, P-Ca726 (targeting a novel region of the r

241 However, patients with a positive FISH EGFR score had a worse overall survival (46.1 month

242 evance: Immunohistochemistry and the 4-probe FISH melanoma analysis are not useful for distinguishing

243 Here, we introduce a new single-probe FISH protocol termed sFISH for budding yeast, Saccharomy

244 the methods on simulated data and published FISH data from cervical cancers and breast cancers.

245 e describe an optimized quantitative FISH (Q-FISH) protocol for measuring telomere length that bypass

246 Here we describe an optimized quantitative FISH (Q-FISH) protocol for measuring telomere length tha

247 Restricting FISH analysis to the 10% of DLBCL patients who have a ge

248 el) to those obtained from ALK, ROS1 and RET FISH on 51 clinical specimens.

249 Single-cell RNA FISH analysis of female T cells revealed that the X-link

250 Single-molecule RNA FISH experiments revealed that the beta-globin enhancer

251 were rare and transient, single-molecule RNA FISH showed that transcription was limited.

252 Here we use single-molecule RNA FISH to address the mechanistic relationship of FLC and

253 Single-molecule RNA FISH to measure mRNA expression of differentiation marke

254 n chain reaction) as well as multiplexed RNA FISH readout.

255 Interestingly, in tumor tissue, RNA FISH analysis showed highest Dnmt3a expression in Lgr5-p

256 encing, and at the single-cell level, by RNA-FISH, and is not attributable to differences in repressi

257 After cell division, RNA-FISH and RNA-seq analyses confirm that Xi reactivation r

258 fluorescence in situ RNA hybridization (RNA-FISH) of the intron region of immediate early transcript

259 in individual ESCs using single-molecule RNA-FISH and quantitative time-lapse movies.

260 -cell flow cytometry and single-molecule RNA-FISH assays, we demonstrate that knocking down of CTCF o

261 We use single-molecule RNA-FISH to systematically quantify and categorize the subce

262 ctions using multiplexed single molecule RNA-FISH.

263 nd one interaction using single-molecule RNA-FISH.

264 ated these results by co-localization of RNA-FISH signals with both a corresponding DNA-FISH signal a

265 etween these possibilities, we performed RNA-FISH to detect nascent transcripts from multiple miRNA g

266 ons and confirmed its localization using RNA-FISH.

267 stems such as multiplex RNA imaging with RNA-FISH and multiplex protein imaging with antibody-stainin

268 eared samples using multiplexed error-robust FISH (MERFISH).

269 lleagues introduces multiplexed error-robust FISH (MERFISH).

270 ed protocols that exploit a highly sensitive FISH method based on branched DNA technology to detect m

271 RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (smRNA FISH), we show that egl-1 is transcribed in the mother o

272 The implemented multi-threading software FISH is freely available for academic use at https://sit

273 o nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (FISH-NanoSIMS), we directly measured (15)N2 uptake by AN

274 Here we report STAR-FISH (specific-to-allele PCR-FISH), a novel method for t

275 mere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (TEL-FISH) coupled with 3D imaging of buccal cell nuclei], pr

276 matic review is sufficient to recommend that FISH and IGHV be performed as standard clinical tests fo

277 The FISH probes were specific for detection of HMPV positive

278 The FISH-Flow protocol involves cell fixation, permeabilizat

279 We also explored using the size of the FISH image as another measure of single-cell activity.

280 We have optimized the FISH protocol so that each round is complete in 1 min, d

281 We also show that the FISH test for the AURKA gene copy number in urine yielde

282 ted by tREX have higher correlation with the FISH measurements than any of the comparison methods.

283 D structure from tREX is consistent with the FISH measurements, and the corresponding distances predi

284 Approximately one half of these FISH-equivocal patients (7.4% overall) became HER2-posit

285 ceptors, and we confirm the findings through FISH analysis of X and Y chromosomes in sex-discordant t

286 ethods may provide a suitable alternative to FISH as they are compatible with multiplexing and diagno

287 er and could provide a robust alternative to FISH testing in the diagnostic setting.

288 H-positive and 36 (1.3% overall) patients to FISH-negative, whereas 157 (5.5% overall) patients remai

289 be reassigned 212 (7.4% overall) patients to FISH-positive and 36 (1.3% overall) patients to FISH-neg

290 ation breakpoints and it extends traditional FISH by its quantitative nature.

291 Using FISH, we determined the distribution of cccDNA under con

292 Using FISH, Xu et al. here analyze the cellular response to DV

293 ar fluorescence in situ hybridization (viral FISH) analysis of environmental samples and confirmed by

294 mparison methods to a Hi-C dataset for which FISH measurements are available to evaluate estimation a

295 or well-trained personnel to perform a whole FISH assay.

296 dic chip was capable of performing the whole FISH assay within 20h.

297 In agreement with FISH results, segregation of EPSPS copies followed singl

298 The 2 children with FISH-positive PNs are melanoma free after 7 and 4 years.

299 etween these different methods compared with FISH has not been evaluated.

300 The physical maps were validated with FISH and genetic mapping of SNP markers derived from BES

301 Combined XY-FISH and Langerin-staining was used to assess donor LC-c